Source

Performance reviews & calibration — found from sitemap — Lattice

Checked for Lattice on 28 Oct 2026

Page: https://lattice.com/articles/how-to-pick-a-performance-review-rating-scale
Checked: 28 Oct 2026, 16:12 UTC
How we may use it: Public page, crawling permitted

Technical details

type: page
http status: 200
content hash: sha256:87570a188ce56635fc279d60543d29426824951c3c432e156f1d11d56eb5c285
permission: robots_ok
screenshot: Screenshot on file (internal exhibit, not published)

Cited by

Performance rating scales Report an error

“5 Types of Performance Review Rating Scale, With Examples”
Review calibration Report an error

“Holding calibration meetings to spot and address manager bias”
Five point scale adoption Report an error

“This type accounted for 61% of all scales for review cycles launched in 2022.”
Numeric low rating usage Report an error

“Lattice customer research from 2021 found that, no matter the number of options available, reviewers presented with numeric scales are less likely to rate individuals with the lowest option. For instance, less than 1% of reviewers gave someone a score of 1 out of 4, but 14% gave someone a “needs improvement” (essentially the same rating, the lowest of four levels.)”
Review questions without numbers growth Report an error

“In 2021, the share of review questions without numbers increased by 40% among Lattice customers”

10 facts read from this page are not shown because they could not be confirmed on the page as captured.