CobbleStone Contract Insight

The General Counsel

The pages show authoring of contract templates with dynamic clauses, an approved clause library that the auto-redline feature draws from, and playbooks assignable at both contract and clause level, with AI side-by-side delta analysis and percentage similarity scoring to flag deviations from approved standards. We found no public information on clause versioning with a named owner, German-language or multilingual templates, or a self-service form for business teams, which keeps this below the governed end of the scale. 3 4 5 8

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

Template authoring with dynamic clauses, an approved clause library of more than 140 clause types, and AI that redlines a Word document against the preferred library is real drafting governance, with smart clause matching scoring deviations from approved standards. The captured pages do not show clause versioning with a named owner, German-language or multilingual templates, or a self-service form letting business teams generate standard contracts alone. 3 4 5 8 11

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

Templates with dynamic clauses, an approved clause library, and playbook rules that flag deviations from approved standards are all documented, and auto-redline replaces clauses with preferred library wording at the click of a button. I found no public information on generating drafts from a CRM record, a self-service form or questionnaire for business users, clause versioning with a named owner, or German-language templates, so this clears the middle level on library strength alone. 3 4 5 8

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Templates with dynamic clauses, an approved clause library that Auto-Redline injects into Word drafts, and playbooks with semantic matching and percentage-based scoring against approved wording are all documented, alongside automated clause extraction into libraries. We found no public information on clause versioning with an owner per clause, German-law or multilingual templates from one source, or a form that lets business users generate standard contracts themselves. 3 4 5 8

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Templates with dynamic clauses and an approved clause library are documented, with AI playbooks that run side-by-side clause comparison and flag deviations from approved language by similarity score. We found no public information on clause versioning with a named owner, German-law or multilingual templates, or self-service generation from CRM or procurement records. 3 4 5 11

Report an error

The Skeptic

Templates with dynamic clauses, an approved clause library, and playbooks that flag deviations are all documented — semantic matching with percentage-based similarity scoring, playbook compliance checks, high-risk clause flagging, and Auto-Redline inserting approved wording into Word documents — with more than 140 standard clause types claimed. We found no public information on a self-service questionnaire letting business users generate contracts themselves, clause versioning with a named owner per clause, or German-language and German-law templates, which is what stands between this and a governed drafting story. 3 4 5 8 11

Report an error

The General Counsel

Auto-redline works on MS Word.docx documents and replaces clauses with preferred library wording, a Microsoft Word plugin carries the AI playbooks, redlined documents can be downloaded back to Word or worked in a native online editor, and built-in negotiating comments with business justifications guide reviewers. The pages describe contract workflow management and document version control in general terms, but we found no public information on counterparty access, approval routing by value or risk, or a record of who approved which version. 3 5 6 11

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

Auto-Redline works on Word documents with a round-trip download, a native online editor and a Word plugin for AI playbooks, supported by guided redlining comments and document version control. I found no public information on counterparty collaboration in the browser, approval routing by value or deviation, or an audit trail of who approved which version. 3 5 10 11

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

Auto-redline on Microsoft Word.docx documents, a Word plugin for playbooks, built-in negotiating comments with business justifications, and IntelliSign's real-time sign/share/negotiate give me a real editing path. But I found no public information on approval routing by deal value or discount, counterparty collaboration in the browser, or an audit trail of who approved which version, which is exactly what my quote-to-signature process runs on. 3 5 10 11

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Auto-Redline rewrites Word.docx files against the preferred clause library, a Microsoft Word plugin carries the AI playbooks, and a native online editor sits beside generic contract workflow automation. We found no public information on counterparty access without a licence, approval routing by value or deviation, or an audit trail of who approved which version — the record I would need at audit time. 3 5 7 10

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Auto-Redline is documented to redline MS Word (.docx) documents against the preferred clause library, with a Microsoft Word plugin for AI playbooks, a native online editor, download back to Word, and built-in negotiating comments and business justifications. We found no public information on counterparty access without a licence, configurable approval routing with delegation, or an audit trail of who approved which version. 3 5

Report an error

The Skeptic

Redlining is real and Word-native: Auto-Redline edits.docx files against the preferred clause library, documents download to MS Word, there is a native online editor, a Microsoft Word plugin, built-in negotiating comments, and IntelliSign to sign, share and negotiate in real time. The sign-off side is the thin part — approval appears only as generic contract workflow management, and we found no public information on approval routing by contract type or value, a record of who approved which version, or counterparty access terms. 3 5 10 11

Report an error

The General Counsel

Contracts and vendors are tracked with metadata field extraction, text indexing and searching including legacy document OCR, configurable email alerts and calendar notifications; the AI auto-obligations feature identifies deadlines and responsibilities, users review and validate before saving, and an Obligation Type Manager ties obligation types to automated tasks and field updates, with custom reports available. We found no public information on escalation to named owners, contract hierarchies linking framework agreements and amendments, or logged reminders that let a missed deadline be traced. 6 7 8 11

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

The obligation engine is strong: deadlines and responsibilities detected automatically, an Obligation Type Manager linking types to automated task creation and field updates, plus text indexing, legacy OCR and custom reports. The captured pages do not show notice periods or renewal dates modelled as first-class dates, reminders escalating to a named owner, or linked contract hierarchies — the exact things I need to see what can be cancelled this quarter. 6 7 8 9 11

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

Obligation detection that pulls deadlines, responsibilities and key requirements into the contract record, review-and-validate before saving, an obligation type manager linked to automated task creation, plus configurable alerts, calendar notifications, OCR for legacy documents, text search and custom reports make a credible portfolio spine. Notice periods as such, escalation to named owners, contract hierarchies, and logged reminders are not documented, which keeps it short of an audit-grade record. 6 7 8 11

Report an error

The IT Integrator

AI obligation detection with review-and-validate before saving, an Obligation Type Manager that ties obligation types to automated task creation and field updates, OCR on legacy documents, text indexing and custom reports are all documented. We found no public information on escalation to named owners, linked contract hierarchies, or logged reminder acknowledgements traceable when a notice deadline is missed. 6 7 8 11

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Obligations are well evidenced: AI scans contracts for deadlines, responsibilities and key requirements, users validate findings before saving, and an Obligation Type Manager links obligation types to automated task creation and alerts, alongside text indexing and searching, legacy-document OCR and custom reports. We found no public information on notice periods and renewal terms captured per contract, access rights per department, contract hierarchies, or reminders logged with escalation to named owners. 6 7 8 11

Report an error

The Skeptic

Obligations are the best-evidenced part of the platform: VISDOM scans documents to identify deadlines, responsibilities and key requirements, a human validates before saving, an Obligations Found section tracks them, an Obligation Type Manager links types to automated actions, and they drive tasks, reminders, notifications and alerts, with text indexing, legacy OCR, metadata extraction, custom reports and an Analytics & Reporting module alongside. But the pages promise only generic deadlines — we found no public information on notice periods (Kündigungsfristen) and renewal dates as named, reminded fields, on access rights per department, escalation to named owners, or amendments linked to their framework contracts. 6 7 8 11

Report an error

The General Counsel

Extracted values and obligations are presented for a human to monitor, validate and manage before saving, and the AI provider is disclosed — VISDOM leverages third-party AI such as OpenAI and may use up to GPT-4.1 Mini, with the vendor reserving the right to adjust model levels. The captured pages are silent on whether customer contracts are used for training, on the AI processing location, and on any ability to disable the AI features per account, which is exactly the assurance a legal team needs and does not get here. 4 6 8 9

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

VISDOM AI is described concretely — it extracts key fields, terms and conditions, and users are told to monitor and validate extracted data before it is loaded, the human check I insist on. OpenAI is named as third-party AI with a published model up to GPT-4.1 Mini, though the vendor reserves the right to adjust model levels, and I found no public information on processing location, training use of customer contracts, or disabling AI features per account. 6 8 9

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

Extracted data and detected obligations are presented for a user to validate before saving, and the model is named — up to GPT-4.1 Mini, with OpenAI named as third-party AI. I found no public statement that customer contracts are excluded from model training, no EU processing location, no per-field source links, and the vendor reserves the right to change the model without notice, so the control sits with the vendor, not my team. 9 6 8

Report an error

The IT Integrator

OpenAI is named as the third-party AI, up to GPT-4.1 Mini, and both data extraction and obligation detection put a human in the loop to monitor and validate before anything is saved — the control I insist on. We found no public information on a statement that customer contracts are not used for training, on the AI processing location, on per-account switch-off or an EU AI Act position, and the vendor reserves the right to alter the AI without notice. 8 9 6

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Extracted data and detected obligations are shown for a human to monitor, validate and manage before saving, and OpenAI is named as third-party AI with GPT-4.1 Mini named as a possible model — though the vendor reserves the right to alter the AI without notice. We found no public information on whether customer contracts are used for training, where AI and OCR processing run, retention of contract text by the model provider, or an option to disable AI per account. 6 8 9

Report an error

The Skeptic

Two things are documented: extracted values go to a human — users monitor and validate extracted data for accuracy and completeness, and obligations are reviewed before saving — and the provider is named, VISDOM leveraging third-party AI such as OpenAI, up to GPT-4.1 Mini. We found no public information on whether customer contracts train these models, where AI processing occurs, extracted values linked to the source passage they came from, or a way to switch AI features off — and the vendor reserves the right to adjust model levels and alter the AI without notice. 6 8 9

Report an error

The General Counsel

E-signature is well covered: the native IntelliSign tool offers bulk signing, completion certificates and advanced authentication, with connectors for Adobe Sign, DocuSign and SignNow — the signNow connector requiring a licence and API key purchased separately from signNow — plus a Microsoft Word plugin. CRM and ERP integrations are named only as generic categories, and we found no public information on a documented API, SSO, an export of documents with their metadata, versions and audit trail, or the eIDAS level of the signatures. 3 10 11

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

Signatures are well covered: IntelliSign built in, Adobe Sign, DocuSign and signNow named, Word round-trip, and CRM and ERP integration stated by category. The eIDAS level is not stated, and I found no public information on an API, SSO, or a documented export of documents with their metadata, versions and audit trail — exit terms I would want in writing. 3 5 10 11

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

IntelliSign is built in for real-time signing, sharing and negotiating, with Adobe Sign, DocuSign and signNow as additional providers — signNow requiring its own licence and API key — and a Microsoft Word plugin is documented. No eIDAS level is stated, CRM and ERP appear only as unnamed categories, and I found no public information on an API, SSO, or a documented export of contracts with their metadata and history. 10 11 3

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Signature providers are named — IntelliSign built in, plus Adobe Sign, DocuSign and a SignNow connector that requires its own licence — while CRM and ERP appear only as categories beside the Microsoft Word plugin. We found no public information on a documented or versioned API, SSO or SCIM, the eIDAS level of any signature (qualified is what the law asks for here), or an export that returns metadata, versions and audit trail — the piece that decides my migration. 10 11 3 5

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

A built-in signature tool with bulk signing, completion certificates and advanced authentication is documented, along with named integrations for Adobe Sign, DocuSign and SignNow and integration categories for CRM and ERP systems. We found no public information on a documented API or export of contracts with metadata and audit trail, on the eIDAS level of the signatures, or on SSO. 5 10 11

Report an error

The Skeptic

E-signature is covered by name: native IntelliSign with bulk signing, advanced authentication and completion certificates, plus integrated Adobe Sign, DocuSign and a signNow connector that itself requires a licence and API key purchased from signNow — an extra cost no captured page prices. CRM and ERP integration is advertised only as categories with no named systems, and we found no public information on a documented API, an export of contracts together with their metadata, SSO, or an eIDAS level for any of the signature tools, so we could not trace an exit path from the captured pages. 10 11

Report an error

The General Counsel

The only location facts on the evidence are company addresses in Princeton, New Jersey, US compliance marks (SOC 1 and SOC 2, FedRAMP Ready), and OpenAI named as a third-party AI whose use the vendor may alter without notice. We found no public information establishing EU hosting, an EU contracting entity or representative, a data processing agreement, or a published subprocessor list with locations, so a European buyer cannot see where its most confidential commitments would be processed. 6 8 10 11

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

The captured pages place the contracting entity and the hosting address at 100 Overlook Center, Princeton, New Jersey, name OpenAI as third-party AI, and report SOC 1, SOC 2 and FedRAMP — United States frameworks. I found no public information on EU hosting options, a data processing agreement, or a published subprocessor list, so nothing European is evidenced on these pages. 6 8 10 11

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

The captured pages show the company and its hosting address in Princeton, New Jersey, and OpenAI is named as a third-party AI provider, so nothing points to EU hosting or an EU contracting entity. I found no public information on a data processing agreement or a published subprocessor list with locations; SOC 1, SOC 2 and FedRAMP Ready status speak to security controls, not to where my contracts live. 2 8 10 11

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Both the legal and hosting listings give a Princeton, New Jersey address, the published attestations are US frameworks (SOC 1 and SOC 2, FedRAMP Ready), and OpenAI sits behind the AI. We found no public information on EU hosting, an EU contracting entity or representative, a data processing agreement, or a published subprocessor list with locations. 10 11 6 8

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The captured pages place the company and its hosting at 100 Overlook Center, Princeton, New Jersey, and the certifications shown are SOC 1, SOC 2 and FedRAMP Ready — United States frameworks — so the vendor side is established outside the EU. No EU hosting option, EU contracting entity, data processing agreement, or subprocessor list with locations beyond the OpenAI mention appears on the pages we read, which matters because a contract repository holds the counterparties' personal data too. 6 8 10 11

Report an error

The Skeptic

Contracting entity, data residency, hosting options and data processing agreement could not be established from the captured pages, and what the pages do show points to the United States: the company address is 100 Overlook Center, Princeton, New Jersey, the named third-party AI is OpenAI, and the published certifications are SOC 1, SOC 2 and FedRAMP — American frameworks. We found no public information on where contract data is hosted, an EU contracting entity or representative, or a published subprocessor list. 2 6 8 10 11

Report an error

The General Counsel

The VISDOM AI plans are published in full with basis and billing period — Basic free up to 100,000 words a month, Starter at $3,995 billed annually ($332/mo equivalent) plus 500,000 words a month, Pro at $6,995, Elite at $29,995, overage invoiced in 750-word increments with no rollover, and a 30-day free trial. The Contract Insight platform itself is shown only as "Request Pricing", and we found no public information on onboarding or migration fees, minimum term, or VAT treatment, so the real annual cost of the whole product cannot be computed from the pages. 5 8 10

Report an error

The Procurement Analyst

The AI add-on is priced to the word — a free tier up to 100,000 words per month, Starter at "$3,995 Billed annually ($332/mo equivalent)", tiers up to 5,000,000 words per month, overage invoiced in 750-word increments with no rollover — so that cost is computable. The platform itself sits behind "Request Pricing", and I found no public information on onboarding fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, while the vendor reserves the right to update or terminate a plan with 30 days notice. 8 10 11

Report an error

The Sales Ops Owner

The AI plans are fully public — Basic Free up to 100,000 words/mo, Starter $3,995 billed annually, Pro $6,995, Elite $29,995, with overage invoiced in 750-word increments and no rollover — but the basis is words processed in and out per iteration shared across all users, which I cannot forecast for a sales team. The Contract Insight platform itself shows "Request Pricing", so the number I would put in next year's budget still starts with a sales call. 8 5 10

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The VISDOM AI add-on is priced publicly — a free tier up to 100,000 words per month, Starter $3,995, Pro $6,995 and Elite $29,995 billed annually with word quotas, overage invoiced in 750-word increments, in USD — which is more than most vendors show. The Contract Insight platform itself and its add-on modules still say Request Pricing, so the real annual cost is not computable, and we found no public information on onboarding or migration fees or a minimum term. 8 10 5

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The VISDOM AI plans are priced publicly with basis and limits: Basic free up to 100,000 words/mo, Starter $3,995 billed annually ($332/mo equivalent) with 500,000 words/mo, up to Elite $29,995 billed annually ($2,499/mo equivalent) with 5,000,000 words/mo, overage invoiced in increments of 750 words with no roll-over, prices in USD. The core Enterprise Edition and add-on modules show Request Pricing, and we found no public information on minimum term, VAT treatment, or onboarding and migration fees, so the platform's real annual cost is not computable from public pages. 8 10

Report an error

The Skeptic

The AI plans are priced publicly with billing period and basis: Basic free at up to 100,000 words per month, Starter $3,995 billed annually, Pro $6,995, Elite $29,995, overage invoiced in 750-word increments, prices in USD, no rollover. But that meter covers only VISDOM — the Enterprise Edition and its add-on modules say Request Pricing, words are consumed in and out per iteration including non-visual results and shared across all users, and we found no public information on onboarding or migration fees, minimum term, or VAT treatment. 8 10

Report an error