Cloud Storage & File Sharing
Internxt Drive
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Internxt Universal Technologies, S.L. · internxt.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Internxt Drive at a glance
- Vendor
- Internxt Universal Technologies, S.L.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 1 Nov 2026
- Starting price
- “Starting at € 1.99 /month” (vendor’s words) source, captured 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Internxt Drive 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Internxt Drive is zero-knowledge, end-to-end encrypted cloud storage from Internxt Universal Technologies SL of Valencia, Spain. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 1 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Internxt Drive is zero-knowledge, end-to-end encrypted cloud storage from Internxt Universal Technologies SL of Valencia, Spain. Strongest is encryption and security at 6 to 8: client-side AES-256, keys stored only on the device, a Kyber 512 post-quantum scheme, a passed Securitum audit with publicly readable reports, and open-source code on GitHub. Weakest are sharing and collaboration at 3 to 4 and administration and governance, flat at 4: password-protected sharing and an encrypted Send service are documented, but we found no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only links, upload requests, co-editing, provisioning, retention policies or remote wipe. Sovereignty scores spread 4 to 6: higher readings credit the Spanish legal basis, a downloadable data processing agreement and a published subprocessor list; lower ones point to data centres described only as "Europe and other locations worldwide". Personal prices are public — a free 1GB tier, "Starting at € 1.99 /month", Essential € 380 with 1TB — but per-user business pricing and VAT treatment are not, and captured pages show both 80% and 85% off. Weighted totals run 4.4 to 5.5.
Speaks for it
- Zero-knowledge client-side AES-256 encryption with Kyber 512 post-quantum key encapsulation and keys stored only on the device
- Independent Securitum audit passed with no significant issues and reports that are publicly readable
- All code published open-source on GitHub
- Files reachable through open protocols — WebDAV, Rclone, a command-line tool and NAS — so data is not locked to vendor apps
- Spanish contracting entity under Spanish law with a downloadable data processing agreement and a published subprocessor list with prior notice and objection rights
Held against it
- Beyond password-protected sharing and a separate encrypted Send service, no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only links, upload requests or co-editing
- Administration documented as a root user managing members in four roles plus business access logs, with no public information on provisioning, retention policies, legal hold or remote wipe
- Data centres described only as "Europe and other locations worldwide", with none named
- No public information on per-user business pricing or VAT treatment, and the captured pages give different discount figures, 80% off and 85% off
- No public information on key recovery for a lost device, version history length or single sign-on, and the named ISO 27001 and SOC 2 appear without a stated scope
Best for
- You need independently verifiable end-to-end encryption — a passed Securitum audit with publicly readable reports, on open-source code — for confidential files
- Your team wants storage reachable through WebDAV, Rclone, a command-line tool or NAS rather than one vendor's apps
- You buy as an individual or small team on published personal prices, with a free 1GB tier and a 30-day money-back guarantee to test
- You want a Spanish contracting entity with a downloadable data processing agreement and a published subprocessor list with objection rights
Avoid if
- You need data-room controls such as link expiry, download limits, view-only links or co-editing, where the documented sharing is password-protected links plus a separate encrypted Send service
- You need directory provisioning, retention with legal hold or remote wipe — the documented administration is a root user managing members in four roles plus business access logs
- You must pin storage to named EU data centres; the pages describe them only as "Europe and other locations worldwide"
- You need predictable team costs under heavy usage — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Sync, clients & file access | 2.5 of 5 |
| Sharing & external collaboration | 2 of 5 |
| Encryption, key custody & recovery | 3.5 of 5 |
| Administration, audit & governance | 2 of 5 |
| Export, API & self-hosting | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2 of 5 |
Sync, clients & file access
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How files reach the people who work with them: desktop clients for Windows, macOS and Linux, files on demand (virtual drive) and selective sync, offline access, mobile apps with camera upload and offline folders, a web interface, block-level or delta sync for large files, sync of folders outside the main folder, file size limits, preview of common formats, full-text search, and access through open protocols (WebDAV, SFTP, S3) or a mounted network drive.
0 — Not a file storage or sync product; files cannot be stored and synced with it.
3 — A web interface and apps for some platforms to upload and download files; desktop sync, files on demand, offline access and limits are basic or not described.
5 — Desktop sync clients for Windows and macOS, files on demand or selective sync, mobile apps with offline files and camera upload, a web interface with previews, file size limits stated, and search by file name.
8 — Clients for Windows, macOS and Linux, a virtual drive with files on demand, block-level or delta sync documented, full-text search inside documents, access via WebDAV, SFTP or S3, large-file handling stated, and LAN sync or a performance figure for big folders.
10 — File access that a whole organisation runs on: every platform covered with feature parity stated, sync conflicts and their resolution documented, open protocols and a mountable drive on every desktop, search across content and metadata with OCR, and sync behaviour and limits published in technical documentation.
The IT Lead
Desktop apps for Windows, macOS and Linux are documented, plus a Windows virtual drive whose location you can change, mobile apps for iOS and Android, a web app that previews Word and Excel files, and access over WebDAV, CLI, Rclone and NAS. Before I move 180 people onto it I would need answers the pages do not give: we found no public information on mobile offline files or camera upload, block-level sync, file size limits, or file search. 1 4 7 8 9 10
The Data Protection Officer
Desktop applications for Windows, macOS and Linux, mobile apps for iOS and Android, a web app with previews of files, images, docx and xlsx, and a Windows virtual drive whose location can be changed are documented, alongside WebDAV, a command-line tool, Rclone, NAS connection and scheduled encrypted computer backups. I found no public information on selective sync or files on demand, offline mobile folders, camera upload, search, block-level sync or file size limits. Video and audio playback in the web app is stated to work for files up to 100 MB. 1 4 7 8 9 10
The Architecture Practice Partner
Desktop apps are documented for Windows, macOS and Linux, the Windows app mounts a virtual drive whose location you can choose, and there are iOS and Android apps plus a web app with previews of docx, xlsx and images, with WebDAV, Rclone and a command-line tool opening the storage to other platforms. For our multi-gigabyte CAD and BIM models I found no public information on files on demand, delta or block-level sync, offline folders on phones, camera upload, full-text search or file size limits, and web playback of video and audio stops at 100 MB. 1 4 7 8 9 10
The Tax Adviser
Desktop apps for Windows, macOS and Linux, iOS and Android apps, and a web app with previews of Word and Excel documents cover the everyday work, and a Windows virtual drive with a changeable location plus access through WebDAV, Rclone, a command-line tool and NAS go beyond the basics. We found no public information on full-text search, delta sync for large annual accounts, offline files on mobile, camera upload or file size limits, so I cannot place it higher. 1 4 7 8 9 10
The Agency Producer
Desktop apps for Windows, macOS and Linux, mobile apps for iOS and Android, a web app with file and image previews, and WebDAV, Rclone, CLI and NAS access are all documented — that covers the basics of getting files to people. We found no public information on files on demand or selective sync beyond a Windows setting for the virtual drive's location, on offline folders, camera upload, delta sync or file search. For a video shop the concrete limit is stated plainly: in-app playback of video and audio stops at 100 MB, so browser review of a real cut is not what this product shows. 1 4 7 8 9 10
The Skeptic
Desktop apps for Windows, macOS and Linux, a Windows virtual drive whose location can be changed, iOS and Android apps, a web app with image and docx/xlsx previews, and access via WebDAV, Rclone, CLI and NAS cover the basics. We found no public information on search, offline files, camera upload, selective or block-level sync, and the only limit stated is playback of video and audio up to 100 MB. 1 4 7 8 9 10
Sharing & external collaboration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How files are shared inside the team and with people outside it: shared team folders or spaces, share links with password, expiry, download limits and view-only or no-download mode, upload links (file requests) for customers, guest or external user accounts, link and access reports, notifications, watermarking, comments and file locking, editing of office documents in the browser together, large-file transfer, and an Outlook or Teams add-in for sending links instead of attachments.
0 — Files cannot be shared with anyone else.
3 — Folders and files can be shared with other users and by public link; link controls, upload links and external accounts are basic or not described.
5 — Shared team folders, share links with password and expiry, view-only links, upload links for external people, permissions per folder (view, edit), notifications on changes, and office documents opened and edited in the browser.
8 — Link policies the administrator sets (forced expiry, passwords, domains allowed), download limits and no-download view, watermarking, guest accounts with their own permissions, an access log per share, file locking and comments, co-editing documented with the editor named, and an Outlook or Teams add-in.
10 — External collaboration at the level of a data room: granular rights including print and download control on shared files, revocation that also reaches copies already opened, recipient identity verification, a complete record of who opened and downloaded what, and end-to-end encryption kept intact when sharing externally and when editing.
The IT Lead
Sharing with an optional password is documented for files and folders, along with an invite-and-collaborate feature and a separate Send product for encrypted large-file transfer. Everything my auditors and my sales office would ask about is undocumented here: we found no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only or no-download links, upload links for customers, guest accounts, or editing office documents together in the browser. 3 4 7 10
The Data Protection Officer
Files and folders can be shared with optional password protection, an invite-share-collaborate feature appears on higher tiers, business plans include access logs of who signed in, uploaded or modified files, and a separate product offers end-to-end encrypted transfer of large files. I found no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only or no-download links, upload requests for external people, guest accounts, file locking, comments, watermarking or co-editing of office documents in the browser — this is nowhere near what a data room requires. 3 4 7 10
The Architecture Practice Partner
Files and folders can be shared with optional password protection, an encrypted large-file transfer service exists for sending plans, and higher tiers list invite, share and collaborate. I found no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only links, upload requests for external structural engineers, guest accounts, comments, file locking or co-editing documents in the browser. 3 4 7 10
The Tax Adviser
Sharing a file or folder with an optional password is documented, a separate end-to-end encrypted Send service handles large transfers, and business plans keep access logs of who signed in, uploaded or modified files. For what my practice needs — link expiry, download limits, upload links so clients can send me receipts without an account, and view-only links — we found no public information. 3 4 7 10
The Agency Producer
Sharing files and folders with optional password protection is documented, and a separate Send tool does end-to-end encrypted large-file transfer, which is the raw-footage hand-off part of my week. We found no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only or no-download links, upload links to collect customer feedback, guest accounts, comments on files or co-editing — the review-and-comment loop my agency runs on is not visible in the captured pages. 3 4 7 10
The Skeptic
Password-protected sharing of files and folders and an end-to-end encrypted Send service for large files are documented, plus an "Invite, share & collaborate" feature on Premium. We found no public information on link expiry, download limits, view-only or no-download mode, upload links, guest accounts, co-editing, comments or file locking. 4 7 10
Encryption, key custody & recovery
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the files are protected and restored: encryption in transit and at rest, client-side or end-to-end encryption and whether it covers all folders, sharing and office editing, who holds the keys and what happens when a user loses theirs, customer-managed keys, two-factor authentication and single sign-on, version history and its length, a recycle bin, restore of a whole folder or account to a point in time after ransomware, ransomware detection, malware scanning, an independent security audit or penetration test, a bug bounty, and certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2, BSI C5) with their scope. Where the data is stored is scored under sovereignty.
0 — Files are stored without any stated encryption and no account protection beyond a password.
3 — Encryption is mentioned and a recycle bin or version history exists; key custody, two-factor, restore after ransomware and audits are basic or not described.
5 — TLS in transit and AES encryption at rest stated, two-factor authentication, version history with its length stated, a recycle bin, the restore of deleted or overwritten files, and a security page naming at least one certification or audit.
8 — Client-side or end-to-end encryption documented with who holds the keys (or customer-managed keys), a whitepaper describing the scheme, single sign-on (SAML), restore of a folder or account to a point in time, ransomware detection or recovery documented, an independent audit or penetration test named, and ISO 27001, SOC 2 or BSI C5 stated with scope.
10 — Security that can be verified: zero-knowledge end-to-end encryption by default that stays on for sharing and editing, the cryptography published and externally audited with the report available, key recovery for organisations documented without the provider gaining access, open-source clients or a public bug bounty, and certifications published with their scope and date.
The IT Lead
The encryption story is genuinely strong: zero-knowledge client-side AES-256 with keys stored only on the device, a published explanation of the Kyber 512 post-quantum scheme, open-source code on GitHub, two-factor authentication, and an independent Securitum audit whose reports are publicly readable, with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 also stated. What I could not find is everything that gets me back after an incident: how long version history runs, restoring a folder or account to a point in time, key recovery when someone loses a device, single sign-on, or the scope of those certifications. 3 4 6 11 12
The Data Protection Officer
Key custody is stated unambiguously: zero-knowledge client-side end-to-end encryption with AES-256 and Kyber 512 post-quantum key encapsulation, keys stored only on the device, and the vendor stating it cannot know the content of an account; a Securitum audit passed with no significant issues, its reports are publicly readable, and the code is open-source on GitHub. Two-factor authentication and file versioning are listed, but I found no public information on key recovery when a user loses their device, single sign-on, or the length of version history, and the named ISO 27001, SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance is stated without scope — the recovery question is the one I ask before patient letters move anywhere. 3 4 6 7 11 12
The Architecture Practice Partner
Zero-knowledge client-side AES-256 encryption is documented with keys held only on the user's device, the post-quantum Kyber 512 scheme is explained in their help pages, two-factor authentication and file versioning exist, an independent Securitum audit passed with the reports publicly readable, and the code is published open-source. What worries me for a 25-person office: I found no public information on what happens when a colleague loses the keys held on their device, how long versions are kept, restore of a folder or account to a point in time, single sign-on, or the scope of the ISO 27001 and SOC 2 statements. 2 3 4 6 7 11 12
The Tax Adviser
Zero-knowledge, end-to-end encryption with AES-256 and post-quantum Kyber 512, keys stored only on the user's device, and the vendor's own statement that it cannot know what a user stores — an independent Securitum audit passed with the reports publicly readable, code open-source on GitHub, two-factor authentication, and ISO 27001 and SOC 2 named. We found no public information on the length of version history, single sign-on, organisational key recovery, ransomware restore or the scope of the certifications, which keeps it below the top. 3 4 6 7 11 12
The Agency Producer
Zero-knowledge AES-256 end-to-end encryption with keys held only on the device, a technical description of the post-quantum Kyber 512 scheme, an independent Securitum audit that passed with publicly readable reports, and open-source code on GitHub — that is privacy I can actually check, and more than most. It thins out at the business end: ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are named without a stated scope, file versioning is listed without its length, two-factor is there but we found no public information on single sign-on, restore of an account to a point in time, or key recovery when someone loses a device. 1 3 4 6 7 11 12
The Skeptic
Zero-knowledge AES-256 client-side encryption with keys stored only on the device, Kyber 512 post-quantum key exchange, two-factor authentication, and a passed Securitum audit whose reports are publicly readable — with open-source code on GitHub — is more than badge-ware. But we found no public information on what happens when a user loses their key, version history length, a recycle bin, or point-in-time restore, and ISO 27001 and SOC 2 appear as stated badges without scope. 3 4 6 7 11 12
Administration, audit & governance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What an administrator controls: an admin console with users, groups and roles, provisioning through Entra ID, Google or LDAP with SCIM, quotas per user or team, an audit log of logins, shares and file actions with export, retention policies and legal hold, data loss prevention or classification, device management with remote wipe and unlinking, policies for external sharing, account transfer when someone leaves, team folders that belong to the company rather than to a user, and reports on storage and sharing.
0 — No administration: every account is independent and nobody can manage the team's users or files.
3 — A team plan with an administrator who can invite and remove users; roles, audit log, retention and device controls are basic or not described.
5 — An admin console with users, groups and admin roles, quotas, an activity or audit log, policies for external sharing, file transfer when a user leaves, company-owned team folders, and remote unlinking of lost devices.
8 — Provisioning via SCIM or a directory (Entra ID, Google, LDAP), an exportable audit log covering logins, shares and file actions, retention policies and legal hold, remote wipe, IP or device restrictions, data classification or DLP, and integration with a SIEM.
10 — Governance a regulated organisation can sign off: granular delegated administration per department or tenant, retention and legal hold with eDiscovery export, DLP with content inspection, every admin and user action logged and streamed to a SIEM, and the audit log retention and completeness stated.
The IT Lead
Business plans include access logs showing who signed in, uploaded or modified files, and a root user can create, edit and delete members with four defined roles, or deactivate a member to block access while keeping the account. For my checklist the pages are silent: we found no public information on provisioning from Entra ID or SCIM, company-owned team folders, exporting the audit log, retention policies or legal hold, or remote wipe of a lost laptop — and the member management described belongs to the S3 object-storage console. 3 13
The Data Protection Officer
The Cloud Console documents a root user who creates, edits and deletes members under four differentiated roles, member deactivation that blocks access, and permanent deletion, while business plans add access logs covering sign-ins, uploads and modifications. I found no public information on directory provisioning or SCIM, quotas, retention policies or legal hold, remote wipe of devices, external sharing policies, log export or SIEM streaming — for a hospital group this is the section that would stall a signature. 3 13
The Architecture Practice Partner
Business plans are said to include access logs showing who signed in, uploaded or modified files, and a cloud console lets a root user create, edit, deactivate and delete members with distinct roles — though that console documentation is written for their object storage product rather than Drive. I found no public information on groups, quotas, provisioning from a directory, retention policies and legal hold, remote wipe or unlinking of a lost device, or company-owned team folders that survive a departure. 3 4 6 13
The Tax Adviser
Business plans include access logs tracking who signed in, uploaded or modified files, and the object-storage console offers root, administrator and full-access roles with member creation, deactivation and permanent deletion. We found no public information on groups and quotas, provisioning from a directory, an exportable audit log, retention policies with legal hold, or remote wipe of a lost device. 3 13
The Agency Producer
Business plans include access logs of who signed in, uploaded or modified files, and the Cloud Console lets a root user create and edit members with roles (Root, Administrator, Full Access, Full Access Limited) and deactivate them — enough to add a freelancer for one project and cut access afterwards. We found no public information on quotas, groups, retention policies, device wipe, directory provisioning or an exportable audit log, which is what a 30-person operation needs before it signs off. 3 13
The Skeptic
The Object Storage Cloud Console gives a root user role-based member management (Administrator, Full Access, Full Access Limited, with deactivation and permanent deletion), and Business plans include access logs of who signed in, uploaded or modified files. We found no public information on groups, quotas, directory provisioning, retention policies, legal hold, remote wipe, SIEM, or transferring a leaver's files. 3 13
Export, API & self-hosting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the files and their structure can leave and connect: a bulk export or download of all data with folders and versions, open protocols (WebDAV, S3, SFTP) usable for migration, a documented REST API and SDKs, webhooks, migration tools from Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive or a file server, integrations with office suites, Microsoft 365 and Teams, Slack, CRM and project tools, an app marketplace, open-source code, a self-hosted or on-premise edition, and deletion of data on termination.
0 — Files can only be downloaded one by one; no export, API or migration path.
3 — Files can be downloaded in bulk or as an archive; an API, migration tools, integrations and self-hosting are basic or not described.
5 — A documented API, bulk download of all files with the folder structure, a migration path from at least one named provider, integrations with named office and collaboration tools, and what happens to data after cancellation stated.
8 — A REST API with SDKs and webhooks, open-protocol access (WebDAV, S3 or SFTP) that makes migration tool-independent, migration tools in both directions or a supported migration service, an app marketplace, a self-hosted or on-premise edition, and deletion on termination under stated terms.
10 — The customer owns the data end to end: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export including versions, shares and permissions in a documented format, and the deletion of every copy and backup on termination documented.
The IT Lead
The door is open at the protocol level: WebDAV, Rclone, a command-line tool and NAS connections are documented, plus an Enterprise S3 offering, and the vendor states all of its code is open source and published on GitHub. We found no public information on a documented REST API with SDKs or webhooks, migration tools from Dropbox, OneDrive or a file server, an app marketplace, a self-hosted edition, or what happens to the data after cancellation. 1 4 5 7
The Data Protection Officer
Open-protocol access through WebDAV, an npm command-line tool, Rclone and direct NAS connection makes moving files in and out tool-independent, and the vendor states every bit of its code is open-source on GitHub. I found no public information on a documented REST API, SDKs, webhooks, named migration tools, an app marketplace or a self-hosted edition, nor on what happens to data after cancellation beyond the words "Cancel anytime". 1 2 4 7
The Architecture Practice Partner
Open protocols are the strength: WebDAV, Rclone, a command-line tool and NAS support would let us move the whole tree in and out tool-independently, and all code is published open-source on GitHub. I found no public information on a documented REST API with SDKs and webhooks, migration tools from Dropbox, OneDrive or a file server, an app marketplace, a self-hosted edition, or the terms for deleting data when a contract ends. 1 2 4 5 7
The Tax Adviser
Open-protocol access through WebDAV, Rclone, a documented command-line tool and NAS, an S3-compatible enterprise offering, and open-source code on GitHub give me migration paths that are not tied to one tool. We found no public information on bulk export with folder structure and versions, a documented REST API with SDKs and webhooks, migration tools from a named provider, or a self-hosted edition. 1 2 5 7
The Agency Producer
WebDAV, native Rclone support, a command-line tool and an Enterprise S3 product mean the data is reachable through open protocols, which makes migration tool-independent, and the code is published as open-source on GitHub. We found no public information on a REST API with SDKs or webhooks, migration tools from named providers, integrations with Slack, Teams or project tools, an app marketplace, or a self-hosted edition — the Slack and project-tool hooks my studio lives on are absent from the captured pages. 1 2 5 7
The Skeptic
WebDAV, Rclone, an npm command-line tool and NAS connection make bulk file access tool-independent, and the code is published open-source on GitHub. We found no public information on a REST API with SDKs or webhooks, migration tools from named providers, export of versions and shares, a self-hosted edition, or what happens to data after cancellation. 1 2 5 7
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where files, metadata and backups are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (data centres, CDN, email that carries share notifications, support desk, payment, office editing). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; files hold the company's documents and personal data, so the whole chain counts, not only the storage. End-to-end encryption with keys only the customer holds reduces what a foreign provider could hand over but does not change who the provider is. A self-hosted edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, storage location unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but the storage location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU storage available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (account data, metadata, notifications, support, office editing, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard, or the parent company is subject to non-EU disclosure laws.
8 — EU storage on named data centres, EU or EEA or Swiss contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, BSI C5, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every file on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, storage and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The IT Lead
The contracting entity is Internxt Universal Technologies SL in Valencia, Spanish law and the Spanish data protection authority apply, a data processing agreement can be downloaded, and the vendor says it maintains and publishes a subprocessor list with a right to object. Storage is stated to be in Europe and other locations worldwide, though, and we found no public information on choosing a European data centre for a given account, on named data centres, or on the locations of subprocessors such as Google Analytics and the third-party payment provider. 1 5 6 10
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity is Internxt Universal Technologies SL of Valencia under Spanish law and exclusive Spanish jurisdiction, the Spanish Data Protection Agency is named as supervisory authority, a downloadable data processing agreement is referenced in the help centre, and the terms state that an updated subprocessor list is published with prior notice and a right to object. The data centres are described only as "Europe and other locations worldwide" with none named, and apart from Google Analytics for navigation data and a third-party payment provider I found no public information on the identities or locations of other subprocessors — I would need the residence commitment and the full list in writing before a single salary statement moves. 1 5 6 10
The Architecture Practice Partner
The contracting entity is Internxt Universal Technologies SL of Valencia under Spanish law with exclusive Spanish jurisdiction, a Data Processing Agreement is downloadable, a subprocessor list is maintained and published with prior notification and objection rights, the Spanish data protection authority is named, and ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are claimed. The storage picture is weaker for our client work: data centers are described only as being in Europe and other locations worldwide, with no named facilities or per-account residency choice, and Google Analytics and a third-party payment provider sit in the chain. 1 3 4 5 6 7 10
The Tax Adviser
A Spanish limited company based in Valencia, Spanish governing law, the Spanish data protection authority named as the supervisory body, a downloadable data processing agreement and a published subprocessor list with notice and objection rights give a European basis. The data centres are described only as 'Europe and other locations worldwide' with no residency commitment and no named data centres, so I cannot confirm where my clients' files would sit. 1 4 5 6 7 10
The Agency Producer
Internxt Universal Technologies SL sits in Valencia, contracts under Spanish law with the Spanish Data Protection Agency as supervisory authority, publishes a subprocessor list with notification and objection rights, and offers a downloadable Data Processing Agreement — a European entity end to end on paper. The open question is the chain: data centers are described as "in Europe and other locations worldwide" with no named facilities and we found no public information on pinning storage to the EU or on the subprocessors' locations, while ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are named without a stated scope. 1 4 5 6 10
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is Internxt Universal Technologies SL of Valencia under Spanish law with the Spanish Data Protection Agency as supervisory authority, and a Data Processing Agreement is downloadable. But the only storage statement is that data centers are "based in Europe and other locations worldwide" — no named locations — and the one named subprocessor is Google Analytics for navigation data, with payment handled by a third party. 1 5 6 7 10
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user or per plan, storage included per user or pooled, the minimum number of users, what extra storage costs, which features (end-to-end encryption, SSO, audit log, longer version history, data residency, advanced admin) need a higher tier or an add-on, the free tier and its limits, lifetime offers and their terms, the self-hosted edition's licence and support, minimum term and VAT.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, storage or features is unclear.
5 — Business tiers are public with their price per user and storage included, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra storage, SSO, audit log, data residency, minimum users) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (users, storage), extra storage and add-ons priced, minimum users and term stated, the self-hosted edition's licence and support cost stated, and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size, storage need and feature set, with every add-on, migration, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The IT Lead
Personal plans are priced openly — € 380 for 1TB, € 580 for 2TB and € 780 for 5TB, with a 1GB free tier, a stated starting price of € 1.99 /month, annual and lifetime options and a 30-day money-back guarantee — though the captured pages give different figures for the discount, 80% off and 85% off. For a company of our size the decisive numbers are missing: we found no public information on per-user business pricing, seat minimums, storage beyond 5TB, VAT treatment, or what single sign-on and the access log would cost on a business plan. 1 2 3 4
The Data Protection Officer
The pricing page publishes a free 1GB tier, a starting price of "€ 1.99 /month", and three plans — Essential € 380 with 1TB, Premium € 580 with 2TB, Ultimate € 780 with 5TB, each listed alongside an original price of € 1900, € 2900 and € 3900 — with annual or lifetime one-time billing, a 30-day money-back guarantee and "Cancel anytime". I found no public information on per-user business pricing, VAT treatment or the cost of any administrative feature, and a fair usage policy lets the vendor throttle, suspend, terminate or convert outlier accounts including lifetime plans, so a team's real annual cost is not computable from these pages. 1 2 4 6
The Architecture Practice Partner
Personal plans are public with prices and storage — Essential at € 380 for 1TB, Premium at € 580 for 2TB, Ultimate at € 780 for 5TB, each against a crossed-out original — alongside a free tier of 1GB, annual or lifetime billing, a 30-day money-back guarantee and cancel anytime. I found no public information on business pricing per user, minimum seats, extra storage or VAT treatment, the captured pages give different framings of the Essential price (annual in one place, one-time payment in another) and different discount figures of 80% and 85%, and the fair use policy allows throttling, suspension or plan conversion of outlier accounts including lifetime ones. 1 2 3 4 6
The Tax Adviser
Prices are public: a free 1GB tier, plans at €380 for 1TB, €580 for 2TB and €780 for 5TB under an annual sale, a lifetime one-time option, a 30-day money-back guarantee and cancel-anytime. We found no public information on per-user business pricing, extra storage or VAT, and the captured pages give different discount figures (80% off and 85% off), so the real annual cost for an eleven-person practice is not computable from these pages alone. 1 2 3 4 6
The Agency Producer
Individual plans are public and readable: a free tier at 1 GB, Essential € 380 for 1TB, Premium € 580 for 2TB, Ultimate € 780 for 5TB as annual prices with lifetime one-time options, a 30-day money-back guarantee and cancel anytime — though the captured pages give different discount figures (80% and 85% off). For a team of thirty it stops there: we found no public information on per-user business pricing, extra-storage rates or VAT treatment, and a fair-usage clause reserves throttling, suspension or termination for outlier usage — exactly the kind of surprise a shoot that fills a terabyte could trigger. 1 2 3 4 6
The Skeptic
Personal plans are public with their storage — Essential € 380 for 1TB, Premium € 580 for 2TB, Ultimate € 780 for 5TB — alongside a 1GB free tier, a "Starting at € 1.99 /month" entry point, annual and lifetime billing, and a 30-day money-back guarantee. The captured pages give different figures for the discount ("80% off" and "85% off"), we found no public information on per-user business pricing, VAT treatment or extra storage, and the terms reserve throttling, suspension or termination of lifetime accounts under a fair usage policy — a caveat any "lifetime" buyer should read. 1 2 4 6
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Internxt Drive
Is Internxt Drive European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Internxt Drive as EU-Made.
Where does Internxt Drive store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
Does Internxt Drive have a free plan?
Yes. Internxt Drive has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Internxt Drive?
As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Nextcloud Files (Nextcloud Hub) (4/5), Tresorit (3.5/5) and Proton Drive (3/5) highest among the other 13 Cloud Storage & File Sharing products evaluated. The highest-rated European alternative is Nextcloud Files (Nextcloud Hub) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Internxt Drive alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Open source, Legal entity, Hosting location. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 20 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 14 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (15)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage (Internxt Drive) internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Company homepage internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (GDPR and data protection) internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Pricing page internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Company page internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Terms of service and legal notice internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Privacy policy internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Sync, clients & file access — found from sitemap help.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Sync, clients & file access — found from sitemap help.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Sharing & external collaboration — found from sitemap help.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Encryption, key custody & recovery — found from sitemap help.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Encryption, key custody & recovery — found from sitemap help.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Administration, audit & governance — found from sitemap help.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Security / trust page — found from the homepage blog.internxt.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Code repository (open-source licence) — found from the homepage github.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →