# Cluvio vs Metabase — Business Intelligence & Dashboards

As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates [Cluvio](https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence/cluvio) 3/5 and [Metabase](https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence/metabase) 3.5/5 in Business Intelligence & Dashboards. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 0 of the 6 judges pick Cluvio and 6 pick Metabase. Cluvio scores higher on 1 of 7 criteria (European sovereignty). Metabase scores higher on 6 of 7 criteria (Self-service analysis & shared metrics, Dashboards, charts & interactivity, Access control, administration & portability, plus 3 more). Provenance — Cluvio: EU-Made; Metabase: Rest of world. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering).

- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/compare/cluvio-vs-metabase
- Cluvio: https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence/cluvio ([md](https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence/cluvio.md))
- Metabase: https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence/metabase ([md](https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence/metabase.md))
- Category: [Business Intelligence & Dashboards](https://whats-best.ai/software/business-intelligence.md)
- Data as of: 2026-11-06

**AI-generated.** Both products were evaluated from public evidence by the same panel of AI judges under the same rubric; without that, no comparison is published. Not a hands-on test; no score can be bought, on either side. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## The short answer

Six judges lean Metabase on dashboards and visualization (6.5 vs 4.2), self-service and modelling (7.0 vs 4.0) and governance and portability (7.8 vs 5.8); four lean Metabase, two tie, on sharing and embedding (7.8 vs 7.0); two lean Metabase, four tie, on data connectivity (6.2 vs 5.7); pricing transparency: 7.5 vs 7.0, three lean Metabase, one Cluvio, two tie. Cluvio leads sovereignty, 6.8 to 6.5 — two lean Cluvio, one Metabase, three tie. Connectivity split: Metabase documents 18 database and warehouse connectors but only tool-by-tool guides for Stripe, HubSpot and Shopify; Cluvio's documented connectors stop at databases and files. Sovereignty split: Cluvio's pages state both that European data stays in Europe and that processing occurs outside the EEA including the US; Metabase's verdict weighs air-gapped self-hosting and a Frankfurt region against a California-law contracting entity with no public information on subprocessors or a data processing agreement. The splits are the answer.

**Choose Cluvio if:**
- You need queries to run directly on your own databases, hosted on AWS with the account region chosen at signup; sovereignty is the criterion where the bench leans Cluvio's way (two lean Cluvio, one Metabase, three tie; means 6.8 to 6.5).
- Your procurement specifies a European vendor: Cluvio comes from Cluvio GmbH of Berlin and is recorded as an EU-made product.
- Your data lives in SQL warehouses and your analysts work in SQL and R: the judges working from a SQL warehouse scored Cluvio 6 to 7 on data connectivity.

**Choose Metabase if:**
- Your non-SQL business users need a no-SQL query builder and a semantic layer whose metric edits propagate to every question: self-service and modelling went 7.0 to 4.0, six judges leaning Metabase.
- You need pivot tables, drill-down or a visual query builder: we found no public information on these for Cluvio, and six judges leaned Metabase on dashboards and visualization (6.5 vs 4.2).
- Your permissions must reach row and column level, with an audit log, a REST API and an AGPL self-hosted edition: governance and portability went 7.8 to 5.8, six judges leaning Metabase.
- You will embed analytics in your own product and need server-signed embeds, locked parameters for per-viewer data isolation and a React SDK: sharing and embedding went 7.8 to 7.0, four judges leaning Metabase and two tying.
- Your stack is databases and warehouses: Metabase queries 18 official connectors live, and data connectivity went 6.2 to 5.7 with two judges leaning Metabase and four tying.

## Overall

| | Cluvio | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Panel rating | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Provenance | EU-Made | Rest of world |
| Sovereignty | not determined | not determined |

## The bench's picks

| Judge | Cluvio | Metabase | Pick |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Finance Controller | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | Metabase |
| The Managing Director | 3/5 | 3/5 | Metabase |
| The Data Analyst | 3/5 | 4/5 | Metabase |
| The IT Administrator | 3/5 | 4/5 | Metabase |
| The SaaS Product Lead | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | Metabase |
| The Skeptic | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | Metabase |

## Criterion by criterion

Bench average per criterion, out of 5; the lean counts which product each judge scored higher.

| Criterion | Cluvio | Metabase | The bench leans |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data sources, connectors & refresh | 3/5 | 3/5 | Metabase, 2 of 6 judges |
| Dashboards, charts & interactivity | 2/5 | 3.5/5 | Metabase, 6 of 6 judges |
| Self-service analysis & shared metrics | 2/5 | 3.5/5 | Metabase, 6 of 6 judges |
| Sharing, scheduled reports & embedding | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Metabase, 4 of 6 judges |
| Access control, administration & portability | 3/5 | 4/5 | Metabase, 6 of 6 judges |
| European sovereignty | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | Cluvio, 2 of 6 judges |
| Pricing transparency | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | Metabase, 3 of 6 judges |

## Sovereignty, side by side

| Dimension | Cluvio | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | Not determined |
| Hosting location | Not determined | Not determined |
| Hosting options | Not determined | Not determined |
| Open source | Not determined | Not determined |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | Not determined |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | Not determined |

## Facts, side by side

Only facts both products carry under the same definition; each is the vendor's own dated statement ([S*n*] → Sources).

| Fact | Cluvio | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance · Certifications | yes · yes · yes [S1] | GDPR · CCPA · SOC 2 Type II · SOC 1 [S2] |
| Compliance · Encryption at rest | yes · yes [S1] | row-level for connection strings and settings · AES256 + SHA512 [S3] |
| Compliance · GDPR | Art. 28 GDPR · yes [S4] | yes [S3] |
| Hosting · Regions | EU · US [S5] | US · Europe · Latin America · Asia-Pacific [S3] |
| Legal · Entity name | Cluvio GmbH [S6] | Metabase, Inc. [S7] |
| Pricing · Trial | 14 · business · no [S8] | 14 · yes [S2] |
| Product · Dashboard filters | dropdowns · date pickers · checkboxes · text inputs · time range · aggregation · time zone [S9] | Dashboards support filter and parameter widgets to filter or parameterize displayed data [S10] |
| Product · Dashboards | yes [S11] | yes [S12] |
| Product · Sql editor | yes [S13] | yes [S12] |
| Product · SSO | yes · yes · yes [S8] | yes · yes [S3] |
| Product · White labeling | yes [S8] | yes [S14] |

## Sources

- [S1] Security / trust page: https://www.cluvio.com/security.html (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S2] Pricing page: https://www.metabase.com/pricing (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S3] Security / trust page: https://www.metabase.com/security (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S4] Terms of service: https://www.cluvio.com/terms.html (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S5] Access control, administration & portability — found from sitemap: https://docs.cluvio.com/api/v2024-06-01 (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S6] Legal notice: https://www.cluvio.com/imprint.html (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S7] Terms of service: https://www.metabase.com/terms (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S8] Pricing page: https://www.cluvio.com/pricing.html (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S9] Dashboards, charts & interactivity — found from sitemap: https://docs.cluvio.com/dashboards/overview (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S10] Dashboards, charts & interactivity — found from sitemap: https://www.metabase.com/docs/latest/dashboards/filters (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S11] Features page (how it works): https://www.cluvio.com/how-it-works.html (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S12] Vendor homepage: https://www.metabase.com/ (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S13] Features page: https://www.cluvio.com/features.html (checked 2026-11-01)
- [S14] Features page (embedded analytics): https://www.metabase.com/product/embedded-analytics (checked 2026-11-01)

## Questions

### Which is better, Cluvio or Metabase?

As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Metabase higher: 3.5/5 against 3/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 0 of the 6 judges pick Cluvio and 6 pick Metabase. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, [as the methodology describes](https://whats-best.ai/methodology).

### Is Cluvio or Metabase European?

Cluvio is European (EU-Made). Metabase is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.

### Where do Cluvio and Metabase store customer data?

Per the vendors’ own pages as captured — Cluvio: Default not stated; pages mention the EU and the US. Metabase: its pages as captured do not say.

### Do Cluvio and Metabase have a free plan?

As of 1 Nov 2026, Cluvio’s own pages state a free plan; Metabase’s pages as captured do not. Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Cluvio vs Metabase", AI panel comparison, as of 2026-11-06. https://whats-best.ai/compare/cluvio-vs-metabase