# Legartis — Contract Management (CLM) Legartis by Legartis Technology AG holds a panel rating of 1.5/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-10-15. Provenance: UK / wider Europe; sovereignty: not determined. - Vendor: Legartis Technology AG (https://www.legartis.ai) - Category: [Contract Management (CLM)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management.md) - Provenance (editorial classification): UK / wider Europe - Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/legartis - Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/legartis/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/legartis/alternatives.md)) - Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-15 · oldest source captured 2026-10-01 **AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology ## At a glance - Vendor: Legartis Technology AG - Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 - Data hosting: Default not stated; pages mention Switzerland and Europe [S2] - Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 ## The panel's verdict Legartis, a Swiss contract management vendor based in Zurich, is strongest at AI extraction control, scoring 4-5: every classification traces back to the playbook requirement and the contract passage, each requirement carries its own quality score from test sets with a published average F1 above 90 percent, and a human remains the final checkpoint. Negotiation and approval scores run 3-4 and integration and exit sits at a flat 4 — a Word add-in with traffic-light marking and per-requirement rules for automatic pass versus approval, a documented document-analysis API, and single sign-on via Microsoft Entra ID or any OAuth2/SAML provider. It is weakest at repository and obligations, 1-2, and at authoring and templates, 1-3: playbooks built from your own templates are evidenced and documents arrive as finished files, while we found no public information on contract generation, notice periods, renewal dates or obligation owners. Sovereignty runs 3-4 — storage on servers in Zurich, Switzerland and Europe is stated, while we found no published subprocessor list. Score spreads stay narrow and the flagged splits flag nothing; no prices appear on the captured pages. **Speaks for it:** - Every AI classification traces back to the playbook requirement and the passage in the contract, with an audit trail - Each playbook requirement carries its own AI quality score from test sets, with a published average F1 score above 90 percent - Analysis runs inside Microsoft Word through the add-in, begins only when the user starts it, and hands unclear cases to a human - A documented API covers document analysis, and single sign-on works with Microsoft Entra ID over OpenID Connect and any OAuth2/SAML provider - Original documents are deleted automatically and irreversibly on request, and the pages state no data exchange with third parties **Held against it:** - The evidenced product is playbook creation and review of finished documents; we found no public information on generating a first draft, template variables or an approved clause library - Contract Management and Contract Insights are named as modules, but we found no public information on notice periods, renewal dates, reminders, obligation owners or department-level access rights - We found no published subprocessor list naming which AI provider receives contract text, and the pages describe the AI learning from your corrections and decisions - We found no public information on e-signature at any level, CRM or ERP integrations, or an export carrying documents out together with metadata, versions and audit trail - No prices appear on any captured page — the only entry points shown are booking a demo or testing the product **Best for:** - You need AI review of finished contracts in Microsoft Word against your company's playbooks, with every classification traceable to the contract passage - Your legal team wants ready-to-use industry best-practice playbooks and playbooks generated automatically from your own templates - You operate across borders and need procurement and sales teams reviewing contracts on their own in every European language - You need single sign-on through Microsoft Entra ID or any OAuth2/SAML-compatible system plus a documented document-analysis API **Avoid if:** - You need notice periods, renewals and obligations modelled with named owners and reminders — the captured evidence for the repository is module names and homepage promises - Your teams need to produce first drafts from templates with variables or a clause library — the pages show documents arriving as finished files for review - Your compliance process requires a published subprocessor list and a named model provider before contract text is shared — the independent sovereignty check returned unknown for subprocessors ## Scores by judge and criterion Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price. | Criterion | The General Counsel | The Procurement Analyst | The Sales Ops Owner | The IT Integrator | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Drafting, templates & clause library | 1.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | | Negotiation, redlining & approval | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | | Repository, deadlines & obligations | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | | AI extraction & review transparency | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | | Integrations, signature & exit | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | | European sovereignty | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | | Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | | **Weighted verdict** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | ### The judges - **The General Counsel** (v1.0): Runs a three-lawyer legal team that negotiates every supplier and customer contract in Word with the other side's counsel. Wants approved clauses with fallbacks, redlines that survive the round-trip, and an approval on record for every deviation — not a sign-off by email. - **The Procurement Analyst** (v1.0): Holds four hundred supplier contracts and the Kündigungsfristen nobody else remembers. Wants notice periods and auto-renewals modelled rather than typed into a note, reminders that escalate to a named owner, and a portfolio report that shows what can be cancelled this quarter. - **The Sales Ops Owner** (v1.0): Owns the quote-to-signature path for a sales team that closes standard deals without legal. Wants contracts generated from the CRM record, approvals that route by discount and value, signature in the same flow, and a price she can put in next year's budget. - **The IT Integrator** (v1.0): Connects the CLM to SAP, Microsoft 365 and the CRM, and will be the one migrating out of it. Wants a versioned API, SSO and SCIM, qualified signature where the law asks for it, and an export that brings back metadata, versions and audit trail — not a ZIP of PDFs. - **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Reads the subprocessor list before the feature page. Asks which model provider receives contract text, whether it is retained or used for training, where OCR runs, and whether the counterparties' personal data in every contract is covered by the DPA. - **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen "AI that reads your contracts" miss a notice period buried in an amendment. Reads for an extraction accuracy nobody states, "Word integration" that loses tracked changes, "never miss a renewal" with reminders to one inbox, and an export that leaves the metadata behind. ## European sovereignty — proven facts Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined. | Dimension | Finding | Points | Source | |---|---|---|---| | Legal entity | Not determined | — | — | | Ownership | Not determined | — | — | | Data residency | Not determined | — | — | | Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — | ## Key facts Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources). **Compliance** - Audit trail: yes [S1] - Audit trail: yes [S5] - Audit trail: yes [S4] - Audit trail: complete audit trail [S4] - Data sharing: no [S4] - GDPR: yes [S1] - GDPR: yes [S2] - GDPR: yes [S5] - GDPR: yes [S4] - GDPR: yes [S4] - ISO 27001: yes [S1] - ISO 27001: yes [S5] - ISO 27001: yes [S4] - ISO 27001: ISO 27001 · yes [S4] - No data sharing: no [S1] - No third party sharing: no [S4] **Data** - Deletion option: yes [S5] - No third party sharing: yes [S5] - Retention: as long as necessary for stated purposes and legal obligations; aggregated/anonymized data may be retained indefinitely [S2] - Rights: information · access · rectification · erasure · restriction [S2] - Third party disclosure: yes [S2] **Hosting** - Region: Zurich, Switzerland [S2] - Regions: Switzerland · Europe [S1] - Regions: Schweiz · Europa [S5] - Regions: Switzerland · Europe [S4] - Regions: Switzerland · Europe [S4] **Integrations** - API docs collection: Getting started · Analyzing documents by api · Api Specifications · SSO - Microsoft Entra ID · API & Integration · 4 [S10] - Document analysis API: yes · document analysis via API [S10] - Oauth2 SAML any provider: yes · yes [S11] - Resources: Webinars · Blog · Case Studies · Guides · Packages [S1] - SSO entra id: yes · Microsoft Entra ID [S10] - SSO entra id oidc: SSO via Microsoft Entra ID using OpenID Connect (OIDC) is supported [S11] - SSO login URL: https://app.legartis.ai · company identifier entered on login page [S11] - SSO setup via support: support@legartis.ai · yes [S11] **Legal** - Address: 8004 · Zurich · Hohlstrasse 216 · Switzerland [S3] - Entity: Legartis Technology AG · Hohlstrasse 216, 8004 Zürich [S2] - Entity name: Legartis Technology AG [S3] - Jurisdiction: Swiss law · Swiss courts at registered office location [S3] - Policy last updated: 2019-11-06 [S2] - Registry number: CHE-438.235.861 · Canton of Zurich [S3] - Trademarks: Legartis name and logo are registered trademarks in Switzerland and other countries [S3] **Pricing** - Packages page: Packages listed under Resources; no prices stated on homepage · yes [S1] **Product** - Addin name: Legartis Legal AI Suite [S7] - Agent architecture: specialised agents: policy generation, prompt definition, test set creation/annotation [S4] - Agent memory: Agent Memory permanently connects playbooks, reviews and contract history [S9] - Agents: Specialised agents: policy generation, prompt definition, test set creation/annotation [S4] - AI agents architecture: Richtlinien-Generierung · Prompt-Definition · Test-Set-Erstellung und Annotation [S5] - AI quality score: Every playbook requirement has its own AI quality score based on test sets [S9] - All contract types: alle Vertragsarten [S5] - Analytics google: Google Analytics · Google Ads · yes [S2] - Analytics tool: Matomo · own servers located in Zurich, Switzerland [S2] - Approval thresholds: Per-requirement thresholds for automatic pass vs approval [S1] - Audit trail: yes [S9] - Auditability: Auditable AI verifies output against a defined standard [S9] - Auditability of decisions: Every decision traceable to requirement and contract passage [S1] - Auto correction loop: yes [S4] - Auto correction loop: AI auto correction loop [S4] - Auto test sets: Automated test sets with quality score [S4] - Autocorrection loop: yes [S5] - Clause analysis: yes [S5] - Clause analysis: Automated clause analysis & policy derivation [S4] - Clause analysis: automated clause analysis and policy derivation [S4] - Contract type flexibility: any contract type supported [S4] - Contract types: Any policy in any contract type [S4] - Cookies usable: yes [S2] - Country of origin: Switzerland [S1] - Document deletion: Original documents deleted automatically and irreversibly on request, after creation or at chosen time [S4] - Document deletion option: irreversible deletion of original documents on request [S4] - Efficiency claims: 85 · 90 [S9] - European languages: alle europäischen Sprachen [S5] - F1 score: F1-Score · 90 [S5] - F1 score: 90 [S4] - F1 score: F1 score · >0.9 [S4] - Feedback channel: Users can provide feedback on AI performance, which the Legartis product team uses to improve AI quality [S8] - Feedback loops: yes · yes [S9] - Green meaning: green · requirement met / approved [S6] - Green missing optional clause: missing clause marked green when requirement is optional or invalid in the playbook [S6] - Human final checkpoint: yes [S9] - Individualized playbooks: yes [S5] - Industry best practice: yes [S5] - Industry playbooks: yes [S4] - Industry playbooks: industry best practice playbooks [S4] - Languages: All European languages supported [S4] - Languages supported: all European languages supported [S4] - Learning from corrections: yes [S1] - Legal agent assist: Legal Agent guides playbook creation [S4] - Legal agent guidance: yes [S5] - Liability: Legal responsibility stays with the person who approves the result [S9] - Memory types: Company Memory · Knowledge Memory [S1] - Modules: Legal Agent · AI Contract Review · Contract Insights · Contract Playbook Creator · Contract Management [S1] - Modules: Legal Agent · AI Contract Review · Contract Insights · Contract Playbook Creator · Contract Management [S3] - Nda checker: Legartis NDA Checker [S2] - No scan without addin: No analysis happens while a document is open without the add-in; analysis only begins when the user starts the add-in in Microsoft Word [S7] - No setup required: yes [S5] - Non legal users: yes [S1] - Platform independence: Platform-independent [S4] - Platform independent: yes [S5] - Platform independent: platform-independent [S4] - Playbook based checking: documents are checked against playbook requirements by AI [S6] - Red meaning: red · correction required / mandatory missing clause [S6] - Red missing mandatory clause: missing mandatory clause from playbook marked red [S6] - Redlining traffic light system: AI identifies text segments and marks them with colours in a traffic light system [S6] - Review test sets: Users can review and maintain test sets in playbooks, improving playbook quality and AI performance when reviewing documents [S8] - Solutions departments: Legal · Sales · Procurement · Construction [S1] - Start without policies: usable without existing company policies [S4] - Tailored playbooks: yes [S4] - Tailored playbooks: tailored playbooks from own templates [S4] - Target users: legal · procurement · sales [S1] - Test sets quality score: yes [S5] - Test sets quality score: AI-generated test sets with AI Quality Score [S4] - Trial: Book a demo or try now available [S4] - User tuning: quality improves via feedback and user tuning on sample contracts [S4] - Workspace description: Agentic Legal AI Workspace handling requests, contracts, deadlines to company standards [S1] - Yellow human review: unclear cases are transferred to the human user for verification [S6] - Yellow meaning: yellow · verification required / incomplete, transferred to human user [S6] ## Questions ### Is Legartis European? Yes, though not from the EU. whats-best.ai classifies Legartis as UK / wider Europe. ### Where does Legartis store data? The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Switzerland and Europe as hosting locations, per [the vendor’s page captured 13 Oct 2026](https://whats-best.ai/evidence/6876). ### Does Legartis have a free plan? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026. ### What are the best alternatives to Legartis? As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [Tomorro (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/tomorro), [Precisely (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) and [fynk (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk) highest among the other 19 Contract Management (CLM) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [Precisely](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Legartis alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/legartis/alternatives). ## What this page leaves out - 36 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 2 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. - 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. ## Sources - [S1] Vendor homepage: https://www.legartis.ai/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S2] Privacy policy: https://www.legartis.ai/data-privacy (checked 2026-10-13) - [S3] Legal notice: https://www.legartis.ai/legal-notice (checked 2026-10-13) - [S4] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://www.legartis.ai/contract-playbook-creator (checked 2026-10-13) - [S5] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://www.legartis.ai/de/contract-playbook-creator (checked 2026-10-13) - [S6] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://knowledge.legartis.ai/en/articles/499038-the-legartis-redlining (checked 2026-10-13) - [S7] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://knowledge.legartis.ai/de/articles/478884-dokumentenprufung-in-ms-word (checked 2026-10-13) - [S8] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://knowledge.legartis.ai/en/articles/496496-training-of-the-ai-by-users (checked 2026-10-13) - [S9] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://www.legartis.ai/ai-quality (checked 2026-10-13) - [S10] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://knowledge.legartis.ai/en/collections/626242-api-integration (checked 2026-10-13) - [S11] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://knowledge.legartis.ai/en/articles/355759-sso-microsoft-entra-id (checked 2026-10-13) --- Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Legartis — Contract Management (CLM)", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/legartis Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/652?target=page