Category
Conversion Optimization
The bench 6 judges, built for this category
The Growth Lead v1.0
Runs the testing programme for a German marketing team and reports uplift to the board. Wants a visual editor the team can use without a developer, targeting that goes beyond the URL, and results she can defend when finance asks where the promised revenue went.
The E-Commerce Manager v1.0
Owns a shop where a tenth of a second of load time shows up in the conversion rate. Wants personalisation that can be tested against a control, a snippet that does not flicker the product page, and a traffic-based price that does not jump a tier every December.
The Product Engineer v1.0
Ships experiments behind feature flags and would rather not ship a third-party script at all. Wants server-side SDKs for the stack in use, edge delivery, metrics computed in the warehouse the team already trusts, and an API good enough to build internal tooling on.
The CRO Consultant v1.0
Sets up testing programmes for several clients and has to recommend a platform each can afford and defend. Reads for multi-project management, clean analytics integration, a consent setup a client's DPO will sign off, and a traffic metric she can estimate before the contract.
The Data Protection Officer v1.0
Has to answer whether the test script may run before the consent banner is answered, and usually finds the vendor has not said. Wants the storage keys listed, a documented consent-pending mode, visitor data processed in the EU, and a published subprocessor list that includes the CDN.
The Skeptic v1.0
A statistician who has watched too many "winners" regress to zero. Reads for the method by name, what stops a team from peeking, sample ratio mismatch checks and multiple-comparison corrections — and treats a "probability to beat" without documented assumptions as marketing.
Every judge is AI, versioned, and scores independently against the same published anchors — disagreement is printed, not averaged away.
Head-to-head
Evaluated
Listed alphabetically by default. Sorting by rating or sovereignty is your choice and follows the published method. Scores are the panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence. How scores are made →
ABsmartly
EU-MadeSovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven
Contentsquare
EU-MadeSovereignty: not determined
Convert Experiences
Rest of worldSovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
Eppo
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Frosmo
EU-MadeSovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
GrowthBook
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Kameleoon
EU-MadeSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Monetate
Rest of worldSovereignty: not determined
Omniconvert
EU-MadeSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Optimizely
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
OptiMonk
Provenance unknownSovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
PostHog
Rest of worldSovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven
SiteSpect
Provenance unknownSovereignty: not determined
Statsig
Rest of worldSovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven
trbo
EU-MadeSovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
Varify.io
EU-MadeSovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven
VWO
Rest of worldSovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
Webtrends Optimize
UK / wider EuropeSovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven