# DiliTrust Contracts — Contract Management (CLM)

DiliTrust Contracts by DiliTrust holds a panel rating of 3.5/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-11-04. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: DiliTrust (https://www.dilitrust.com)
- Category: [Contract Management (CLM)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/dilitrust-contracts
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/dilitrust-contracts/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/dilitrust-contracts/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-11-04 · evaluated 2026-11-04 · oldest source captured 2026-11-03

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: DiliTrust
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026

## The panel's verdict

DiliTrust Contracts is the contract lifecycle management module of a five-module SaaS suite from DiliTrust, a French SAS registered at RCS Nanterre. The strongest bands are repository and obligations and integration and exit, each ranging 7 to 7, resting on a searchable repository with OCR extraction and automated alerts for renewals, expirations and compliance deadlines, and on native Word, Outlook, Teams, Salesforce, HubSpot and Dynamics 365 connectors plus SCIM 2.0 and a CLM API in every CLM subscription. Negotiation and approval scores 7-8 for its documented internal-then-external review — the counterparty needs no account — and approval routing by contract amount. The weakest bands are AI extraction control at 6 and sovereignty at 5-6, where judges on both sides credit published certifications and in-house AI training and note the same gap: no data processing agreement or subprocessor list appears on the captured pages. Authoring and templates spans 6-7, with no public information on clause versioning or playbook rules. No prices appear on the pages read; pricing transparency scores 0 to 1 and is not counted in these verdicts.

**Speaks for it:**
- Repository and obligations ranges 7 to 7, on one searchable contract repository with OCR extraction from scans and automated alerts for renewals, expirations and compliance deadlines
- Obligations are modelled as tasks linked to a contract and optionally a specific clause, each carrying a named responsible person, reminders and an export
- Integration and exit ranges 7 to 7, with the CLM API in every CLM subscription, SCIM 2.0 alongside SSO, and native connectors for Word, Google Docs, Outlook, Teams, Salesforce, HubSpot and Dynamics 365
- Negotiation and approval ranges 7 to 8: internal review then external review on a secure webpage where the counterparty needs no account, with approval workflows routing by document type, country or contract amount
- Qualified eIDAS-level signatures are named for Universign and SignaturIt, and signature events reach other systems through webhooks

**Held against it:**
- Sovereignty scores 5 to 6: no data processing agreement or subprocessor list appears on the captured pages, and the stated presence spans France, the United States, Canada, Dubai, Spain, Italy, Germany, Mexico, Colombia and Peru
- AI extraction control scores 6 to 6: we found no public information on extracted values shown beside their source passage, per-field confidence, or a per-account switch to disable AI features
- Exit is the weak leg: the vendor's API FAQ states the Board Portal has no bulk document export and no endpoint for document versions, and we found no public information on a CLM export including metadata, versions and audit trail
- Authoring and templates scores 6 to 7: we found no public information on clause versioning with a named owner, approved fallbacks, or playbook rules flagging deviations from approved wording
- Tasks never switch to an overdue status on their own, a recurring task cannot be turned back into a one-off, and deleting the linked contract permanently orphans the obligation

**Best for:**
- You need one searchable repository across the whole portfolio, with automated alerts for renewals, expirations and compliance deadlines — the criterion ranges 7 to 7
- Your sales team generates contracts from Salesforce opportunities or HubSpot deals, drafts in a native Word add-in, and needs approvals routed by contract amount band
- You negotiate with counterparties who should not need an account — external review runs on a secure webpage, every imported version is kept in history, and qualified eIDAS-level signatures are available via Universign and SignaturIt
- You track contractual obligations as owned tasks — each obligation is a task linked to a contract and optionally to a specific clause, with a named responsible person, statuses and reminders

**Avoid if:**
- Your deadline discipline depends on the system itself flagging overdue items — tasks keep their current status when a due date passes, recurrence cannot be turned back into a one-off, and deleting a linked contract permanently orphans the obligation
- You need a documented way out with your data — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You must settle data protection terms before signing — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You need published extraction accuracy or per-field confidence before relying on automated fields — AI extraction control scores 6 to 6, and we found no public information on either

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v2). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price, or the judge found no public information on that criterion.

| Criterion | The General Counsel | The Procurement Analyst | The Sales Ops Owner | The IT Integrator | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Drafting, templates & clause library | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 |
| Negotiation, redlining & approval | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Repository, deadlines & obligations | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| AI extraction & review transparency | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Integrations, signature & exit | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| European sovereignty | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **3.5/5** | **3.5/5** | **3.5/5** | **3/5** | **3/5** | **3/5** |

### The judges

- **The General Counsel** (v1.0): Runs a three-lawyer legal team that negotiates every supplier and customer contract in Word with the other side's counsel. Wants approved clauses with fallbacks, redlines that survive the round-trip, and an approval on record for every deviation — not a sign-off by email.
- **The Procurement Analyst** (v1.0): Holds four hundred supplier contracts and the Kündigungsfristen nobody else remembers. Wants notice periods and auto-renewals modelled rather than typed into a note, reminders that escalate to a named owner, and a portfolio report that shows what can be cancelled this quarter.
- **The Sales Ops Owner** (v1.0): Owns the quote-to-signature path for a sales team that closes standard deals without legal. Wants contracts generated from the CRM record, approvals that route by discount and value, signature in the same flow, and a price she can put in next year's budget.
- **The IT Integrator** (v1.0): Connects the CLM to SAP, Microsoft 365 and the CRM, and will be the one migrating out of it. Wants a versioned API, SSO and SCIM, qualified signature where the law asks for it, and an export that brings back metadata, versions and audit trail — not a ZIP of PDFs.
- **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Reads the subprocessor list before the feature page. Asks which model provider receives contract text, whether it is retained or used for training, where OCR runs, and whether the counterparties' personal data in every contract is covered by the DPA.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen "AI that reads your contracts" miss a notice period buried in an amendment. Reads for an extraction accuracy nobody states, "Word integration" that loses tracked changes, "never miss a renewal" with reminders to one inbox, and an export that leaves the metadata behind.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | — |
| Open source | Not determined | — | — |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | — |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- AI act: yes [S9]
- Certifications: encryption · two-factor authentication · granular access controls · ISO 27001 · SOC 2 Type II [S1]
- Encryption at rest: AES-256 [S11]
- GDPR: yes · no [S9]
- ISO 27001: yes [S9]
- Iso27701: yes [S9]
- SOC 2: yes [S9]
- SOC 2 type2: yes [S9]
- Transport encryption: HTTPS with TLS 1.2 or higher [S11]
- US cloud act: except for US clients · yes [S9]

**Data**
- Request form options: export personal data · remove personal data [S2]
- SCIM deletion deactivates: yes · no · yes · yes [S11]
- Separation: yes [S9]
- Third party sharing: no [S2]

**Hosting**
- Board portal mea region: MEA · United Arab Emirates [S11]
- Countries: France · United States · Canada · Dubai · Spain · Italy · Germany · Mexico · Colombia · Peru [S9]
- Countries: France · United States · Canada · Dubai · Spain · Italy · Germany · Mexico · Colombia · Peru [S12]
- Data residency: yes [S9]
- Presence: France · United States · Canada · Dubai · Spain · Italy · Germany · Mexico · Colombia · Peru [S1]
- Presence countries: France · United States · Canada · Dubai · Spain · Italy · Germany · Mexico · Colombia · Peru [S8]
- Provider: 2 rue Kellermann – 59100 Roubaix – France · OVH [S2]

**Integrations**
- Adobe sign: DiliTrust Suite · Adobe Sign [S12]
- API available: yes · yes [S12]
- API permissions respected: yes [S11]
- API rest json: JSON · REST [S11]
- Board portal auth methods: API Token (Basic), User Token (Bearer JWT), Client Token (Bearer JWT) [S11]
- Board portal data: Board Portal API covers documents/folders, meetings, votes and quorums, users, signatures, user activity logs, security reports, tasks [S11]
- Board portal formats: multipart/form-data · JSON · XML · JSON · XML [S11]
- Board portal mea endpoint: https://api-mea1.dilitrust.com/api/v1 [S11]
- Board portal no bulk export: no [S11]
- Board portal no dev uat: no [S11]
- Board portal no doc versions: no [S11]
- Board portal no incremental sync: no [S11]
- Board portal no pagination: no [S11]
- Board portal no webhooks: no [S11]
- Board portal timeout: 5 [S11]
- Board portal token validity: yes · no · 1 [S11]
- Boxsign: DiliTrust CLM · BoxSign [S12]
- Clm API included: yes [S11]
- Clm base URL: https://api.dilitrust.com/api/clm/v2 [S11]
- Clm provider limit: tenant administrator · 2 [S11]
- Clm token SCIM reuse: yes [S11]
- Clm token validity: yes · 12 [S11]
- Connective: Connective · advanced eSignature · eID verification [S12]
- Dilisign providers: DocuSign · Adobe Sign · YouSign · Universign · Signaturit · Connective · Dropbox Sign · Box Sign · Generic [S11]
- Dilisign signature levels: availability depends on provider · Standard · Advanced · Advanced with SMS · ID verification · Advanced with ID [S11]
- Dilisign webhooks: yes [S11]
- Dilitrust sign MFA: yes [S11]
- Dilitrust sign webhook: yes [S11]
- Docusign: DiliTrust Suite · DocuSign [S12]
- Dropbox sign: DiliTrust Suite · Dropbox Sign (HelloSign) [S12]
- External provider requirements: endpoint URL · authentication token or credentials · external signature feature enabled · provider set up in module [S11]
- Lem base URL: https://api-eu2.dilitrust.com/api/v1 [S11]
- Lem data coverage: companies · individuals · contracts · litigations · mandates · shares and transactions · documents/folders · e-signatures · tasks [S11]
- Lem formats: JSON · XML · multipart/form-data · JSON · XML [S11]
- Lem historization: yes [S11]
- Lem pseudo user: LEM tokens have a pseudo user with login prefixed by api-users- [S11]
- Lem token setup requires support: yes [S11]
- Llm API: yes [S9]
- No server side retries: no [S11]
- Public APIs available: Board Portal · CLM · LEM · SCIM · DiliSign · yes [S11]
- SCIM endpoint: https://api.dilitrust.com/api/scim/v2/ [S11]
- SCIM idp documented: Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD) [S11]
- Signaturit: DiliTrust Suite · SignaturIt · advanced · qualified [S12]
- Support email: support@dilitrust.com · [API Integration] [S11]
- Universign: DiliTrust Suite · UniverSign · eIDAS · qualified [S12]
- Yousign: DiliTrust Suite · YouSign · eIDAS [S12]

**Legal**
- Data rights: objection · access · rectification · mail [S2]
- Entity type capital: SAS · 27471203.98 · DiliTrust [S2]
- Governing law: France · exclusive jurisdiction of French courts [S2]
- Rcs: Nanterre B 400 701 918 [S2]
- Siret: 400 701 918 000 64 [S2]
- VAT number: FR 92 400 701 918 [S2]

**Product**
- Access restriction: restricted access, specific contractual agreement · no [S7]
- AI automation: data extraction · contract review · minutes generation [S1]
- AI capabilities: document analysis, minute generation, summary sheet fill-in [S9]
- AI data extraction: yes · AI-powered automated data extraction from contracts [S10]
- AI engine: proprietary AI engine named Lini [S1]
- Alerts reports: extracted data powers alerts and reports [S10]
- Awards: ranks 69th among French software publishers; Legal Tech Awards Summer 2026 Best Overall [S1]
- Bias mitigation: yes [S9]
- Board portal capabilities: agendas · document sharing · votes · automatic minutes [S1]
- Client training: yes [S9]
- Clm AI scope: AI provides risk & clause analysis [S9]
- Continuous updates: yes [S9]
- Contract templates: yes [S4]
- Contract type adaptation: extraction adapts to contract types (NDAs, service agreements, shareholder pacts) [S10]
- Counterparty portal: Counterparty reviews via a dedicated secure webpage; can visualize, download, accept or decline [S5]
- Counterparty version upload: Counterparty can leave a comment and upload a new version which is automatically uploaded to DiliTrust [S5]
- Countries: France · United States · Canada · Dubai · Spain · Italy · Germany · Mexico · Colombia · Peru [S2]
- Decline edit: On declining a review, user can edit the document or upload a new version [S5]
- Deployment speed: risk exposure decreases within first weeks of deployment [S1]
- Dilisign: Single API to multiple external signature providers [S11]
- Dilitrust sign: Built-in e-signature service; recipients sign, approve or receive copy; returns signed docs with audit trail certificate [S11]
- Editing tools: Word · Google Doc · CK Editor [S5]
- Encryption: yes [S9]
- External link validity: 30 · yes [S5]
- External review recipient: External review sent by entering recipient name and email with a personalized message [S5]
- Extracted fields: dates · parties · clauses · obligations [S10]
- Extraction speed: summary produced in seconds [S10]
- Finalize steps: After negotiation, proceed to validation and/or signature steps [S5]
- Human oversight: yes [S9]
- Inhouse AI: yes [S9]
- Integration categories: native · partner · third-party [S12]
- Integration with clm: works inside DiliTrust CLM [S10]
- Internal review reviewers: Internal reviewers must have a DiliTrust user account and are notified by email [S5]
- Linked documents send: Can send one or all linked documents at once during external review [S5]
- Mobile app: yes [S1]
- Modules: 5 · board portal · contracts · entities · matter management · dataroom [S1]
- Native dynamics365: DiliTrust CLM [S12]
- Native gmail addin: DiliTrust Matter Management [S12]
- Native google docs addon: DiliTrust CLM [S12]
- Native hubspot: DiliTrust CLM [S12]
- Native microsoft teams: DiliTrust Board Portal [S12]
- Native outlook addin: DiliTrust Board Portal [S12]
- Native salesforce: DiliTrust CLM [S12]
- Native word addin: DiliTrust CLM [S12]
- Negotiation vs validation: A contract already validated or signed cannot be sent for negotiation/proofreading [S5]
- Negotiation workflow: Negotiation is an internal review followed by an external review sent to the counterparty [S5]
- No auto overdue status: no [S7]
- Occurrence editable fields: Name · Clause · Due date · Related content [S7]
- Ocr: OCR-based extraction from scanned files, images, PDFs, Word [S10]
- Partner ewitness: DiliTrust Legal Entity Management [S12]
- Partner impalact: DiliTrust Legal Entity Management [S12]
- Partner pf registres: DiliTrust Legal Entity Management [S12]
- Past due date allowed: yes [S7]
- Personalized workflow roles: administrators · lawyers · business managers [S6]
- Private messages: Private message per reviewer, visible only to that reviewer [S5]
- Rating: 4.6 · 700+ [S1]
- Recurrence permanent: no [S7]
- Recurring tasks: yes · yes [S7]
- Repository: searchable contract repository connected to drafting, approvals and renewal alerts [S8]
- Repository AI capabilities: AI key-term extraction, risk identification, language suggestions [S8]
- Repository analytics: reporting on contract performance, compliance status, operational metrics [S8]
- Repository automated alerts: renewals · expirations · compliance deadlines [S8]
- Repository integration surface: CRM · financial software · e-signature tools [S8]
- Repository metadata extraction: key metadata extraction includes parties, effective dates, contract values [S8]
- Repository mobile access: yes [S8]
- Repository role based access: role-based access controls, encryption, audit trails [S8]
- Repository search: advanced multi-criteria search including contract type, parties, dates, values, language [S8]
- Repository version control: complete document history, change tracking, version comparison [S8]
- Review per version: Review can be triggered for each new version before stakeholders agree [S5]
- Saas: 5 · SaaS [S1]
- SCIM group provisioning: yes [S11]
- SCIM single role: Administrator · Editor · Contributor · Validator · Reader · no [S11]
- SCIM SSO combined: yes [S11]
- SCIM support: CLM · 2.0 · yes [S11]
- Sequential reviewers: Multiple reviewers notified one after the other [S5]
- Standard workflows: yes [S6]
- Standard workflows criteria: yes [S6]

**Support**
- Channels: Help Center · Customer Support · FAQ [S9]
- Channels: Help Center · Customer Support · FAQ · Compliance · Security · Accessibility Commitment [S8]
- Help center: Help Center · Customer Support · FAQ [S12]
- Support: 24/7 multilingual support with dedicated account manager · unlimited, included in every subscription [S1]

47 more facts on the canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/dilitrust-contracts

## Questions

### Is DiliTrust Contracts European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where DiliTrust Contracts is based.

### Where does DiliTrust Contracts store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### Does DiliTrust Contracts have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to DiliTrust Contracts?

As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates [fynk (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk), [Gatekeeper (3/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/gatekeeper) and [Precisely (3/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) highest among the other 27 Contract Management (CLM) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [fynk](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [DiliTrust Contracts alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/dilitrust-contracts/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (dilitrust.com, dilitrust.com/de/legal-notice-2, support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081061-how-to-add-a-clause-template-from-my-clause-library-in-a-contract-model-, support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081054-how-to-create-contract-templates-, support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081052-how-do-i-negotiate-my-contract-, support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081069-how-to-set-up-a-standard-workflow- and 6 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page.
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://www.dilitrust.com (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S2] Imprint — found from the homepage: https://www.dilitrust.com/de/legal-notice-2/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S3] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081061-how-to-add-a-clause-template-from-my-clause-library-in-a-contract-model- (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S4] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081054-how-to-create-contract-templates- (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S5] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081052-how-do-i-negotiate-my-contract- (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S6] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000081069-how-to-set-up-a-standard-workflow- (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S7] Repository, deadlines & obligations — found from sitemap: https://support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000098921-clm-task-obligation-management (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S8] Repository, deadlines & obligations — found from sitemap: https://www.dilitrust.com/contract-repository/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S9] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://www.dilitrust.com/ai-code-of-conduct/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S10] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://www.dilitrust.com/meet-our-proprietary-ai/ai-automated-data-extraction/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S11] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://support.dilitrust.com/en/support/solutions/articles/7000101388-dilitrust-apis-frequently-asked-questions-board-portal-clm-lem-e-signature-and-scim- (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S12] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://www.dilitrust.com/integrations/ (checked 2026-11-03)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "DiliTrust Contracts — Contract Management (CLM)", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-11-04. https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/dilitrust-contracts

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/1385?target=page