# Equionline — Stable & Equestrian Management

Equionline by EQUIONLINE SARL holds a panel rating of 2/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2.5/5), as of 2026-10-16. Provenance: EU-Made; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: EQUIONLINE SARL (https://www.equionline.fr)
- Category: [Stable & Equestrian Management](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): EU-Made
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/equionline
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/equionline/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/equionline/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-10-20 · evaluated 2026-10-16 · oldest source captured 2026-10-16

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: EQUIONLINE SARL
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Starting price: “- dès 7.70 € €/mois” (vendor’s words) [S2]

## The panel's verdict

Equionline, from EQUIONLINE SARL of Marly, France, is strongest at boarding and billing — the only 7 on the board, with no spread between judges. Monthly board invoices go out automatically, calculated on the horses actually present, with quotes, credit notes, online payment, automated reminders, a VAT journal, a universal accounting export and stated compliance with the 2026 French e-invoicing reform. Pricing transparency is weakest at 1-2: the captured pricing page names seven modules, a free trial is the only pricing statement, and no price figure, setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment appears, so an annual cost cannot be computed. Horse care records and facilities and lessons score 4, showing a digital card per horse and a lesson-planning module while we found no public information on feeding plans, medication logging or arena booking. Staff and operations scores 3-4, judges differing on whether tasks, outings and a weekly schedule are more than a shared to-do list. Sovereignty spans 3-5 as judges weigh a French SARL and stated OVH hosting against computed attributes recording jurisdiction, ownership, residency and subprocessors as unknown.

**Speaks for it:**
- Board invoices go out automatically each month, calculated on the horses actually present, alongside quotes, credit notes, online payment and automated payment reminders
- A VAT journal, a universal accounting export and stated compliance with the 2026 French e-invoicing reform cover the accounting side
- Each owner consults their own horse's balance and history whenever they wish, without disturbing the stable
- A digital card per horse with care history and movements is consultable by the whole team from the phone, alongside a digitalised register
- Families, consumptions and third-party payers are explicitly handled for shared horses and riding partners

**Held against it:**
- We found no public information on any price figure, per horse, box or module, nor on setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, so an annual cost cannot be computed
- We found no public information on structured feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, or a medication log with dose and administrator
- We found no public information on task assignment with completion records, staff time recording, or holiday and absence planning
- We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, online course registration, or device integration for walkers or solariums
- Computed attributes record jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure as unknown, and we found no public information on the processors behind payment, push or email, on a data processing agreement, or on a published security statement

**Best for:**
- You run a livery or boarding stable and want monthly board invoices generated automatically from the horses actually present, with online payment and automated reminders
- You bill families, shared horses and third-party payers and want quotes, invoices and credit notes in one system
- You want owners checking their own horse's balance and history themselves instead of phoning the stable
- Your invoices must be ready for the 2026 French e-invoicing reform, which the vendor states it complies with

**Avoid if:**
- You need to see prices or compute an annual cost before a sales call — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You must show a vet or an inspector a horse file covering feeding, vaccination or medication — horse care records scores 4 and we found no public information on these
- You need staff time records, task completion history or holiday planning for payroll or a working-time audit — staff and operations scores 3-4
- You require confirmed residency, ownership or subprocessor information before signing — sovereignty scores 3-5 with these attributes recorded as unknown

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price.

| Criterion | The Boarding-Stable Owner | The Stable Manager | The Boarder | The Riding-School Lead | The Tax Adviser | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 | 3.5/5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 2/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 |
| **Weighted verdict** | **2/5** | **2/5** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** |

### The judges

- **The Boarding-Stable Owner** (v1.0): Runs a forty-box Pensionsstall and loses a few hundred euros a month to blanket changes and leg wraps nobody wrote down. Wants extra services logged where they happen and billed without retyping, direct debit that collects on time, and one system instead of a spreadsheet and three WhatsApp groups.
- **The Stable Manager** (v1.0): Runs the morning round with two grooms, a trainee and a mini-jobber, and is the one the vet calls. Wants feeding plans the night shift can read on a phone, medication logged with who gave what, rotas and time records that hold up, and an app that still works at the far end of the barn.
- **The Boarder** (v1.0): Pays five hundred euros a month for her mare and works full time. Wants to see what the farrier did, why the bill has three extra wraps, and whether her turnout instruction was read — and does not want the other boarders, or an analytics company, seeing her horse's file.
- **The Riding-School Lead** (v1.0): Runs lessons six days a week on twelve school horses, plus weekend clinics with guest riders. Wants lessons and arena slots booked without double bookings, school horses not over-worked, ten-lesson cards that count themselves, and course payments that land in the same books as board.
- **The Tax Adviser** (v1.0): Does the books for a dozen equestrian businesses and knows that board, lessons and sold hay are not taxed alike. Wants invoices with GoBD-compliant numbering, VAT per service, a DATEV export instead of a shoebox of PDFs, and time records for the staff that would survive a customs minimum-wage check.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.0): Has seen stable apps arrive with a launch post and vanish two seasons later with the horse records inside. Reads "billing" that is a price list, "staff management" that is a chat, geofencing with no word on staff consent, and an imprint that names a riding stable rather than a software company — and asks what happens to the data then.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Ownership | Not determined | — | — |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | — |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- Einvoicing compatible: yes [S1]
- GDPR page: yes [S3]
- Resources: Sécurité & RGPD page available [S2]

**Hosting**
- France rgpd: France · yes [S1]

**Legal**
- Entity: Equionline · yes [S3]
- Hippolia member: member of the Hippolia competence cluster [S1]
- Membership: Membre du pôle Hippolia [S2]
- Pages: Mentions légales · Confidentialité [S3]

**Pricing**
- Annual commitment: 8 · no [S3]
- Annual discount: 8 [S3]
- Association discount: structures associatives · 10 [S3]
- Avance price: HT · Avancé · EUR · Planning des reprises · Planning des chevaux · Planning des réservations · Planning personnel · 8.5 [S3]
- Complet price: HT · Complet · EUR · Site internet pour vous & vos cavaliers · 9 [S3]
- E invoicing all tiers: yes · yes [S3]
- E invoicing included: yes · no [S3]
- Einvoice no extra fee: e-invoicing included without additional fees [S1]
- Electronic invoicing free: no [S2]
- Essentiel price: HT · Essentiel · EUR · Facturation & comptabilité · Gestion clientèle · Médiathèque · Registre d'élevage · Utilisateurs illimités · 7.7 [S3]
- Free trial: yes [S2]
- Horse tiers: 10 · 20 · 30 · 50 · 75 · 100 · 150 · 200 · 200 [S3]
- Over 200: yes · 24 [S3]
- Pension example: 320 · EUR · Pension - nov. [S1]
- Plan change: no · yes · no [S3]
- Starting price: 7.7 [S2]
- Temp overflow: no · yes [S3]
- Trial: 31 · yes · yes [S3]
- Users: yes · yes [S3]

**Product**
- Accounting module: VAT journal, universal accounting export [S2]
- Activity module: outings, tasks, weekly schedule [S2]
- Automatic invoicing: yes [S2]
- Client management module: families, consumptions, third-party payers [S2]
- Core purpose: boarder tracking, owner invoicing, outing logs [S2]
- Customer stats: 18000 · 500 · 120000 [S1]
- Einvoicing 2026: automatic sending/receiving of invoices, compliant with 2026 French e-invoicing reform [S1]
- Electronic invoicing compatible: yes [S2]
- Horse management: horse records, rider files and care history [S1]
- Horse management module: digitalized register, care, movements [S2]
- Horse records: yes [S2]
- Invoicing module: quotes, invoices, credit notes, online payment [S2]
- Modules: Facturation · Gestion clientèle · Gestion des chevaux · Facturation électronique · Planning cours & montoir · Espace cavalier · Registre d'élevage [S1]
- Modules: Facturation · Gestion clientèle · Gestion des chevaux · Facturation électronique · Planning cours & montoir · Espace cavalier · Registre d'élevage [S3]
- Modules list: Facturation · Gestion clientèle · Gestion des chevaux · Facturation électronique · Planning cours & montoir · Espace cavalier · Registre d'élevage [S2]
- Owner portal: yes [S2]
- Payment reminders: yes [S2]
- Rating: 4.9 · Google [S2]
- Shared planning: team-wide real-time planning [S1]
- Shared planning: yes [S2]
- Stats: 18000 · 500 · 120000 [S3]
- Tagline: Gestion, facturation et planification pour les professionnels du cheval. [S3]
- Target segment: Pour les écuries de propriétaire [S2]
- Target segments: Écurie de propriétaire · Centre équestre · Écurie d'élevage · Cavalier professionnel [S1]
- Trial available: yes [S1]

## Questions

### Is Equionline European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Equionline as EU-Made.

### Where does Equionline store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.

### Does Equionline have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to Equionline?

As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates [horsemanager+ (3/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/horsemanager-plus), [Equimondo (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/equimondo) and [LIVERYLive (2.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/liverylive) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [horsemanager+](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/horsemanager-plus) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [Equionline alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/equionline/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown.
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor homepage: https://www.equionline.fr/ (checked 2026-10-16)
- [S2] Features page (livery stables): https://www.equionline.fr/structure/ecurie-de-proprietaires (checked 2026-10-16)
- [S3] Pricing page: https://www.equionline.fr/tarifs (checked 2026-10-16)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "Equionline — Stable & Equestrian Management", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-20. https://whats-best.ai/software/stable-management/equionline

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/852?target=page