E-Signature
viSIGN
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Validated ID S.L. · www.validatedid.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
viSIGN at a glance
- Vendor
- Validated ID S.L.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates viSIGN 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. viSIGN, from Spanish vendor Validated ID, is an e-signature offering whose trust credentials show clearly and whose daily sending mechanics barely appear. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
viSIGN, from Spanish vendor Validated ID, is an e-signature offering whose trust credentials show clearly and whose daily sending mechanics barely appear. Signature levels scores cluster at 4: the vendor states it is itself a Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS issuing digital certificates and qualified seals, though judges found no public information labelling simple, advanced and qualified levels by plan or country. Sovereignty scores cluster at 3-4 on an evidenced European chain — VALIDATED ID, S.L.U., registered in the Barcelona Commercial Register, Spanish law and Madrid courts, ISO 27001 and ENS certifications — and judges found no public information on where documents, audit trails and identification data are stored, or on any subprocessor list. Signing workflow is the low point at 1-2: pages describe signature modalities — handwritten on a tablet, remote via smartphone, certificate-based — but judges found no public information on templates, signing order, reminders, bulk sending or whether signers need an account. Evidence and retention and integration and API scores sit at 2-3; no price appears on the vendor's public pages, a demo request being the only commercial step.
Speaks for it
- Vendor states it is itself a Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS, issuing digital certificates and qualified seals.
- Identification is a full product family — VIDidentity, VIDconnect, VIDwallet, VIDverifier — implementing OpenID Connect SIOP v2 with same-device and cross-device flows.
- Contracting entity is evidenced as European: VALIDATED ID, S.L.U. in the Barcelona Commercial Register, under Spanish law, part of the Signaturit Group.
- PAdES-LT long-term signatures appear among published certifications, with CA policies, certificates, CRL and OCSP documentation available.
- ISO 27001 and the Spanish ENS scheme are published among the certifications.
Held against it
- We found no public information on which plan or country offers simple, advanced or qualified signature levels, or on the provider's EU Trust List entry.
- We found no public information on templates, signing order, reminders, bulk sending or whether signers need an account — signing is described only as modalities.
- We found no public information on an audit trail, completion certificate, timestamp source, retention periods or export of documents with their evidence.
- We found no public information on a documented signing API, webhooks, a sandbox, embedded signing or connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR or DMS systems.
- We found no public information on where documents, audit trails and identification data are stored or processed, or on any subprocessor list with locations.
Best for
- You need qualified electronic signatures and seals issued by a vendor that is itself an EU Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS.
- Your procurement or legal review requires an evidenced European contracting entity — a Spanish company registered in the Barcelona Commercial Register under Spanish law, with ISO 27001 and ENS certifications.
- Your use case combines signing with credential-based identification — wallet credentials, OpenID Connect SIOP v2, same-device and cross-device flows.
Avoid if
- You send at volume and need templates, bulk sending, reminders and signing order visible before you commit.
- Your team needs signing driven from Microsoft 365, a CRM, HR or DMS system, or embedded in your own application through a documented API with webhooks and a sandbox.
- You must be able to confirm audit trail contents, retention periods and export paths for documents and their evidence before choosing.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| eIDAS levels & trust services | 2 of 5 |
| Signer identification | 2 of 5 |
| Signing workflow & signer experience | 1 of 5 |
| Evidence, validation & retention | 1.5 of 5 |
| Integrations & API | 1.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
eIDAS levels & trust services
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Which signature levels the platform offers — simple, advanced, qualified, and qualified seals — through which qualified trust service provider on the EU Trust List, for which countries and legal regimes (eIDAS, ZertES), and on which plans.
0 — No signature level named; the platform calls its signature "legally binding" without saying which kind it is.
3 — Simple signatures by default with "advanced" or "qualified" mentioned as available, but no trust service provider named and no statement on which plan or country offers which level.
5 — SES, AdES and QES offered and labelled in the product, the qualified trust service provider named, and which documents need which level explained for at least Germany or the EU.
8 — Every level documented with the plans and countries it is available in, the QTSP's entry on the EU Trust List linked, QES under eIDAS (and ZertES where relevant) stated, qualified electronic seals for company documents, and the signature level printed in the signed document and audit trail.
10 — Levels are an explicit product decision: the provider is or contracts a named QTSP with its conformity assessment published, level selection per document type or template, remote QES without a separate account, EUDI wallet support stated with a date, and the legal effect per level documented for the main EU markets.
The Legal Counsel
The vendor states it is a Qualified Trust Service Provider issuing digital certificates and qualified seals in compliance with eIDAS, and qualified electronic signatures and seals are named among its technologies, so the trust service provider is the vendor itself. But we found no public information distinguishing simple, advanced and qualified signatures by plan or country, no link to the provider's EU Trust List entry, and no ZertES or Germany-specific statement on which documents need which level. 1 4 5
The HR Operations Lead
Validated ID states it is itself a Qualified Trust Service Provider issuing digital certificates and qualified seals under eIDAS, and qualified electronic signatures and seals are named — better than a generic legally-binding claim. But I found no public information on which plans or countries offer which level, no separation of simple and advanced tiers in the product pages, and no guidance on which employment documents need which level. 1 4 5
The Revenue Operations Lead
The vendor states plainly that it is a Qualified Trust Service Provider issuing digital certificates and qualified seals under eIDAS, and describes signature modes from handwriting on a tablet to remote smartphone signing to certificate-based signing. What I cannot see is any labelling of simple, advanced and qualified tiers per product, which plan or country carries which level, or the provider's EU Trust List entry — we found no public information on any of that. 1 4 2
The Integration Engineer
The vendor states it is itself a Qualified Trust Service Provider issuing digital certificates and qualified seals under eIDAS, which is more than a bare mention of qualified signatures. Signature types are described by modality (handwritten on tablet, remote via smartphone, certificate-based) rather than labelled simple, advanced and qualified, and we found no public information on which plan or country offers which level or a link to the EU Trust List entry. 1 4
The Data Protection Officer
The vendor states it is itself a qualified trust service provider issuing digital certificates and qualified seals in compliance with Regulation (EU) 910/2014, and qualified electronic signatures and seals are named — but we found no public information on simple and advanced levels being labelled in the product, which plan or country offers which level, a link to the EU Trust List entry, or which documents need which level. 1 4 5
The Skeptic
The vendor states it is a Qualified Trust Service Provider under eIDAS issuing digital certificates and qualified seals, so a real trust service is named rather than a bare "legally binding" label. The captured pages describe signatures by modality — handwritten on tablet, remote via smartphone, certificates, reliable communications — and we found no public information on simple, advanced and qualified levels being labelled per plan or country, or on the provider's entry on the EU Trust List. A named trust service, but the level-per-plan detail that would justify the middle of the scale is missing. 1 4
Signer identification
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the signer is identified for each level: email and SMS codes, video ident, eID card (Online-Ausweis), bank ident or EUDI wallet — who performs it, in which countries it works, and what happens to the ID data afterwards.
0 — Email link only; no statement on how signers are authenticated.
3 — Email plus SMS or access code, with "ID verification" mentioned as an add-on but no methods, provider or countries named.
5 — Identification methods for AdES and QES listed by name (for example video ident, eID, bank ident), the identification provider named, and the countries or ID documents they accept stated.
8 — Methods documented per level and country, automated and agent-based ident distinguished, reuse of an identification for later signatures explained, retention and deletion of ID data stated, and the ident provider listed as subprocessor.
10 — Identification is transparent end to end: every method with its countries, assurance level and failure rate or completion guidance, EUDI wallet and national eID supported, ID data minimisation and retention committed, and the signer-facing privacy notice published.
The Legal Counsel
Identification is presented as a product family — wallet, connector and verifier — with named flows such as same-device and cross-device and the OpenID Connect SIOP v2 protocol for credential exchange. However, the captured pages do not tie any identification method to a signature level, and we found no public information on accepted ID documents, the countries each method works in, or the retention and deletion of identification data afterwards. 2 6 7
The HR Operations Lead
Electronic identification is a headline service with named products (VIDidentity, VIDconnect, VIDverifier) built on wallet credentials and OpenID flows, which is more than nothing. But I found no public information on the identification methods behind a qualified signature — no video ident, eID card or bank ident named, no countries or ID documents accepted stated, and nothing on retention of ID data, which is exactly what I need for applicants' real passports. 2 6 7
The Revenue Operations Lead
Identification is more than a passing mention here — it is a whole product family (VIDidentity, VIDconnect, VIDwallet, VIDverifier) with named protocols like OpenID Connect SIOP v2 and described same-device and cross-device flows. But nothing ties identification methods to signature levels, and we found no public information on video ident or eID or bank ident methods, accepted countries and ID documents, or what happens to ID data afterwards. 1 6 7
The Integration Engineer
Electronic identification is named a main service and VIDconnect is documented with OpenID, SIOP v2 and same-device/cross-device wallet flows, but these describe credential verification rather than how a signer is identified for each signature level. We found no public information on methods such as video ident, eID card or bank ident, on who performs them, which countries or documents they accept, or what happens to the identification data. 2 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
Identification is wallet- and credential-based and performed in-house: VIDconnect implements OpenID Connect SIOP v2 with same-device and cross-device flows, VIDwallet holds the credentials and VIDverifier checks them. We found no public information on the countries or ID documents accepted, the assurance level per method, or retention and deletion of ID data — the questions a signer's biometrics depend on. 2 6 7
The Skeptic
Identification appears through the SSI products — VIDconnect with OpenID Connect SIOP v2, VIDwallet credential exchange, app-to-app and browser-to-app flows — and electronic identification is named a main service. We found no public information on identification methods per signature level such as video ident, eID or bank ident, on the countries or ID documents accepted, or on retention and deletion of ID data. Identification exists as a product line, but nothing on these pages ties it to the level a signer actually signs at. 2 6 7
Signing workflow & signer experience
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting a document out and back signed: templates and form fields, signing order and roles, bulk sending, reminders and delegation, signing without an account or app, mobile signing, and accessibility for signers.
0 — Single-recipient signing of an uploaded PDF; no templates, order or reminders.
3 — Multiple signers and basic templates, but no signing order, no bulk send, and signers must create an account.
5 — Templates with field placement, sequential and parallel signing order, automatic reminders and expiry, signing without an account on mobile, and a status overview for the sender.
8 — Roles and conditional fields, bulk sending, delegation and substitute signers, team and approval workflows, branded signer experience, signer languages listed, and signer accessibility addressed.
10 — The workflow is complete and documented: web forms and self-service signing links, mixed signature levels within one process, in-person and remote signing, a published accessibility conformance statement, and team administration with shared templates and audit of sender actions.
The Legal Counsel
The pages name signature modes — handwritten on a tablet, remote via smartphone, certificate-based, and certified delivery — and registration is required to use the solutions, but we found no public information on templates, signing order, reminders, bulk sending, or whether a signer can sign without creating an account. I could not advise a client on the day-to-day sending process from this evidence. 1 2
The HR Operations Lead
The signature service is described by modality — handwritten on a tablet, remote via smartphone, certificate-based, and reliable communications — but that is the whole picture. I found no public information on templates, bulk sending, signing order, reminders, or signers completing on a phone without an account, which are the mechanics my two hundred contracts a year actually depend on. 1 2
The Revenue Operations Lead
The pages describe how a signature is captured — handwritten on a tablet, remotely with a smartphone, by certificates — but nothing about how a deal gets signed. We found no public information on templates, signing order, automatic reminders and expiry, bulk sending, or whether a signer can complete without creating an account, and the legal notice states registration is required to use the solutions as a user or customer. 1 2
The Integration Engineer
Signature modalities beyond a plain uploaded PDF are named — handwritten signing on a tablet and remote signing with a smartphone — which suggests in-person and remote paths exist. We found no public information on templates, signing order, bulk sending, reminders, expiry, or whether signers need an account. 1
The Data Protection Officer
All the pages show on signing itself is a catalogue of signature types — handwritten on a tablet, remote with a smartphone, certificate-based, and certified delivery. We found no public information on templates, signing order, reminders, bulk sending, a status overview, or whether signers need an account. 1 2
The Skeptic
The pages evidence signature modalities — in person on a tablet, remote via smartphone, certificates, certified delivery — but we found no public information on templates and field placement, signing order, bulk sending, reminders, delegation, or signer accessibility. The legal notice only says registration is required to use the solutions as a user or customer, and says nothing about the signer's side. Slightly more than a bare upload-and-sign, only because the modalities are described. 1 2
Evidence, validation & retention
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What proves a signature years later: the audit trail and certificate of completion, qualified timestamps, long-term validation (PAdES-LTV), validation reports, and how long signed documents and evidence are kept — and whether they can leave the platform.
0 — A signed PDF and nothing else; no audit trail, no statement on storage or deletion.
3 — An audit trail or completion certificate exists, but its contents, the timestamp source and the retention period are unstated.
5 — Audit trail with signer events, IP addresses and authentication method embedded in or attached to the signed PDF, timestamps applied, documents downloadable, and the retention period stated.
8 — PAdES signatures with long-term validation, qualified timestamps from a named provider, a validation tool or report, configurable retention and automatic deletion, and bulk export of documents with their evidence.
10 — Evidence outlives the subscription: LTV and archive timestamps documented, validation verifiable with independent tools such as the EU DSS validator, export to a DMS or archive with evidence intact, and post-termination access and deletion committed in the terms.
The Legal Counsel
PAdES-LT is listed among the certifications and the trust-service documentation publishes policies, CA certificates and CRL & OCSP material, which speaks to long-term validity of signatures. But we found no public information on the audit trail's contents, the timestamp source, any retention period, validation reports, or export of documents together with their evidence — precisely the points a dispute eight years from now turns on. 1 4
The HR Operations Lead
The certification list names PAdES-LT long-term signatures and the trust-service documentation publishes policies, CA certificates and revocation information, so long-term validation is at least claimed. But I found no public information on an audit trail or certificate of completion, the timestamp source, retention periods, or export of documents with their evidence — for fixed-term contracts that must be provable years later, that decides it. 1 4
The Revenue Operations Lead
The certification list names PAdES-LT long-term signatures and the trust documentation carries CA policies, certificates and CRL and OCSP material — evidence built to outlive the deal. But we found no public description of an audit trail or completion certificate, no timestamp source, no retention period and no export path for documents with their evidence. 1 4
The Integration Engineer
PAdES-LT long-term signature support appears among the published certifications and CA policies with CRL and OCSP are published, which speaks to revocability and long-term validation of the signatures themselves. For my archival requirements, we found no public information on audit trail contents, the timestamp source applied to signatures, retention periods, bulk export, or post-termination access to documents and their evidence. 1 4
The Data Protection Officer
PAdES long-term signatures appear in the certification list and CA certificates with CRL and OCSP responses are published, which speaks to long-term validation. We found no public information on an audit trail or completion certificate, its contents such as IP addresses and authentication method, the timestamp source, or how long signed documents and evidence are kept. 1 4
The Skeptic
A long-term signature format is claimed — PAdES-LT appears among the certifications alongside the QTSP status, and the CA documentation page lists policies, certificates, CRL and OCSP. We found no public information on an audit trail or completion certificate and its contents, on the timestamp source, or on how long signed documents and evidence are kept and whether they can be exported. The format that preserves a signature is named; what proves it years later is not described. 1 4
Integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Signing from inside the systems where contracts are made: a documented API with webhooks and a sandbox, embedded signing, and connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS and ERP systems.
0 — No API and no integrations; everything happens in the vendor's web app.
3 — A few named integrations or a Zapier connector, and an API mentioned without public documentation.
5 — A documented REST API with webhooks and a sandbox, plus connectors for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and at least one CRM or HR system named.
8 — Embedded signing in the customer's own application, API access to every signature level, versioned API with rate limits published, SDKs, and connectors for named DMS, ERP or HR systems with their scope.
10 — Integration is a product: white-label and embedded flows documented, API parity with the web app, a status page with incident history, deprecation policy, and a marketplace of integrations with stated maintainers.
The Legal Counsel
A developers section is linked from the site footer, and the identity products are described as integrable via OpenID Connect with credential exchange flows. But we found no public information on documented API endpoints, webhooks, a sandbox, or connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, document management or ERP systems, so the depth of API access is unverifiable. 4 6 7
The HR Operations Lead
A developers section is linked from the site footer and the identity products advertise OpenID compatibility with simple integration, which amounts to an API being mentioned. I found no public information on documented signing APIs with webhooks or a sandbox, and no connectors named for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR or DMS systems, so I could not see how contracts would be sent from our HR systems. 4 6 7
The Revenue Operations Lead
A developers section is linked from the site and VIDconnect is described as an OpenID provider supporting app-to-app and browser-to-app flows with simple integration, so API work clearly exists. We found no published API documentation with webhooks and a sandbox, and not a single named connector for Microsoft 365, a CRM, HR or a DMS — signing from inside the systems where contracts are made is unevidenced. 4 6 7
The Integration Engineer
A developers section is linked in the footer and VIDconnect is described as OpenID-compatible with "simple integration", but that concerns the identification product, not signing. We found no public information on documented signing APIs, webhooks, a sandbox, embedded signing in the customer's application, signature levels reachable via API, or named connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR or DMS systems — the core of what I need before any evaluation could proceed. 4 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
A developers section is linked in the footer and the identity products expose OpenID Connect SIOP v2 with stated same-device and cross-device flows. We found no public information on a document-signing API with webhooks and a sandbox, embedded signing, or connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS or ERP systems. 4 6 7
The Skeptic
A Developers section is linked in the footer, and VIDconnect is marketed as integrating simply and being compatible with the OpenID protocol — but for identity, not for signing. We found no public information on a documented signing API with webhooks and a sandbox, on embedded signing, or on connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS or ERP systems. A developer area is mentioned without its documentation captured, which is exactly where this scale's low end sits. 4 6 7
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity, the trust service provider and their owners are, where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where documents and signer data are stored, and subprocessors unnamed.
3 — An EU entity contracts, but documents or signer data are processed outside the EU by default without an explained safeguard, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU contracting entity and EU data storage stated, with a DPA, but the hosting, identification or trust service chain is non-EU-controlled without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU entity, documents, audit trails and ID data stored in named EU data centres, an EU qualified trust service provider, subprocessor list with locations published, and certifications (ISO 27001, ETSI conformity) published.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity and EU QTSP, every processing location and subprocessor European, customer-selectable data residency, and certifications with their scope published.
The Legal Counsel
The contracting entity is a Spanish company with a Barcelona address, commercial register details, Spanish governing law and Madrid courts, and it presents itself as an EU qualified trust service provider holding ISO 27001 and ENS certifications. But we found no public information on where documents, audit trails and identification data are stored and processed, on the Signaturit Group's ownership, or on subprocessors and their locations. 1 2 7
The HR Operations Lead
A Spanish company, Validated ID S.L.U. of Barcelona in the Signaturit Group, contracts under Spanish law and GDPR and is itself the eIDAS-compliant qualified trust service provider, with ISO 27001 and the Spanish ENS scheme published. But I found no public information on where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored or processed, and no subprocessor list with locations. 1 2 7
The Revenue Operations Lead
The contracting entity is a Spanish company registered in Barcelona, under Spanish law with Madrid courts, part of Signaturit Group, and the trust service is the vendor itself as an EU qualified provider with ISO 27001 and the Spanish ENS scheme listed. The captured pages are silent on where documents and audit trails are stored, and we found no subprocessor list, which caps this well short of the higher rungs. 1 2 7
The Integration Engineer
A Spanish company registered in the Barcelona Commercial Register, governed by Spanish law, acting as its own eIDAS trust service provider and holding ISO 27001 and ENS certifications gives an evidenced European contracting and trust chain. We found no public information on where documents, audit trails and identification data are stored and processed, on the Signaturit Group's ownership, or on a subprocessor list with locations. 1 2 7
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity is verifiably European — Validated ID S.L.U., registered in the Barcelona Commercial Register, Spanish governing law, Madrid courts, Signaturit Group parent — and the qualified trust service is performed in-house with ISO 27001 and ENS listed among certifications. We found no public information on where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored, on any subprocessors with locations, or on the scope of those certifications. 1 2 7
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is clearly European: VALIDATED ID S.L.U., registered in the Barcelona Commercial Register, Spanish governing law with Madrid courts for legal entities, part of the Signaturit Group, with ISO 27001 and the Spanish ENS scheme among published certifications. We found no public information on where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored, or on any subprocessor list with locations. The EU entity is evidenced; the hosting and processing chain that sovereignty actually turns on is not. 1 2
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the cost of their signing volume from public pages alone — plan prices, envelope or document limits, the per-signature price of AdES and QES, identification fees, API pricing and overage.
0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.
3 — Plan prices published, but envelope limits, QES and identification fees are unstated — the cost of a qualified signature is unknowable.
5 — Plans with envelope or document limits priced, but at least one commonly incurred cost (per-QES fee, video ident, API access, overage) is missing or "on request".
8 — Every plan and limit priced publicly, AdES and QES priced per signature, identification fees and overage stated, API pricing published, and contract term and notice period given.
10 — Complete cost computability: the cost of a given monthly volume per signature level derivable from public pages, volume tiers published, and every add-on and price-change term on a public page.
The Legal Counsel
The only route to the product shown is a demo request, with registration required to use the solutions. We found no public information on plan prices, envelope limits, per-signature fees for advanced or qualified signatures, identification fees or contract terms — the cost of a qualified signature is not computable from these pages. 1 2
The HR Operations Lead
No plan prices, envelope limits, per-signature fees for qualified signatures, identification charges or any other cost figure appear on the captured pages — the only commercial step published is a demo request. The cost of a qualified signature cannot be known before a contract is signed, which is precisely what I need. 1
The Revenue Operations Lead
Not a single plan, price, envelope limit or per-signature fee appears on any captured page — the only commercial gesture is a demo request. The cost of a signing volume, let alone a qualified signature or identification, cannot be computed from public information. 1 2
The Integration Engineer
No plan prices, envelope or document limits, or per-signature fees appear on the captured pages; the only commercial path shown is a demo request. A buyer cannot compute the cost of any signing volume, let alone a qualified signature, from public information. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The only commercial step captured is a request-a-demo link; we found no public information on plan prices, envelope or document limits, per-signature fees for advanced and qualified signatures, identification fees, API pricing, or contract terms. A buyer cannot compute any cost from public pages. 1
The Skeptic
No price appears anywhere in the captured pages — no plan prices, no envelope limits, no per-signature or identification fees, no API pricing. The only commercial call to action is "Request a demo", and the legal notice confirms registration is required to use the solutions. The cost of any signing volume, qualified or otherwise, is unknowable from public pages alone. 1 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about viSIGN
Is viSIGN European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where viSIGN is based.
Where does viSIGN store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does viSIGN have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to viSIGN?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Scrive (3/5), Viafirma Documents (2.5/5) and Penneo (2.5/5) highest among the other 18 E-Signature products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Scrive (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: viSIGN alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (validatedid.com, validatedid.com/en/legal-note, validatedid.com/en/compliance, validatedid.com/en/identity/projects/eidas-bridge, validatedid.com/de/identity/projects/eidas-bridge, validatedid.com/de/identity/vidconnect and 1 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 3 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (7)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Legal notice — found from the homepage www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Security / trust page — found from the homepage www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.validatedid.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →