# eID Easy — E-Signature eID Easy by eID Easy OÜ holds a panel rating of 3/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-11-03. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined. - Vendor: eID Easy OÜ (https://eideasy.com) - Category: [E-Signature](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature.md) - Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown - Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/eid-easy - Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/eid-easy/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/eid-easy/alternatives.md)) - Data as of: 2026-11-04 · evaluated 2026-11-03 · oldest source captured 2026-11-03 **AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology ## At a glance - Vendor: eID Easy OÜ - Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026 - Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026 - Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026 ## The panel's verdict eID Easy presents itself as an integration hub rather than a sender's document tool: one API and one contract reach Qualified (QES) and Advanced (AdES) eSignatures, eSealing, timestamping and validation through more than 80 qualified trust service providers, with 80+ methods covering 160+ countries and territories. Its strongest scores come on evidence and retention at 7-8, crediting qualified timestamps under eIDAS, archival signatures timestamped by different providers so one compromise cannot invalidate a document, and an automated validation API checking certificates against official EU Trusted Lists. Signature levels follow at 6-7 with the legal effect of both levels spelled out. The weakness is signing workflow at 3-4: the captured pages document the signer-side flow, with no public information on templates, signing order or reminders. Integration and API spans 4-6 — higher where judges valued the full API reference, lower where they wanted connectors into business applications. Sovereignty scores 5-6: an Estonian contracting entity, privacy policy stating EU/EEA processing, and we found no public information naming subprocessors or data centres. The commercial signals are a free demo and a 15-minute expert call. **Speaks for it:** - Evidence and retention scores 7-8 on qualified eIDAS timestamps, archival signatures timestamped by different providers, and an automated validation API checked against official EU Trusted Lists. - Signature levels scores 6-7, with QES legally equivalent to a handwritten signature across all EU member states and AdES unable to be denied legal effect under eIDAS. - One API and one contract reach QES, AdES, eSealing, timestamping and validation through 80+ providers with automatic failover. - Retention is stated concretely — signed files deleted after 7 days or sooner on API call, unsigned files after 14, logs after 90, with optional encrypted storage of signed containers. - The contracting entity is EID Easy OÜ of Tallinn, and the privacy policy states all information is stored and processed within the EU/EEA with no transfers to third countries. **Held against it:** - Signing workflow scores 3-4: we found no public information on templates, field placement, signing order, reminders or a sender's status overview. - We found no public information on connectors to Microsoft 365, CRM, HR or document-management systems — the documented integrations are the trust-service and identity providers themselves. - We found no public information naming an individual trust service provider with its EU Trust List entry, an identification provider, or retention rules for identification data itself. - We found no public information on webhooks, a sandbox, SDKs or published rate limits. - We found no public prices — the commercial signals on the captured pages are a free demo and a 15-minute expert call. **Best for:** - You are a development team embedding QES, AdES, seals, timestamps and validation into your own portal through one documented API under a single contract. - You need long-term evidence for disputes — qualified timestamps, archival signatures from different providers, and a machine-readable validation record checked against official EU Trusted Lists. - Your signers span many countries and you want 80+ eSignature and eID methods covering 160+ countries and territories. - You want an EU-based contracting entity — EID Easy OÜ of Tallinn — whose privacy policy states storage and processing within the EU/EEA with no transfers to third countries. **Avoid if:** - You need a sender-side document tool out of the box — templates, signing order, reminders, a status overview — rather than building the workflow around the API yourself. - You expect to send documents for signature from inside Microsoft 365, your CRM or your HR system without building the integration yourself. - You need public price information to budget before a sales conversation — the captured pages show only a free demo and a 15-minute expert call. ## Scores by judge and criterion Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v2). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price, or the judge found no public information on that criterion. | Criterion | The Legal Counsel | The HR Operations Lead | The Revenue Operations Lead | The Integration Engineer | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | eIDAS levels & trust services | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | | Signer identification | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | | Signing workflow & signer experience | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | | Evidence, validation & retention | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | | Integrations & API | 3/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | | European sovereignty | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | | Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | | **Weighted verdict** | **3/5** | **3/5** | **2.5/5** | **3/5** | **3/5** | **3/5** | ### The judges - **The Legal Counsel** (v1.0): Decides which contracts may be signed electronically and at which level. Wants SES, AdES and QES named per plan and country, the qualified trust service provider linked to the EU Trust List, and an audit trail with timestamps that still validates when the contract is disputed in eight years. - **The HR Operations Lead** (v1.0): Sends two hundred employment contracts a year, many of them fixed-term and so under written form. Wants QES that a new hire can complete on a phone in ten minutes, identification that accepts the IDs applicants actually hold, bulk sending from templates, and a price per qualified signature known before the contract is signed. - **The Revenue Operations Lead** (v1.0): Measures how long a quote takes to come back signed and where it stalls. Wants signing from inside the CRM, templates sales cannot break, reminders and signing order that run themselves, and a signer experience that needs no account, no app and no explanation. - **The Integration Engineer** (v1.0): Embeds signing into the company's own portal and archives the result in the DMS. Wants a versioned API with webhooks and a sandbox, every signature level reachable through the API rather than only in the web app, and signed documents exported with their evidence intact. - **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Knows every signer who holds an ID card up to a camera hands biometric and identity data to a provider they never chose. Asks who performs the identification, where documents and ID data are stored, how long the audit trail keeps IP addresses, and who the subprocessors in the trust service chain are. - **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Knows "legally binding" usually means a simple signature. Reads for the level the default plan actually signs at, the QTSP the provider does not operate itself, the per-QES and ident fees on top of the plan, the envelope limit, and "eIDAS-compliant" from a provider that names no trust service at all. ## European sovereignty — proven facts Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined. | Dimension | Finding | Points | Source | |---|---|---|---| | Legal entity | Not determined | — | — | | Hosting location | Not determined | — | — | | Hosting options | Not determined | — | — | | Open source | Not determined | — | — | | Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | — | | Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | — | ## Key facts Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources). **Compliance** - Apac acceptance: Asia-Pacific · yes [S4] - Eidas: eIDAS · high [S7] - Eidas recognition: Europe · yes · yes [S4] - Encryption at rest: yes [S3] - GDPR: yes [S7] - ISO 27001: yes · yes [S1] - ISO 27001 data centers: yes [S3] - ISO 27001: yes · yes [S10] - Latam acceptance: Latin America · yes [S4] - No automated decisions: no [S3] - Processor role: data processor for data controllers [S3] - Sca: Strong Customer Authentication [S7] - Security audit: yes [S3] - Signed container storage: yes · yes [S3] - Supervisory authority: Tatari 39, 10134 Tallinn, Estonia · Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate [S3] - Tls encryption: 256-bit [S3] **Data** - Access copy: yes [S3] - Account deletion: 30 [S3] - App log retention: 90 [S3] - Portability: yes [S3] - Signed file retention: 7 · yes [S3] - Unsigned file retention: 14 [S3] **Hosting** - Residency: yes [S3] - Third country transfer: no [S3] **Integrations** - API reference: yes [S1] - Developer resources: Documentation · Supported Methods · Guide · Full API reference · Status [S4] - Google analytics: yes [S3] - Hubspot: yes [S3] - One API: Europe · LATAM · APAC · yes [S4] - Provider directory pages: 6 [S10] - Qtsp count: 80 · > [S10] - Sample API request: API accepts files with content, fileName, mimeType, container_type and signature_redirect, authenticated via client_id and secret [S1] - Single contract API: yes [S8] - Tsp partnering: yes [S10] **Legal** - Address: Tallinn · A. Lauteri tn 3 · Estonia · 10114 [S2] - Court jurisdiction: Harju County Court [S3] - Disclosure last updated: May 2025 [S2] - DPA: yes [S3] - Effective date: July 2024 [S3] - Entity: EE102310148 · EE367700771002083464 · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · EID Easy OÜ · 14080014 [S1] - Entity: eID Easy OÜ · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn 10114, Estonia · 14080014 [S3] - Entity: EE102310148 · EE367700771002083464 · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · EID Easy OÜ · 14080014 [S5] - Entity: EE102310148 · EE367700771002083464 · EID Easy OÜ · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · 14080014 [S4] - Entity: EE102310148 · EID Easy OÜ · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · 14080014 [S6] - Entity: EE102310148 · EE367700771002083464 · EID Easy OÜ · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · 14080014 [S7] - Entity: EE102310148 · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · EID Easy OÜ · 14080014 [S8] - Entity: EID Easy OÜ · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn 10114, Estonia · 14080014 [S10] - Entity details: EE102310148 · A. Lauteri tn 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia · EID Easy OÜ · 14080014 [S9] - Entity name: EID Easy OÜ [S2] - Governing law: Republic of Estonia [S3] - Iban: EE367700771002083464 [S2] - Iban: EE367700771002083464 [S6] - Iban: EE367700771002083464 [S8] - Iban: EE367700771002083464 [S9] - Iban: EE367700771002083464 [S10] - Policy amendment notice: 30 [S3] - Registry number: 14080014 [S2] - VAT: EE102310148 [S10] - VAT number: EE102310148 [S3] - VAT number: EE102310148 [S2] **Pricing** - Demo available: yes [S1] **Product** - Ades definition: AdES is a digital signature providing identity verification, data integrity, and legal standing [S4] - Ades not qes: no [S4] - Archival signature multi timestamp: yes [S8] - Authentication method: 1FA (PIN or biometric) · no [S4] - Batch signing: yes [S1] - Bundle or standalone: yes · yes [S8] - Coverage expansion: yes [S7] - Developer resources: Documentation · Supported Methods · Guide · Full API reference · Status [S2] - Disclosure auth in scope: Broken authentication and broken access control vulnerabilities (incorrect implementation of authentication, session management, access control) [S2] - Disclosure confidentiality commitment: yes [S2] - Disclosure confidentiality rule: yes [S2] - Disclosure coordinated publication: yes [S2] - Disclosure excluded attacks: physical security · social engineering · DDoS · spam · third-party applications [S2] - Disclosure in scope: Injection and deserialization vulnerabilities (SQL injection, command injection, object deserialization) [S2] - Disclosure no bounty: no · no [S2] - Disclosure no legal action: yes [S2] - Disclosure out of scope: Missing SPF or DMARC fields · weak TLS configurations · non-compliance with best practices · output of well-known automated tools [S2] - Disclosure reproduction required: yes [S2] - Disclosure rules: yes [S2] - Disclosure web vulns in scope: Cross-site scripting · Cross-site request forgeries · XML external entities · Server-side request forgeries · Redirect vulnerabilities · Underprotected API [S2] - Disclosure zero day in scope: yes [S2] - Eid based verification: no [S7] - Eid infrastructure: Integrates public and private ID providers for onboarding, KYC and authentication [S1] - Eidas compliance: eIDAS-aligned identity methods [S6] - Esealing: Document eSealing for high-volume, tamper-proof sealing [S1] - Esignature eid flow: eID authentication combined with eSignatures and eSeals [S6] - Esignatures: Supports Qualified (QES) and Advanced (AdES) eSignatures [S1] - Eudiw 2027 page teaser: Is Your Organisation Expected to Support the EU Digital Identity Wallet (EUDIW) in 2027? [S2] - Eudiw hub channel: EUDIW is one channel within the eID Easy Hub alongside national eIDs and bank-based identity methods [S1] - Eudiw readiness: supports national and bank eIDs today, EUDIW prepared as they launch [S6] - Eudiw support: Platform offers eSignature, eID and eSealing via one API, with readiness for upcoming EU Digital Identity Wallets [S1] - Eudiw timeline: EUDIW expected in 2027 [S7] - External provider signatures: yes [S9] - Feature modules: Advanced Electronic Signatures · Qualified Electronic Signatures · Batch Signing · One-Shot Signature · Hash Signatures · Timestamping · Signature Extension · Signature Validation [S5] - Features list: Advanced Electronic Signatures · Qualified Electronic Signatures · Batch Signing · One-Shot Signature · Hash Signatures · Timestamping · Signature Extension · Signature Validation [S10] - Free demo: free demo, no setup required [S6] - Free demo: yes [S7] - Free demo: yes [S10] - GDPR data residency: identity data processed in line with GDPR principles [S6] - Hash algorithm: SHA-256 [S8] - Hash signatures: yes [S1] - Identity verification API: One API integration for onboarding and KYC across industries [S6] - Industries: Financial services and fintech · Identity and verification platforms · Telecom · Gaming and gambling · Crypto and Web3 · Other regulated industries [S6] - Industries: legal_public_sector · banking_finance · telecom_utilities · healthcare_insurance [S9] - Long term verifiability: yes [S9] - Machine readable record: yes [S9] - Managed services: certificate management · local laws · signature validation [S4] - Method coverage: 160 · 80 [S1] - Monitoring own assets: yes [S2] - Multi provider failover: yes [S8] - National profiles: yes [S9] - No document uploads: No document uploads, faster onboarding [S6] - One API one contract: single API, single contract, multi-provider [S9] - Platform modules: eSignatures · eID Authentication · EUDIW · eSealing · Provider Integrations [S2] - Platform modules: eSignatures · eID Authentication · EUDIW · eSealing · Provider Integrations [S5] - Platform modules: eSignatures · eID Authentication · EUDIW · eSealing · Provider Integrations [S4] - Platform modules: eSignatures · eID Authentication · EUDIW · eSealing [S7] - Provider coverage: wide range of national eID and bank-based identity providers [S6] - Psd2 sca: PSD2 Strong Customer Authentication compliance via multi-factor authentication [S6] - Qes 2FA: yes [S5] - Qes definition: QES is highest EU signature standard, created with QSCD and backed by Qualified Certificate from QTSP [S5] - Qes legal equivalence: yes · yes [S5] - Qes use cases: Cross-border agreements, healthcare/insurance, legal contracts, government applications, banking/loans/wealth management, real estate and notarial acts [S5] - Qes workflow: identity_verification · certificate_issuance · signature_creation · evidence_and_locking [S5] - Qtsp integration count: yes · 80 [S5] - Qualified timestamp qtsp: QTSP · eIDAS or equivalent · yes [S8] - Rating: 4.9/5 [S6] - Rating: 4.9/5 [S7] - Regional coverage: Europe · LATAM · APAC · identity_verification · certificate_issuance · compliance [S5] - Reusable identity: yes [S7] - Sales call: 15 [S7] - Security disclosure policy: yes [S2] - Signature features: Advanced Electronic Signatures · Qualified Electronic Signatures · Batch Signing · One-Shot Signature · Hash Signatures · Timestamping · Signature Extension · Signature Validation [S2] - Signature features: Advanced Electronic Signatures · Qualified Electronic Signatures · Batch Signing · One-Shot Signature · Hash Signatures · Timestamping · Signature Extension · Signature Validation [S4] - Signature features: Advanced Electronic Signatures · Qualified Electronic Signatures · Batch Signing · One-Shot Signature · Hash Signatures · Timestamping · Signature Extension · Signature Validation [S7] - Signature validation: yes [S1] - Signing steps: Identity Verification (1FA) · Signature Creation · Document Locking [S4] - Single API: yes [S1] - Single API: Single API to integrate trusted eIDs, extending workflows to EUDI Wallets [S7] - Standalone timestamping use cases: server logs · financial records archiving · blockchain anchoring · long-term evidentiary value [S8] - Supported formats: PDF signatures · ASiC-E · CAdES · XAdES · server logs · blockchain entries [S8] - Tamper detection: yes · yes [S4] - Target segments: Service Providers · Technology Partners · Platform Solutions [S1] - Target segments: KYC/IDV platforms, fraud & risk providers, compliance/regtech, TSPs, digital onboarding, identity infrastructure providers [S7] **Support** - Call booking: 15 [S6] - Developer docs: yes [S10] - Docs: yes [S6] - Docs: yes [S7] - Security report email: security@eideasy.com [S2] 12 more facts on the canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/eid-easy ## Questions ### Is eID Easy European? Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where eID Easy is based. ### Where does eID Easy store data? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026. ### Does eID Easy have a free plan? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026. ### What are the best alternatives to eID Easy? As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates [sproof sign (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/sproof-sign), [MOXIS (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/moxis) and [Signicat Sign (3/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/signicat-sign) highest among the other 22 E-Signature products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [sproof sign](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/sproof-sign) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [eID Easy alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/eid-easy/alternatives). ## What this page leaves out - 6 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 4 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. ## Sources - [S1] Vendor page: https://eideasy.com (checked 2026-11-03) - [S2] Legal notice — found from the homepage: https://www.eideasy.com/legal/responsible-disclosure (checked 2026-11-03) - [S3] Privacy policy — found from the homepage: https://www.eideasy.com/legal/privacy-policy (checked 2026-11-03) - [S4] EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/features/advanced-electronic-signatures (checked 2026-11-03) - [S5] EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/features/qualified-electronic-signatures (checked 2026-11-03) - [S6] Signer identification — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/solutions/identity-verification (checked 2026-11-03) - [S7] Signer identification — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/use-cases/identity-verification-platforms (checked 2026-11-03) - [S8] Evidence, validation & retention — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/features/timestamping (checked 2026-11-03) - [S9] Evidence, validation & retention — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/features/signature-validation (checked 2026-11-03) - [S10] Integrations & API — found from sitemap: https://www.eideasy.com/provider-integrations (checked 2026-11-03) --- Cite as: whats-best.ai, "eID Easy — E-Signature", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-11-04. https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/eid-easy Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/1413?target=page