Knowledge Base & Wiki
Slite
Rest of world Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Slite, Inc. · slite.com
Compare with Nuclino → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Slite at a glance
- Vendor
- Slite, Inc.
- Headquarters
- Incorporated in United States source, captured 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Slite 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Slite is a collaborative knowledge base, strongest on authoring and search and access control: a real-time editor with Markdown, diagrams and hundreds of embeds, AI answers that cite their exact sources across 20-plus connected sources, and per-doc roles with cascading permissions that every query inherits. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 1 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Slite is a collaborative knowledge base, strongest on authoring and search and access control: a real-time editor with Markdown, diagrams and hundreds of embeds, AI answers that cite their exact sources across 20-plus connected sources, and per-doc roles with cascading permissions that every query inherits. Knowledge governance spreads 6-8: API-settable verification expiries and an agent that flags outdated docs against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity are documented, while the lower scores cite no public information on read confirmations, multi-reviewer approvals or an exportable audit trail. Portability and hosting scores 4 with no spread — the help pages state bulk export is not possible and that history and comments are not included — and sovereignty follows at 3-4: the contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation, personal information is stated to be provided in the United States, and media assets and backups sit in EU Google Cloud storage. Pricing transparency scores 5-6: Basic at "$10 per user/month" and Pro at "$20 per user/month", both billed yearly, are published, but reader-only seats, audit logs and SCIM sit in custom-priced Enterprise.
Speaks for it
- AI answers cite the exact sources that shaped them, with verified docs ranked first and a trust signal on every citation
- Every query — search, AI answers and even third-party agents over MCP — inherits the user's permissions
- Doc verification carries an expiry date settable through the API, and an agent flags outdated content against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity with human approval of drafted fixes
- A documented public API (v1.0) and an MCP server with over forty tools over OAuth support custom integrations
- Importers are advertised for Notion, Confluence, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote
Held against it
- The export help states that exporting several docs in bulk is not possible and that doc history and comments are not included
- The contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the privacy policy states personal information is provided in the United States
- Reader-only seats, audit logs and SCIM sit in the Enterprise tier, priced only on request
- Subprocessors appear as categories rather than a named list with locations
Best for
- You need an internal knowledge base where AI answers cite their sources and every query, including third-party agents, inherits the reader's permissions
- Your team writes in Markdown with diagrams and wants search to reach Slack, Google Drive and 20-plus connected sources
- You want stale docs flagged automatically against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity, with drafted fixes routed for human approval
- You plan to build on a documented public API and an MCP server with over forty tools
Avoid if
- You need to leave with a complete archive: bulk export is documented as not possible, and doc history and comments are not included in exports
- You require an EU contracting entity or self-hosted delivery — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You need a computable price for read-only access: reader-only seats sit only in the Enterprise tier with custom pricing on request
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Editor, structure & search | 3.5 of 5 |
| Verification, ownership & freshness | 3.5 of 5 |
| Permissions, SSO & administration | 3.5 of 5 |
| Help-center publishing & integrations | 3 of 5 |
| Import, export & self-hosting | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 of 5 |
Verification, ownership & freshness
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the content stays true: page owners or experts named per page, verification with a review date and a reminder when it lapses, approval or publishing workflows with drafts and reviewers, read confirmations for mandatory pages, analytics on views, searches without a result and stale pages, duplicate detection, archiving rules, and an audit trail of who changed and approved what.
0 — No way to see who owns a page or when it was last checked beyond the edit date.
3 — Page history and last-edited dates; owners, verification, approvals and content analytics are basic or not described.
5 — An owner or verifier per page, a review interval with reminders, a draft and publish step, page view statistics, and archived pages kept out of search.
8 — Approval workflows with several reviewers, read confirmations for mandatory pages, analytics on failed searches and stale content, duplicate or outdated content flagged automatically, and an exportable audit trail of changes and approvals.
10 — Governance that a regulated organisation runs on: controlled documents with versioned approvals that meet a named standard (ISO 9001, GxP), expiry and review enforced per space, knowledge gaps reported from searches and AI questions, and every published statement traceable to an approved version.
The Operations Lead
Doc ownership and a verification workflow are named per doc, even the API sets a verification expiry date, and the agent flags outdated content by comparing docs against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity, routing drafted fixes through human triage; a proofreader workflow produces a gap analysis against tickets and threads. Reading and search analytics are described. We found no public information on read confirmations for mandatory pages, multi-reviewer approvals or an exportable audit trail. 6 13 3 14 2
The IT Administrator
Doc ownership and a verification workflow with expiry dates settable through the API, scheduled maintenance checks that run automatically, and an agent that flags stale content by comparing docs against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity and drafts fixes for human triage. Reading and search analytics, version history and full audit logs are stated; we found no public information on read confirmations for mandatory pages, duplicate detection, or whether the audit trail can be exported. 1 6 13 3 2 14
The Support Knowledge Manager
Verification with an expiry date, doc ownership, draft states and full audit logs with every write attributed are documented, and the agent automatically flags stale docs against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity and routes the fix to the right expert for human triage. Read confirmations, duplicate detection and an exportable trail of approvals are not described in the captured pages. 1 2 3 6 13
The Engineering Lead
Doc ownership and a verification workflow ship in the base plan, verification expiry is even settable through the API, and every write is attributed with draft states and version history behind it. The standout is freshness: the Agent compares docs against activity in Slack, GitHub and Linear, flags outdated content and routes drafted fixes to a human for approval, with a panel showing which docs need attention plus reading and search analytics. We found no public information on read confirmations for mandatory pages, duplicate detection, or exporting the audit trail. 1 2 3 6 13
The Quality Manager
Doc ownership, a verification workflow whose status carries an expiry date set through the API, and automatic flagging of outdated content against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity go well beyond last-edited dates. Write attribution, draft states, version history and audit logging are documented, and analytics show what is read and searched plus which docs need attention. What I need for a regulated quality system is not evidenced: read confirmations for mandatory pages, named multi-reviewer approval workflows, and an audit trail exportable for the certifier. 1 2 3 6 7 13
The Skeptic
Doc ownership and a verification workflow with an expiry date settable through the API, an agent that flags stale pages by comparing docs against Slack, GitHub and Linear activity and routes drafted fixes through a triage screen for human review, plus reading and search insights, scheduled maintenance checks and every write attributed in audit logs. I found no public information on read confirmations for mandatory pages, duplicate detection, multi-reviewer approval chains, or an exportable audit trail. 1 2 3 6 13
Permissions, SSO & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who may see and edit what, and how the administrator keeps control: roles and permissions per space and per page, restricted or private pages, guest and external access, groups synced from Azure AD/Entra ID, Google Workspace or LDAP, single sign-on (SAML, OIDC), SCIM provisioning, two-factor authentication enforced, an audit log of access and permission changes, and admin controls over sharing and public links. Where the data is hosted and certifications are scored under sovereignty.
0 — Everyone in a workspace sees and edits everything; no permissions of any kind.
3 — Admins, members and guests, or private and shared pages; per-space or per-page rights, SSO and an audit log are basic or not described.
5 — Permissions per space and per page, guest access with limits, single sign-on through Google or Microsoft, two-factor authentication, groups, and admin control over public sharing.
8 — SAML or OIDC single sign-on with any identity provider, SCIM provisioning or LDAP and directory group sync, enforced 2FA, an audit log of views, edits and permission changes, IP or domain restrictions, and permissions honoured by search and AI answers.
10 — Access control an enterprise auditor accepts as documented: granular roles with inheritance explained, just-in-time and external access with expiry, every access and permission change logged and exportable to a SIEM, and the permission model published with its limits.
The Operations Lead
Five workspace roles, per-doc roles for writer, reader and channel admin, cascading permissions with overrides, guest collaborators and admin controls over inviting and public sharing are documented, along with OpenID SSO, SCIM and an audit log. Every AI query and the MCP server inherit the user's permissions, so the workshop can ask questions without seeing HR's pages. We found no public information on enforced two-factor authentication for members, IP or domain restrictions, or directory group sync; reader-only seats sit only in the custom-priced Enterprise plan. 16 15 6 1 7 18
The IT Administrator
OpenID SSO and SCIM provisioning are on the plan pages, five workspace roles plus doc-level roles with cascading inheritance, guest collaborators, admin control over public sharing and invitations, audit logging of authentication, SSO and admin actions, and AI queries that inherit the user's permissions even for third-party agents. We found no public information on enforced two-factor authentication for users, IP or domain restrictions, or directory group sync beyond the words SCIM provisioning. 1 6 15 16 7
The Support Knowledge Manager
Per-channel and per-doc roles with cascading inheritance are explained in the help pages, OpenID SSO, SCIM provisioning and an audit log of authentication and admin events are listed, and search, AI answers and even MCP queries inherit the user's permissions. We found no public information on enforced two-factor authentication for members, IP or domain restrictions, or directory group sync. 1 6 7 15 16
The Engineering Lead
Five workspace roles and per-doc Channel admin, Writer, Reader and No access, with cascading permissions down the tree, overrides at any level, guest collaborators, reader-only seats and admin controls over inviting, public sharing and channel creation. OpenID SSO and SCIM provisioning are real, and the part that decides it for me: every query, including third-party agents through MCP, inherits the user's permissions. We found no public information on enforced two-factor authentication for end users or IP restrictions, and the audit log is described without an export path. 1 6 7 12 15 16 18
The Quality Manager
Granular roles per doc and channel with cascading permissions and overrides, guest collaborators, five workspace roles, OpenID SSO and SCIM provisioning, and admin control over invites and public sharing are all documented. Audit logging covers authentication, SSO and admin actions, and permission-awareness extends to AI answers and even third-party agents. Enforced customer two-factor authentication and IP or domain restrictions are not described on the pages we read. 1 6 7 15 16 12
The Skeptic
Five workspace roles with documented doc-level permissions — Reader, Writer, Channel admin, No access — inheritance explained down the doc tree including how to restore it, guest handling, SCIM provisioning, OpenID SSO, audit logging of authentication and admin actions, and admin controls over invites, public sharing and user groups. Every query, even from third-party agents, inherits the user's permissions — exactly what I look for in an AI knowledge base. SAML, enforced two-factor for customers, IP or domain restrictions and directory group sync are not described on the captured pages. 1 6 7 15 16 18
Help-center publishing & integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How knowledge reaches people outside the editor: public or password-protected sites and help centers with a custom domain, branding and SEO controls, an in-app widget or contextual help, ticket deflection in a help desk, multilingual publishing, integrations with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Google Drive, help desks and CRMs, a browser extension, a documented REST or GraphQL API, webhooks, and an MCP server or connector for AI assistants.
0 — Content cannot be shared beyond the editor and nothing connects to it.
3 — Sharing a page by public link and a few integrations such as Slack; a branded help center, an API and webhooks are basic or not described.
5 — A published site or help center with custom domain and branding, integrations with Slack or Teams and Google Drive or Microsoft 365, a documented API, and embeds of common tools.
8 — A help center with SEO controls, multilingual publishing, access for logged-in customers and analytics, a widget or contextual help inside the customer's product, help desk integration with ticket deflection, webhooks, and a connector or MCP server for AI assistants.
10 — Knowledge delivered wherever it is needed from one source: internal and public audiences served from the same pages with per-audience rules, a complete API with SDKs and rate limits stated, a marketplace of integrations, and every channel measured in one report.
The Operations Lead
Public docs can carry custom branding and domain with SEO indexing and AI answers, and the integration catalogue runs to hundreds — Slack, Jira, Google Drive, Linear, Notion — plus a documented API with rate-limit responses and an MCP server with OAuth and more than 40 tools. We found no public information on multilingual publishing, logged-in customer access to a help center, an in-product widget, webhooks or ticket deflection, so this reads as strong public sharing rather than a full help-center operation. 6 5 8 18
The IT Administrator
Public docs with custom domain, branding and SEO indexing, a documented public API with rate-limit responses, Slack and Google Drive among 20+ search sources, a remote MCP server with OAuth and 40+ tools, and a Chrome extension. We found no public information on webhooks, multilingual publishing, a customer-facing widget or logged-in help-center access; Intercom appears as an import source rather than a publishing channel. 6 5 8 13 18 11
The Support Knowledge Manager
Public docs publish with a custom domain, branding and SEO indexing, AI answers arrive in Slack, and a documented API, an MCP server with over forty tools, a Chrome extension and a long list of embeds are all evidenced. For my support use case the gaps are real: we found no public information on an embeddable widget inside our own product, help-desk ticket deflection, webhooks, or multilingual publishing of one article across languages. 5 6 8 12 18
The Engineering Lead
This is what I would wire our pipeline into: a documented v1 API that fetches and searches docs, creates docs from Markdown, serves whole subtrees through a descendants endpoint, service accounts, custom blocks with live interaction, and an MCP server with 40-plus read-write tools over OAuth. Public docs get SEO indexing, custom branding and a custom domain, integrations run into the hundreds including Jira, Slack, Google Drive and Figma, and AI answers are reachable from Slack and from a Chrome extension that answers from the page you are on. We found no public information on webhooks, multilingual publishing, a customer-facing widget or help-desk ticket deflection. 5 6 8 12 18 20
The Quality Manager
Public docs can carry custom branding and domain, AI answers and SEO indexing, and there is a documented public API with authentication and rate-limit responses plus an MCP server with OAuth and over forty tools. AI answers inside Slack, a Chrome extension and a long list of embeds and data sources are described. We found no public information on multilingual publishing, a widget or contextual help inside a customer product, logged-in customer access with analytics, webhooks, or help-desk ticket deflection. 5 6 8 13 18
The Skeptic
Public docs with SEO indexing, AI answers on public pages and custom branding and domain; a documented v1.0 API with service accounts and a TypeScript examples repository, an MCP endpoint with OAuth and forty-plus read-write tools, AI answers in Slack, Zapier, and hundreds of embeds. I found no public information on webhooks, multilingual publishing, logged-in customer access to a help center, help-desk ticket deflection, or analytics on published pages. 5 6 8 12 18
Import, export & self-hosting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What arriving and leaving would cost: import from Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, Word and Markdown with structure, attachments and links kept, a full export of every space in an open format (Markdown, HTML, XML, PDF) with attachments and history, an API that reaches all content, a stated migration path from Confluence Server or Data Center, open-source code under a named licence, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition with its own documentation.
0 — Content cannot be imported or exported; it can only be read in the vendor's interface.
3 — Single pages export to PDF or Word and some files can be imported; a full export, a Confluence import and self-hosting are basic or not described.
5 — Import from Confluence or Notion and from Word or Markdown, a full workspace export to Markdown or HTML with attachments, a documented API covering pages, and a stated retention of data after cancellation.
8 — A Confluence migration tool or service that keeps hierarchy, permissions and attachments, a full export with history in an open format, a self-hosted or on-premise edition with installation and update documentation, and data returned or deleted on termination under stated terms.
10 — The customer owns the content end to end: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export another tool can import without loss, and the deletion of every copy on termination documented.
The Operations Lead
Arriving is well covered: migrations from Notion, Confluence, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote are advertised, which would absorb our OneNote books, and the API can export a doc subtree in SliteML or HTML. The help pages state that doc history and comments are not included in exports and that exporting several docs in bulk, such as a channel, is not possible. We found no public information on a self-hosted edition. 1 19 20
The IT Administrator
Import from Confluence is named alongside Notion, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote, and the API can fetch a document with its entire subtree in SliteML or HTML, but the captured pages give no detail on whether hierarchy, permissions or attachments survive a Confluence migration. The help pages state that doc history and comments are not included in exports and that exporting several docs in bulk is not possible, and we found no public information on a self-hosted or on-premise edition. 1 19 20 6
The Support Knowledge Manager
Migration paths from Notion, Confluence, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote are advertised and the API can export a doc and its subdocs in SliteML or HTML, but page export is per-document, excludes history and comments, and bulk export of a channel with its docs is documented as not possible. We found no public information on a self-hosted or open-source edition. 1 8 19 20
The Engineering Lead
Getting in is fine, with importers advertised for Notion, Confluence, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote. Getting out is the problem: the export help page offers PDF, Markdown and HTML per individual doc and states that exporting several docs in bulk is not possible and that doc history and comments are not included, so the API's subtree export in SliteML or HTML is the only route to a full archive — and we found no public information on a self-hosted or open-source edition. 1 8 19 20
The Quality Manager
Imports from Notion, Confluence, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote are listed, and the API can export a doc and its subdocs in SliteML or HTML. The export help states plainly that doc history and comments are not included and that exporting several docs in bulk is not possible in the product. No self-hosted edition or open-source licence is described, and data return on termination is not stated; workspace deletion removes data on a backup schedule instead. 1 19 20 7
The Skeptic
Leaving costs work: export covers individual docs in PDF, Markdown or HTML without history or comments, and the help pages state plainly that exporting several docs in bulk — a channel and the docs below it — is not possible; the API can fetch a document subtree and return SliteML or stripped HTML, so a real migration is a script you write yourself. Imports from Notion, Confluence, ClickUp, Quip and OneNote are offered, and workspace deletion schedules deletion from backups. I found no public information on a self-hosted or open-source edition, or on attachments in exports. 1 7 19 20
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where pages, attachments and search indexes are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, CDN, search, email, support, payment, and the AI model provider that reads pages for answers and summaries, with whether content is used for training). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a wiki holds internal processes, customer data and trade secrets, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU data residency available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (CDN, search, email, support, AI model) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard, or EU residency is limited to the higher tiers.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations including the AI model provider, no training on customer content stated, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every page on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor including AI, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Operations Lead
The contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, the primary transfer country is the United States, and the captured pages state the Paris entity does not commercialise the service or contract with customers. On the other side, media assets and backups sit in EU Google Cloud, a data processing agreement with standard contractual clauses is published, customer content is stated never to train AI models, and SOC 2 Type II is evidenced. Subprocessors appear only as categories plus Google Cloud, Stripe and Datadog, with no list of locations, so the chain is only partly visible. 9 10 7
The IT Administrator
The contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, with the Paris entity explicitly stated not to commercialise the service or contract with customers; hosting is Google Cloud Platform operated by Google LLC. Media assets and daily backups are stated to sit in EU storage and EU data centres, a data processing addendum with standard contractual clauses and SOC 2 Type II are published, and customer content is stated not to train external models — but the region of the primary database, search index and AI processing is not stated, and subprocessors appear by category with only Stripe named. 9 10 7
The Support Knowledge Manager
The contracting entity is a Delaware corporation and the Paris entity is documented as not contracting with customers, while media assets and backups sit in EU Google Cloud, embeddings are computed internally, and a DPA with SCCs and no training on customer content is published. The captured pages give categories of subprocessors rather than a named list with locations, and personal information is stated to be provided to Slite in the United States. 7 9 10
The Engineering Lead
The contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, the service runs on Google Cloud Platform operated by Google LLC, and the privacy policy says personal information is provided directly in the United States; the French entity exists but the legal notice states it does not commercialise the service and does not act as contracting entity. The mitigations are real — media assets and daily backups stated to sit in EU Google Cloud storage, embeddings for AI search computed internally, data stated never to be used to train AI models, a Data Processing Addendum with Standard Contractual Clauses and SOC 2 Type II — but subprocessor locations are not published beyond categories with Stripe, Datadog and Vanta named. 1 7 9 10
The Quality Manager
The contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, and the service runs on Google Cloud Platform with stated transfers of personal information to the United States; the French entity provides staff and support and does not contract with customers. Media assets and backups are stated to sit in EU Google Cloud buckets, a Data Processing Addendum with Standard Contractual Clauses exists, and SOC 2 Type II and a no-training-on-customer-content statement are published. Subprocessors appear only as categories without named locations, and no AI model provider location, EU residency option or self-hosted edition is evidenced. 1 7 9 10 12
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is Slite, Inc., a Delaware corporation in San Francisco, hosting runs on Google Cloud Platform operated by Google LLC, and the privacy policy states personal information is provided in the United States and transferred to affiliates and service providers there; media assets and daily backups sit in EU buckets, but the Paris entity is explicitly stated not to commercialize the service or contract with customers. "Your data is never used to train AI models" is stated, a data processing agreement with standard contractual clauses and SOC 2 Type II exist, yet subprocessors appear as categories rather than a named list, and I found no public information on where the Elasticsearch index or the AI embeddings are processed beyond "internally using GPU resources". 1 7 9 10
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user and tier, readers or guests free or charged, minimum seats, which features (SSO, SCIM, audit log, verification, help-center publishing, custom domain, AI answers, EU data residency) cost extra, the free tier and its limits, storage limits, the self-hosted edition's licence and support price, minimum term and setup or migration fees.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, readers or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price per user and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, AI, readers or guests, EU residency, the self-hosted edition) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (editors, readers, guests, storage), add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's licence and support cost stated, minimum seats, term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of editors and readers and a feature set, with every add-on, AI credit, setup, migration and support fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Operations Lead
Basic and Pro are published at "$10 per user/month" and "$20 per user/month" billed yearly, with storage per user, AI-edit quotas, a 200MB upload limit and a 14-day trial without credit card stated. But reader-only seats, audit logs, SCIM and the service level agreement sit only in Enterprise, which is "Let's talk" custom pricing — so the one price I care about, read access for the workshop, is a sales call. We found no public information on minimum seats, minimum term, VAT treatment or a permanent free plan. 6 16
The IT Administrator
Basic at "$10 per user/month Billed yearly" and Pro at "$20 per user/month Billed yearly" are public with storage per user, AI limits and inclusions listed, which lets me compute two-thirds of the bill. The Enterprise tier, where reader-only seats, SCIM, audit logs and migration support sit, is custom pricing on contact, and readers are Enterprise-only; we found no public information on minimum seats, term or VAT treatment. 6
The Support Knowledge Manager
Basic at $10 per user per month and Pro at $20 per user per month, both billed yearly, publish their inclusions down to storage per user and monthly AI credits, but reader-only seats, SCIM, audit logs and the service level agreement sit in an Enterprise plan priced only on request. We found no public information on a permanent free tier, minimum seats, VAT treatment, or setup and migration fees. 6 16
The Engineering Lead
Basic is $10 per user/month and Pro $20 per user/month, both billed yearly, and the surrounding detail is unusually good: 30 AI edits per month per user on Basic, 50 monthly credits per seat on Pro, storage of 5GB to 10GB per user, a 200MB upload cap, OpenID SSO included from Pro, and a 14-day free trial with no credit card required. Reader-only seats, SCIM and audit logs sit in an Enterprise tier with custom pricing, and we found no public information on minimum seats, term length or VAT treatment. 6
The Quality Manager
Basic at "$10 per user/month" and Pro at "$20 per user/month", both billed yearly, are published with their inclusions, storage per user and AI edit or credit limits, and a 14-day trial needs no credit card. But audit logs, SCIM and reader-only seats sit in the Enterprise tier, which is custom pricing on request, so the cost of a read-only reader cannot be computed. Minimum seats, VAT treatment and setup or migration fees are not stated on the pages we read. 6 16
The Skeptic
Basic is "$10 per user/month Billed yearly" and Pro "$20 per user/month", with storage per user (5GB, 10GB, 10GB), a 200MB upload cap, thirty AI edits a month on Basic and fifty monthly credits per seat on Pro all public. But reader-only seats, audit logs, SCIM and HIPAA sit behind "Let's talk Custom pricing Contact Sales" Enterprise, and I found no public information on guest pricing, minimum seats, term, VAT treatment, or a free tier beyond the fourteen-day trial. 6 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in US ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 9 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Slite
Is Slite European?
No. whats-best.ai classifies Slite as Rest of world. Its vendor, Slite, Inc., is incorporated in United States, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.
Where does Slite store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
Does Slite have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Slite?
As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Document360 (3.5/5), BookStack (3/5) and XWiki (3/5) highest among the other 13 Knowledge Base & Wiki products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Document360 (UK / wider Europe). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Slite alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. A French group entity (Slite France SAS) exists, but the page states it does not commercialize the Service and is not the contracting entity for customers.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 12 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (20)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (knowledge base) slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Features page (AI search) slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Integrations page slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Pricing page slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Security page slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 API documentation developers.slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Legal notice slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Privacy policy slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Editor, structure & search — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Editor, structure & search — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Verification, ownership & freshness — found from sitemap developers.slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Verification, ownership & freshness — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Permissions, SSO & administration — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Permissions, SSO & administration — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Help-center publishing & integrations — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Help-center publishing & integrations — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 19 Import, export & self-hosting — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 20 Import, export & self-hosting — found from sitemap slite.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →