# AllVoices — Whistleblowing Portals

AllVoices by AllVoices, Inc. holds a panel rating of 2/5 from 6 AI judges (category median 2/5), as of 2026-10-15. Provenance: provenance unknown; sovereignty: not determined.

- Vendor: AllVoices, Inc. (https://www.allvoices.co)
- Category: [Whistleblowing Portals](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing.md)
- Provenance (editorial classification): provenance unknown
- Canonical page: https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/allvoices
- Alternatives: https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/allvoices/alternatives ([markdown](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/allvoices/alternatives.md))
- Data as of: 2026-10-21 · evaluated 2026-10-15 · oldest source captured 2026-10-13

**AI-generated.** Every score, rationale and verdict here is written by a panel of AI judges from public evidence — an analysis, not a hands-on test. Every fact quotes the vendor page it was read from. No score can be bought. How scores are made: https://whats-best.ai/methodology

## At a glance

- Vendor: AllVoices, Inc.
- Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026

## The panel's verdict

AllVoices, Inc. is an AI-native employee relations and whistleblowing platform whose bench scores split sharply between what a reporter touches and what a compliance buyer must evidence. Reporting channels are the strongest area at 7-8: intake runs by web, mobile, phone, email and QR code in 200+ languages, with no logins or PINs and two-way anonymous messaging that holds through resolution. Case management scores 4-6 for one dashboard, step-by-step workflows, configurable routing rules, SLAs and trend analytics. Compliance alignment and security assurance sit at 3: encryption, MFA, SSO and automatic PII stripping before AI processing are asserted, while we found no public information on certifications, penetration tests, statutory deadline clocks, national transpositions or IP and metadata logging. Sovereignty scores run 0-1, with hosting on AWS and no public information on hosting region, data residency, a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list. The genuine split is multi-entity scale at 1-4: the SME judge can live with that ambiguity for a single company, while the group counsel reads the same pages as one company, one channel. No public prices appear.

**Speaks for it:**
- Reporting channels score 7-8, spanning web, mobile, phone, email and QR-code intake in 200+ languages.
- Two-way anonymous messaging keeps the reporter anonymous through resolution, with no logins or PINs.
- Every channel's reports land in one dashboard with step-by-step workflows, configurable routing rules, SLAs and trend analytics — case management scores 4-6.
- Encryption at rest and in transit, MFA, SSO and automatic PII stripping before AI processing are stated in plain terms.
- The vendor states customer data is not used to train or improve any AI model.

**Held against it:**
- Sovereignty scores run 0-1, with AWS hosting and no public information on hosting region, data residency, a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list.
- Compliance alignment sits at 3, with the EU Whistleblower Directive named only alongside SOX and Dodd-Frank and no public information on statutory deadlines, retention periods or national transpositions.
- Security assurance sits at 3, with no public information on ISO 27001 or equivalent certification, penetration tests, or IP and metadata logging.
- Case management scores 4-6, with no public information on statutory deadline clocks, conflict-of-interest exclusion, role separation or tamper-evident case history.
- Multi-entity scale scores span 1-4, with no public information on per-entity channels or separated case access per legal entity.

**Best for:**
- You are a single company that needs broad, reporter-friendly intake first — web, mobile, phone, email and QR code in 200+ languages; reporting channels scored 7-8.
- You want employees to report anonymously without logins, PINs or forms that feel like a police report, with two-way follow-up that keeps them anonymous through resolution.
- You need one dashboard consolidating every intake channel, with configurable workflows, routing rules and SLAs; case management scored 4-6 with judges crediting the workflow depth.

**Avoid if:**
- Your whistleblowing data must sit under European jurisdictional control — sovereignty scored 0-1, hosting is on AWS, and we found no public information on hosting region, a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list.
- You are a corporate group needing per-entity channels or separated case access per subsidiary — multi-entity scale scored 1-4, the widest spread on the table and the one criterion where the judges genuinely split.
- You expect the vendor to own statutory discipline — acknowledgment and feedback deadlines, retention periods, national transpositions — compliance alignment scored 3 and we found no public information on any of these as product features.
- You need independently auditable security evidence — certifications, penetration tests, an IP and metadata logging policy — before trusting the anonymity promise; security assurance scored 3 on vendor assertions.

## Scores by judge and criterion

Scores out of 5, each judge scoring independently against the published rubric (v1). "n/r" = not rated: the vendor publishes no price.

| Criterion | The Compliance Officer | The Reporter's Advocate | The SME Operator | The Group Counsel | The Security Auditor | The Skeptic |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reporting channels & reporter experience | 3.5/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 | 3.5/5 | 4/5 |
| Case management & deadline discipline | 2/5 | 2.5/5 | 2/5 | 3/5 | 2/5 | 2.5/5 |
| Legal compliance alignment | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Security & anonymity assurance | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 | 1.5/5 |
| Group & multi-entity capability | 1/5 | 1/5 | 2/5 | 0.5/5 | 1/5 | 1.5/5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5/5 | 0/5 | 0.5/5 | 0/5 | 0.5/5 | 0.5/5 |
| Pricing transparency | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r | n/r |
| **Weighted verdict** | **2/5** | **2.5/5** | **2/5** | **1.5/5** | **1.5/5** | **2/5** |

### The judges

- **The Compliance Officer** (v1.0): Runs the internal reporting office of a 600-employee company and answers for every missed statutory clock. Optimizes for case discipline: automated acknowledgment and feedback deadlines, role separation, documentation that survives a regulator. Rejects inbox-with-a-form products that make the deadlines her problem.
- **The Reporter's Advocate** (v1.0): Judges from the frightened side of the form. Optimizes for anonymity that survives contact, a two-way dialog without an account, languages the workforce actually speaks, and channels that work on a night-shift phone. Rejects login walls, app installs and anything that makes reporting feel like a deposition.
- **The SME Operator** (v1.2): Runs a 60-employee company that the law obligated, not convinced. Optimizes for compliance set up in an afternoon at a price the year-end review will not question, with the legal duties handled by the product. Rejects per-report fees, setup charges and anything that needs a compliance department to operate.
- **The Group Counsel** (v1.0): Rolls one system out to 25 subsidiaries in a dozen countries. Optimizes for per-entity channels with real access separation, per-country legal rule sets, external ombudsman roles and group reporting that respects entity boundaries. Rejects one-channel products multiplied by twenty-five contracts.
- **The Security Auditor** (v1.0): Pentests the anonymity promise for a living. Optimizes for evidenced security: current certificates with visible scope, published pentests, documented end-to-end encryption, metadata minimization, and hosting outside hostile jurisdictional reach. Rejects adjective security and "military-grade" anything.
- **The Skeptic** (v1.2): Assumes "audit-proof" and "100% anonymous" are marketing until the evidence says otherwise. Hunts certification claims without certificates, anonymity claims next to analytics scripts, per-report pricing traps and legal-update promises with no named lawyer. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

## European sovereignty — proven facts

Built only from facts on the vendor's own pages; a dimension we could not prove is left open, never scored as zero. Headline: not determined.

| Dimension | Finding | Points | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | — |
| Ownership | Not determined | — | — |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | — |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | — |

## Key facts

Each fact is the vendor's own statement, cited to the source page it was read from ([S*n*] → Sources).

**Compliance**
- AI data usage: yes · no [S7]
- CCPA: yes [S7]
- Certifications: yes · yes · yes [S8]
- Continuous monitoring: Continuous monitoring via Vanta plus vulnerability scanning of packages [S7]
- Device security: Anti-malware on employee devices, VPN required for production access, Vanta monitoring installed [S7]
- Employee controls: yes · yes · yes [S7]
- Encryption: AES-256 · TLS 1.3 · yes [S7]
- GDPR: yes [S7]
- Openai zero retention: yes · yes [S7]
- Pen testing: product · infrastructure · APIs · at least annually · yes [S7]
- SOC 2 type2: yes [S7]

**Hosting**
- Provider: AWS [S7]

**Integrations**
- Module: yes [S6]

**Pricing**
- Demo only: Demo request form; no pricing shown on page [S4]

**Product**
- AI assistant: yes [S6]
- AI automations: yes [S4]
- AI intake: yes [S2]
- AI pii stripping: Automatic PII stripping before sending to AI model [S7]
- Anonymous reporting: yes [S6]
- Audit ready documentation: audit-ready documentation · early trend detection · AI-powered features [S6]
- Automated legal documentation: yes · Comprehensive Documentation [S6]
- Best practice alignment: Best Practice Alignment [S6]
- Case intake channels: web form · anonymous hotline · email · admin entry [S5]
- Case management: yes · yes [S1]
- Case management: Centralized platform for anonymous reports, cases, and investigations with step-by-step workflows and AI automations [S4]
- Compliance frameworks: SOX · Dodd-Frank · EU Whistleblower Directive [S3]
- Compliance solution: Compliant investigations process: aligns case management and investigations with best practices and legally required documentation [S6]
- Configurable workflows: intake forms · routing rules · SLAs · resolutions [S5]
- Customizations: yes [S6]
- Data insights: yes [S6]
- Encryption: yes · yes [S8]
- Fair consistent process: Fair and Consistent Process [S6]
- Hotline: yes · yes · yes [S1]
- HR case manager: yes [S6]
- Intake channels: phone · web · mobile · email · yes [S3]
- Languages: 200+ [S3]
- MFA: yes · yes [S7]
- No llm training: no [S8]
- Performance improvement: yes [S6]
- Positioning: AI-native employee relations platform [S1]
- Product description: Employee relations platform: surface, investigate, respond to workplace incidents; audit-ready documentation, early trend detection, AI-powered features [S8]
- Product modules: AI Assistant, Anonymous Reporting, Data & Insights, Workplace Investigations, Whistleblower Hotline, Integrations, HR Case Manager, Performance Improvement, Customizations [S8]
- Reporter anonymity: yes · yes [S3]
- Reporting channels: web · mobile · phone · email · QR code · 200+ [S2]
- Resolve faster claim: 70 [S4]
- Trend analytics: yes [S4]
- Two factor auth: yes [S8]
- Two way anonymous messaging: yes [S5]
- Two way messaging: two-way messaging without revealing reporter identity · yes [S2]
- Whistleblower hotline: yes [S6]
- Workflows: yes [S4]
- Workplace investigations: yes [S6]

**Support**
- Faq: yes [S6]
- Help center: yes [S6]

## Questions

### Is AllVoices European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where AllVoices is based.

### Where does AllVoices store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

### Does AllVoices have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

### What are the best alternatives to AllVoices?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates [preeco | hinweisgeberschutz (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/preeco-hinweisgeber), [EQS Integrity Line (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/eqs-integrity-line) and [Safecall (3.5/5)](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/safecall) highest among the other 36 Whistleblowing Portals products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is [preeco | hinweisgeberschutz](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/preeco-hinweisgeber) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: [how scores are made](https://whats-best.ai/methodology#ordering). The full list, with European products first: [AllVoices alternatives](https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/allvoices/alternatives).

## What this page leaves out

- 48 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 16 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 15 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material.
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown.
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement.

## Sources

- [S1] Vendor page: https://www.allvoices.co (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S2] Reporting channels & reporter experience — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/products/anonymous-reporting (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S3] Reporting channels & reporter experience — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/products/whistleblower-hotline (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S4] Case management & deadline discipline — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/demo/hr-case-manager (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S5] Case management & deadline discipline — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/products/hr-case-manager (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S6] Legal compliance alignment — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/solutions/compliance (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S7] Security & anonymity assurance — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/security (checked 2026-10-13)
- [S8] Security & anonymity assurance — found from sitemap: https://www.allvoices.co/solutions/security (checked 2026-10-13)

---

Cite as: whats-best.ai, "AllVoices — Whistleblowing Portals", AI panel analysis, as of 2026-10-21. https://whats-best.ai/software/whistleblowing/allvoices

Corrections: https://whats-best.ai/correct/843?target=page