Category
AI Agents & Assistants
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Langdock (4/5), Dust (3.5/5) and Unique AI (3.5/5) highest in AI Agents & Assistants, out of 16 products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European option is Langdock (EU-Made). Of the products whose own pages state a free plan, the panel rates Dust highest. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
Independence note: the judges on this site are AI models. Products of the company whose models power the panel are not listed in this category: a panel does not rate its own maker. Every other assistant here is judged by the same rubric, bench and publish gate. Conflicts of interest
The bench 6 judges, built for this category
The Head of IT v1.0
Has to roll an AI assistant out to eight hundred staff without a second shadow-IT wave. Wants SSO and SCIM, groups that decide who gets which model, agent and connector, answers that respect SharePoint permissions, audit logs for the SIEM, and a deployment option that is not "trust us".
The Data Protection Officer v1.0
Signs the DPA and gets asked where a prompt goes. Wants every model provider named as a subprocessor with its region, training excluded for all of them, retention the company controls, and an EU-only switch that also covers agents and connectors — not just the chat window.
The Automation Lead v1.0
Builds the agents that file tickets, draft offers and chase approvals across the ERP, CRM and wiki. Wants tools and actions with scoped permissions, MCP and an API, approval steps before anything is sent, run logs, and a way to test an agent before the whole company uses it.
The Customer-Service Director v1.0
Runs a contact centre with forty agents and wants half the routine calls and chats answered by an AI agent. Wants handover to a human with the full context, actions in the order and ticket systems, evaluation before go-live, and a price per conversation the CFO can forecast.
The Works Council Member v1.0
Has a co-determination right the moment a tool can monitor staff, and an AI assistant logs every prompt. Wants usage reports that can be aggregated or pseudonymised, prompt logging rules set out in writing, a human approving what agents do to colleagues, and no training on staff input.
The Skeptic v1.0
Has read "European AI" on a wrapper that sends every prompt to a US model, "agents" that are saved prompts, and "we never train on your data" with no word on the model provider behind it. Asks which model answers, where it runs, what it may do unsupervised, and what a thousand seats cost.
Every judge is AI, versioned, and scores independently against the same published anchors — disagreement is printed, not averaged away.
Head-to-head
Gemini for Google Workspace vs Microsoft 365 Copilot
Microsoft 365 Copilot leads six criteria — data use and training 7.0 to 3.2, integrations and knowledge 7.0 to 3.8, sovereignty 4.7 to 2.7, processing and models, admin and access...
Compare →
Claude for Work vs Langdock
Langdock holds the wider margins: processing and models 8.2 to 3.7, sovereignty 8.0 to 3.8, agent capabilities 8.0 to 7.0, pricing transparency 7.2 to 6.2, integrations and knowled...
Compare →
Langdock vs nele.ai
Langdock holds the higher mean on the seven criteria — nele.ai on none: closest at sovereignty 8.0 to 5.7 and data use and training 8.0 to 4.0, widest at agent capabilities 8.0 to...
Compare →
Parloa vs PolyAI
The bench splits along clean lines.
Compare →
Evaluated
Listed alphabetically by default. Sorting by rating or sovereignty is your choice and follows the published method. Scores are the panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence. How scores are made →
Aleph Alpha Workspace
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
Claude for Work
Rest of worldSovereignty: not determined
Cognigy
EU origin, foreign-ownedSovereignty: not determined
Dust
EU-MadeSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Gemini for Google Workspace
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Langdock
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
LightOn
EU-MadeSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Microsoft 365 Copilot
Rest of worldSovereignty: not determined
Mistral Vibe
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
Moveworks
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
nele.ai
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
Omnifact
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
Parloa
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
PolyAI
UK / wider EuropeSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Relevance AI
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Unique AI
UK / wider EuropeSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Questions about AI Agents & Assistants software
What is the best AI Agents & Assistants software?
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Langdock (4/5), Dust (3.5/5) and Unique AI (3.5/5) highest of the 16 AI Agents & Assistants products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence. Each judge weighs the criteria differently, so read the scores for the criteria that matter to you.
Which AI Agents & Assistants software is European?
As of 28 Oct 2026, 11 of the 16 AI Agents & Assistants products evaluated are European by provenance: Langdock, Dust, Unique AI, Omnifact, LightOn, Parloa, Cognigy, Mistral Vibe, and 3 more (see the full list). The highest-rated of them is Langdock (EU-Made).
Which AI Agents & Assistants tools have a free plan?
As of 28 Oct 2026, the vendors’ own pages state a free plan for Dust, Claude for Work and Mistral Vibe. Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.
How were these AI Agents & Assistants tools evaluated?
Each product is scored by a bench of 6 AI judges built for this category, against the same published rubric of 7 criteria, using public evidence captured from the vendor’s own pages. Every score is AI-generated; nobody tested the products hands-on, and no score can be bought. The full method is on the methodology page.