# fynk — Contract Management (CLM)

fynk by fynk GmbH holds a panel rating of 2.5/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-10-15. Provenance: EU-Made; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: fynk GmbH (https://fynk.com/de/)
- Category: [Contract Management (CLM)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): EU-Made
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-15 · oldest source captured 2026-10-01

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: fynk GmbH
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan: Yes, per the vendor’s own page [S2]

## The panel's verdict

fynk is contract-management software from fynk GmbH, Vienna, spanning templates, negotiation, e-signature and obligation tracking. Strongest are integration and exit, repository and obligations and negotiation and approval: a documented REST API with version pinning, signed webhooks, SCIM and SAML single sign-on, all three eIDAS levels including qualified signatures, renewal dates tracked with configurable reminders, and in-browser redlining where counterparties join by link without an account. Pricing transparency is the weakest criterion at 2-3: the pages claim clear prices and a free plan with unlimited documents, signatures included with no envelope fee, yet no paid-tier figure appears, so a paying annual invoice is not computable. AI extraction control scores 3-4 — extracted values are held for confirmation, but analysis triggers automatically on upload and no public information names the model provider or where processing runs. Authoring and templates spans 4 to 6 on a 175-template library with no public information on conditional clause logic or clause versioning; sovereignty scores 4-5 with hosting stated in ISO 27001-certified data centres in Germany and no public information on a subprocessor list.

**Speaks for it:**
- Documented REST API with version pinning, per-response rate limits, signed webhooks with retries, SCIM and SAML single sign-on.
- All three eIDAS signature levels including qualified, selected per document, with signers requiring no account.
- Signed contracts file with parties, term and notice period extracted, renewal dates tracked and reminders configurable by timing, repetition and recipient.
- Redlining in one live document with per-change accept or reject, version comparison and counterparties reviewing by link without an account.
- Contracts generated from HubSpot or Salesforce deal records, with values, durations, tags and statuses exportable to Looker, Power BI or Tableau.

**Held against it:**
- We found no public price figure for any paid tier, so a paying annual invoice is not computable from the captured pages.
- We found no public information on the AI model provider, training use or where AI processing runs, while analysis triggers automatically on every upload.
- Independently sourced sovereignty attributes list data residency and subprocessor exposure as unknown, and we found no published subprocessor list.
- We found no public information on conditional clause logic, approved fallbacks or per-clause versioning with owners.
- The stated "full export anytime" carries no public information on its contents, format or the audit trail.

**Best for:**
- You run HubSpot or Salesforce and want contracts built from the deal record with signature and approval events pushed to your systems over signed webhooks.
- You need automated notice-period and renewal tracking with task owners, due dates and portfolio exports into Looker, Power BI or Tableau.
- You negotiate in-browser and want counterparties to review and comment without creating an account, with every change accepted or rejected one by one.
- You operate in Austria or Germany and want local template content, including board and circular resolutions, in a German-language product.

**Avoid if:**
- You need a published price to budget an annual invoice before talking to sales.
- You require AI analysis to stay off until you enable it, since analysis triggers automatically on upload.
- You require independently confirmed data residency and a published subprocessor list before uploading confidential contracts.

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price.

| Criterion | The General Counsel | The Procurement Analyst | The Sales Ops Owner | The IT Integrator | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Drafting, templates & clause library | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Negotiation, redlining & approval | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Repository, deadlines & obligations | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
| AI extraction & review transparency | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Integrations, signature & exit | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| European sovereignty | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1.5/5 |
| **Weighted verdict** | **2.5/5** | **3/5** | **2.5/5** | **3/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** |

### The judges

- **The General Counsel** (v1.0): Runs a three-lawyer legal team that negotiates every supplier and customer contract in Word with the other side's counsel. Wants approved clauses with fallbacks, redlines that survive the round-trip, and an approval on record for every deviation — not a sign-off by email.
- **The Procurement Analyst** (v1.0): Holds four hundred supplier contracts and the Kündigungsfristen nobody else remembers. Wants notice periods and auto-renewals modelled rather than typed into a note, reminders that escalate to a named owner, and a portfolio report that shows what can be cancelled this quarter.
- **The Sales Ops Owner** (v1.0): Owns the quote-to-signature path for a sales team that closes standard deals without legal. Wants contracts generated from the CRM record, approvals that route by discount and value, signature in the same flow, and a price she can put in next year's budget.
- **The IT Integrator** (v1.0): Connects the CLM to SAP, Microsoft 365 and the CRM, and will be the one migrating out of it. Wants a versioned API, SSO and SCIM, qualified signature where the law asks for it, and an export that brings back metadata, versions and audit trail — not a ZIP of PDFs.
- **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Reads the subprocessor list before the feature page. Asks which model provider receives contract text, whether it is retained or used for training, where OCR runs, and whether the counterparties' personal data in every contract is covered by the DPA.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen "AI that reads your contracts" miss a notice period buried in an amendment. Reads for an extraction accuracy nobody states, "Word integration" that loses tracked changes, "never miss a renewal" with reminders to one inbox, and an export that leaves the metadata behind.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Ownership | Not determined | — | — |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | — |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- DPA available: yes · Art. 28 EU-Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO) [S5]
- Eidas GDPR: yes · yes [S15]
- GDPR page: yes [S15]
- No automated decisions: no [S3]
- Social media links: Social-Media-Kanäle nur als statische Links, keine Plugins [S3]
- Supervisory authority: Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde · Barichgasse 40-42, 1030 Wien, Österreich [S3]
- Third country transfers: EU Angemessenheitsbeschluss Art. 45 DSGVO / EU-US Data Privacy Framework · Standardvertragsklauseln Art. 46 Abs. 2 c DSGVO [S3]

**Data**
- Business partner retention: 6-10 [S3]
- Log retention: 60 [S3]

**Hosting**
- Data centres: Germany · yes [S15]
- Log retention: 60 [S3]

**Integrations**
- API: yes · yes [S7]
- API: yes [S9]
- API: yes · yes [S13]
- API: yes · yes [S15]
- Auth header: HTTP Authorization header · yes [S14]
- Bi tools: Looker · Power BI · Tableau [S14]
- Document creation: yes · yes [S14]
- Listed: MCP server · Integrations · API [S8]
- Mcp server: MCP Server · CRM connections · document archive · bulk creation & automation [S2]
- Mcp server: yes [S13]
- Mcp server: yes · yes · yes [S15]
- Rate limits: yes [S14]
- Rest API: REST over HTTPS · yes [S14]
- Signature types: simple · advanced · qualified [S14]
- Signed pdf download: yes [S14]
- Token setup: Settings > Integrations > API · yes [S14]
- Versioning: yes · yes [S14]
- Webhooks: yes · yes [S2]
- Webhooks: yes · yes · yes [S14]
- White label: yes [S14]

**Legal**
- Agb free terms: kostenlose Nutzung · yes [S5]
- Agb paid terms: entgeltliche Nutzung · yes [S5]
- Commercial register: Handelsgericht Wien · FN580816t [S4]
- Company name: fynk GmbH [S5]
- Company name: fynk GmbH · 2026 [S7]
- Company register court: Handelsgericht Wien [S4]
- Company register number: FN580816t [S4]
- Entity: fynk GmbH · legal@fynk.com · Heinrichsgasse 2/1/8, 1020 Wien, Österreich [S3]
- Entity: fynk GmbH [S8]
- Entity: fynk GmbH [S9]
- Entity: fynk GmbH [S15]
- Entity name: fynk GmbH · Heinrichsgasse 2/1/8, 1010 Wien, Österreich [S4]
- Entity name: fynk GmbH · Heinrichsgasse 2/1/8, 1010 Wien, Österreich [S4]
- Gisa number: 35046585 [S4]
- Jurisdiction: Wien · Austria [S4]
- Jurisdiction: Österreich [S4]
- Media owner: fynk GmbH · fynk GmbH · fynk GmbH [S4]
- Social media coverage: yes [S4]
- Social media imprint scope: Imprint also covers social media presences, e.g. LinkedIn company page https://www.linkedin.com/company/fynk [S4]
- Trade license: Dienstleistungen in der automatischen Datenverarbeitung und Informationstechnik [S4]
- VAT id: ATU78215156 [S4]
- VAT id: ATU78215156 [S4]
- Website operator: fynk GmbH [S4]

**Pricing**
- Annual discount percent: 34 [S2]
- Business price: yes · 39 · monthly · 250 [S2]
- Credit topups: 10 · S · 50 · 75 · M · 500 · 200 · L · 2000 · 12 · yes [S2]
- Essential price: yes · 19 · monthly · 150 [S2]
- Free price: yes · 0 · monthly · 50 [S2]
- Free tier: yes [S1]
- Free trial: yes · yes [S7]
- Onboarding credits: yes [S2]
- Pro price: yes [S2]
- Signatures included: no · yes [S15]
- Templates free: yes [S7]
- Transparency: Claims transparent pricing, no hidden costs [S1]
- Trial: 14 · yes · no [S2]
- VAT: yes [S2]

**Product**
- Acceleration clause examples: Acceleration clause · 14 [S6]
- Acceleration of rent examples: Acceleration of rent · 11 [S6]
- Accept reject changes: yes [S9]
- Access easement examples: Access easement · 12 [S6]
- Account level task rules: Aufgabenregeln auf Account-Ebene oder pro Dokument konfigurierbar [S11]
- Action audit trail: Actions recorded and traceable (accountability) [S10]
- Acts of god examples: Acts of god · 15 [S6]
- Addendum examples: Addendum · 21 [S6]
- Additional insured examples: Additional insured · 18 [S6]
- Additional rent examples: Additional rent · 20 [S6]
- Aes auth methods: SMS code · national eID (BankID, MitID) [S15]
- AI analysis: AI analysis automatically extracts key dates, values, parties, and obligations from documents [S13]
- AI analysis apply options: manually review results · automatically apply results [S12]
- AI analysis metadata: key dates and deadlines · clauses · other important contract details [S12]
- AI analysis notifications: Owner and Editor roles notified two weeks before termination deadline · yes [S12]
- AI analysis rerun: yes [S12]
- AI analysis review: yes [S12]
- AI analysis trigger: yes [S12]
- AI assistant: KI-Assistent finds answers, creates contracts, keeps processes moving [S1]
- AI assistant: yes [S9]
- AI assistant: yes · yes [S12]
- AI assistant: AI assistant builds contracts, invites signatories, edits batch fields, builds dashboards, answers with referenced clauses [S13]
- AI assistant: yes · repo_query · create_from_template · version_compare · pdf_analysis · dashboard_building [S1]
- AI capabilities: yes · yes · yes [S15]
- AI draft: AI draft generates a legally structured first draft from a prompt [S13]
- AI features: assistant · analysis · summary · review · search · drafting [S2]
- AI features: AI assistant · AI contract analysis · AI review · MCP server [S7]
- AI features: AI assistant · AI contract analysis · AI review [S15]
- AI import: AI import: bulk upload existing contracts, AI reads, structures, organizes them [S13]
- AI overview: Built-in AI reads, reviews, and explains every contract; extracts data and answers questions [S13]
- AI review: AI review checks contracts against company rules and policies [S8]
- AI review: AI review applies company-defined rules as automatic checks on every contract [S13]
- AI search: yes [S12]
- AI search: AI search: plain-language search across dates, clauses, obligations, contract values [S13]
- AI search bookmarks: yes [S12]
- AI summary: AI summary reads full document on import and delivers plain-language summary [S13]
- Alphabetical navigation: yes · Clause library organized alphabetically A-Z plus # [S6]
- Approval tracking: Real-time approval status tracking [S8]
- Approval workflows: Contracts get a clear approval path, routed automatically in order, with visibility of pending steps and who needs to act [S8]
- Arbitration examples: Arbitration · 12 [S6]
- Attachment support: yes [S9]
- Audit log: Volle Protokollierung aller Handlungen an Aufgaben [S11]
- Audit trail: yes [S15]
- Auto reminders: Automatic reminders tied to approval steps; reminders to non-responding approvers [S8]
- Auto renewal tracking: Automatische Verfolgung von Verlängerungs- und Ablauffristen [S11]
- Auto task assignment: Aufgaben weisen sich per Auslöser (Daten, Vertragsstatus, Genehmigungen) selbst zu [S11]
- Automatic renewal examples: Automatic renewal · 14 [S6]
- Automatic tasks: Tasks auto-assign via triggers on dates, status or approvals [S10]
- Automatic termination examples: Automatic termination · 20 [S6]
- Balloon payment examples: Balloon payment · 16 [S6]
- Bill and hold examples: Bill and hold · 20 [S6]
- Breach of confidentiality examples: Breach of confidentiality · 21 [S6]
- Breakup fee examples: Breakup fee · 20 [S6]
- Bulk AI analysis: Bulk AI analysis re-runs analysis on changed documents in the background [S13]
- Bulk import AI: yes · dates · parties · values · clauses [S14]
- Bulk upload: yes [S13]
- Business features: direct CRM integrations · pre-signed documents · API · custom branding · multi-entity management [S2]
- Buyout examples: Buyout · 18 [S6]
- Call right examples: Call right · 20 [S6]
- Capabilities listed: contract management software · AI assistant · AI contract analysis · AI review · MCP server · integrations · API · security & GDPR [S4]
- Central task management: Zentrale Aufgabenverwaltung mit Filter, Bearbeitung und Erledigung [S11]
- Change history: yes · yes [S9]
- Change of control examples: Change of control · 15 [S6]
- Checkpoints: Checkpoints can be set before review or signing, with automatic notifications to those in charge [S8]
- Choice of law and venue examples: Choice of law and venue · 20 [S6]
- Circular resolution templates: circular resolution templates for shareholder approvals (annual surplus, loans, dissolution, asset disposal, board changes, liquidators, financial statements) [S7]
- Claimed customer count: 3000 [S1]
- Claimed outcomes: 30% fewer missed renewals · 40% faster contract review · 25% faster close rates · 15% vendor savings achieved · 2x faster onboarding · 2x faster approvals [S9]
- Clause library: clause library · yes [S7]
- Clause library purpose: A library of clauses and legal text examples that are actually used in real contracts. [S6]
- Collaboration features: real-time commenting · tracking · audit trail · alerts [S15]
- Compliance section: roles & permissions · document history · audit log [S2]
- Conditional routing: Conditional routing triggered at specific contract steps [S8]
- Consent tool: Consent-Management-Tool Klaro [S3]
- Contract hub: Central searchable contract workspace [S1]
- Contract management included: yes [S15]
- Contract templates: yes [S15]
- CRM integration: HubSpot · Salesforce [S14]
- Custom dashboard: Assistant builds dashboards from description [S1]
- Custom notification rules: Individuelle Benachrichtigungen mit Zeitpunkt, Wiederholung und Empfänger konfigurierbar [S11]
- Customer count: 3000 [S1]
- Customer count: teams · 3000 [S9]
- Customized alerts: Configurable reminder timing, repeat frequency and recipients [S10]
- Dashboard feature: Dokumenten-Kalender · Dashboards · Metadaten · Dokumentenvorlagen [S11]
- Data export: yes [S15]
- Data sharing GDPR: data sharing agreement template · yes [S7]
- Deadline calendar: Live calendar showing all tasks and deadlines [S10]
- Deadline calendar: Live-Fristenkalender für Aufgaben und Fristen [S11]

**Support**
- Human support: human support with fast help and feedback-driven improvements [S1]
- Trust center: Trust Center · yes [S7]

97 more facts on the canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk

## Questions

### Is fynk European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies fynk as EU-Made.

### Where does fynk store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

### Does fynk have a free plan?

Yes. fynk has a free plan, per [the vendor’s page captured 13 Oct 2026](https://whats-best.ai/evidence/6809).

### What are the best alternatives to fynk?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [Tomorro (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/tomorro), [Precisely (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) and [Juro (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/juro) highest among the other 19 Contract Management (CLM) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [Precisely](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [fynk alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- 64 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 11 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 10 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 9 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 4 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 4 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 2 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown.
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor homepage: https://fynk.com/de/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S2] Pricing page: https://fynk.com/de/preise/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S3] Privacy policy: https://fynk.com/de/datenschutzerklaerung/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S4] Legal notice: https://fynk.com/de/impressum/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S5] Terms of service: https://fynk.com/de/agb/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S6] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/clauses/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S7] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/templates/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S8] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/features/approval-workflows/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S9] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/features/redlining/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S10] Repository, deadlines & obligations — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/features/tasks-reminders/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S11] Repository, deadlines & obligations — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/de/funktionen/aufgaben-erinnerungen/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S12] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://help.fynk.com/en/articles/624531-ai-functions-in-fynk (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S13] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/features/ai/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S14] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/integrations/api/ (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S15] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://fynk.com/en/electronic-signatures/ (checked 2026-10-13)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "fynk — Contract Management (CLM)", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/646?target=page