Accounting

sevDesk

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by sevDesk GmbH · sevdesk.de

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The Bookkeeper v1.0 · The Tax Adviser v1.0 · The Auditor v1.0 · The Founder v1.0 · The Integrator v1.0 · The Skeptic v1.0 · rubric v1 · evaluated 15 Sep 2026

Compare with Lexware Office → Compare with BuchhaltungsButler → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Integrator

Weighted verdict

Connects the books to the shop, the payment provider and the payroll system. Wants a documented API, e-invoicing both directions, and imports that reconcile rather than duplicate. Reads a Zapier logo as an outsourced integration.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Integrator

Bookkeeping core

How this is scored

Double-entry, the chart of accounts (SKR03/SKR04), postings, journals, opening balances and period closing — the ledger underneath the pretty screens.

0 — Income-and-expense lists only; no double-entry, no chart of accounts, no journal.

3 — Simplified bookkeeping suitable for EÜR with a fixed account list; no free posting, no period close.

5 — Double-entry with SKR03/SKR04, manual postings, journals, opening balances and a month-end close.

8 — Full ledger with cost centres, recurring and reversing entries, accruals, multi-year comparatives, and a documented close checklist with locking.

10 — An accountant's ledger: configurable charts including customised accounts, period locking with audit, foreign currency with documented valuation, group or multi-entity handling, and reporting that reconciles to the trial balance.

Report an error

The Integrator

The evidence claims "einfache und doppelte Buchführung" with cashbook, trial balance, EÜR/GuV and depreciation, and cost centres plus BWA in Buchhaltung Pro — real ledger territory. But nowhere is a chart of accounts (SKR03/SKR04), journals, opening balances or any period close with locking evidenced, which is what separates rubric level 5 from real bookkeeping. 2

Report an error

GoBD, immutability & audit

How this is scored

Whether the record survives a tax audit: unalterable postings, complete change history, retention across the statutory period, and a Verfahrensdokumentation the vendor actually supplies.

0 — Postings can be edited or deleted without trace; no retention statement, no GoBD claim, no documentation.

3 — GoBD asserted on the marketing page with nothing behind it — no described audit trail, no documentation offered, no statement on retention.

5 — Postings become unalterable after close with corrections booked as reversals, a change log exists, and the statutory retention period is stated.

8 — Documented GoBD conformity with a supplied Verfahrensdokumentation template, complete and exportable audit trail, receipts linked to postings, and a GoBD-compliant data export (GDPdU/Z3) for the auditor.

10 — Audit-ready as a product feature: an independent GoBD certification or attestation published, Verfahrensdokumentation maintained per release, tamper-evident journals, retention executed across the full statutory period, and an export the Betriebsprüfer accepts without argument.

Report an error

The Integrator

Total silence: the feature inventories on homepage and pricing page list dozens of capabilities without one word on GoBD, immutability, retention period or a Verfahrensdokumentation. For a 170,000-customer bookkeeping product that absence speaks loudly, and rubric level 0 is exactly that: no GoBD claim, no retention statement, no documentation. 1 2

Report an error

Tax handling & filings

How this is scored

VAT logic and the filings that follow: UStVA, ELSTER submission, EÜR or Bilanz, OSS for cross-border sales, and reverse-charge handling.

0 — No VAT logic beyond a rate field; no filings, no ELSTER.

3 — VAT rates and a UStVA figure to copy out by hand; no electronic submission, no special cases.

5 — UStVA prepared and submitted electronically via ELSTER, EÜR or a simple balance sheet produced, and reverse-charge and intra-community supply handled.

8 — The above plus OSS handling for cross-border B2C, Zusammenfassende Meldung, small-business (§19) and Ist/Soll taxation, permanent extension (Dauerfristverlängerung), and E-Bilanz where relevant.

10 — The filing year is handled end to end: every routine German filing generated and submitted electronically with validation before sending, cross-border VAT determined from the transaction rather than by hand, and correction filings supported.

Report an error

The Integrator

UStVA goes directly to the Finanzamt through an integrated ELSTER interface with no extra certificate, and EÜR plus GuV are listed — the core of rubric level 5 is there. But reverse-charge, intra-community supply, OSS, Zusammenfassende Meldung and correction filings appear nowhere, so I can't go above the middle. 1 2

Report an error

Receipts, banking & matching

How this is scored

How evidence and money get into the ledger: bank feeds, receipt capture, OCR, matching rules, and whether the digital receipt is legally sufficient on its own.

0 — Manual entry only; no bank connection, no receipt storage.

3 — Bank statement import by file and receipt upload as plain attachments; matching is entirely manual.

5 — Automatic bank feeds for the major German banks, receipt upload with OCR, suggested matches, and receipts linked to their postings.

8 — PSD2 feeds across many institutions, rule-based automatic matching with learning, e-invoice handling (ZUGFeRD/XRechnung) both directions, and replacement scanning (ersetzendes Scannen) documented so paper can be destroyed.

10 — The evidence chain is closed: every posting reaches its receipt in one click, e-invoicing inbound and outbound as standard, documented compliant archiving of the digital original, and matching accurate enough that exceptions rather than transactions are the work.

Report an error

The Integrator

Over 4,000 banks connected with transfers straight out of the app, AI receipt capture with automatic category recommendation, and e-invoicing in ZUGFeRD/XRechnung both directions in every plan — the pipe from money and evidence into the books is genuinely built. What's missing is the reconciliation half: no rule-based automatic matching with learning, no ersetzendes Scannen, no archiving of the digital original. 1 2

Report an error

Tax adviser handoff

How this is scored

How the books reach the Steuerberater — DATEV above all — and whether the adviser can work in the system rather than around it.

0 — No adviser access and no accounting export; the year-end is a pile of PDFs.

3 — Generic CSV or Excel export described as "suitable for your tax adviser", with no named format.

5 — A documented DATEV export (postings and, ideally, receipts) plus a read-only login for the adviser.

8 — DATEV export including receipt images with correct linking, or a maintained DATEV interface; the adviser gets their own scoped access with an audit of what they changed.

10 — The adviser is a first-class user: bidirectional DATEV exchange including corrections coming back, or a certified interface; period handover with locking, and a workflow where adviser queries are resolved inside the system.

Report an error

The Integrator

DATEV and ADDISON interfaces are named, assigned to a concrete paid tier and framed as "Verknüpfung zu deiner Steuerberatung", and the adviser can be invited into the account to work — that meets rubric level 5. But the export's contents (receipt images, linking) are undocumented, the adviser seat is unscoped and unaudited, and corrections flowing back is pure speculation on this evidence. 1 2

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the books live and who could be compelled to produce them — plus, uniquely here, whether statutory retention survives leaving the vendor. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed — with a ten-year retention obligation attached to data held abroad.

3 — EU hosting offered while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — OCR, AI categorisation, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU or German hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and a stated export that satisfies retention if the contract ends.

10 — Sovereign and durable: German or EU hosting throughout, every subprocessor European, certification published, and a documented archive export that keeps the customer compliant for the full retention period after they leave.

Report an error

The Integrator

The vendor's own pages state German server location, the imprint confirms a German GmbH under Amtsgericht Freiburg, and the privacy page publishes a subprocessor list, AVV and TOM — rubric level 5 territory. But nothing is independently verified (the pipeline flags every attribute unknown), the infrastructure is unnamed, and there is no stated export that keeps statutory retention alive if the contract ends. 3 4

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a business can compute the real annual invoice — including the bookings, users, bank accounts and adviser access they actually need — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A headline monthly price exists, but booking or document limits, extra users or the tier where DATEV export begins are unstated.

5 — Tier prices public with billing period stated and the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (DATEV export, extra bank accounts, adviser seat) sits in an unpriced tier.

8 — Every tier and add-on priced publicly with limits, overage, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; adviser access priced or explicitly free.

10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given transaction volume, user count and feature set, including overage and the year-end extras.

Report an error

The Integrator

Structure is public: 1/12/24-month terms with "ab" prices valid only for 24-month terms, an explicit free tier with a 3-invoice limit, and the DATEV tier identifiable. But a business still can't compute its real invoice: one user per plan with no extra-seat or adviser price, marketplace partner costs explicitly "nicht inkludiert", discount promos of "bis zu 70%" muddying the headline, and no euro figures or VAT treatment captured at all. 1 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Ownership	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Data residency	EU only ⚠ unverified	3/3 pts	4 Report an error
Subprocessors	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 31 Aug 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
Weak sourcing — Data residency. The region claim sits on the privacy overview page without naming the hoster, while the security page names AWS as the hosting provider but states no server region.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

96 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
71 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
20 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
17 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
9 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
6 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
4 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
The panel’s written verdict is withheld: our own re-read found claims in it that the evidence does not carry, and a second synthesis did not fix them. The scores and the material below are unaffected. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about sevDesk? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (15)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor homepage sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 +2 earlier captures: 15 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026 Details →
2 Pricing sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 +3 earlier captures: 15 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026, 31 Aug 2026 Details →
3 Imprint sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
4 Privacy policy sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
5 Security / trust page — found from the homepage sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 30 Sep 2026 Details →
6 Bookkeeping core — found from sitemap sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
7 Bookkeeping core — found from sitemap sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
8 GoBD, immutability & audit — found from sitemap hilfe.sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
9 GoBD, immutability & audit — found from sitemap hilfe.sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
10 Tax handling & filings — found from sitemap hilfe.sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
11 Tax handling & filings — found from sitemap hilfe.sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
12 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap hilfe.sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
13 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
14 Tax adviser handoff — found from sitemap sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
15 Tax adviser handoff — found from sitemap hilfe.sevdesk.de Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →