whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

E-Signature

Signicat Sign

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Signicat AS · www.signicat.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Signicat Sign: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Signicat Sign: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Signicat Sign at a glance

Vendor
Signicat AS
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Default not stated; pages mention Europe source, captured 20 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Signicat Sign 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Signicat Sign is an e-signature product from Signicat AS of Trondheim, Norway; the vendor names itself an eIDAS-certified qualified trust service provider. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources

Signicat Sign alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Knows every signer who holds an ID card up to a camera hands biometric and identity data to a provider they never chose. Asks who performs the identification, where documents and ID data are stored, how long the audit trail keeps IP addresses, and who the subprocessors in the trust service chain are.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Panel median The Data Protection Officer This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Data Protection Officer
eIDAS levels & trust services 2 of 5 2 of 5
Signer identification 3 of 5 3 of 5
Signing workflow & signer experience 3 of 5 3 of 5
Evidence, validation & retention 3 of 5 2.5 of 5
Integrations & API 2.5 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 2 of 5

eIDAS levels & trust services

How this is scored

Which signature levels the platform offers — simple, advanced, qualified, and qualified seals — through which qualified trust service provider on the EU Trust List, for which countries and legal regimes (eIDAS, ZertES), and on which plans.

0 — No signature level named; the platform calls its signature "legally binding" without saying which kind it is.

3 — Simple signatures by default with "advanced" or "qualified" mentioned as available, but no trust service provider named and no statement on which plan or country offers which level.

5 — SES, AdES and QES offered and labelled in the product, the qualified trust service provider named, and which documents need which level explained for at least Germany or the EU.

8 — Every level documented with the plans and countries it is available in, the QTSP's entry on the EU Trust List linked, QES under eIDAS (and ZertES where relevant) stated, qualified electronic seals for company documents, and the signature level printed in the signed document and audit trail.

10 — Levels are an explicit product decision: the provider is or contracts a named QTSP with its conformity assessment published, level selection per document type or template, remote QES without a separate account, EUDI wallet support stated with a date, and the legal effect per level documented for the main EU markets.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The vendor names itself as the certified eIDAS qualified trust service provider, offers qualified signatures with single-use or four-year certificates, and explains EU-wide validity through the eIDAS interoperability principle, with XAdES and PAdES signature types in the API. We found no public information labelling simple or advanced signature levels in the product, on which plan or country offers which level, or on qualified electronic seals or the provider's Trust List entry. 4 6 11

Report an error

Signer identification

How this is scored

How the signer is identified for each level: email and SMS codes, video ident, eID card (Online-Ausweis), bank ident or EUDI wallet — who performs it, in which countries it works, and what happens to the ID data afterwards.

0 — Email link only; no statement on how signers are authenticated.

3 — Email plus SMS or access code, with "ID verification" mentioned as an add-on but no methods, provider or countries named.

5 — Identification methods for AdES and QES listed by name (for example video ident, eID, bank ident), the identification provider named, and the countries or ID documents they accept stated.

8 — Methods documented per level and country, automated and agent-based ident distinguished, reuse of an identification for later signatures explained, retention and deletion of ID data stated, and the ident provider listed as subprocessor.

10 — Identification is transparent end to end: every method with its countries, assurance level and failure rate or completion guidance, EUDI wallet and national eID supported, ID data minimisation and retention committed, and the signer-facing privacy notice published.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Methods are named in abundance — MitID, BankID, itsme, Freja, iDIN, SMS and email one-time passwords, ReadID chip reading of passports and ID cards, and VideoID with liveness and optional human checks — across 35 European eIDs and the EU wallets, with the vendor itself as the identification provider and ReuseID explaining reuse of an onboarding credential. Verified ID documents are kept "for years in line with AML regulations" with redaction and watermarking, but we found no public information on a defined retention or deletion period for ID data, on failure or completion rates per method, or on a signer-facing privacy notice. 5 6 11 2

Report an error

Signing workflow & signer experience

How this is scored

Getting a document out and back signed: templates and form fields, signing order and roles, bulk sending, reminders and delegation, signing without an account or app, mobile signing, and accessibility for signers.

0 — Single-recipient signing of an uploaded PDF; no templates, order or reminders.

3 — Multiple signers and basic templates, but no signing order, no bulk send, and signers must create an account.

5 — Templates with field placement, sequential and parallel signing order, automatic reminders and expiry, signing without an account on mobile, and a status overview for the sender.

8 — Roles and conditional fields, bulk sending, delegation and substitute signers, team and approval workflows, branded signer experience, signer languages listed, and signer accessibility addressed.

10 — The workflow is complete and documented: web forms and self-service signing links, mixed signature levels within one process, in-person and remote signing, a published accessibility conformance statement, and team administration with shared templates and audit of sender actions.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Templates with conditional logic and a visual builder, parallel and any-order multi-signer signing, signature forwarding to a nominated signer, rejection with a stated reason, default 30-day deadlines extendable to 45, and email and SMS notifications cover the core workflow, and an accessibility statement with WAI-ARIA and a feedback channel addresses signer accessibility. We found no public information on bulk sending, automatic reminders, team or approval workflows, branded signer pages, or signer languages, and the accessibility statement is a self-evaluation dated December 2021. 7 11 8

Report an error

Evidence, validation & retention

How this is scored

What proves a signature years later: the audit trail and certificate of completion, qualified timestamps, long-term validation (PAdES-LTV), validation reports, and how long signed documents and evidence are kept — and whether they can leave the platform.

0 — A signed PDF and nothing else; no audit trail, no statement on storage or deletion.

3 — An audit trail or completion certificate exists, but its contents, the timestamp source and the retention period are unstated.

5 — Audit trail with signer events, IP addresses and authentication method embedded in or attached to the signed PDF, timestamps applied, documents downloadable, and the retention period stated.

8 — PAdES signatures with long-term validation, qualified timestamps from a named provider, a validation tool or report, configurable retention and automatic deletion, and bulk export of documents with their evidence.

10 — Evidence outlives the subscription: LTV and archive timestamps documented, validation verifiable with independent tools such as the EU DSS validator, export to a DMS or archive with evidence intact, and post-termination access and deletion committed in the terms.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

PAdES packaging, automatic timestamping of authentication events in a vault, an archive with configurable retention from 1 month to 50 years, instant retrieval, and a referenced document retention and deletion lifecycle guide give a solid evidence base. We found no public information on the audit trail's contents — including whether signer IP addresses and authentication method are recorded, and for how long — nor on long-term validation, a qualified timestamp provider, a validation report, or export of documents together with their evidence. 10 11 5 2

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Signing from inside the systems where contracts are made: a documented API with webhooks and a sandbox, embedded signing, and connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS and ERP systems.

0 — No API and no integrations; everything happens in the vendor's web app.

3 — A few named integrations or a Zapier connector, and an API mentioned without public documentation.

5 — A documented REST API with webhooks and a sandbox, plus connectors for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and at least one CRM or HR system named.

8 — Embedded signing in the customer's own application, API access to every signature level, versioned API with rate limits published, SDKs, and connectors for named DMS, ERP or HR systems with their scope.

10 — Integration is a product: white-label and embedded flows documented, API parity with the web app, a status page with incident history, deprecation policy, and a marketplace of integrations with stated maintainers.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Sign API v2 is publicly documented with an OpenAPI reference, sample requests and responses, packaging webhooks, SDKs, sandbox environments and a free test account, and the platform also integrates via OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0. We found no public information on connectors for Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, CRM, HR, DMS or ERP systems, on embedded signing in the customer's own application, or on API rate limits and versioning policy. 11 1 5

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity, the trust service provider and their owners are, where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.

0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where documents and signer data are stored, and subprocessors unnamed.

3 — An EU entity contracts, but documents or signer data are processed outside the EU by default without an explained safeguard, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU contracting entity and EU data storage stated, with a DPA, but the hosting, identification or trust service chain is non-EU-controlled without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU entity, documents, audit trails and ID data stored in named EU data centres, an EU qualified trust service provider, subprocessor list with locations published, and certifications (ISO 27001, ETSI conformity) published.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity and EU QTSP, every processing location and subprocessor European, customer-selectable data residency, and certifications with their scope published.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The contracting entity is Signicat AS, registered in Norway, the vendor states it is itself the certified qualified trust service provider, and the captured pages state that data is stored and processed in Europe — one page saying "in the EU". We found no public information on ownership, a subprocessor list with locations, named data centres, customer-selectable residency, or certifications such as ISO 27001 or ETSI conformity; the privacy policy names only Microsoft Exchange for email and web analytics processors. 2 4 10 6

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the cost of their signing volume from public pages alone — plan prices, envelope or document limits, the per-signature price of AdES and QES, identification fees, API pricing and overage.

0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.

3 — Plan prices published, but envelope limits, QES and identification fees are unstated — the cost of a qualified signature is unknowable.

5 — Plans with envelope or document limits priced, but at least one commonly incurred cost (per-QES fee, video ident, API access, overage) is missing or "on request".

8 — Every plan and limit priced publicly, AdES and QES priced per signature, identification fees and overage stated, API pricing published, and contract term and notice period given.

10 — Complete cost computability: the cost of a given monthly volume per signature level derivable from public pages, volume tiers published, and every add-on and price-change term on a public page.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The only public pricing facts are a free eID and wallets trial, a free test account, and a "Talk to a DEM expert" contact. We found no public information on plan prices, envelope or document limits, per-signature fees for qualified signatures, identification fees, API pricing, overage, or contract term — a buyer cannot compute the cost of any signing volume from these pages. 5 1 9

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about Signicat Sign

Is Signicat Sign European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Signicat Sign is based.

Where does Signicat Sign store data?

The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Europe as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 20 Oct 2026.

Does Signicat Sign have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Signicat Sign?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Scrive (3/5), Viafirma Documents (2.5/5) and Penneo (2.5/5) highest among the other 18 E-Signature products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Scrive (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Signicat Sign alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Signicat Sign? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (11)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Privacy policy — found from the homepage www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap developer.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Evidence, validation & retention — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Evidence, validation & retention — found from sitemap www.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Integrations & API — found from sitemap developer.signicat.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →