# Avilius — Information Security

Avilius by Avilius GmbH holds a panel rating of 0/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 3/5), as of 2026-10-21. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: Avilius GmbH (https://avilius.de)
- Category: [Information Security](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/avilius
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/avilius/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/avilius/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-21 · oldest source captured 2026-10-20

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: Avilius GmbH
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026

## The panel's verdict

Avilius reaches this bench listed in the information-security category, but the captured pages present a care and everyday-assistance service in the Rhein-Kreis Neuss, founded in 2010 — and the scores follow that mismatch: information security management, controls and statement of applicability, framework coverage, audit readiness, and integrations and automation all score 0. The strongest area is sovereignty, where scores range from 1 to 2; the spread turns on how much credit the German entity and the Kaarst and Bielefeld locations earn, and at both ends of that range we found no public information on hosting, a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list. On connections, the only item on record is a "Mit Facebook verbinden" button beside a contact form, with no public information on an API or connectors to a live estate. On cost, the only public information is a free on-site consultation and a note that health-insurance coverage will be clarified.

**Speaks for it:**
- A German entity is on record, founded in 2010 in the Rhein-Kreis Neuss with locations in Kaarst and Bielefeld
- A free on-site consultation is offered, per the captured pages
- The company states it clarifies which costs the health insurance covers
- A privacy policy is referenced for the contact form

**Held against it:**
- The captured pages present a care and everyday-assistance service rather than information-security software
- We found no public information on asset inventory, risk methodology, treatment tracking or incident handling
- We found no public information on control catalogs, a statement of applicability or internal audit support
- No compliance regime — ISO 27001, NIS2, TISAX, DORA, BSI IT-Grundschutz or SOC 2 — appears in the captured material
- The only connection on record is a 'Mit Facebook verbinden' button, with no public information on an API, directory import, ticketing, CMDB or scanner connectors

**Best for:**
- You are looking for care and everyday-assistance services in the Rhein-Kreis Neuss — the market the captured pages actually address
- You want to start with a free on-site consultation before any commitment
- You want clarity on what your health insurance will cover before you engage

**Avoid if:**
- You are buying an ISMS or GRC platform — the captured pages present caregiving services, a contact form and appointments by arrangement instead
- You must evidence a regime such as ISO 27001, NIS2, TISAX, DORA, BSI IT-Grundschutz or SOC 2 — the pages show health-insurance cost clarification and free on-site consultation instead of any compliance regime
- You need connections to your live IT estate — the only connection shown is a 'Mit Facebook verbinden' button beside a contact form
- You require disclosed hosting, a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list — the published addresses belong to care-service offices and we found no public information on hosting

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price.

| Criterion | The CISO | The GRC Consultant | The Drafted IT Officer | The Lead Auditor | The Evidence Integrator | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asset & risk management depth | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Controls, SoA & measures | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Framework & standard coverage | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Audit readiness & evidence | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| Integrations & automation | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 |
| European sovereignty | 1/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **0/5** | **0/5** | **0/5** | **0/5** | **0/5** | **0/5** |

### The judges

- **The CISO** (v1.0): Owns the ISO 27001 certificate and the NIS2 exposure of a 400-employee company. Optimizes for a real risk backbone: methodology, inheritance, incident clocks, a statement of applicability that is never stale. Rejects checklist theater and risk registers that cannot answer who accepted what.
- **The GRC Consultant** (v1.0): Builds and runs ISMSs for a dozen clients at once. Optimizes for reusable control catalogs, multi-framework mapping that answers a control once, and templates that make client twelve cheaper than client one. Rejects single-tenant tools and frameworks bolted on as checklists.
- **The Drafted IT Officer** (v1.1): SME IT admin who became the information security officer by an email from management. Optimizes for guided setup, sane defaults, plain-language controls and a tool that runs alongside the day job. Rejects platforms that assume a security team and a consultant on retainer.
- **The Lead Auditor** (v1.0): Certifies ISMSs for a living and has seen every folder of screenshots. Optimizes for revision-safe history, an SoA generated from live control status, and a defensible answer to "show me the state on date X". Rejects audit trails assembled the week before the audit.
- **The Evidence Integrator** (v1.0): Believes evidence that is typed is evidence that is stale. Optimizes for connectors to the live estate — directory, CMDB, ticketing, cloud — continuous control checks, and an API with parity to the UI. Rejects data islands with a CSV drawbridge.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.1): Hunts "100% audit success" claims, framework logos that link nowhere, "coming soon" integrations sold as shipped, consulting bundled as software, and customer counts that disagree between pages. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

No sovereignty finding yet.

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- Privacy policy: yes [S1]

**Hosting**
- Locations: avilius Lebenshilfe · Rottes 32, 41564 Kaarst [S1]
- Second location: avilius Seniorendienst · Voltmannstr. 277, 33613 Bielefeld [S1]

**Integrations**
- Facebook: yes [S1]

**Legal**
- Founding year: 2010 · Rhein-Kreis-Neuss · Guido Prass [S1]

**Product**
- Consultation: 0 · yes · yes [S1]
- Cost clarification: Klärt, welche Kosten von der Krankenkasse übernommen werden [S1]
- Services: Betreuungsdienst und Alltagshelfer im Rhein-Kreis Neuss [S1]

**Support**
- Appointment only: yes [S1]

## Questions

### Is Avilius European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Avilius is based.

### Where does Avilius store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

### Does Avilius have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to Avilius?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [6clicks (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/6clicks), [preeco | informationssicherheit (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit) and [Secfix (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/secfix) highest among the other 26 Information Security products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [preeco | informationssicherheit](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Avilius alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/avilius/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (avilius.de). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://avilius.de (checked 2026-10-20)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Avilius — Information Security", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/avilius

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/918?target=page