# Centraleyes — Information Security Centraleyes by Centraleyes Inc. holds a panel rating of 2.5/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 3/5), as of 2026-10-16. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined. - Vendor: Centraleyes Inc. (https://www.centraleyes.com) - Category: [Information Security](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security.md) - Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown - Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/centraleyes - Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/centraleyes/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/centraleyes/alternatives.md)) - Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-16 · oldest source captured 2026-10-13 **AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology ## At a glance - Vendor: Centraleyes Inc. - Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 - Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 - Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026 ## The panel's verdict Centraleyes is an AI-powered risk and compliance platform built around four modules — 1st Party, 3rd Party, Boardview and an AI Risk Register. Its strongest showing is framework coverage at 7-8, on dedicated TISAX content with assessment levels and control domains, Smart Mapping across NIS2, NIST CSF and the ISO editions, and current ISO 27001:2022 support; the captured pages nonetheless give different figures for the library itself, from more than fifty pre-loaded to over 180+ frameworks. Integrations and automation scored 6-7 on bidirectional Jira and ServiceNow integration and API-driven evidence collection. Information security management sits at 4: risk identification, scoring, treatment planning and monitoring are described, but we found no public information on asset inventory or incident workflows with statutory reporting clocks. Audit readiness spans 4-6, the bench's widest range — the lead auditor scored it 4 for want of revision-safe change history and point-in-time reconstruction. Sovereignty runs 0-1, with no public information on legal entity jurisdiction, ownership, data residency or subprocessor exposure. The only pricing signal anywhere is the 'Start Getting Value With Centraleyes for Free' claim. **Speaks for it:** - Framework coverage scored 7-8, with dedicated TISAX content down to assessment levels and control domains - Controls, requirements and evidence are mapped once and applied across frameworks, including NIS2, NIST CSF and ISO 27001 - Bidirectional Jira and ServiceNow integration pushes tasks out and pulls updates back - Evidence is collected automatically via APIs and stored under custom roles and permissions - Remediation tasks are assigned to people with severity-tagged workflows and progress tracking and reminders **Held against it:** - Sovereignty scored 0-1, with no public information on legal entity jurisdiction, ownership, data residency or subprocessor exposure - Information security management scored 4, with no public information on asset inventory, protection-needs inheritance or incident workflows with statutory reporting clocks - The Statement of Applicability appears only as an educational step-by-step guide and policy templates rather than generation from live control status - The captured pages give different figures for the framework library: over 180+, over a hundred pre-populated, more than fifty pre-loaded - We found no public information on revision-safe change history, point-in-time reconstruction or a dedicated auditor access role **Best for:** - You need one control answered once across frameworks such as ISO 27001, NIS2 and NIST CSF instead of re-assembling evidence per audit - You are preparing for TISAX and need assessment levels and control domains supported in-platform - Your team already runs Jira or ServiceNow and wants remediation tasks to flow out to them and updates to flow back - You need centralized, API-collected evidence stored under custom roles and permissions with consolidated audit-trail reporting **Avoid if:** - You must be able to document where your risk register will be hosted, under whose law, and which subprocessors touch it before purchase — sovereignty scored 0-1 on the bench - Your audits depend on revision-safe change history and reconstruction of the state on a past date — audit readiness spread 4-6 over exactly this gap - You need an ISMS core beyond risk management, such as asset inventory or incident workflows with statutory reporting clocks - You expect to generate a Statement of Applicability from live control status rather than assemble it from a guide and templates ## Scores by judge and criterion Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price. | Criterion | The CISO | The GRC Consultant | The Drafted IT Officer | The Lead Auditor | The Evidence Integrator | The Skeptic | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Asset & risk management depth | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | | Controls, SoA & measures | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | | Framework & standard coverage | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | | Audit readiness & evidence | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | | Integrations & automation | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | | European sovereignty | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | | Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | | **Weighted verdict** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **3/5** | **2/5** | ### The judges - **The CISO** (v1.0): Owns the ISO 27001 certificate and the NIS2 exposure of a 400-employee company. Optimizes for a real risk backbone: methodology, inheritance, incident clocks, a statement of applicability that is never stale. Rejects checklist theater and risk registers that cannot answer who accepted what. - **The GRC Consultant** (v1.0): Builds and runs ISMSs for a dozen clients at once. Optimizes for reusable control catalogs, multi-framework mapping that answers a control once, and templates that make client twelve cheaper than client one. Rejects single-tenant tools and frameworks bolted on as checklists. - **The Drafted IT Officer** (v1.1): SME IT admin who became the information security officer by an email from management. Optimizes for guided setup, sane defaults, plain-language controls and a tool that runs alongside the day job. Rejects platforms that assume a security team and a consultant on retainer. - **The Lead Auditor** (v1.0): Certifies ISMSs for a living and has seen every folder of screenshots. Optimizes for revision-safe history, an SoA generated from live control status, and a defensible answer to "show me the state on date X". Rejects audit trails assembled the week before the audit. - **The Evidence Integrator** (v1.0): Believes evidence that is typed is evidence that is stale. Optimizes for connectors to the live estate — directory, CMDB, ticketing, cloud — continuous control checks, and an API with parity to the UI. Rejects data islands with a CSV drawbridge. - **The Skeptic** (v1.1): Hunts "100% audit success" claims, framework logos that link nowhere, "coming soon" integrations sold as shipped, consulting bundled as software, and customer counts that disagree between pages. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest. ## European sovereignty — proven facts Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined. | Dimension | Finding | Points | Source | |---|---|---|---| | Legal entity | Not determined | — | — | | Ownership | Not determined | — | — | | Data residency | Not determined | — | — | | Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — | ## Key facts Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources). **Compliance** - Frameworks supported: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S10] - ISO 27001 2022 control count: 93 [S5] - ISO 27001 2022 transition deadline: 2025-10-31 [S5] - Standards supported: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S10] **Integrations** - API platforms: yes [S8] - API vendors: AWS · GitHub · Google Cloud [S9] - Itsm systems: JIRA · ServiceNow · bidirectional [S10] **Legal** - Additional address: 500 7th Avenue, New York, NY 10018 [S11] - Company name: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S10] - Company name: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S5] - Copyright entity: 2026 · Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S3] - Copyright entity: 2026 · Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S6] - Copyright entity: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S8] - Entity: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S2] - Entity: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S4] - Entity: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S7] - Entity: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S9] - Entity: Centraleyes Tech Ltd [S11] - Headquarters: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ; 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S2] - Headquarters: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S4] - Headquarters: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S8] - Headquarters: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S9] - Headquarters: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S10] - Headquarters: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S5] - Hq address: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S3] - Hq address: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ · 500 7th Avenue New York, NY 10018 [S6] - Hq address: Hoboken, NJ and New York, NY offices [S7] - Hq address: 2 Hudson Place, 4th Floor, Hoboken, NJ [S11] **Product** - AI analysis: yes [S8] - AI evidence collection: yes [S8] - AI platform: AI-powered platform for internal risk and compliance [S2] - AI remediation planner: AI-powered remediation planner for vendor gap mitigation [S10] - AI risk register: AI maintains a living internal risk register and automates remediation/compliance tasks [S2] - AI risk register: yes [S7] - Assessments frameworks: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S5] - Audit ready evidence: Supports audit-ready evidence and formal compliance deliverables [S2] - Audit trails: consolidated reports with complete audit trails [S7] - Auto answer questionnaires: Auto-answers questionnaires, monitors regulatory change, acts on risk [S1] - Automated assessments: yes · yes · yes [S6] - Automated remediation: automated remediation: task assignment, progress tracking, reminders [S7] - Automated testing: yes [S8] - Boardview: Cyber risk executive reporting focused on business impact [S1] - Brochure: Free brochure download available [S2] - Competitor comparisons: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S3] - Competitor comparisons: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S8] - Competitors compared: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S2] - Competitors compared: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S4] - Competitors compared: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S7] - Competitors compared: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S10] - Competitors compared: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S5] - Components: streamlined data collection, automated scoring and tiering, smart mapping, intuitive dashboard, visualization and reporting, single-click vendor deployment, guided vulnerability remediation [S10] - Content libraries: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S9] - Continuous monitoring: continuous control tracking and testing [S7] - Continuous monitoring: continuous monitoring: vulnerability scanning, framework change notifications, real-time risk remediation guidance [S10] - Control mapping: Maps shared controls across frameworks for automated compliance [S1] - Cross standard leverage: ISO 27001 · ISO 27701 · GDPR · NIS2 [S6] - Crosswalking automation: Centraleyes automates crosswalking of controls across frameworks [S7] - Custom frameworks: yes · over a hundred [S1] - Dashboards: Reports and dashboards built and updated automatically in real time [S2] - Dashboards: yes [S8] - Dashboards reporting: real-time dashboards · compliance scoring · automated workflows · executive reporting [S6] - Demo available: yes [S9] - Deployment: yes · yes · less than a day [S10] - Evidence automation APIs: automated evidence collection via APIs [S9] - Evidence management: yes [S6] - First party: Internal risk & compliance with automated workflows, questionnaires, smart data feeds [S1] - Framework count: 180 [S1] - Framework crosswalk mapping: smart mapping/crosswalk of controls across frameworks [S9] - Framework libraries: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S11] - Framework library: Extensive framework library including ISO 27001 [S5] - Framework mapping: Controls, requirements and evidence mapped once and applied across frameworks [S2] - Framework updates alerts: alerts to framework changes and updates in real-time [S7] - Frameworks: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S8] - Frameworks count: 50 [S10] - Frameworks covered: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S6] - Frameworks plus: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S4] - Frameworks supported: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S3] - Free tier claim: Free entry to the platform is offered ("Start Getting Value With Centraleyes for Free") [S5] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail · Life Science [S1] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S2] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S3] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S4] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S7] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S8] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S11] - Industries: Financial · Insurance · Higher Education · Energy · Retail [S10] - ISMS policy templates: ready-made ISMS policy templates [S4] - ISO 27001 2022 support: ISO 27001:2022 · ISO 27002:2022 · yes [S5] - ISO 27001 platform integration: ISO 27001 is integrated into the Centraleyes platform [S5] - ISO 27001 questionnaire: yes [S4] - ISO editions available: 2022 · ISO 27001 · ISO 27002 [S4] - Modules: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S2] - Modules footer: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S7] - Modules platform: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S9] - Onboarding time: Onboarding in days [S1] - Partner program: yes [S1] - Partners program: Become a Partner, Find a Partner, Partner Login [S3] - Platform modules: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S3] - Platform modules: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S4] - Platform modules: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S8] - Platform modules: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S11] - Platform modules: 1st Party · 3rd Party · Boardview · AI Risk Register [S5] - Questionnaires: pre-loaded smart questionnaires, automated workflows [S2] - Real time alerts: real-time alerts on compliance drift [S7] - Real time dashboards: Reports and dashboards built and updated automatically in real time [S1] - Release: New Centraleyes 4th Generation Release Officially Goes Live [S11] - Risk management: risk identification · risk scoring · treatment planning · monitoring [S6] - Risk score domains: risk score breakdown by domains: technology, physical security, administrative, etc. [S10] - Secure evidence storage roles: secure evidence storage with custom roles and permissions [S9] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S2] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S3] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S4] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S7] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S8] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S9] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S11] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S10] - Services: GRC as a Service · Regulatory Watch [S5] - Single assessment multiple frameworks: single standardized assessment across multiple frameworks [S7] - Smart mapping: yes · NIS2 · NIST CSF · ISO 27001 · ISO 27002 [S4] - Soa guide: Educational guide on developing an ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability (SoA) [S4] - Standards: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S8] - Standards: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S9] - Standards: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S11] - Standards covered: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S6] - Standards frameworks: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S2] - Standards supported: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S2] - Standards supported: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S3] - Standards supported: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S4] - Standards supported: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S5] - Supported frameworks: SOC 1 · SOC 2 · ISO 27001 · PCI DSS · CMMC [S7] - Supported standards: NIST · NIST 800-53 · ISO 27001 · CMMC · PCI [S7] - Third party: Third-party risk management: assess, categorize & prioritize vendors in one dashboard [S1] - Third party risk: yes [S6] - Ticketing system: proprietary ticketing system with severity tagging and workflows: remediate, accept, assign, ignore [S10] - Time saving claim: 90 [S1] **Support** - Channel: yes [S3] - Competitors compared: AuditBoard · Archer · LogicGate · MetricStream · OneTrust · ServiceNow · Vanta [S6] 16 more facts on the canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/centraleyes ## Questions ### Is Centraleyes European? Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Centraleyes is based. ### Where does Centraleyes store data? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026. ### Does Centraleyes have a free plan? Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026. ### What are the best alternatives to Centraleyes? As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [6clicks (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/6clicks), [preeco | informationssicherheit (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit) and [Secfix (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/secfix) highest among the other 26 Information Security products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [preeco | informationssicherheit](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Centraleyes alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/centraleyes/alternatives). ## What this page leaves out - We could not confirm any pricing information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind. - 5 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. - 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. ## Sources - [S1] Vendor page: https://www.centraleyes.com (checked 2026-10-13) - [S2] Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/1st-party-internal-risk/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S3] Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/integrated-risk-management/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S4] Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/develop-a-statement-of-applicability/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S5] Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/iso-27001-1/understanding-the-iso-27001-statement-of-applicability-in-cybersecurity/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S6] Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/tisax/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S7] Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/hmanage-multi-framework-compliance/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S8] Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/automated-compliance-evidence/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S9] Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/compliance-evidence-collection-for-security-assurance-best-practices/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S10] Integrations & automation — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/compliance-automation/ (checked 2026-10-13) - [S11] Integrations & automation — found from sitemap: https://www.centraleyes.com/media/new-features-include-smart-mapping-advanced-tenable-integration-and-more/ (checked 2026-10-13) --- Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Centraleyes — Information Security", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/centraleyes Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/717?target=page