# LogicGate Risk Cloud — Information Security

LogicGate Risk Cloud by LogicGate, Inc. holds a panel rating of 3/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 3/5), as of 2026-11-03. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: LogicGate, Inc. (https://www.logicgate.com)
- Category: [Information Security](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicgate-risk-cloud
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicgate-risk-cloud/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicgate-risk-cloud/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-11-04 · evaluated 2026-11-03 · oldest source captured 2026-11-03

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: LogicGate, Inc.
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026

## The panel's verdict

LogicGate Risk Cloud is an AI GRC platform with no-code configuration for governance, risk and compliance. Evidence scoring is strongest on integrations and automation at 7-8 and on framework coverage, where scores cluster at 7: a documented REST API v2 with webhooks and an automated evidence collection endpoint, 267 catalogued integrations including Jira, Workday, AWS Security Hub and CrowdStrike, and 33 catalogued frameworks with predefined crosswalks that update automatically as UCF authority documents change. Sovereignty is the weakness at 1-2: the contracting entity is LogicGate, Inc. at 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W, Chicago, IL 60654, and the captured pages state nothing about hosting location, data residency, subprocessors or a data processing agreement. On controls work the judges spread 5-7: higher scores credit the UCF common-controls mapping and automated testing, lower ones the absence of public information on a generated statement of applicability and measure delegation. Information security management scores sit at 5-6, with no public information found on a risk methodology or NIS2 24h/72h reporting deadlines. Pricing appears only via a Request Pricing call.

**Speaks for it:**
- A documented REST API v2 with webhooks, bulk record import, a Postman collection, an SFTP connector and an automated evidence collection endpoint that pushes evidence without granting access to internal systems
- 267 catalogued integrations including Jira, Workday, AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike and BitSight, with no-cost native Jira, Slack and Microsoft 365 integrations
- Thirty-three frameworks in the catalog with predefined crosswalks across SOC 2, ISO 27001-2 and NIST CSF, updating automatically as UCF authority documents change
- Automated control testing with evidence requirements per control and dashboards for control audit status, evidence testing results, open issues and corrective actions
- An A-LIGN partnership maps external audit evidence requirements into the product, alongside an exportable audit log API

**Held against it:**
- The contracting entity is a US company — LogicGate, Inc. at 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W, Chicago, IL 60654 — and the captured pages state nothing on hosting location, data residency, subprocessors or a data processing agreement, with sovereignty scored 1-2
- We found no public information on single sign-on or SCIM provisioning, which judges flagged ahead of a company-wide rollout
- We found no public information on a generated statement of applicability, on measure delegation and escalation, or on read-only auditor access and reproducing a record as it stood on a given date
- We found no public information on NIS2, TISAX, DORA or BSI IT-Grundschutz coverage, and the frameworks page notes that framework licences are not included with the platform
- The captured pages give different figures for framework support (over 25, over 30, and 33 listed in the catalog) and integration totals (200-plus on the homepage against 267 in the integrations directory), and one page still describes Spark AI control testing in future tense for January 2026

**Best for:**
- You run compliance against multiple frameworks such as SOC 2, ISO 27001-2 and NIST CSF and want predefined crosswalks with automatic framework updates as authority documents change
- Your risk and control evidence lives in systems like Jira, Workday, AWS Security Hub or CrowdStrike and you want it collected automatically through a documented API instead of manual exports
- You hold an active UCF account with API access and want common controls mapped onto internal controls to answer each control once
- You need an audit evidence pipeline — audit log export, automated evidence collection and A-LIGN-mapped audit requirements — feeding continuously updated executive reporting

**Avoid if:**
- You require a non-US contracting entity or documented data residency — the captured pages prove a Chicago, Illinois entity, state nothing on hosting, residency, subprocessors or a data processing agreement, and list OpenAI among named integrations without stating what data it processes
- Your certification audit will demand a generated statement of applicability with measure delegation and escalation — we found no public information on these
- You need NIS2, TISAX, DORA or BSI IT-Grundschutz among the supported frameworks — we found no public information on these regimes
- You require documented single sign-on with SCIM provisioning before rollout — we found no public information on it

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v2). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price, or the judge found no public information on that criterion.

| Criterion | The CISO | The GRC Consultant | The Drafted IT Officer | The Lead Auditor | The Evidence Integrator | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asset & risk management depth | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 |
| Controls, SoA & measures | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Framework & standard coverage | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Audit readiness & evidence | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Integrations & automation | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
| European sovereignty | 1/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **3/5** | **3/5** | **2.5/5** | **3/5** | **3/5** | **2.5/5** |

### The judges

- **The CISO** (v1.0): Owns the ISO 27001 certificate and the NIS2 exposure of a 400-employee company. Optimizes for a real risk backbone: methodology, inheritance, incident clocks, a statement of applicability that is never stale. Rejects checklist theater and risk registers that cannot answer who accepted what.
- **The GRC Consultant** (v1.0): Builds and runs ISMSs for a dozen clients at once. Optimizes for reusable control catalogs, multi-framework mapping that answers a control once, and templates that make client twelve cheaper than client one. Rejects single-tenant tools and frameworks bolted on as checklists.
- **The Drafted IT Officer** (v1.1): SME IT admin who became the information security officer by an email from management. Optimizes for guided setup, sane defaults, plain-language controls and a tool that runs alongside the day job. Rejects platforms that assume a security team and a consultant on retainer.
- **The Lead Auditor** (v1.0): Certifies ISMSs for a living and has seen every folder of screenshots. Optimizes for revision-safe history, an SoA generated from live control status, and a defensible answer to "show me the state on date X". Rejects audit trails assembled the week before the audit.
- **The Evidence Integrator** (v1.0): Believes evidence that is typed is evidence that is stale. Optimizes for connectors to the live estate — directory, CMDB, ticketing, cloud — continuous control checks, and an API with parity to the UI. Rejects data islands with a CSV drawbridge.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.1): Hunts "100% audit success" claims, framework logos that link nowhere, "coming soon" integrations sold as shipped, consulting bundled as software, and customer counts that disagree between pages. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | — |
| Open source | Not determined | — | — |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | — |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- Gartner leader: Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant for GRC Tools [S4]
- Named frameworks: ISO 27001-2 · NIST CSF · SOC 2 [S3]

**Hosting**
- Address: 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W Chicago, IL 60654 [S6]
- Domain pattern: Customer instances hosted at {your-company}.logicgate.com subdomains [S8]

**Integrations**
- Adobe sign: Adobe Sign Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Amazon s3: Amazon S3 Integration [S11]
- API v2 available: Risk Cloud API v2 documented [S8]
- Ascent: Ascent Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Audit log export: Build Audit Log Export API usage guide available [S8]
- Authentication bearer: API authentication via Authorization: Bearer {API_TOKEN} header [S8]
- Aws security hub: AWS Security Hub [S11]
- Bitsight: BitSight Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Black kite: Black Kite Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Black kite compliance ratings: Black Kite Compliance Ratings Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Black kite tprm: Black Kite · yes [S10]
- Bulk import records: Bulk Import Records API usage guide available [S8]
- Confluence: Confluence Integration [S11]
- Control evidence: Automated control evidence collection [S1]
- Count: 200 [S1]
- Crowdstrike: CrowdStrike Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Cube: CUBE Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Docusign: DocuSign Risk Cloud Connector [S11]
- Everbridge: Everbridge integration [S11]
- Evidence endpoint: POST /api/v1/evidence endpoint accepts parentRecordId, fieldId and stepId query parameters [S8]
- Featured jira: Jira · yes [S10]
- Featured microsoft planner: Microsoft Planner · yes [S10]
- Fields endpoint: GET /api/v1/fields/workflow/{workflow-id}/values returns field objects [S8]
- File upload format: File uploaded via multipart/form-data with a 'file' key [S8]
- Incident response: Automated workflows route incidents instantly (integration benefit) [S1]
- Named erm integrations: OpenAI · Jira · Microsoft Power BI [S3]
- Open API: RESTful · yes [S10]
- Optional query params: Optional params: jobExecutionOperationId (string), dueDateInterval (integer), dueDateIntervalUnit (DAYS/WEEKS/MONTHS/YEARS), assignUserId (string), assignFieldId (string) [S8]
- Platform integrations: yes [S5]
- Popular: Jira · ServiceNow · Tenable [S2]
- Popular: Jira · Workday · AWS [S4]
- Postman collection: Postman collection available for Risk Cloud API [S8]
- Powerbi connection: Risk Cloud PowerBI Connection documented in developer resources [S8]
- Related endpoints: GET /api/v1/workflows returns workflow objects including nested steps [S8]
- Sftp connector: yes [S10]
- Total count: 267 [S10]
- Webhooks available: Risk Cloud Webhooks documented in developer resources [S8]

**Legal**
- Address: Chicago · IL · 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W · 60654 [S5]
- Address: 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W, Chicago, IL 60654 [S3]
- Address: 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W Chicago, IL 60654 [S4]
- Address: 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W Chicago, IL 60654 [S1]
- Company address: LogicGate, Inc. · 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W, Chicago, IL 60654 [S10]
- Company address: LogicGate HQ: 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W, Chicago, IL 60654 [S8]
- Company name: LogicGate, Inc. [S4]
- Copyright: 2026 · LogicGate, Inc. [S10]
- Copyright entity: LogicGate, Inc. [S3]
- Copyright entity: Copyright held by LogicGate, Inc. [S8]
- Copyright holder: 2026 · LogicGate, Inc. [S5]
- Copyright holder: 2026 · LogicGate, Inc. [S11]
- Entity: LogicGate, Inc. [S1]
- Headquarters address: 320 W Ohio St Suite 600W Chicago, IL 60654 [S11]

**Pricing**
- Availability: Pricing only via 'Request Pricing' CTA; no prices stated [S1]
- Implementation hours: 20 [S7]
- Licenses: 2 · yes [S2]

**Product**
- A lign partnership: A-LIGN · audit evidence requirements mapped into Risk Cloud for external audit preparation [S4]
- Agent audit trail: ERM Agents execute multi-step processes with a complete audit trail [S3]
- AI agents: GRC Agents, Config Newton, Foundational AI [S6]
- AI capabilities: GRC Agents provide data-driven reasoning and orchestrate multi-step workflows; humans remain in the loop [S1]
- AI flagged gaps: AI flags gaps for audit scoping; automated first-pass reviews [S5]
- AI generated summaries: yes [S9]
- AI workflow templates: Out-of-the-box workflows for documenting, reviewing, approving AI use cases [S3]
- API version 1 in use: Evidence Collection endpoint is under API v1 (/api/v1/) [S8]
- Applications: Cyber Risk Management · Controls Compliance · Vulnerability Management [S2]
- Applications: Enterprise Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, Cyber Risk Management, Controls Compliance, AI Governance [S6]
- Applications: Controls Compliance · Policy & Procedure Management · Issues Management [S4]
- Applications: Enterprise Risk Management · Third-Party Risk Management · Cyber Risk Management · Controls Compliance · AI Governance [S1]
- Assessment agent: Enterprise Risk Assessment Agent evaluates assessments, populates fields, identifies control gaps, creates mitigation records [S3]
- Authority documentation ingestion: Authority Documentation from UCF can be ingested into Risk Cloud including associated controls and citations [S7]
- Auto framework updates: Control frameworks in Risk Cloud update automatically as UCF Authority Documents change [S7]
- Auto import mapping: New requirements, frameworks, and controls are automatically imported and mapped from UCF [S7]
- Automated evidence collection: automates evidence collection, control testing, and reporting [S5]
- Automated evidence collection: yes [S4]
- Automated evidence collection: Risk Cloud API provides an Automated Evidence Collection endpoint to push evidence files into Risk Cloud [S8]
- Automated workflows: Automated GRC workflows in Risk Cloud streamline control evaluations and risk assessments at a preferred cadence [S7]
- Centralized asset risk view: Centralized connected view of assets, risks and controls [S2]
- Centralized reporting automation: Continuously updated centralized reporting and automated data-driven presentations [S9]
- Centralized risk database: Unified database stores risks, assessments, and strategies [S3]
- Compliance templates: Customizable templates for risk controls and policies [S3]
- Config newton: Config Newton is an agentic GRC engineer that builds, optimizes, and scales GRC programs [S1]
- Connector mapping: UCF Common Controls can be mapped to internal controls in Risk Cloud to avoid redundant control evaluations [S7]
- Connectors: out-of-the-box connectors · yes [S10]
- Control record creation: Connector generates control records, citations, and links Authority Documentation [S7]
- Control testing: Automated control testing enables continuous compliance with notifications on issues [S1]
- Control testing automation 2026: automated control testing powered by Spark AI · 2026-01 [S4]
- Controls compliance application: Controls Compliance Application available from Risk Cloud Exchange [S8]
- Cross mapping: yes [S6]
- Cross solution integration: yes [S3]
- Crosswalks: Built-in crosswalks with predefined mappings across frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and NIST CSF [S4]
- Custom integrations contact: Custom integrations discussed via LogicGate Account Team [S7]
- Cyber risk financial quantification: Reports assessing cybersecurity threats in financial terms [S9]
- Cyber risk integration: Cyber Risk Management Solution [S4]
- Dashboards reports: pre-built dashboards and reports for cross-framework compliance, control audit status, evidence testing results, open issues, corrective actions [S5]
- Dashboards reports: Pre-built dashboards and reports to track control audit status and effectiveness [S4]
- Drill down risk metrics: Dynamically links risk, control, and assessment findings with drill-down into risk metrics [S9]
- Erm agent triage: ERM Agents triage new risks, route to assessment path, and automate first-pass evaluations against defined risk framework [S3]
- Erm applications: Enterprise Risk Management · Controls Compliance · Model Risk Management [S3]
- Evidence sources: human resource information systems · cloud platform security services · Controls Compliance Application [S10]
- Executive dashboards: Executive dashboards visualizing risks and assets by financial impact [S2]
- Executive reporting: Executive reporting aggregating data across business units with summary reports on key metrics [S9]
- Financial quantification: Risk Cloud Quantify translates risk impacts into financial terms [S3]
- First pass control evaluations: automated first-pass control evaluations based on latest evidence [S5]
- Forrester recognition: Named a Leader in The Forrester Wave: Third-Party Risk Management Platforms, Q1 2026 [S1]
- Foundational AI: Foundational AI reviews evidence, autofills forms, and transforms data into insights [S1]
- Framework capabilities: controls content, pre-built assessment workflows, automated evidence collection [S6]
- Framework count centeralize: 25 [S4]
- Framework count enforce: Enforce compliance across +30 frameworks while proactively monitoring risks [S4]
- Frameworks catalog total: 12 · 33 [S6]
- Frameworks count: 25 [S2]
- Frameworks count: 25 [S6]
- Frameworks examples: ISO 27001-2 · NIST CSF · SOC 2 [S2]
- Frameworks license excluded: no [S6]
- Frameworks named: CCPA, CIS, GDPR, HIPAA (Security Standards – Subpart 3), ISO 27001-2, NIST 800-53, NIST CSF, PCI DSS, SCF, SOC 2 TSC, Australian ISM Guidelines, CMMC [S6]
- Frameworks named: NIST CSF · SOC 2 TSC · ISO 27001/2 [S4]
- Frameworks supported: security · privacy · 30 [S5]
- G2 recognition: 29 [S1]
- Graph database: No-code graph database connects compliance controls, assets, and risks with multi-hop views [S1]
- Human in loop: yes [S1]
- Industry recognition: Named a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for GRC Tools, Assurance Leaders [S1]
- Intake agent: Enterprise Risk Intake Agent pre-fills records, reviews documents, triages and routes risks [S3]
- Integration data push pull: Out-of-the-box or fully custom integrations to push or pull risk data [S9]
- Kri tracking: Define, monitor and report on key risk indicators [S2]
- Mcp server: query Risk Cloud data via natural language prompts in AI tools [S10]
- Native integrations: no-cost · no-code · Jira · Slack · Microsoft 365 · yes [S10]
- No code: No-code configuration; live in weeks not months [S1]

**Support**
- Demo request: yes [S9]
- G2 satisfaction: Support Satisfaction metric sourced from G2 Reviews, 2024 (value shown as 0% in DOM) [S1]

26 more facts on the canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicgate-risk-cloud

## Questions

### Is LogicGate Risk Cloud European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where LogicGate Risk Cloud is based.

### Where does LogicGate Risk Cloud store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### Does LogicGate Risk Cloud have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to LogicGate Risk Cloud?

As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates [preeco | informationssicherheit (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit), [Secfix (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/secfix) and [6clicks (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/6clicks) highest among the other 29 Information Security products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [preeco | informationssicherheit](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [LogicGate Risk Cloud alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicgate-risk-cloud/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://www.logicgate.com (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S2] Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/solutions/cyber-risk-management/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S3] Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/solutions/enterprise-risk-management/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S4] Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/solutions/controls-compliance/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S5] Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/platform/features/automated-control-testing/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S6] Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/solutions/frameworks/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S7] Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/platform/integrations/unified-compliance-framework/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S8] Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/developer/risk-cloud-api-automated-evidence-collection/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S9] Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/platform/features/reporting-and-analytics/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S10] Integrations & automation — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/platform/integrations/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S11] Integrations & automation — found from sitemap: https://www.logicgate.ai/developer-type/integrations/ (checked 2026-11-03)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "LogicGate Risk Cloud — Information Security", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-11-04. https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicgate-risk-cloud

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/1450?target=page