# Pocketlaw — Contract Management (CLM)

Pocketlaw by Pocketlaw AB holds a panel rating of 2.5/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-10-21. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: Pocketlaw AB (https://pocketlaw.com)
- Category: [Contract Management (CLM)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/pocketlaw
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/pocketlaw/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/pocketlaw/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-21 · oldest source captured 2026-10-20

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: Pocketlaw AB
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026

## The panel's verdict

Miramis, formerly Pocketlaw, is a contract management platform judged strongest at negotiation and approval, scores 6-7, on parallel and sequential approvers, group quorums, automatic escalation to a backup and a timestamped log of every assessment, request, approval and rejection. Repository and obligations scores 6-7 on automated renewal, termination and payment tracking with configurable alerts and OCR search. Authoring and templates scores 4-6 on a published library covering United Kingdom and Sweden only; integration and exit scores 5-6. The low scores are sovereignty at 1-2 — the pages publish ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II and GDPR claims and offices in London and Stockholm, but we found no public information on hosting location, the AI and OCR subprocessors, or the contracting entity's jurisdiction — and pricing transparency at 0-1, two editions named with no public price for either and a free 30-minute demo as the buying path. AI extraction and control clusters at 4: citation-backed answers and logged reasoning, but no public information on the model provider or on switching AI features off. No criterion spans more than two points — no genuine split to report.

**Speaks for it:**
- Approvals cover single, paired, parallel and sequential approvers with any-one-of-a-group and any-two-of-a-group quorums and automatic escalation to a backup
- Every assessment, request, approval and rejection is logged with a timestamp, and re-run assessments are logged against the version used
- Renewal dates, termination windows and payment obligations are tracked automatically, with configurable alerts and unlimited tasks carrying due dates
- Every AI answer is citation-backed to the source clause, and the full reasoning behind each verdict is kept alongside the decision
- Named integrations include Salesforce, HubSpot, DocuSign, SharePoint, Word, Teams, Slack and Google Drive, alongside a WebAPI with developer documentation and SSO/SAML

**Held against it:**
- Sovereignty scored 1-2, with no public information on hosting location, the AI and OCR subprocessors, or the contracting entity's jurisdiction
- Native eSigning is described only as "eIDAS-compliant eSigning", without stating whether that means simple, advanced or qualified
- We found no public information on the AI model provider, on training with customer contracts, or on switching AI features off per account
- The published template library covers United Kingdom and Sweden, with no public information on German-law or German-language templates
- Only CSV exports of views and review results are public, with no documented export of documents together with their metadata, versions and audit trail

**Best for:**
- You need approval routing with quorums, automatic escalation and a timestamped audit trail before contracts go out for signature
- You want automated tracking of renewal dates, termination windows and payment obligations with configurable alerts and OCR search over scanned contracts
- Your contracts run on United Kingdom or Swedish law and you want business users self-serving routine drafts from templates and playbooks
- You generate contracts from Salesforce or HubSpot deal data and want executed documents filed automatically to SharePoint

**Avoid if:**
- You must confirm hosting location, subprocessors and the contracting entity's jurisdiction before adoption — sovereignty scored 1-2 with all three unconfirmed on the captured pages
- You need German-law or German-language templates — the published library covers the United Kingdom and Sweden
- Your AI governance requires a named model provider, a no-training commitment or a per-account off switch — AI extraction and control scored 4 and we found no public information on any of these
- You need a documented exit path exporting documents with their versions and audit trail — only CSV downloads of views and review results are public

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price.

| Criterion | The General Counsel | The Procurement Analyst | The Sales Ops Owner | The IT Integrator | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Drafting, templates & clause library | 2/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 |
| Negotiation, redlining & approval | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Repository, deadlines & obligations | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| AI extraction & review transparency | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Integrations, signature & exit | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **2.5/5** | **3/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** | **2.5/5** |

### The judges

- **The General Counsel** (v1.0): Runs a three-lawyer legal team that negotiates every supplier and customer contract in Word with the other side's counsel. Wants approved clauses with fallbacks, redlines that survive the round-trip, and an approval on record for every deviation — not a sign-off by email.
- **The Procurement Analyst** (v1.0): Holds four hundred supplier contracts and the Kündigungsfristen nobody else remembers. Wants notice periods and auto-renewals modelled rather than typed into a note, reminders that escalate to a named owner, and a portfolio report that shows what can be cancelled this quarter.
- **The Sales Ops Owner** (v1.0): Owns the quote-to-signature path for a sales team that closes standard deals without legal. Wants contracts generated from the CRM record, approvals that route by discount and value, signature in the same flow, and a price she can put in next year's budget.
- **The IT Integrator** (v1.0): Connects the CLM to SAP, Microsoft 365 and the CRM, and will be the one migrating out of it. Wants a versioned API, SSO and SCIM, qualified signature where the law asks for it, and an export that brings back metadata, versions and audit trail — not a ZIP of PDFs.
- **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Reads the subprocessor list before the feature page. Asks which model provider receives contract text, whether it is retained or used for training, where OCR runs, and whether the counterparties' personal data in every contract is covered by the DPA.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen "AI that reads your contracts" miss a notice period buried in an amendment. Reads for an extraction accuracy nobody states, "Word integration" that loses tracked changes, "never miss a renewal" with reminders to one inbox, and an export that leaves the metadata behind.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Ownership | Not determined | — | — |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | — |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- Certifications: yes · yes · yes [S5]
- Certifications: ISO 27001 · SOC 2 · GDPR [S7]
- Certifications: ISO 27001 · SOC 2 · GDPR [S12]
- Eidas: eIDAS-compliant eSigning [S6]
- GDPR: yes · Sweden [S2]
- GDPR: GDPR-native [S6]
- ISO 27001: ISO 27001 [S6]
- ISO 27001: ISO/IEC 27001 · yes [S2]
- SOC 2: SOC 2 [S6]
- SOC 2 type ii: SOC 2 Type II · yes [S2]

**Hosting**
- Addresses: London and Stockholm offices [S5]
- London office: London office at WeWork, 17 St Helen's Pl, EC3A 6DG [S6]

**Integrations**
- CRM populate templates: Salesforce · HubSpot · yes [S12]
- Demo walkthrough: 30 [S6]
- Docusign: yes [S12]
- Hris sync: HRIS · yes [S12]
- Integration directions: create (data in) · store (signed contracts back to system of record) · sync (contract data out to other tools) [S12]
- Native list: Salesforce, HubSpot, DocuSign, SharePoint, Word, Teams, Slack, Google Drive, WebAPI [S12]
- Signed docs sharepoint: SharePoint · yes [S12]

**Legal**
- Address london: London · WeWork, 17 St Helen's Pl, London, England EC3A 6DG [S3]
- Address stockholm: Stockholm · Wallingatan 2, 111 60 Stockholm [S3]
- Copyright entity: 2026 · Miramis Technologies [S10]
- Entity: Miramis Technologies [S5]
- Entity: Miramis Technologies [S7]
- Entity locations: London, England EC3A 6DG · Wallingatan 2, 111 60 Stockholm [S8]
- Entity name: Miramis Technologies [S3]
- Entity name: Miramis Technologies [S8]
- Entity name: Miramis Technologies [S9]
- Entity name: Miramis Technologies [S12]
- Formerly pocketlaw: Pocketlaw · Miramis [S10]
- Jurisdiction: Miramis Technologies [S6]
- Offices: London, England EC3A 6DG · Stockholm, Wallingatan 2, 111 60 [S10]
- Stockholm office: Stockholm office at Wallingatan 2, 111 60 Stockholm [S6]

**Product**
- Access control: yes · yes · yes [S2]
- AI assisted drafting: AI-assisted drafting support [S4]
- AI generated charts: AI-generated dashboard charts via PLAI [S7]
- AI metadata extraction: bulk upload with AI metadata extraction and tagging [S7]
- AI metadata extraction: AI-powered metadata extraction [S9]
- AI reasoning logged: Full reasoning behind every AI verdict kept with the decision [S6]
- AI routing: AI routes each contract to the right approvers based on rules set once [S6]
- All approvers: All listed approvers, parallel or sequential [S6]
- Any one of group: First approver in group resolves it [S6]
- Any two of group: Any two from the group must approve [S6]
- Approval workflows: Checks whether a contract needs sign-off before signature and routes the request automatically [S6]
- Approver email action: no · yes [S6]
- Article date: 2024-03-19 [S10]
- Audit trail: Every assessment, request, approval and rejection logged with timestamp [S6]
- Bulk upload formats: PDF · Word · scanned documents via OCR [S7]
- Citation backed answers: citation-backed AI answers [S7]
- Configurable alerts: yes · configurable deadline alerts [S7]
- Corporate templates: Corporate · Board Minutes [S3]
- CSV export: saved custom views and CSV export · yes [S7]
- Custom labels: yes · custom labels and conditions for AI tagging [S10]
- Custom widgets: custom dashboard widgets (bar, line, metrics) [S7]
- Dashboards: Intuitive dashboards showing key metrics [S9]
- Data driven reporting: Data-driven reporting [S9]
- Dataprotection templates: Data protection & GDPR · Privacy Policy · Data Processing Agreement (DPA) [S3]
- Demo availability: 30-minute walkthrough available [S7]
- Demobooking: free demo · yes [S10]
- Developer docs: yes [S5]
- Document level permissions: yes · document level [S2]
- Draft assistance: yes [S5]
- Eidas esigning: yes · yes [S2]
- Employment contract templates: 4 · Casual · Fixed Junior / Mid-Level · Indefinite Junior / Mid-Level · Indefinite Senior [S3]
- Encryption: AES-256 · TLS 1.2 [S2]
- Full platform edition: full platform · automated contract workflows · collaboration, negotiation, and AI-assisted review · automated approval routing and native eSigning [S7]
- HR templates: 2 · HR & Employment · Consultancy Agreement · Consultancy Agreement - Simple [S3]
- Implementation support: dedicated implementation support [S7]
- Integrations email calendar messaging: Pocketlaw · email · calendar · Slack · Teams [S8]
- Live dashboards: dashboards update live as contracts change [S7]
- Metadata customisable: yes [S10]
- Metadata fields: parties · contract dates · renewal and expiration dates · payment/fee/penalty conditions · legal jurisdiction · confidentiality clauses · termination clauses · duties & obligations · liability limitations · intellectual property rights · r… [S10]
- Metadata filtering export: filter/browse by metadata fields (counterparty, owner, value) [S7]
- Metadata tagging: AI-powered metadata tagging of contracts [S10]
- Metric hours saved: 470h · average hours saved per user per year [S4]
- Metric time to sign: 86% · decrease in time from draft to signed [S4]
- Multiple dashboards: multiple dashboards per team [S7]
- Natural language search: natural language search across archive [S7]
- Nda playbook demo: yes [S5]
- Nda templates: 3 · Mutual · Simple · Unilateral [S3]
- Ocr llm extraction: yes · yes · Accuracy >20% higher than traditional legal platforms [S9]
- Ocr support: yes · OCR for scanned documents [S7]
- Office locations: London, England EC3A 6DG · Stockholm, Wallingatan 2, 111 60 [S9]
- Overview tasks section: yes [S8]
- Penetration testing: full platform · yes · yes [S2]
- Plai backdating: PLAI · backdate contracts with new metadata [S10]
- Plai search: PLAI · universal search across contracts [S10]
- Plai verdict: PLAI returns a verdict, reasoning, and the right approver [S6]
- Playbooks: yes [S5]
- Primary backup: Escalates to backup automatically if primary doesn't act [S6]
- Prompt library: saved prompt library [S7]
- Redlining workflow: Review, edit, collaborate, redline and negotiate contracts with revision history in one place, enhanced with LLMs [S5]
- Reeval logged: Re-run assessments are logged showing which version was used [S6]
- Regulation tagging: tag contracts needing review against regulatory criteria within minutes [S10]
- Renewal filtering: filtering contracts by renewal dates or payment terms [S10]
- Renewal tracking: automated renewal, termination and payment obligation tracking [S7]
- Repository centralised: centralised repository for new and legacy contracts [S7]
- Repository only edition: repository only · AI extraction · search · tabular analysis · custom dashboards and reporting · obligation and renewal tracking · audit-ready [S7]
- Revision history: yes [S5]
- Role based access: yes · role-based access control [S7]
- Rto rpo: yes · yes [S2]
- Scale: hundreds to tens of thousands and more [S10]
- Self serve repository: Central repository of templates and playbooks enabling self-serve by business users [S4]
- Single approver: One named person must approve [S6]
- SSO: yes [S2]
- SSO SAML: yes · yes [S6]
- Tabular review: tabular review of multiple contracts simultaneously [S7]
- Tabular review CSV: tabular review results download as CSV [S7]
- Tabular review custom extraction: custom extraction fields in tabular review [S7]
- Tandc templates: 3 · B2B Goods and Service · B2B SaaS · B2B Services [S3]
- Task assignment: yes [S8]
- Task edit delete: yes · yes [S8]
- Task filtering: yes · yes [S8]
- Task workflow todo completed: To-do · Completed [S8]
- Tasks reminders: Product offers tasks and reminders functionality [S8]
- Teams supported: Legal · Sales · Finance · HR · Procurement [S6]
- Template categories: Most templates are categorised under Commercial Agreement · yes [S3]
- Template jurisdictions: United Kingdom · Sweden [S3]
- Template library available: yes [S3]
- Termination templates: Terminate a Contract · Termination Letter [S3]
- Testing coverage: 100 [S2]
- Two named approvers: Two specific named people must both approve [S6]
- Unlimited tasks: yes · yes · yes [S8]
- Word add in: yes [S5]

**Support**
- Developer docs: yes [S12]
- Developer documentation: Developer documentation offered [S4]
- Docs footer: developer documentation · yes [S10]

## Questions

### Is Pocketlaw European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Pocketlaw is based.

### Where does Pocketlaw store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

### Does Pocketlaw have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to Pocketlaw?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [Tomorro (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/tomorro), [Precisely (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) and [fynk (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/fynk) highest among the other 19 Contract Management (CLM) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [Precisely](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/precisely) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Pocketlaw alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/pocketlaw/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (pocketlaw.com, miramis.co/security-compliance, miramis.co/template-library, miramis.co/product-templates-playbooks, miramis.co/contract-redlining-software, miramis.co/contract-approval-software and 6 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page.
- 51 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 7 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 7 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 6 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 6 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://pocketlaw.com (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S2] Security / trust page — found from the homepage: https://miramis.co/security-compliance (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S3] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/template-library (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S4] Drafting, templates & clause library — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/product-templates-playbooks (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S5] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/contract-redlining-software (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S6] Negotiation, redlining & approval — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/contract-approval-software (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S7] Repository, deadlines & obligations — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/contract-repository (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S8] Repository, deadlines & obligations — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/content-hub/keep-calm-with-tasks-reminders (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S9] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/contract-analysis-software (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S10] AI extraction & review transparency — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/content-hub/ai-metadata-labelling-for-simplified-contract-management (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S11] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/electronic-signature-software (checked 2026-10-20)
- [S12] Integrations, signature & exit — found from sitemap: https://miramis.co/integrations (checked 2026-10-20)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Pocketlaw — Contract Management (CLM)", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/contract-management/pocketlaw

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/869?target=page