# Agiloft — Contract Management (CLM) Agiloft by Agiloft, Inc. holds a panel rating of 2/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-10-15. Provenance: Rest of world; sovereignty: not determined. - Vendor: Agiloft, Inc. (https://www.agiloft.com) - Category: [Contract Management (CLM)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management.md) - Provenance (editorial classification): Rest of world - Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/agiloft - Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/agiloft/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/agiloft/alternatives.md)) - Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-15 · oldest source captured 2026-10-13 **AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology ## At a glance - Vendor: Agiloft, Inc. - Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 - Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 - Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 ## The panel's verdict Agiloft, a contract lifecycle management platform from Agiloft, Inc. of Redwood City, earns its strongest marks on integration and exit: scores run 4 to 6, with three judges at 6, citing over 1,000 pre-built bi-directional connectors, Salesforce, SAP, Oracle and Microsoft 365 links, an API, iPaaS middleware, and DocuSign or Adobe Sign out of the box. Even there, no e-signature level is stated and we found no public information on exporting documents with their metadata, versions and audit trail. Authoring and templates scored 3 to 4, negotiation and approval 4 to 5, and repository and obligations 3 to 5 — resting on published feature names, with nothing public behind notice periods, renewal modelling, reminders or who approved which version. The judges split on AI extraction control, 1 to 4, over how much weight the lone visible control — a bring-your-own-LLM option — deserves against an unnamed model provider, no training commitment and a privacy notice that expressly excludes Customer Data. Sovereignty sits at a flat 3 — United States processing by default, the European Union only for certain customers. No public prices appear. **Speaks for it:** - Over 1,000 pre-built bi-directional connectors, with Salesforce, SAP, Oracle and Microsoft 365 named - One-click contract creation of proposals and MSAs from Salesforce, with approvals routed through email and SMS to e-signature - E-signature out of the box through DocuSign and Adobe Sign - No-code configuration of workflows, approvals, fields and rules, plus a Contract Assistant for Microsoft Word and Outlook - An API, custom integrations and iPaaS middleware for systems beyond the pre-built connectors **Held against it:** - The privacy notice expressly excludes Customer Data, so its assurances do not cover contract text - Processing and storage are published as the United States, with the European Union available only for certain customers - We found no public information on a subprocessor list, including any AI, OCR or e-signature providers - We found no public information on exporting documents with their metadata, versions and audit trail - We found no public information on notice periods, renewal reminders or an audit trail of who approved which version **Best for:** - Your team works in Salesforce and wants contracts created in one click from CRM records, with approvals by email and SMS flowing to DocuSign or Adobe Sign - Your estate runs SAP, Oracle, SharePoint or Microsoft 365 and you need bi-directional contract sync without custom code - Your legal and procurement teams negotiate in Microsoft Word and Outlook and want document comparison and a contract assistant there - You want workflows, approvals, fields and rules configurable by business teams without developer support **Avoid if:** - You require EU processing as standard — the published position is transfer to, processing and storage in the United States, with the European Union offered only for certain customers - You need AI terms you can read before signing — the privacy notice expressly excludes Customer Data, leaving contract text governed by a customer agreement the public cannot see - You must budget before a sales cycle — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it - You need an exit you can diligence now — inbound integration is documented in detail while export of documents, metadata, versions and audit trail is not ## Scores by judge and criterion Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price. | Criterion | The General Counsel | The Procurement Analyst | The Sales Ops Owner | The IT Integrator | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Drafting, templates & clause library | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | | Negotiation, redlining & approval | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | | Repository, deadlines & obligations | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | | AI extraction & review transparency | 2/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | | Integrations, signature & exit | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | | European sovereignty | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | | Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | | **Weighted verdict** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** | **2/5** | **2/5** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | ### The judges - **The General Counsel** (v1.0): Runs a three-lawyer legal team that negotiates every supplier and customer contract in Word with the other side's counsel. Wants approved clauses with fallbacks, redlines that survive the round-trip, and an approval on record for every deviation — not a sign-off by email. - **The Procurement Analyst** (v1.0): Holds four hundred supplier contracts and the Kündigungsfristen nobody else remembers. Wants notice periods and auto-renewals modelled rather than typed into a note, reminders that escalate to a named owner, and a portfolio report that shows what can be cancelled this quarter. - **The Sales Ops Owner** (v1.0): Owns the quote-to-signature path for a sales team that closes standard deals without legal. Wants contracts generated from the CRM record, approvals that route by discount and value, signature in the same flow, and a price she can put in next year's budget. - **The IT Integrator** (v1.0): Connects the CLM to SAP, Microsoft 365 and the CRM, and will be the one migrating out of it. Wants a versioned API, SSO and SCIM, qualified signature where the law asks for it, and an export that brings back metadata, versions and audit trail — not a ZIP of PDFs. - **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Reads the subprocessor list before the feature page. Asks which model provider receives contract text, whether it is retained or used for training, where OCR runs, and whether the counterparties' personal data in every contract is covered by the DPA. - **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen "AI that reads your contracts" miss a notice period buried in an amendment. Reads for an extraction accuracy nobody states, "Word integration" that loses tracked changes, "never miss a renewal" with reminders to one inbox, and an export that leaves the metadata behind. ## European sovereignty — proven facts Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined. | Dimension | Finding | Points | Source | |---|---|---|---| | Legal entity | Not determined | — | — | | Ownership | Not determined | — | — | | Data residency | Not determined | — | — | | Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — | ## Key facts Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources). **Compliance** - Appeals process: state attorney general · yes [S3] - Authorized agents: yes [S3] - Eea UK rights: EEA · Switzerland · UK · yes [S3] - Encryption ssl: yes [S3] - Financial incentives notice: yes · yes [S3] - Google API limited use: yes · yes [S3] - Privacy breach contact: privacy@agiloft.com [S3] - Privacy contact email: privacy@agiloft.com [S3] - Standard contractual clauses: yes [S3] - State privacy laws: California · Colorado · Connecticut · Delaware · Florida · Indiana · Iowa · Montana · Oregon · Tennessee · Texas · Utah · Virginia [S3] - State rights optout sharing: yes [S3] **Data** - Customer data processor role: yes · yes [S3] - Data subject rights list: access/copy · object to direct marketing · correction · deletion · restriction · portability · withdraw consent [S3] - No sale disclosure: no [S3] - Retention criteria: legally mandated retention periods · pending or potential litigation · intellectual property or ownership rights · contract requirements · operational directives or needs · historical archiving [S3] **Hosting** - Regions: United States · European Union · Australia · UK · Canada [S3] **Integrations** - Approvals: data [S2] - Approvals tools: Connects to email, messaging, and other collaboration tools for approvals [S1] - Connector count: pre-built connectors · 1000 [S1] - Connectors: 1000 [S2] - Custom API: API and custom integrations · yes [S6] - E signature: DocuSign · Adobe Sign [S1] - E signature: out_of_the_box [S2] - Enterprise systems: Salesforce · SAP · Oracle [S1] - Enterprise systems: Salesforce · SAP · Oracle · 1,000+ [S2] - Instant setup: Point-and-click setup in minutes [S1] - Integration hub: Integration Hub · 1,000+ [S6] - Ipaas: iPaaS middleware-based connectivity · yes [S6] - Llm exploration: Users can use their preferred LLM to explore Agiloft [S5] - Named systems: Zip · Zendesk · Xero · Workday · Veeva CRM · Up Keep · UKG Ready · UKG Pro · Trimble · Tradeshift · Slack · SharePoint [S6] - Prebuilt connectors: pre-built connectors · 1000+ · yes · bi-directional [S6] - Salesforce: Salesforce · email · SMS · e-signature · yes [S6] - Searchable list: Contract Side · Industry · Business Function · yes [S6] **Legal** - Address: Agiloft Inc. · 303 Twin Dolphin Drive Redwood City, CA 94065 [S2] - Address: 94065 · Redwood City · CA · 303 Twin Dolphin Drive [S3] - Address: 303 Twin Dolphin Drive Redwood City, CA 94065 [S5] - Entity name: Agiloft, Inc. [S3] - Entity name: Agiloft, Inc. [S4] - Entity name: Agiloft Inc. [S5] - Governing law: State of Delaware and the United States [S4] - Paid customer customer agreement: Paid Customers governed by separate Customer Agreement where applicable [S4] - Privacy notice reference: Data handling governed by Privacy Notice [S4] - Review date: February 6, 2026 [S3] - Terms last updated: 2024-02-07 [S4] **Product** - Astra AI platform: Astra contracts AI platform for legal and procurement teams [S1] - Clause documentation automation: Required clauses and documentation can be embedded into workflows [S5] - Clm platform: Enterprise CLM platform centralizing, automating, and governing every stage of the contract process from request and negotiation to execution and value recognition [S1] - Compliance workflows: Workflows can include compliance controls [S5] - Customer metrics: 96 · 96 · 99 [S1] - Free terms apply to visitors: Terms govern Websites, Applications, and Materials; paid customers may be under a separate Customer Agreement [S4] - Included features: Document generation, Contract repository, Contract templates & creation, Document comparison, Negotiation and execution, Obligation tracking, Permission groups, Workflow and approvals, Workflow and Automation, Analyze Manage and Change, AI… [S2] - Integration applications: Agiloft Contract Assistant for Microsoft Word · Agiloft Contract Assistant for Microsoft Outlook · Agiloft for Gmail · Agiloft for Google Docs [S4] - Leader recognition: Named Contract Lifecycle Management leaders 6 years in a row [S1] - Llm exploration: yes [S2] - Microsoft integrations: Contract Assistant for Microsoft Word · Contract Assistant for Microsoft Outlook · Agiloft for Microsoft Teams [S3] - No code customization: yes [S2] - Ongoing risk lifecycle: Risk can be highlighted as ongoing in the contract lifecycle, not just at signature [S5] - Platform modules footer: CLM Platform · Integration Hub · Astra · Data First Agreement [S4] - Pre post signature: Covers pre- and post-signature contract stages [S1] - Rating g2 like: 38 · 101 · 4.8 · 4.5 [S2] - Realtime dashboards: yes [S1] - Risk scoring frameworks: Risk scoring can align with Stark, AKS, HIPAA, and CMS exposure [S5] - Risk triage on request: Regulatory triage can start at the moment a contract request is submitted [S5] - Risk visibility oversight: Contract risk can be made visible for executive oversight [S5] - Subscription licensing: subscription · optional add-on modules [S4] **Support** - Footer links: Services Overview · Implementation · Support Plans · Support [S4] - Marketing optout email: marketing@agiloft.com [S3] ## Questions ### Is Agiloft European? No. whats-best.ai classifies Agiloft as Rest of world. ### Where does Agiloft store data? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026. ### Does Agiloft have a free plan? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026. ### What are the best alternatives to Agiloft? As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [Tomorro (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/tomorro), [Precisely (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) and [fynk (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk) highest among the other 19 Contract Management (CLM) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [Precisely](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Agiloft alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/agiloft/alternatives). ## What this page leaves out - We could not confirm any pricing information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind. - 14 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 12 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 6 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 3 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. - 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. ## Sources - [S1] Vendor homepage: https://www.agiloft.com/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S2] Pricing page: https://www.agiloft.com/pricing (checked 2026-10-13) - [S3] Privacy policy: https://www.agiloft.com/privacy-policy (checked 2026-10-13) - [S4] Terms of service: https://www.agiloft.com/terms-of-service (checked 2026-10-13) - [S5] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://www.agiloft.com/landing/7-ways-to-embed-risk-assessment-into-contract-workflows (checked 2026-10-13) - [S6] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://www.agiloft.com/platform/integrations (checked 2026-10-13) --- Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Agiloft — Contract Management (CLM)", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/agiloft Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/656?target=page