# GanttPRO — Project Management & Collaboration

GanttPRO by GanttPRO holds a panel rating of 2/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 3/5), as of 2026-10-15. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: GanttPRO (https://ganttpro.com)
- Category: [Project Management & Collaboration](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/ganttpro
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/ganttpro/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/ganttpro/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-15 · oldest source captured 2026-10-13

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: GanttPRO
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026

## The panel's verdict

GanttPRO is a project management and collaboration tool whose scores are strongest on getting started and weakest on sovereignty. Onboarding effort scores 6 to 7, crediting a free 14-day trial to premium features with no credit card required plus free industry Gantt chart templates. Support documentation sits at 4 to 5 on a help center, video tutorials, a community hub, and a support email. Collaboration depth scores 4 to 6: the Portfolio view and a team workload check put team-level planning on the page, though we found no public information on assignments, comments, dependencies, or guest and client permissions. Reporting scores 3 to 4 and integrations a flat 3 — progress is answered on screen through Gantt, Kanban, List and Portfolio views, and the only connections on record are Jira and an online MPP viewer, with no public information on time or budget reports, exports, an API, or webhooks. Sovereignty scores 1 to 2, with no sovereignty attributes on record. The judges' scores cluster tightly, and no significant disagreement was recorded between them.

**Speaks for it:**
- a free 14-day trial to premium features with no credit card required and free industry Gantt chart templates
- a Portfolio view and a team workload check that put team-level planning on the page beyond per-person task lists
- a help center, video tutorials, a community hub and a support email that form a real learning surface
- a Jira integration and an online MPP viewer that give a genuine import path from Microsoft Project files

**Held against it:**
- sovereignty scores 1 to 2, with no public information on data residency, a data processing agreement, or subprocessors
- we found no public information on assignments, comments, dependencies, or guest and client permissions
- we found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting, dashboards, or any export path
- we found no public information on a public API, webhooks, calendar or chat connections, or automation platforms
- we found no public information on tier prices, billing periods, or seat minimums

**Best for:**
- You want a self-serve start — a 14-day premium trial without a credit card, with industry templates for the first project
- You plan across several projects and want Portfolio and team workload views for progress and capacity
- You come from Microsoft Project and want an online MPP viewer for reading existing files
- You are comfortable with self-serve help — help center, videos, community hub, email — as the visible support surface

**Avoid if:**
- You must verify data residency, a data processing agreement, or subprocessors before signing
- You need answers to leave the tool — time, budget or utilization reports, dashboards, or exports
- Your stack depends on a documented API, webhooks, or connections beyond Jira and Microsoft Project files
- You are deploying at scale and need the permission model, guest access, or dependencies verified up front

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price.

| Criterion | The Data Protection Officer | The Bootstrapper | The Enterprise Architect | The UX Purist | The Integrator | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Collaboration depth | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 |
| Reporting | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Integrations | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Onboarding effort | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 | 3.5/5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 |
| Support & documentation | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **1.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** | **3/5** | **2/5** | **2/5** |

### The judges

- **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Reads the DPA before the feature list. Optimizes for GDPR posture: EU hosting, subprocessor exposure, deletion guarantees. Rejects anything that cannot answer where the data lives.
- **The Bootstrapper** (v1.2): Pays with their own card. Optimizes for price/value at 3 seats and at 30, a usable free tier, and a price page that answers instead of qualifying. Rejects hidden seat minimums and "contact sales".
- **The Enterprise Architect** (v1.0): Buys for two hundred seats and answers for it later. Optimizes for SSO/SCIM, permissions, audit trails, certifications and a clean exit. Rejects anything that cannot survive procurement.
- **The UX Purist** (v1.0): Measures time-to-first-value with a stopwatch. Optimizes for clarity, density and software that teaches itself. Rejects fourteen-step setups and empty screens that offer no way forward.
- **The Integrator** (v1.0): Lives in the API docs before the product tour. Optimizes for webhooks, import/export and a tool that plays well in a stack. Rejects closed ecosystems and CSV-only exits.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.2): Assumes the marketing is lying until the evidence says otherwise. Hunts lock-in, dark patterns, hidden cost and dead changelogs. Exists to keep the rest of the panel honest.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

No sovereignty finding yet.

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- DPA: yes [S1]

**Integrations**
- Jira: yes [S1]
- Mpp: yes [S1]

**Legal**
- Entity: 0001046070 · DPM Solutions Sp. z o.o. · PL6793271397 · Poland [S1]

**Product**
- Templates: yes [S1]
- Trial: 14 · no [S1]
- Views: Gantt chart, Kanban board, List view, Portfolio view [S1]
- Workload: yes [S1]

**Support**
- Channels: Help center, video tutorials, community hub [S1]

## Questions

### Is GanttPRO European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where GanttPRO is based.

### Where does GanttPRO store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

### Does GanttPRO have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to GanttPRO?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [awork (4/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/awork), [Kantree (4/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/kantree) and [Teamwork.com (4/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/teamwork) highest among the other 60 Project Management & Collaboration products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [awork](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/awork) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [GanttPRO alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/ganttpro/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- We could not confirm any pricing information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind.
- 7 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 3 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://ganttpro.com (checked 2026-10-13)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "GanttPRO — Project Management & Collaboration", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/project-management/ganttpro

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/733?target=page