# LogicManager — Information Security

LogicManager by LogicManager, Inc. holds a panel rating of 2/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 3/5), as of 2026-11-03. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven.

- Vendor: LogicManager, Inc. (https://www.logicmanager.com)
- Category: [Information Security](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicmanager
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicmanager/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicmanager/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-11-04 · evaluated 2026-11-03 · oldest source captured 2026-11-03

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: LogicManager, Inc.
- Headquarters: Incorporated in United States [S4]
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026

## The panel's verdict

LogicManager is a SaaS enterprise risk management platform whose strength is connection: a taxonomy holds risks, assets, vendors, policies, controls and incidents in one repository and surfaces cascading effects, and information security management scores run 5-6. Integrations and automation drew the bench's best scores, 5-7, on prebuilt vendor-maintained connectors, SCIM and Entra ID provisioning with separation-of-duties enforcement, DocuSign, and drag-and-drop field mapping without IT. Reporting for board, regulatory and internal audiences from one source of truth keeps audit readiness at 4, though we found no public information on revision-safe change history or read-only auditor access; controls and statement of applicability also sit at 4, which judges read as linked repositories rather than an operable statement of applicability. Framework coverage is the genuine split, 2 to 5: higher scores credit the Risk Maturity Model umbrella over COSO, ISO, NIST and OCEG, while the low end sees alignment claims without delivered catalogues and SOC 2 only as an on-demand advisory workshop. Sovereignty and pricing transparency are the weakest categories, at 1-2 and 0-2; no price figures appear on the captured pages.

**Speaks for it:**
- A taxonomy links risks to controls, assets, vendors, policies and people in one repository, with cascading effects surfaced — information security management scores run 5-6.
- Integrations and automation scores run 5-7, the bench's highest, on vendor-maintained prebuilt connectors with direct-to-production setup, SCIM and Entra ID provisioning with separation-of-duties enforcement, and DocuSign.
- Reporting is configurable for board, regulatory and internal audiences from one source of truth, with built-in dashboards, heatmaps and key-risk-indicator tolerance tracking.
- Environment access arrives within 5 business days, with implementation, training and maintenance included and a dedicated advisory analyst available through the subscription lifetime.

**Held against it:**
- Sovereignty scores run 1-2: a Boston, USA global headquarters stated on a marketing page is the only sovereignty fact, and we found no public information on hosting location, data residency, subprocessors or a data processing agreement.
- Controls and statement of applicability scores sit at 4, and we found no public information on a statement of applicability generated from control status, per-control implementation status, or evidence attached to controls.
- Framework coverage splits 2-5: standards appear as alignments under the Risk Maturity Model and SOC 2 as an on-demand advisory workshop, with no public information on NIS2, TISAX, DORA or BSI IT-Grundschutz coverage.
- Audit readiness stops at 4: we found no public information on revision-safe change history, on-demand evidence packs or read-only auditor access.
- Pricing transparency scores run 0-2 because no price figures appear on the captured pages, so any invoice comes out of a sales conversation behind a free demonstration.

**Best for:**
- You want one connected risk register across business units, with risks tied to the controls, resources, processes and people they impact.
- Your small or one-person team wants vendor-maintained connectors and drag-and-drop field mapping rather than in-house integration work.
- You need board- and regulator-facing reporting with dashboards, heatmaps and key-risk-indicator tracking from a single source of truth.
- You value hands-on onboarding: implementation, training and maintenance included, environment access within 5 business days, and an advisory analyst for the subscription lifetime.

**Avoid if:**
- You must evidence European regimes such as NIS2, TISAX, DORA or BSI IT-Grundschutz — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your certification or recertification depends on a statement of applicability and per-control evidence — the controls category sits at 4 across the scores with neither shown.
- Your procurement requires documented data residency, hosting options or a data processing agreement — sovereignty scores run 1-2 and the only stated fact is a Boston, USA global headquarters.
- You expect integrations to drive automated evidence collection and self-running control checks against the live estate — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v2). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price, or the judge found no public information on that criterion.

| Criterion | The CISO | The GRC Consultant | The Drafted IT Officer | The Lead Auditor | The Evidence Integrator | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Asset & risk management depth | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Controls, SoA & measures | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Framework & standard coverage | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1/5 |
| Audit readiness & evidence | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Integrations & automation | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 2.5/5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **2/5** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** | **2/5** | **2.5/5** | **1.5/5** |

### The judges

- **The CISO** (v1.0): Owns the ISO 27001 certificate and the NIS2 exposure of a 400-employee company. Optimizes for a real risk backbone: methodology, inheritance, incident clocks, a statement of applicability that is never stale. Rejects checklist theater and risk registers that cannot answer who accepted what.
- **The GRC Consultant** (v1.0): Builds and runs ISMSs for a dozen clients at once. Optimizes for reusable control catalogs, multi-framework mapping that answers a control once, and templates that make client twelve cheaper than client one. Rejects single-tenant tools and frameworks bolted on as checklists.
- **The Drafted IT Officer** (v1.1): SME IT admin who became the information security officer by an email from management. Optimizes for guided setup, sane defaults, plain-language controls and a tool that runs alongside the day job. Rejects platforms that assume a security team and a consultant on retainer.
- **The Lead Auditor** (v1.0): Certifies ISMSs for a living and has seen every folder of screenshots. Optimizes for revision-safe history, an SoA generated from live control status, and a defensible answer to "show me the state on date X". Rejects audit trails assembled the week before the audit.
- **The Evidence Integrator** (v1.0): Believes evidence that is typed is evidence that is stale. Optimizes for connectors to the live estate — directory, CMDB, ticketing, cloud — continuous control checks, and an API with parity to the UI. Rejects data islands with a CSV drawbridge.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.1): Hunts "100% audit success" claims, framework logos that link nowhere, "coming soon" integrations sold as shipped, consulting bundled as software, and customer counts that disagree between pages. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: 1 of 6 dimensions proven.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Incorporated in US | 0/2 | [S4] |
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | — |
| Open source | Not determined | — | — |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | — |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Hosting**
- Headquarters: Boston, USA (Global Headquarters) [S3]
- Regions: EMEA · APAC [S3]

**Integrations**
- App count: 7000 [S6]
- Docusign connector: DocuSign connector for contract management; signature requests from LogicManager, automatic retrieval of signed agreements, no coding [S6]
- Drag and drop configuration: drag-and-drop data field mapping without IT [S6]
- Maintained by vendor: yes [S6]
- Msa faq cutoff: FAQ applies to MSAs signed before December 13th, 2024 [S6]
- Prebuilt connectors: direct-to-production · yes [S6]
- SCIM entra id connector: SCIM & Entra ID connector; automates user provisioning/deprovisioning, enforces Separation of Duties [S6]

**Legal**
- Hq location: Boston, USA (Global Headquarters) [S4]

**Pricing**
- Fixed price model: fixed-price model, no hidden fees, no-code configuration [S1]
- Included services: yes · yes · yes [S3]
- Jbtd licensing: Jobs-to-be-Done licensing, not per user seat [S1]
- Satisfaction guarantee: 90-Day Unconditional Satisfaction Guarantee [S1]
- Unlimited user licenses: unlimited user licenses, no per-user license limitations [S6]

**Product**
- AI analytics: Risk Ripple Analytics, AI-powered risk management tools [S1]
- Apac region: APAC (Asia-Pacific) · yes [S4]
- Assess module: pre-built, configurable risk assessments criteria [S2]
- Built in AI assistant: built-in AI assistant for risk management expertise and automated insights [S6]
- Centralized repository: risks, assets, vendors, policies, controls, tasks, and more in one online platform [S2]
- Centralized source of truth: Single source of truth for reporting [S5]
- Company description: LogicManager is the industry leader in SaaS-based Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) software [S4]
- Completeness checker: Completeness Checker verifies integrations during setup [S6]
- Configurability: solution packages are scalable, repeatable, and configurable [S3]
- Configurable reports: Reports configurable for board, regulatory, and internal audiences [S5]
- Connect module: built on robust taxonomy technology; connect risks to controls, resources, processes, and people [S2]
- Dashboards visualizations: Built-in dynamic dashboards, heatmaps, risk matrices [S5]
- Delivery model: yes · Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) [S3]
- Ebook resource: eBook "How to Integrate Risk & Governance Areas" available for download [S2]
- Emea region: EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa) · yes [S4]
- Free demo: free demonstration · yes [S2]
- Identify module: centralized libraries of industry-specific risks [S2]
- Implementation days: 5 [S3]
- Insight workbenches: Insight Workbenches provide dynamic visualizations and real-time interaction with data [S5]
- Kri tracking: Key risk indicators and trends highlighted in reports [S5]
- Mitigate module: repositories of mitigation activities, controls, and procedures; connect activities to impacted resources and requirements [S2]
- Mitigation repositories: Repositories of mitigation activities, controls, and procedures [S5]
- Monitor module: testing, metric collection, and incidents remediation [S2]
- Numeric scale assessments: risk assessments based on numeric scales and standardized evaluation criteria [S2]
- Packages configurable: yes · yes · yes [S4]
- Platform description: Enterprise Risk Management platform bridging silos across oversight lifecycle [S1]
- Real time trend monitoring: Real-time risk tracking by initiative or department [S5]
- Report module: dynamic dashboards, heatmaps, and risk-matrices built in [S2]
- Risk assessments: Pre-built configurable risk assessment criteria [S5]
- Risk based approach: risk-based GRC approach with a common framework across governance, risk, and compliance [S3]
- Risk libraries: Centralized libraries of industry-specific risks [S5]
- Risk library: pre-built risk library and centralized risk taxonomy [S2]
- Risk maturity model: Risk Maturity Model framework aligned with COSO, ISO, NIST, OCEG [S1]
- Risk monitoring: Testing, metric collection, and incident remediation capabilities [S5]
- Risk ripple intelligence: Risk Ripple Intelligence surfaces cascading effects of risks [S5]
- SOC 2 advisory workshop: LogicManager offers an on-demand advisory workshop on SOC 2 compliance [S4]
- Solution modules: Enterprise Risk · Security Risk · Privacy & Records Management · Third Party Risk · Regulatory Compliance · Business Continuity · Internal Audit · ICFR · Workplace Performance & Talent Risk · Model Risk · Credit, Market & ALM Risk · EHS ·… [S1]
- Taxonomy AI insights: no additional cost · Taxonomy Insights · existing clients · yes [S2]
- Taxonomy linking examples: connecting incidents to policies, vendors to business processes, physical assets to their associated contracts [S2]
- Taxonomy relationships: Create relationships between risks, business units, mitigation activities, and more [S2]
- Taxonomy technology: taxonomy technology powers central governance structure making relationships explicit [S3]
- Taxonomy technology: Taxonomy technology connects risks to controls, resources, processes, people [S5]
- Tolerance tracking: Tracks whether metrics stay within tolerance limits [S5]

**Support**
- Advisory analysts: paired with a team of advisory analysts [S3]
- Data migration: yes · yes [S3]
- Dedicated analyst: dedicated Advisory Analyst, guided onboarding, best-practice consulting [S1]
- Lifetime availability: available throughout the lifetime of the subscription [S3]

## Questions

### Is LogicManager European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where LogicManager is based. Its vendor, LogicManager, Inc., is incorporated in United States, per [the vendor’s page captured 3 Nov 2026](https://whats-best.ai/evidence/17406).

### Where does LogicManager store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### Does LogicManager have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to LogicManager?

As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates [preeco | informationssicherheit (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit), [Secfix (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/secfix) and [6clicks (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/6clicks) highest among the other 29 Information Security products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [preeco | informationssicherheit](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/preeco-informationssicherheit) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [LogicManager alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicmanager/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (logicmanager.com, logicmanager.com/platform/risk-taxonomy, logicmanager.com/platform/risk-based-process, logicmanager.com/logicmanager-advisory-workshop-on-demand-soc-2-compliance, logicmanager.com/platform/dashboard-reports, logicmanager.com/logicmanager-connector-program). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://www.logicmanager.com (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S2] Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap: https://www.logicmanager.com/platform/risk-taxonomy/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S3] Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap: https://www.logicmanager.com/platform/risk-based-process/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S4] Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap: https://www.logicmanager.com/logicmanager-advisory-workshop-on-demand-soc-2-compliance/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S5] Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap: https://www.logicmanager.com/platform/dashboard-reports/ (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S6] Integrations & automation — found from sitemap: https://www.logicmanager.com/logicmanager-connector-program/ (checked 2026-11-03)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "LogicManager — Information Security", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-11-04. https://whats-best.ai/software/information-security/logicmanager

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/1451?target=page