Video Conferencing
Demio
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Demio · demio.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Demio at a glance
- Vendor
- Demio
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Demio 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Demio is a webinar platform built for marketers. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Demio is a webinar platform built for marketers. Strongest is reach and accessibility, scored 5-6: attendees join in a browser — Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Edge on desktop, native iOS and Android browsers — with no install, and live captions auto-detect among six languages. Integrations scores sit at 4 throughout: a broad, marketing-shaped catalogue — Salesforce, Mailchimp, Stripe — all push-only into registrant records. Weakest is sovereignty, scored 0-1 — the captured pages state no region for media, recordings or the 24-hour backups, the contracting entity and subprocessors are listed as unknown, and the security-documentation contact is privacy@banzai.io with no jurisdiction stated. Recording governance scores 2-3 because every live session is recorded automatically, with no public information found on participant notification, consent or a policy switch. Meeting core and encryption and access cluster at 3-4 — screen sharing is documented in depth, admission rides on 16-symbol join links, and we found no published participant capacity. No criterion-level disagreement was flagged among the judges. No public prices were found; a Premium plan is named and the homepage invites booking a demo.
Speaks for it
- Attendees join in a browser — Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Edge on desktop, plus native iOS and Android browsers — with nothing to install.
- Live captions auto-detect the spoken language among six — English, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese — with a stated 1-3 second delay.
- Screen sharing is documented in depth: entire screen, individual windows, dual-monitor selection, or PDF slides presented inside the room.
- A broad marketing catalogue — Salesforce, Pipedrive, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, Stripe and more — plus a documented API, all push-only with CRM access limited to registrant email lookup.
- Every session is recorded automatically in 1080p, with MP4 download, shareable replay pages and editable VTT transcripts on the Premium plan or higher.
Held against it
- Every live session is recorded automatically and kept while the account is active with no stated limit, and we found no public information on participant notification, consent or an organisation-wide switch for recording or analytics.
- Data residency, the contracting entity's jurisdiction, ownership and subprocessor exposure are listed as unknown — residency is not confirmed on the vendor's own captured pages.
- Admission rests on 16-symbol unique join links plus a waiting room that redirects automatically when a session begins, and we found no public information on per-meeting passcodes, SSO-gated joining or end-to-end encryption.
- We found no public information on participant capacity, breakout rooms or host mute-all — the only mute documented is each participant silencing their own sound and microphone.
- We found no public prices — a Premium plan is named for transcripts and certain integrations, and the homepage routes to booking a demo.
Best for
- You run marketing webinars and want registration data flowing into your CRM or marketing-automation stack — the catalogue spans Salesforce, Pipedrive, Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign and Stripe (some on the Premium plan), alongside a documented API.
- Your audience joins from anywhere without installing anything — desktop support covers Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge, with native browser support on iOS and Android.
- You present to multilingual audiences — live captions automatically detect the spoken language among English, Spanish, French, German, Italian and Portuguese.
- You present slides as much as screens — PDF slides can be uploaded and presented inside the room, and screen share covers the entire screen, an individual window or a chosen monitor on dual-monitor setups.
Avoid if
- You must document where media and metadata are processed — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your compliance regime requires participant consent, notification or an organisation-wide switch for recording — every live session is recorded automatically on this platform.
- Your security model needs more than a join link at the door — admission rests on 16-symbol unique join links plus a waiting room that redirects automatically when a session begins.
- Your integration needs are identity and scheduling rather than marketing — the documented catalogue is push-only registrant data into CRM, email and advertising tools, and we found no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning or calendar-suite sync.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| The meeting itself | 2 of 5 |
| Encryption & meeting access | 2 of 5 |
| Reach & accessibility | 3 of 5 |
| Recordings, retention & admin control | 1.5 of 5 |
| Integrations & deployment | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0 of 5 |
The meeting itself
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the call works: participant capacity, video and audio quality under load, screen sharing, breakout rooms, moderation, and what happens on a bad connection.
0 — Small meetings only, no screen sharing worth the name, no moderation controls, and the call degrades without telling anyone.
3 — Standard meetings with screen sharing and mute-all, but low participant limits, no breakout rooms and no bandwidth adaptation stated.
5 — Meetings at the scale most teams need with screen sharing, breakout rooms, host moderation, and documented behaviour on constrained connections.
8 — Large meetings and webinars with published capacity limits, per-participant moderation and waiting rooms, layout control, simulcast or adaptive bitrate stated, and reliable behaviour on mobile networks.
10 — Scale and control are engineering claims the vendor stands behind: capacity published per plan and per region, selective forwarding with adaptive quality documented, live streaming, hardware-room support, and diagnostics an admin can read after a bad call.
The IT Administrator
Screen sharing is genuinely well covered — whole screen, single window, dual-monitor selection, and PDF slides presented straight inside the room — with a pre-event waiting room and simulcast stated for Chrome. I found no public information on participant capacity, breakout rooms, a host mute-all, documented behaviour on a bad connection, or any diagnostics an admin could read after a failed session, and I need capacity published rather than promised before this scores higher. 3 5 6
The Security Officer
Screen sharing is genuinely covered — full screen, individual windows, or slides uploaded as PDF presented inside the room — and Chrome streaming leans on simulcast for stability, but the engineering claims stop there. We found no public information on participant capacity, host moderation beyond chat replies, breakout rooms, or behaviour on a constrained connection outside Chrome. The waiting room auto-redirects everyone the moment a session begins, so it is a courtesy lobby, not an admission control. 3 5 6
The Works Council Advocate
Screen sharing is well covered — full screen, single window, dual monitors, or PDF slides presented inside the platform — and Chrome streaming is said to rely on simulcast for stability. But I found no public information on participant capacity, breakout rooms, or host moderation such as muting all participants; the only mute control documented is each participant silencing their own sound and microphone, and the waiting room simply redirects everyone once the session begins. 3 5 6
The Educator
Screen sharing is genuinely documented — whole screen, a chosen window, or slides uploaded as PDF and presented inside the room — and attendees can mute their own sound and microphone, with simulcast named for Chrome as streaming stability. I found no public information on breakout rooms, on session capacity, on host-level moderation like mute-all, or on what attendees experience on a constrained connection beyond that Chrome note, and breakout rooms are how I teach thirty people in small groups. 3 6
The Accessibility Advocate
Screen sharing is documented in real depth — entire screen, individual windows, dual-monitor selection and PDF slide upload — with simulcast named for streaming stability and a waiting room before sessions start. But we found no public information on participant capacity, breakout rooms, or host mute-all, and the only mute documented is participants muting themselves. 3 5 6
The Skeptic
Screen share with window, screen and per-monitor selection, in-app slide upload and Chrome simulcast are documented, along with self-mute and chat pop-out — but I found no published participant capacity on any page, and no mute-all, no remove-participant control and no breakout rooms in these captures. Simulcast is claimed for Chrome only, and nothing states what happens to the call on a constrained connection beyond that one sentence. 1 3 6
Encryption & meeting access
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What is actually encrypted and against whom, plus who can get into a meeting. Judged on documented mechanism rather than on the word "encrypted".
0 — Transport encryption only, undocumented; meetings joinable by anyone with a link and no lobby.
3 — TLS in transit and encryption at rest, with the vendor holding all keys; access control is a passcode.
5 — The above plus a lobby or waiting room, host-controlled admission, per-meeting passcodes, and a clear statement that the vendor can technically access media.
8 — Optional end-to-end encryption for meetings with the trade-offs named (which features stop working), documented key handling, SSO-gated joining, and per-meeting access policies.
10 — End-to-end encryption available without surrendering the product — its cryptography documented or open source, key management explained, identity verification for participants, and the vendor stating plainly what it can and cannot see.
The IT Administrator
HTTPS and encrypted disk storage are stated, and entry rides on 16-character unique join links plus a waiting room that only redirects when the session begins. I found no public information on end-to-end encryption, key handling, per-meeting passcodes, or a plain statement of what the vendor can technically see in the media path, so the documented mechanism stops at transport and storage encryption. 4 5
The Security Officer
The security page documents HTTPS connections and encrypted disk storage and stops there — we found no public information on end-to-end encryption, key handling, or whether the vendor can technically access session media. Admission is a 16-character Unique Join Link held by anyone who registers, and the waiting room redirects the room automatically rather than letting a host vet arrivals. That link is a bearer credential, and with no public information on passcodes or single-sign-on gated joining, it is the whole lock on the door. 4 5
The Works Council Advocate
The security page documents HTTPS connections and encrypted disk storage — transport and at rest, keys held by the vendor — and admission rests on a 16-character unguessable join link plus a waiting room that only exists until the session starts. I found no public information on end-to-end encryption, key handling, single sign-on gated joining, or a plain statement of what the vendor can technically see in a session, which matters when every session is recorded automatically. 4 5
The Educator
The security page states in-session information is protected by HTTPS encrypted connections and stored on encrypted disk storage, and admission rides on 16-symbol unique join links with a pre-event waiting room that redirects everyone automatically when the session begins. I found no public information on end-to-end encryption, on key handling, on host-controlled admission, or on a plain statement of what the vendor can and cannot see. 4 5
The Accessibility Advocate
In-session information travels over HTTPS connections and sits on encrypted disk storage, with nothing published on key handling or what the vendor can technically see; admission is via unique 16-symbol join links plus a waiting room that redirects automatically once a session begins. We found no public information on end-to-end encryption, SSO-gated joining, or per-meeting access policies. 4 5
The Skeptic
The security page offers exactly two sentences of mechanism — HTTPS connections and encrypted disk storage — with nothing on key handling or who can technically access media, and no page states end-to-end encryption for any meeting or plan. Admission rests on 16-symbol unique join links plus a waiting room that auto-redirects everyone when the session starts, so gating exists in time but there is no host-controlled admission and no per-meeting passcode stated. 4 5
Reach & accessibility
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether everyone who needs to join can: browser without an install, dial-in, low bandwidth, guests without accounts, captions and keyboard operation.
0 — A desktop client is the only way in; guests must create an account.
3 — Browser joining exists but is degraded, guests can join by link, and there is no dial-in and no accessibility statement.
5 — Full-feature browser joining without an install, guest access by link, mobile apps, and a stated accessibility posture.
8 — Telephone dial-in with numbers listed, live captions, keyboard-navigable and screen-reader-tested interface, and documented low-bandwidth behaviour.
10 — Reach is designed for: browser parity with the client, dial-in across the regions the customer operates in, live captions and translation, a published accessibility conformance report, and a usable experience on a poor mobile connection.
The IT Administrator
Joining is browser-native across Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Edge on desktop and mobile browsers with no install, guests arrive by unique join link, and live captions run in six languages with auto-detection — real reach, well past a degraded-browser story. I found no public information on telephone dial-in, an accessibility statement or conformance report, keyboard or screen-reader testing, or documented low-bandwidth behaviour. 6 7
The Security Officer
Browser joining is the design — desktop and mobile across the major browsers, attendees arriving through their Unique Join Link with nothing to install — and live captions run in six languages with automatic language detection. We found no public information on telephone dial-in, keyboard or screen-reader testing, an accessibility conformance report, or low-bandwidth behaviour beyond Chrome's simulcast. Captions earn real credit here; the missing accessibility posture caps it. 6 7
The Works Council Advocate
Anyone joins in a browser — Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Edge on desktop, native browsers on iOS and Android — with no install and via a unique join link, and live captions auto-detect the spoken language among six including German, French and Spanish. I found no public information on telephone dial-in, a published accessibility conformance report, keyboard or screen-reader testing, or behaviour on poor mobile connections beyond the simulcast claim. 6 7
The Educator
Joining is browser-first and real: Chrome, Firefox, Safari or Edge on desktop and the native browsers on iOS and Android, straight from a unique join link with no install, and live captions run in six languages with automatic detection. I found no public information on telephone dial-in, on keyboard or screen-reader testing, on a published accessibility conformance report, or on documented low-bandwidth behaviour, and for my learners in dead spots the phone line is the missing door. 6 7
The Accessibility Advocate
Live captions are real and non-trivial — six languages with auto-detection, a stated one-to-three-second delay, host-toggleable — and joining needs no install across four desktop browsers and mobile browsers via a unique link. But we found no public information on telephone dial-in, keyboard operation, screen-reader testing, or any accessibility statement or conformance report, and that absence is the difference between a marketing page and a commitment. 6 7
The Skeptic
Browser joining is first-class on desktop and mobile without any install, attendees join by their unique link, and live captions in six languages with auto-detection are a genuine strength I can verify. But we found no public information on telephone dial-in, keyboard or screen-reader support, an accessibility statement or conformance report, or documented low-bandwidth behaviour — those are the sentences I went looking for and could not find. 5 6 7
Recordings, retention & admin control
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
A recording is personal data about everyone in the room. Who may record, who is told, where it is stored, how long it lives, and what the works council can switch off.
0 — Anyone can record, storage location unstated, no retention rule, no admin policy.
3 — Host-only recording with a notification, but storage region unstated, retention manual, and no organisation-wide policy control.
5 — Admin policy over who may record, participant notification and consent prompt, stated storage region, and manual deletion that works.
8 — Automatic retention and deletion per policy, recordings encrypted at rest with access logged, transcription handled with its own retention rule, and attendance or analytics features that can be switched off for co-determination.
10 — Built for a works agreement: every recording, transcript and analytics feature independently switchable and documented, retention executed and evidenced, an audit trail of who accessed which recording, and no participant-level behavioural scoring at all.
The IT Administrator
Every live session is recorded automatically rather than by host or policy choice, recordings sit on the account for as long as it is active, and deletion is manual — permanent once done, with registrant data removable by archiving and deleting the event. I found no public information on the storage region, participant recording notification, organisation-wide recording policy, access logging, or any switch to turn the session analytics off. 4 8
The Security Officer
Every live session is recorded automatically, and we found no public information on switching that off, on notifying participants, or on an organisation-wide recording policy. Storage region is unstated, recordings are kept for as long as the account is active with no stated limit, and deletion is manual — an irreversible delete button, event deletion for registrant data, and a 30-day wipe after account cancellation. Transcripts follow the same indefinite path with no separate retention rule of their own. 4 8
The Works Council Advocate
Every live session is recorded automatically — the vendor records "each and every" one — and I found no public information on any admin policy, opt-out, participant notification or consent prompt; the storage region is unstated and recordings are kept for as long as the account is active, which is retention without a rule. Manual permanent deletion of a recording works and registrant data can be deleted by deleting the event, but I found no public information on switching session analytics off, on access logging, or on a separate retention rule for transcripts. As governance of personal data about everyone in the room, this sits near the bottom of the scale. 4 8
The Educator
Every live session is recorded automatically, recordings stay on the account for as long as it is active with no stated limit, deletion is manual and irreversible, and all information is aimed to be deleted within 30 days of cancellation, with storage stated as encrypted disk. I found no public information on the storage region, on participant notification or consent before recording, on organisation-wide recording policy, on access logging, or on any way to switch the session analytics off, and analytics a works council cannot switch off is a problem. 8 4
The Accessibility Advocate
Every live session is recorded automatically, and we found no public information on participant notification or a consent prompt; storage region is unstated, recordings live as long as the account is active with no stated limit, and account cancellation deletes data within 30 days. Manual deletion is permanent and works, export exists, and transcripts come with editing — but there is no organisation-wide policy control, no access logging, and no way documented to switch analytics off. 4 8
The Skeptic
Every session is recorded automatically — the platform decides, not a host — and recordings sit on the account with no stated limit, no retention rule other than deletion within 30 days of account cancellation, and storage region unstated. Manual deletion is documented and irreversible, transcripts carry their own Premium-plan gate with language auto-detect, and session analytics exist, but we found no public information on participant notification or consent, access logging, or any organisation-wide policy that switches recording, transcription or analytics off. 4 8
Integrations & deployment
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Calendar, identity and the wider stack — plus, in this category, whether the product can be run on the customer's own infrastructure at all.
0 — No calendar integration, no SSO, no API; cloud-only with no alternative.
3 — One calendar integration and basic SSO, no API worth building on, cloud-only.
5 — Calendar integration for the major suites, SAML or OIDC SSO, a documented API for scheduling, and room-system support.
8 — The above plus SCIM provisioning, embedding via SDK, webhooks for meeting events, and either a self-hosted option or a documented private-cloud deployment.
10 — Deployment is the customer's choice: a genuine on-premises or private-cloud option with the same features, open protocols or open source, embeddable SDKs, and identity integration that does not require the vendor's directory.
The IT Administrator
There is a documented API and a broad marketing-stack catalogue — Salesforce, Pipedrive, Mailchimp, Stripe, much of it via Zapier — though every integration is push-only registrant data, and the only calendar touch is an add-to-calendar link in the waiting room. I found no public information on single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, webhooks, an embeddable SDK, room-system support, or any self-hosted or private-cloud option, and as the one who owns identity, the silence on SSO is what I feel most. 4 5 10
The Security Officer
The marketing stack is broad — Salesforce, Pipedrive, Mailchimp, Stripe and more, plus a documented API — and the vendor states integrations are push-only with no access to other data inside the connected CRMs. But this is a leads-and-registration picture, not an identity one: we found no public information on single sign-on, provisioning, calendar-suite sync for scheduling, or room systems, and no deployment option other than the vendor's own cloud appears in the captured pages. 4 10
The Works Council Advocate
The integration catalogue is broad but aimed squarely at marketing — CRM, email, advertising, payments — and all of it is push-only into registrant records, alongside an advertised API. I found no public information on single sign-on, provisioning, webhooks, embedding SDKs or calendar-suite scheduling, and no self-hosted or private-cloud deployment appears in the captured pages. 4 10
The Educator
The marketing stack is richly wired, with native and Zapier-based integrations across CRM, email, marketing automation, payments and social, plus a public API, though all integrations are push-only into registrant records. I found no public information on calendar-suite scheduling integration, on single sign-on via SAML or OIDC, on SCIM provisioning, on an embedding SDK or webhooks, or on any self-hosted or private-cloud deployment. 10 11 4
The Accessibility Advocate
A documented API plus a long push-only integration list across CRM, email, marketing automation and payments — several running through Zapier and some gated to a Premium plan — with vendor access to integrated CRM data explicitly limited. We found no public information on calendar integration, single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, webhooks, embedding, or any self-hosted deployment. 4 10 11
The Skeptic
An API is advertised and the marketing stack is broad — Mailchimp, ActiveCampaign, Salesforce, Stripe, most of them push-only by the vendor's own words — but we found no public information on calendar integration with the major suites, SAML or OIDC single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, webhooks or an embeddable SDK. Every deployment path in these captures is the vendor's cloud. 4 10 11
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where media and metadata are processed, who the contracting entity is, which subprocessors carry the traffic. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it — which in this category is heavily.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, media routed through unstated regions, subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU data residency for storage while media relays or metadata remain non-EU, or the contracting entity sits outside the EU.
5 — EU hosting and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — relays, analytics, support tooling, transcription — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — Media and metadata processed in the EU on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: media never leaves the EU, every subprocessor European, certification published, and an on-premises option that removes the question entirely.
The IT Administrator
Data residency, the contracting entity and the subprocessor chain are all unconfirmed on the vendor's own captured pages; the only geographic hint anywhere is a support address at banzai.io on the security page. For a category I weight heavily, I found no public information on where media and metadata are processed or who carries the traffic. 4
The Security Officer
Nothing here tells me where media and metadata are processed, who the contracting entity is, or which subprocessors carry the traffic — data residency is not confirmed on the vendor's own captured pages, and every sovereignty attribute we hold is unknown. Even the privacy contact points to a different corporate domain, banzai.io, so the chain is unmapped in the pages a buyer can read. I weigh this category heavily, and absence of an answer is an answer. 4
The Works Council Advocate
The captured security and privacy page states HTTPS and encrypted disk storage but names no region for media, recordings or the daily backups, and I found no public information on the contracting entity's jurisdiction or on any subprocessor. Every question I weigh most heavily — where media is processed, who the contracting party is, who carries the traffic — goes unanswered on the public pages, and even the privacy contact is a banzai.io address with no entity or location named. 4 8
The Educator
I found no public information on where media and metadata are processed, on the contracting entity and its jurisdiction, or on a single named subprocessor, and data residency is not confirmed on the vendor's own captured pages. For a buyer who weighs this heavily, nothing in the chain is evidenced; the only adjacent detail is a privacy contact at a banzai.io address with no jurisdiction stated. 4
The Accessibility Advocate
We found no public information on where media and metadata are processed, the contracting entity's jurisdiction, ownership, or a single named subprocessor — even the security and privacy pages are silent on geography. The only infrastructure facts published are operational, a 24-hour backup with recovery objectives, which says nothing about where anything sits; for a buyer weighing this heavily, unverifiable is not better than foreign. 4
The Skeptic
Nothing in the captured pages states where media or metadata are processed, who the contracting entity is, or which subprocessors carry the traffic; the security documentation contact points to a privacy@banzai.io address with no jurisdiction stated anywhere. For a buyer weighing this heavily, completely unstated residency, ownership and subprocessor exposure scores at the bottom of the scale on absence of information. 1 4
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the annual invoice for their host count — including the capacity, dial-in and recording storage they actually need — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-host headline exists, but participant caps, dial-in minutes or recording storage are unpriced or unmentioned.
5 — Per-host prices public with billing period stated and capacity limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (webinar capacity, dial-in, storage) sits in an unpriced add-on.
8 — Every tier and add-on priced publicly with per-host maths, capacity limits, dial-in rates, storage allowances, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: a calculator producing the annual invoice for a given host count, meeting size and recording volume, including overage and per-region dial-in.
The IT Administrator
A Premium tier is named for transcripts and certain integrations and demos are bookable through sales, but I found no public pricing information — no per-host figure, billing period, capacity limit, dial-in rate, or storage allowance. A buyer cannot compute an annual invoice from public pages on this evidence. 1 8 10
The Security Officer
No price figure, billing period, capacity limit, dial-in rate or recording-storage cost appears anywhere in the pages we hold, and the front page steers to booking a demo. Plan tiers surface only in passing — transcripts and several integrations sit on the Premium plan — so a buyer cannot compute any invoice from what is public. That is a sales conversation, not pricing transparency. 1 8 10
The Works Council Advocate
The captured pages contain no prices at all: a Premium plan is named as the requirement for transcripts and some integrations but carries no figure, and the homepage route is a booked demo. A buyer cannot compute any annual invoice for their host count from what is public here, and I found no public information on capacity, dial-in rates or recording storage pricing. 1 8
The Educator
The captured pages name a Premium tier for transcripts and some integrations and invite a demo booking, but I found no public prices at all — no per-host figure, no billing period, no capacity limits, no dial-in or recording-storage rates — so no annual invoice can be computed from what is published. 1 8 10
The Accessibility Advocate
The captured pages reference a Premium plan and price-gate features like transcripts against it, but we found no public prices at all — no per-host figure, no billing period, no capacity limits — and the front door is a Book A Demo conversation. Recording storage is stated as unlimited, yet without any price a buyer cannot compute any part of an invoice. 1 8 10
The Skeptic
We found no public price information at all in these captures — no per-host figure, no plan tiers, no capacity limits, and nothing on dial-in or recording storage allowances — while the homepage's call to action is booking a demo. A buyer cannot compute any part of an annual invoice from what is published here. 1
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Demio
Is Demio European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Demio is based.
Where does Demio store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does Demio have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Demio?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates alfaview (3/5), Tixeo (3/5) and Nextcloud Talk (3/5) highest among the other 27 Video Conferencing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is alfaview (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Demio alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 12 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (11)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 The meeting itself — found from sitemap www.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 The meeting itself — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Encryption & meeting access — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Encryption & meeting access — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Reach & accessibility — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Reach & accessibility — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Recordings, retention & admin control — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Recordings, retention & admin control — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Integrations & deployment — found from sitemap www.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Integrations & deployment — found from sitemap help.demio.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →