# Ocoya — Social Media Marketing

Ocoya by Ocoya holds a panel rating of 2.5/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-11-04. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: Ocoya (https://www.ocoya.com)
- Category: [Social Media Marketing](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/ocoya
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/ocoya/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/ocoya/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-11-04 · evaluated 2026-11-04 · oldest source captured 2026-11-03

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: Ocoya
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026

## The panel's verdict

Ocoya, from UAB Ocoya of Vilnius, Lithuania, is an AI social media platform that writes, designs, schedules and replies across networks. The bench scored it strongest on publishing, where a drag-and-drop calendar, bulk upload at up to a thousand posts per minute, RSS-fed queues, per-network caption versions and live character counts are documented, and on platform coverage, with twenty-eight listed connections including Threads, Bluesky and Mastodon — though the captured pages give different figures for the count, twenty-six against twenty-eight. Collaboration and governance held at 6: approvals run on every plan, posts wait on a one-click email decision, and decisions are logged. Weakest are analytics and reporting, documented in a single line with no named metrics or exports, and the engagement inbox, a named module with no public information on assignment or conversation history. Sovereignty runs 3-4, judges weighing a European contracting entity and a published Data Processing Addendum against processing stated as United States and worldwide; pricing transparency runs 5-6, the Starter tier's limits published without a price.

**Speaks for it:**
- Publishing scored 7-8: bulk upload at up to a thousand posts per minute, RSS-fed queues, best-time suggestions and per-network caption versions with live character counts are documented
- Approvals run on every plan, with named reviewers, a one-click email decision, the post held until it clears, and every decision logged on the post itself
- Twenty-eight connections are listed — including Threads, Bluesky and Mastodon — alongside a service status page and a REST API with typed SDKs
- Team at $79 / month with 5 users and 20 social profiles and Agency at $199 / month with 20 users and 100 social profiles are published, each '+ VAT where applicable', with 'Yearly (2 months free)'
- A Data Processing Addendum is published incorporating standard contractual clauses, with the vendor acknowledging its processor role, a 5-day subprocessor objection window, and self-service data subject request tools at no additional cost

**Held against it:**
- Analytics and reporting scored 2-3: measurement appears as a single line — 'Track performance and let your agent double down on what works' — with no public information on named metrics, exports or cross-network views
- The engagement inbox scored 3-4: a Social Inbox module and AI replies triggered by comments, DMs and mentions are shown, with no public information on assignment, saved replies or conversation history
- The Data Processing Addendum states customer data may be transferred and processed 'in the United States and anywhere else in the world', with no residency option offered, and we found no public information on a subprocessor list with locations
- The Starter tier's limits (1 user, 5 social profiles, 300 credits) are listed without a price, we found no public information on the cost of an extra seat, profile or credit, and the trial terms state '7 days free, card required' with automatic renewal
- We found no public information on what happens when a post fails — on notifications, retry or platform-error surfacing — nor on link shortening with UTM tags

**Best for:**
- You publish at volume across many networks and want bulk upload, RSS-fed queues, per-network caption versions and best-time suggestions on one calendar
- You want approval before publication enforced on every plan, with a logged decision trail and comment threads on drafts
- You build your own tooling and value a REST API with typed SDKs plus MCP access for assistants such as Claude and ChatGPT
- Your team fits the published tier counts — 5 users and 20 social profiles, or 20 users and 100 — and wants the price, VAT note and trial terms visible up front

**Avoid if:**
- Your procurement requires data processing confined to the EU — the addendum states transfers to and processing in the United States and anywhere else in the world, with no residency option offered
- You must hand clients measurement reports — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your community team runs a live queue on assignment, saved replies and response-time tracking rather than AI replies fired by comment, DM and mention triggers
- You need your full annual cost before committing — the Starter tier's price and the cost of seats or profiles beyond the tier counts are not public

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v2). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price, or the judge found no public information on that criterion.

| Criterion | The Community Manager | The Agency Lead | The Brand Governance Officer | The Analyst | The Data Protection Officer | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Publishing & calendar | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Engagement & community inbox | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Analytics & reporting | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Approvals, roles & brand safety | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Network coverage & API resilience | 3/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3/5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| **Weighted verdict** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** | **2.5/5** |

### The judges

- **The Community Manager** (v1.0): Answers the comments, including the angry ones, and lives in the inbox. Wants every mention and message in one queue with ownership and history, saved replies that save real time, and a failed 3am post that tells her rather than silently not existing.
- **The Agency Lead** (v1.0): Runs twelve client brands from one tool and must keep them strictly apart. Wants client workspaces, approval chains that include the client, white-label reporting, and per-account pricing that does not make a small client unprofitable.
- **The Brand Governance Officer** (v1.0): Answers to the board for what appears on the corporate account. Wants enforced approval before anything publishes, an audit trail of who wrote and released it, granular permissions, and no shared credentials anywhere in the design.
- **The Analyst** (v1.0): Has to compare metrics the networks define differently and report a number the board believes. Wants history retained past the platforms' own windows, normalisation documented rather than hidden, and UTM attribution that reaches web analytics.
- **The Data Protection Officer** (v1.0): Notes that every comment and message arriving from a network is personal data the company now processes. Wants a DPA that addresses that squarely, retention on the conversation archive, and an answer on where the sentiment analysis sends the text.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Counts the network logos, then asks which are official API integrations and what each one cannot do. Has watched a platform change break a feature overnight, and wants to know what the vendor did last time and whether the archive survived it.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | — |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | — |
| Open source | Not determined | — | — |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | — |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- Audits: SSAE 16 · PCI [S2]
- DPA available: v2026-10-20 · yes · 2026-10-20 [S2]
- Government access policy: no · yes [S2]
- Role processor: processor [S2]
- Sccs: yes [S2]
- Security incident notification hours: 48 [S2]
- Sensitive data prohibited: no [S2]
- Subprocessor objection window: 5 [S2]

**Data**
- Data subject request tools: no · yes [S2]
- Deletion on termination: yes · yes [S2]

**Hosting**
- Data locations: no · United States · worldwide [S2]

**Integrations**
- Networks: Facebook, Instagram, X, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Bluesky, Threads, YouTube Shorts, Google Business, TikTok, Telegram, Slack, Discord, Mastodon, Dribbble, Tumblr, WordPress, DEV.to, Whop, Notion, Airtable, Webflow, Framer, Wix, Twitch, Kick, Wo… [S3]
- Supported platforms: Facebook · Instagram · X (Twitter) · LinkedIn · Pinterest · Bluesky · Threads · YouTube Shorts · Google Business · TikTok · Telegram · Slack · Discord · Mastodon · Dribbble · Tumblr · WordPress · DEV.to · Whop · Notion · Airtable · Webflow… [S2]
- Workflow actions: yes · yes · yes [S3]
- Workflow triggers: new comment · DM · mention · RSS · Notion · schedule · webhook · WooCommerce [S3]

**Legal**
- Copyright: 2026 · UAB Ocoya [S3]
- Entity: UAB Ocoya [S1]
- Entity: LT100013652516 · Vilnius · UAB Ocoya · Perkūnkiemio g. 19, Vilnius, Lithuania · Lithuania · 305673313 [S2]
- Entity: LT100013652516 · UAB Ocoya · Lithuania · 305673313 [S3]
- Registration: LT100013652516 · Lithuania · 305673313 [S1]

**Pricing**
- Agency: + VAT where applicable · 199 [S1]
- Agency limits: 20 · 5000 · 100 [S1]
- Custom plans: yes [S1]
- Starter limits: 1 · 300 · 5 [S1]
- Team: + VAT where applicable · 79 [S1]
- Team limits: 5 · 1500 · 20 [S1]
- Trial terms: 7 · yes · yes [S1]
- Yearly discount: yes · 2 [S1]

**Product**
- AI caption writing: yes [S3]
- AI credits monthly refresh: monthly [S1]
- AI visuals video: yes [S1]
- Analytics: yes [S1]
- API: REST API + typed SDKs · yes [S1]
- API available: yes [S2]
- Approval email: yes [S3]
- Approval logging: yes [S3]
- Approvals: yes [S3]
- Approvals all plans: yes [S3]
- Auto posting: 24/7 · yes [S3]
- Best time suggestions: no · yes [S3]
- Brand kit: yes [S1]
- Bulk scheduling rate: 1000 [S3]
- Calendar: yes [S3]
- Calendar drag drop: yes [S3]
- Campaigns: yes [S3]
- Character count live: yes [S3]
- Comment mentions: yes [S3]
- Core description: AI social media copilot: writes, designs, schedules, replies [S1]
- Customer count: 656552 [S1]
- Design editor: yes [S1]
- Design studio: yes [S3]
- Features: Publishing · Campaigns · Design Studio · Bio pages · Social Inbox · Workflows · API · MCP [S2]
- Features modules: Publishing · Campaigns · Design Studio · Bio pages · Social Inbox · Workflows · API · MCP [S1]
- Free trial available: yes [S2]
- Hashtag API mcp: yes · yes [S3]
- Hashtag libraries: yes [S3]
- In place editing: rewrite · shorten · expand · retone · translate [S3]
- Language detection: yes [S3]
- Languages interface: English, Español, Português, Deutsch, Français, Italiano, Polski, Lietuvių [S3]
- Languages translation: 37 [S1]
- Mcp available: yes [S2]
- Mcp support: yes · Claude · ChatGPT [S1]
- Networks count: 26 [S3]
- Per network versions: yes [S3]
- Post comments: yes [S3]
- Post delay: yes [S3]
- Quality score: yes [S3]
- Rich text formatting: yes [S3]
- Scheduling: yes [S1]
- Service description: social media service, automation and marketing platform [S2]
- Social inbox: yes [S1]
- Supported networks: 28 · Facebook · Instagram · X (Twitter) · LinkedIn · Pinterest · Bluesky · Threads · YouTube Shorts · Google Business · TikTok · Telegram · Slack · Discord · Mastodon · Dribbble · Tumblr · WordPress · DEV.to · Whop · Notion · Airtable · We… [S1]
- Translate 37 languages: 37 [S3]
- Workflow auto rewrite: yes [S3]

**Support**
- Help center: yes [S2]
- Status page: yes [S2]

## Questions

### Is Ocoya European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Ocoya is based.

### Where does Ocoya store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### Does Ocoya have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to Ocoya?

As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates [Swat.io (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/swat-io), [HeyOrca (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/heyorca) and [Coosto (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/coosto) highest among the other 32 Social Media Marketing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [Swat.io](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/swat-io) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Ocoya alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/ocoya/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- 2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 2 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://www.ocoya.com (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S2] Security / trust page — found from the homepage: https://www.ocoya.com/legal/data (checked 2026-11-03)
- [S3] Publishing & calendar — found from sitemap: https://www.ocoya.com/features/publish (checked 2026-11-03)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Ocoya — Social Media Marketing", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-11-04. https://whats-best.ai/software/social-media-marketing/ocoya

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/1500?target=page