Design
Kittl
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Kittl Technologies GmbH · www.kittl.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Kittl at a glance
- Vendor
- Kittl Technologies GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 1 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Kittl 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Kittl is a graphic design platform built on 10,000+ templates and AI generation, and the scoring favors buyers whose deliverable is finished visual assets. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Oct 2026 to 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Kittl is a graphic design platform built on 10,000+ templates and AI generation, and the scoring favors buyers whose deliverable is finished visual assets. Brand asset governance is the high point at 4 to 5: Brand Studio stores logos, colours, fonts, graphics, visual style and tone of voice as multiple reusable Brands, imports them from a store URL and applies them across an artboard. Collaboration and handoff and AI and content rights both hold at 4: real-time co-editing, synced comments and owner-approved edit requests are documented, model providers from OpenAI to Kling are named, token costs are shown before each generation, and Pro, Expert and Max plans own and may sell generated images and videos, stock resale excepted. Sovereignty spans 1 to 3: we found no public information on hosting region, the contracting entity or a subprocessor list, while prompts flow to named US and Chinese providers. Pricing transparency spans 2 to 4 — no per-seat price appears beyond a $0 free start, and team add-ons are Contact Sales. File ownership and portability sits at 3 with per-artboard export.
Speaks for it
- Brand Studio stores logos, colours, fonts, graphics, visual style and tone of voice as multiple reusable Brands, importable from a store URL.
- Real-time co-editing, instantly synced comment threads and free viewer commenting are documented, with edit requests approved by the project owner.
- AI model providers — OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Ideogram, Recraft, Black Forest Labs, Kling — are named, with token costs shown before each generation and refunded on failure.
- Pro, Expert and Max plans are stated to own generated images and videos outright and may sell them, with stock resale the stated exception.
- Export covers PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4 with DPI control, RGB or CMYK profiles and multi-artboard zips.
Held against it
- We found no public information on where design files and AI prompts are hosted, on the contracting entity, or on a subprocessor list with locations and purposes.
- We found no public information on per-seat prices for the paid plans, while Team Workspaces, History & Time Machine and Custom Brand Management are Contact Sales.
- We found no public information on whole-file export with structure, a documented file format, or what happens to files after a downgrade or cancellation.
- We found no public information on reusable components, team libraries, auto layout or interactive prototyping.
- We found no public information on whether customer files train the AI models, on an opt-out, on admin switches or on processing locations.
Best for
- You run a small business, agency or print-on-demand operation producing marketing and merch visuals from templates, with one brand kit applied across every artboard.
- You sell physical or digital products or do client work and need stated commercial ownership of AI-generated images and videos on a paid plan.
- Your clients and reviewers need to view and comment on designs without a paid seat.
Avoid if
- You need a confirmed hosting region, data processing agreement or subprocessor list before unreleased client work enters the tool; we found no public information on these.
- You must compute a year's cost from public per-seat prices before committing.
- Your engineers need an inspect mode with measurements or code handoff rather than exported files.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Design, prototyping & design systems | 2 of 5 |
| Collaboration, review & developer handoff | 2 of 5 |
| Brand assets & governance | 2.5 of 5 |
| Files, formats & portability | 1.5 of 5 |
| AI features & rights to the work | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.5 of 5 |
Design, prototyping & design systems
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The making itself: vector and layout tools, interactive prototypes, and the shared components, styles and tokens that keep a company's products and materials consistent — judged on what the feature and help pages document, not on showcase images.
0 — A single-purpose editor with no reusable components, no shared styles and no prototyping.
3 — Templates and basic shapes or layouts, with styles saved per file only and prototyping limited to linking screens.
5 — Reusable components and shared styles across files, responsive or auto layout, clickable prototypes with transitions, and team libraries that update where they are used.
8 — A design system managed in the tool: variables or tokens for colour, type and spacing with modes or themes, component variants and properties, prototypes with conditional logic, and library change notes with versions.
10 — The design system is a governed product: library releases versioned and reviewable, token export in a documented format for development, usage analytics per component, and accessibility checks such as contrast built into the editor.
The Product Designer
Kittl is a template product: 10,000+ premium templates across marketing and merch categories, vector editing, text effects, an infinite canvas, and a Brand kit whose stored colours and fonts are swapped across an artboard. We found no public information on prototyping of any kind, on reusable components with variants or properties, on tokens with modes or themes, or on versioned team libraries that update where they are used. I score it at the templates-and-basic-layouts level, with the Brand kit as shared styles and nothing above that. 2 6 11 1
The Frontend Engineer
Vector editing, text effects, an infinite canvas, custom fonts and ten-thousand-plus templates are documented, and Brand does carry shared colors, fonts and graphics across projects — but we found no public information on reusable components with variants and properties, auto or responsive layout, clickable prototypes, or token export in any documented format for development. 1 2 11 1
The Brand Marketer
Templates are the strong suit — over ten thousand premium ones across flyers, posters, brochures and banners, with vector editing, text effects, artboards and an infinite canvas all documented. What I could not find is any reusable component library, shared style tokens with themes, or prototyping with transitions — consistency rests on the brand kit swapping colours and fonts across an artboard, not on governed components. 6 11 1 12
The Agency Owner
Vector editing, text effects, infinite canvas and ten thousand-plus templates are well documented, and a saved Brand can swap colours and fonts across an entire artboard. We found no public information on reusable components, team libraries that update where they are used, auto layout, or any clickable prototyping with transitions — for a studio doing design-system work, that side is unverified from the public pages. 2 1 12
The Data Protection Officer
The editor documents vector editing, text effects, an infinite canvas and a very large template library, and Brand stores colours and fonts as styles reusable across projects. We found no public information on reusable components with variants, design tokens or variables, or any interactive prototyping, which is where a design system would begin. 1 11 1
The Skeptic
A template- and vector-driven editor: vector editing, text effects, infinite canvas, mockups, and a vectorizer with colour-count control are documented. We found no public information on reusable components, styles shared across files, team libraries, auto layout, or any interactive prototyping, which is what would move a maker tool beyond the basics. 1 12 12 1
Collaboration, review & developer handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Working on the same files with colleagues, clients and developers: comments and review, permissions for internal and external people, and the handoff that gives engineering measurements, assets and code rather than screenshots.
0 — Files shared as exports or links with no comments, no permissions beyond view or edit, and no developer view.
3 — Real-time co-editing and comments, but external reviewers need a paid seat or full access, and developers get only exported images.
5 — Comments with mentions and resolution, view-only and comment-only access for guests without a paid seat, permissions per file and project, and an inspect mode with measurements, styles and asset export.
8 — Branching or review of changes before they reach the main file, version history with restore, a developer mode that links components to code, an API and plugins documented, and named integrations with issue trackers and code tools.
10 — Handoff is a contract between design and code: component properties mapped to code components, token and asset export automated through the API, an audit log of access and sharing, and external access governed by domain, expiry and admin policy.
The Product Designer
Collaboration is real and well documented — presence avatars, comment threads synced in real time, view and edit roles, three link-access levels, and a request-edit-access flow the owner approves or denies. We found no public information on an inspect mode with measurements and styles, a developer mode linking components to code, version history with restore, branching, or documented API and plugins; History & Time Machine appears only as a business add-on behind Contact Sales. Handoff to engineering is export files — PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF, MP4 — rather than a contract. 8 9 13 2
The Frontend Engineer
Real-time co-editing with presence avatars, comment threads synced live, view and edit roles per project, and free view-and-comment access for anyone with a link are well documented — but we found no public information on an inspect mode with measurements and styles, a developer mode mapping components to code, or a documented API and plugins, and version history appears only as a business add-on on request. 8 9 2
The Brand Marketer
Invite by email or link, live co-editing with presence avatars, comment threads that sync in real time, per-project view-versus-edit permissions and an approve/deny prompt for edit requests are all documented, and viewers can comment without a paid seat. We found no public information on comment mentions or resolution, version history appears only as a contact-sales add-on, and there is no developer view with measurements or code — engineers would work from exported files. 8 9 2
The Agency Owner
Real-time co-editing with presence avatars, comment threads that sync instantly, owner approval of edit requests, and view-or-edit link access give my clients review access without a paid seat. We found no public information on comment mentions and resolution, version history beyond a contact-sales add-on, branching, or any developer mode with measurements, styles or code — handoff to engineering rests on exported images and SVG. 8 9 2
The Data Protection Officer
Real-time co-editing, comment threads with live presence, per-project view and edit roles, three link-access levels and owner-approved edit requests are documented. We found no public information on comment mentions and resolution, a developer inspect view with measurements, styles and asset handoff, or documented APIs and issue-tracker integrations, and team workspaces plus history sit behind Contact Sales. 8 9 2
The Skeptic
Real-time co-editing with live presence, comments that sync instantly, view and edit roles, owner-approved access requests, and free commenting for viewers are documented. We found no public information on an inspect mode, measurements, code handoff, version history, or documented API and issue-tracker integrations — a bare "MCP" mention is the only developer-facing word captured. 9 8 2 15
Brand assets & governance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keeping a brand usable and correct across a company: a central library for logos, images and templates, brand guidelines people can find, locked templates that let non-designers produce material, and rights and expiry metadata on every licensed asset.
0 — No shared asset library; logos and images are uploaded per file by whoever needs them.
3 — A shared folder of assets and some templates, but no guidelines, no locking of brand elements and no metadata beyond file names.
5 — A central brand library with logos, colours and fonts, templates with locked elements for non-designers, brand guidelines published in the tool, and tagging and search across assets.
8 — Rights, usage and expiry metadata on assets with warnings or automatic withdrawal on expiry, approval workflows for new assets and template output, version control on assets, and access per team, market or partner.
10 — Brand governance is auditable: every asset carries its licence, owner and permitted use, usage of each asset is tracked across files and channels, distribution to external partners is logged, and the whole library with metadata is exportable in a documented format.
The Product Designer
Brand Studio is genuinely good: logos, colours, fonts, graphics, visual style and tone of voice stored as reusable Brands — several of them, switchable, importable from a store URL — applied across artboards and on by default inside AI workflows, with written Setting, Art direction and Rules & boundaries and a completeness tracker. Above the library, the pages go quiet: we found no public information on locked elements in templates, tagging and search across assets, licence, rights or expiry metadata, approval workflows, or asset version control. Custom Brand Management exists only as a Contact Sales add-on, so the auditable tier is a negotiation rather than a feature. 10 11 2
The Frontend Engineer
Brand Studio is a real central library — logos, colors, fonts, graphics, visual style and tone of voice stored once and applied across projects, importable from a store URL and completed from presets — but we found no public information on locked template elements for non-designers, tagging and search across assets, or rights, usage and expiry metadata on any asset; custom brand management is a Contact Sales add-on. 2 10 11 2
The Brand Marketer
Brand Studio is genuinely useful for my twelve offices: logos, colours, fonts, graphics, tone of voice and a written style direction sit centrally, multiple Brands can be kept and switched, and Apply Brand pushes them across a whole artboard. But for non-designers I still need locks and paper trails: we found no public information on locked template elements, tagging or search across assets, licence or expiry metadata on the premium stock, approval workflows, or access per team or market — custom brand management is a contact-sales add-on. 2 10 11
The Agency Owner
A central Brand holding logos, colours, fonts, graphics and tone of voice — importable from a store URL, applied across whole artboards, with a generated rules-and-boundaries style guide and multiple brand profiles — is a genuine brand library. We found no public information on locked template elements for non-designers, tagging and search across assets, or licence and expiry metadata with approval workflows. 10 11
The Data Protection Officer
Brand Studio is a real central library of logos, colours, fonts, graphics, visual style and tone of voice, importable from a store URL, applied across projects and tracked for completeness. We found no public information on rights, usage or expiry metadata on assets, approval workflows, asset version control or per-team access rules, and custom brand management is a Contact Sales add-on. 10 11 2
The Skeptic
Brand Studio evidences a real central kit: logos, colours, fonts, graphics, visual style and tone of voice, multiple brands, URL import, and apply-brand swaps across an artboard, plus generated art-direction rules. We found no public information on locked template elements for non-designers, tagging and search, licence or expiry metadata, approval workflows, or asset version control; the "Custom Brand Management" add-on is Contact Sales. 10 11 2
Files, formats & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the work can leave: open or documented file formats, export that keeps layers, vectors and components, offline or self-hosted options, and what happens to files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract.
0 — Files exist only in the vendor's cloud in a proprietary format, export is a flat image, and nothing is said about files after cancellation.
3 — Export to PNG, PDF and SVG per frame, but no export of whole files with structure, and files after a downgrade or cancellation addressed only in general terms.
5 — Whole files exportable to a local or documented format, vector and layered export (SVG, PDF) with text kept as text, bulk export of a team's files, and a stated period during which files remain accessible after cancellation.
8 — An open or publicly documented file format, export and import with other tools documented, an API that reads full file structure, files of removed users transferred to the organisation by policy, and a stated deletion timeline after the contract ends.
10 — Portability is built in: an open-source or openly specified format, self-hosting or a local-first option, round-trip export without loss of components and prototypes, and the customer's ownership of all files and their export rights written into the terms.
The Product Designer
Export is thorough at the file level — PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4 with DPI control, scale options, RGB or CMYK profiles, multi-artboard zips, and SVG that scales without a pixel cap — and a converter brings JPG or PNG images back in as editable vectors whose colours can be changed. We found no public information on whole-project export that keeps structure, a documented or open file format, an API that reads files, offline or self-hosted options, or what happens to files after a downgrade or cancellation. Individual assets travel; the captured pages show nothing of the project travelling with them as a structured file. 12 13 12
The Frontend Engineer
Export covers PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4 per artboard, with vector SVG uncapped, DPI control and multi-artboard zip — but we found no public information on exporting whole files with structure, a documented or open file format, an API that reads the full file, or what happens to files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract. 2 13 12
The Brand Marketer
Per-artboard export to PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4 with RGB or CMYK profiles, DPI control, transparent backgrounds and combined PDF output covers a print handoff, and SVGs come back into the editor for colour changes. We found no public information on exporting a whole project with its structure, an API that reads files, or what happens to files after a downgrade or cancellation. 12 13
The Agency Owner
Export runs per artboard to PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4, with vector SVG uncapped and colour-editable after download, so handing a client finished assets is covered. We found no public information on exporting a whole file with its structure, a documented file format, or an API that reads one, and the captured terms say nothing about what happens to files after a downgrade or cancelled contract — handing over the working source is not evidenced. 5 12 13
The Data Protection Officer
Exports cover PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4 with colour profiles, DPI control and multi-artboard zips, and raster images convert to editable vectors. We found no public information on whole-file export preserving structure, import from other design tools, an API reading file content, or what happens to projects after a downgrade or cancellation. 2 12 13
The Skeptic
Export is well documented but per artboard: PNG, JPEG, SVG, PDF and MP4 with DPI, colour-profile and unit options, and only elements clipped to an artboard are included. We found no public information on whole-file export with structure, an open or documented file format, or what happens to files after a downgrade or cancellation. 13 12
AI features & rights to the work
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the vendor's AI does with the customer's files and what the customer may do with the AI's output: training on customer content and the opt-out, the models and where they run, commercial use of generated images, stock licences and indemnity.
0 — Generative features with no statement on training on customer files, no named models, and no word on whether output may be used commercially.
3 — An AI page that promises responsibility but leaves open whether customer files train models, and output rights are stated only for some features or only in community terms.
5 — Training on customer content excluded or opt-out documented, AI features switchable by an admin for the organisation, model providers named, and commercial use of generated output permitted in the terms.
8 — Training excluded by default for business plans, the processing location of AI features stated, generated content labelled or carrying content credentials, stock and template licences stated per asset type, and an IP indemnity for generated output on a named plan.
10 — AI is governed in writing: a per-feature list of models, providers and locations, admin controls per team and feature, a log of AI use, training exclusion and output ownership in the contract terms, and indemnity and licence limits published in full.
The Product Designer
Providers are named openly — OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Ideogram, Recraft, Black Forest Labs, Kling — and output rights are spelled out per plan and feature: Pro, Expert and Max users own the images and videos they generate and can sell them freely, with the no-stock-resale rule and the community-publishing caveat written down, plus token costs displayed before every generation with refunds on failure. The other half of the contract is missing: we found no public information on whether customer files train these models or how to opt out, on admin controls per team or feature, on processing location, content credentials or IP indemnity. The output side is unusually clear; on the input side we found no public information at all. 7 14 15 1
The Frontend Engineer
Model partners are named (OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Ideogram, Recraft, Black Forest Labs, Kling), token costs are shown before each generation and refunded on failure, and paid plans get full ownership and commercial sale rights with the stock-material limit spelled out — but we found no public information on whether customer files are used to train models, admin switches for AI features, processing locations, content labelling or any indemnity. 1 2 7 14 15
The Brand Marketer
My trade-fair stand question gets an answer for paying teams: on Pro, Expert or Max you own generated images outright and can sell them on physical and digital products and use them for client work, with resale as stock the stated exception, and model providers are named with token costs shown before each generation. But we found no public information on whether customer files train these models, an opt-out, admin controls to switch AI off per team, processing locations, content labelling, or any indemnity. 1 7 14 15
The Agency Owner
Model providers are named openly — OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Ideogram, Recraft, Black Forest Labs, Kling — token costs are shown before each generation, and Pro, Expert and Max plans own their generated images and videos outright, with per-tool selling rules and an explicit stock-resale ban. We found no public information on whether customer files train these models, an admin switch for AI features, where processing runs, content labelling, or any indemnity. 7 14 15
The Data Protection Officer
Model providers are named openly and paid plans carry stated ownership of generated output, including commercial sale on Pro, Expert and Max. But we found no public information on whether customer files or prompts train these models or on any opt-out, no organisation-wide admin control, no processing location for the named providers including ByteDance and Kling, and no indemnity; the ownership rules live on help pages rather than in the captured terms. 1 14 15
The Skeptic
Model providers are named in full (OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Ideogram, Recraft, Black Forest Labs, Kling), token mechanics are transparent, and help pages state that paid plans own the output and may sell it, with a stated no-stock-resale limit. The rest of the contract a buyer needs is absent: we found no public information on training on customer files or an opt-out, processing location, admin feature switches, output labelling, or any indemnity. 1 7 14 15 12
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity is, where design files, brand assets and AI prompts are stored and processed, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where files are hosted, and subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU data residency available only on an enterprise plan or not at all, or the subprocessor list is absent, or AI features send files outside the EU without an explained safeguard.
5 — EU hosting stated for files, a DPA available, but the contracting entity or significant parts of the chain (AI, rendering, support) are non-EU without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU contracting entity, files, assets and backups stored in the EU on named infrastructure, subprocessor list published with locations and purposes, and AI processing location stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity, every hosting, AI and support subprocessor European or optional, self-hosting or a European cloud offered, and certifications published.
The Product Designer
The vendor presents as a Berlin company, yet the captured pages give no confirmation of the contracting entity's jurisdiction and no statement of where design files, brand assets and AI prompts are stored or processed. The AI providers named on the homepage come with no processing-location statement and no safeguard for EU customers is described, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or a subprocessor list with locations and purposes. A buyer with residency requirements gets questions rather than answers. 2 3 1
The Frontend Engineer
We found no public information confirming where design files are hosted, which entity contracts, or a subprocessor list with locations and purposes, while AI prompts flow to named non-European providers such as OpenAI, Google and ByteDance with no processing location stated. 1 3 4
The Brand Marketer
The vendor line names Kittl Technologies GmbH of Berlin, yet the captured pages do not confirm the contracting entity, where design files and AI prompts are stored, or a single subprocessor with location and purpose, and the AI partners listed are largely non-European. We found no public information on EU hosting, a data-processing agreement, or certifications. 1 3
The Agency Owner
The vendor is presented as a Berlin company, but we found no public information confirming the contracting entity, where design files are hosted, or any subprocessor list with locations and purposes. The AI models come from American and Chinese providers with no stated processing location or safeguard for files sent to them, which matters when client brand assets ride along. 1 3 5
The Data Protection Officer
The vendor presents as a Berlin company, but we found no public information on the captured pages confirming the contracting entity, the hosting region of files and backups, a data processing agreement, or a subprocessor list with locations and purposes. The AI canvas names OpenAI, Google, ByteDance, Ideogram, Recraft, Black Forest Labs and Kling with no processing location or safeguard stated, which is exactly the chain I need named before unreleased work lands in it. 1 3 5
The Skeptic
The captured pages give no statement on where design files or AI prompts are hosted, and no subprocessor list beyond the app-connection directory in the privacy policy. Generation runs on named US and Chinese model providers with no stated safeguard, and we found no public information confirming the contracting entity's jurisdiction on the vendor's own pages. 3 1 1
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the annual cost for their team from public pages alone — which seat types exist and what each may do, how viewers and guests are billed, how seats are added and trued up, AI credits, and the plan where SSO, admin controls and brand features begin.
0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-seat price for an entry plan, but the seat types, the billing of guests and reviewers, and the plan needed for business features are unclear.
5 — Plans priced per seat type with their main features, but at least one commonly incurred cost (seat upgrades on request, AI credits, storage, brand or SSO add-ons) is missing or "on request".
8 — Every plan and seat type priced, free viewers and guests stated with their limits, how and when added seats are billed explained, AI credits and storage priced or included explicitly, and the plan that unlocks SSO and admin controls named.
10 — Complete cost computability: annual cost derivable for a given mix of editors, viewers and guests, true-up and auto-upgrade rules published, every add-on priced publicly, and contract term, renewal and downgrade conditions stated.
The Product Designer
The plan tables are legible where they exist — tokens of 100 one-time, 2,000, 6,000 and 12,000 per month per editor, daily tokens on the top tiers, storage from 500 MB to 1 TB, project limits, and credit mechanics explained down to reset times, pre-generation cost display and refunds. We found no public information on the seat prices themselves, on how viewers or guests are billed, on extra-token package pricing, or on which plan unlocks admin controls; Team Workspaces, History & Time Machine and Custom Brand Management all sit behind Contact Sales, and daily credits are labelled promotional and subject to change. You can enumerate what each plan contains far better than you can compute what it costs. 2 7 2
The Frontend Engineer
The pricing page lays out plans with per-editor token allowances, daily tokens, storage and project limits, and token mechanics like the midnight UTC reset and refund on failure are documented — but business add-ons including team workspaces and history are Contact Sales, we found no public information on the price of Extra Tokens or on which plan adds SSO and admin controls, and the captured pages give daily credits as promotional and subject to change. 2 7 2
The Brand Marketer
The pricing page structures plans by monthly AI tokens (100 one-time up to 2,000, 6,000 and 12,000 per editor), daily tokens, storage from 500 MB to 1 TB and 10,000+ premium templates, but no seat price in currency appears in what we captured, and team workspaces, custom brand management and advanced support are all listed as Contact Sales. We found no public information on how viewers or guests are billed, the price of extra tokens, or which plan brings SSO and admin controls. 2 7 2
The Agency Owner
The plan comparison is public and unusually granular — projects, storage from 500 MB to 1 TB, monthly and daily tokens per editor per plan — on top of a free tier at $0. Every team feature, from Team Workspaces to Custom Brand Management, is Contact Sales, and we found no public information on per-seat prices for the paid plans, how guests and reviewers are billed, or what Extra Tokens cost — I cannot compute a year's cost for my team from the public pages. 2 1 2
The Data Protection Officer
The pricing page compares plans by storage, project limits and monthly AI token allotments, and free access is stated at $0, but we found no public per-seat price in the captured material and team workspaces, custom brand management, custom design requests and advanced support are Contact Sales. Seat types, viewer and guest billing, extra-token prices and the plan unlocking admin controls or SSO are not stated, so an annual cost is not computable from the captured pages. 2 1 2
The Skeptic
The plan matrix is unusually detailed on consumption — monthly and daily AI token allocations, storage, and token mechanics like cost-shown-before-generate and refunds on failure — but the captured pages give no per-plan prices at all, only a "$0" free start and a savings claim. Team workspaces and brand add-ons are Contact Sales, daily credits are promotional and subject to change, and we found no public information on how viewers or guests are billed. 2 2 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Kittl
Is Kittl European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Kittl as EU-Made.
Where does Kittl store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does Kittl have a free plan?
Yes. Kittl has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Kittl?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates Penpot (2.5/5), Sketch (2.5/5) and Frontify (2.5/5) highest among the other 13 Design products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Penpot (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Kittl alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 48 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (15)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing page www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Legal notice www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Terms of service www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Design, prototyping & design systems — found from sitemap www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Design, prototyping & design systems — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Collaboration, review & developer handoff — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Collaboration, review & developer handoff — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Brand assets & governance — found from sitemap www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Brand assets & governance — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Files, formats & portability — found from sitemap www.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Files, formats & portability — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 AI features & rights to the work — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 AI features & rights to the work — found from sitemap help.kittl.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →