# AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers — software compared by an AI panel As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates [MeetGeek (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek), [Noota (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/noota) and [Jamie (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/jamie) highest in AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers, out of 15 products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European option is [MeetGeek](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek) (EU-Made). Of the products whose own pages state a free plan, the panel rates [MeetGeek](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek) highest. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). - Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants - Data as of: 2026-11-06 **AI-generated.** Every rating here is the opinion of a panel of AI judges, formed from public evidence against a published rubric — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Listed alphabetically; no placement is for sale. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology ## Products | Product | Vendor | Provenance | Panel rating | Sovereignty | Markdown | |---|---|---|---|---|---| | [Fathom AI Notetaker](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fathom-ai) | Fathom Video Inc. | Rest of world | 2.5/5 | 1 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fathom-ai.md) | | [Fellow](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fellow) | Fellow Insights, Inc. | Rest of world | 3.5/5 | 1 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fellow.md) | | [Fireflies.ai](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fireflies) | Fireflies.AI Corp. | Rest of world | 3/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fireflies.md) | | [Grain](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/grain) | Grain Intelligence, Inc. | Rest of world | 3/5 | 2 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/grain.md) | | [Jamie](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/jamie) | wespond UG (haftungsbeschränkt) | EU-Made | 3.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/jamie.md) | | [Krisp AI Meeting Assistant](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/krisp) | Krisp Technologies, Inc. | Rest of world | 2.5/5 | 2 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/krisp.md) | | [Leexi](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/leexi) | Leexi SA | EU-Made | 3.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/leexi.md) | | [MeetGeek](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek) | AIVISION PRODUCTS SRL | EU-Made | 3.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek.md) | | [Noota](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/noota) | NOOTA SAS | EU-Made | 3.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/noota.md) | | [Notta](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/notta) | Notta Pte. Ltd. | Rest of world | 2.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/notta.md) | | [Otter.ai](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/otter) | Otter.ai, Inc. | Rest of world | 2.5/5 | 1 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/otter.md) | | [Read AI](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/read-ai) | Read AI, Inc. | Rest of world | 3/5 | 2 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/read-ai.md) | | [Sally](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/sally) | Aliru GmbH | EU-Made | 3.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/sally.md) | | [Sembly AI](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/sembly) | Sembly AI, Inc. | Rest of world | 3/5 | 1 of 6 dimensions proven | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/sembly.md) | | [tl;dv](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/tldv) | tldx Solutions GmbH | EU-Made | 3.5/5 | not determined | [md](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/tldv.md) | Ratings are out of 5 (the panel's mean, half steps). Sovereignty is scored only when all 6 dimensions (legal entity, hosting location, hosting options, open source, data processing agreement and transfer impact assessment) are proven from the vendor's own pages. ## Head-to-head comparisons - [Fireflies.ai vs tl;dv](https://whats-best.ai/compare/fireflies-vs-tldv) ([md](https://whats-best.ai/compare/fireflies-vs-tldv.md)): Neither product takes the page: the benches split by concern. - [Jamie vs Otter.ai](https://whats-best.ai/compare/jamie-vs-otter) ([md](https://whats-best.ai/compare/jamie-vs-otter.md)): The split runs by criterion, not by judge line. - [Fathom AI Notetaker vs Leexi](https://whats-best.ai/compare/fathom-ai-vs-leexi) ([md](https://whats-best.ai/compare/fathom-ai-vs-leexi.md)): Six judges lean Leexi on five criteria: capture and transcription (7.0 vs 4.3), summaries and knowledge (7.2 vs 5.0), integrations and workflow (8.0 vs 7.0), data control and administration (7.0 vs 5.8) and sovereignty (8.0 vs 3.0). - [Noota vs Read AI](https://whats-best.ai/compare/noota-vs-read-ai) ([md](https://whats-best.ai/compare/noota-vs-read-ai.md)): Noota leads on four criteria — sovereignty 8.3 to 4.0, data control and administration 7.3 to 6.0, capture and transcription 7.2 to 5.7, and pricing transparency 6.8 to 3.8 — with six judges leaning Noota on each. ## Questions ### What is the best AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers software? As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates [MeetGeek (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek), [Noota (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/noota) and [Jamie (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/jamie) highest of the 15 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence. Each judge weighs the criteria differently, so read the scores for the criteria that matter to you. ### Which AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers software is European? As of 6 Nov 2026, 6 of the 15 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated are European by provenance: [MeetGeek](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek), [Noota](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/noota), [Jamie](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/jamie), [Leexi](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/leexi), [Sally](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/sally) and [tl;dv](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/tldv). The highest-rated of them is [MeetGeek](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek) (EU-Made). ### Which AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers tools have a free plan? As of 6 Nov 2026, the vendors’ own pages state a free plan for [MeetGeek](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/meetgeek), [Noota](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/noota), [Jamie](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/jamie), [Fellow](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/fellow), [tl;dv](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/tldv), [Grain](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/grain), [Read AI](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/read-ai), [Sembly AI](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants/sembly), and 3 more (see [the full list](https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants#products)). Each product page links the pricing page it was read from. ### How were these AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers tools evaluated? Each product is scored by a bench of 6 AI judges built for this category, against the same published rubric of 7 criteria, using public evidence captured from the vendor’s own pages. Every score is AI-generated; nobody tested the products hands-on, and no score can be bought. The full method is on the [methodology page](https://whats-best.ai/methodology). ## The bench 6 AI judges built for this category, each versioned and scoring independently; disagreement is printed, not averaged away. - **The Management Consultant** (v1.0): Partner at a twelve-person management consultancy in Munich with six client calls a day, half in German, half in English, and workshops in the client's meeting room. Writes the minutes at night and wants that to stop. Wants accurate German transcripts with the right names, minutes by meeting type with decisions and action items, capture of in-person workshops without a laptop on the table, and a promise in writing that client conversations train nobody's model. - **The Sales Team Lead** (v1.0): Leads eight account executives at a software vendor for the German Mittelstand. Discovery calls run on Teams and Zoom, and the CRM is only as good as the notes someone found time to type. Does not want a coaching platform that scores the team: wants the call summary, next steps and the fields that matter written into HubSpot after every call, a follow-up email draft, and prospects told politely that the call is recorded. - **The Works Council Chair** (v1.0): Chairs the works council of a machine builder with 2,300 employees in Baden-Württemberg. Management wants a notetaker in every Teams meeting; the council has to agree to it under § 87 BetrVG first. Wants to know who is told that a recording runs and who can say no, whether talk time or engagement scores per person exist and can be switched off for good, how long recordings are kept, and material the vendor provides for a works agreement. - **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Data protection officer of a private bank in Frankfurt that falls under DORA. Has to write the data protection impact assessment before the first recording. Reads the subprocessor list before the feature page, because the language model that reads the transcript is a processor too, and wants its name and region, contractual exclusion from training, retention and deletion by policy, voice profiles explained, and a DPA that matches what the security page claims. - **The IT Lead** (v1.0): Head of IT at a 450-person engineering services firm on Microsoft 365, where a dozen employees already signed up for free notetakers with their work address. Wants one tool for everyone instead: single sign-on and SCIM, admin policies for when the assistant joins and what may be shared outside the company, retention set centrally, audit logs, Teams and SharePoint working properly, and a seat price that holds at four hundred users. - **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen "99% accuracy in 100 languages" turn a German meeting into English nonsense, a bot that joined a meeting its owner never attended and mailed the summary to every guest, and an action item no one in the room had agreed to. Asks which model wrote the summary and where it runs, whether each statement can be traced to the transcript, who told the external participants, what "we do not train on your data" covers in the DPA — and how the archive leaves. --- Cite as: whats-best.ai, "AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers", AI panel comparison, as of 2026-11-06. https://whats-best.ai/software/meeting-assistants