Accounting
Pennylane
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Pennylane SAS · www.pennylane.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Pennylane at a glance
- Vendor
- Pennylane SAS
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 27 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Pennylane 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Pennylane is strongest on documents and banking, scored 5 to 7: an ACPR licence backs the bank connection, OCR read 2.6 million invoices in December, and incoming payments are matched to open invoices automatically. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 27 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 27 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Pennylane is strongest on documents and banking, scored 5 to 7: an ACPR licence backs the bank connection, OCR read 2.6 million invoices in December, and incoming payments are matched to open invoices automatically. Weakest are GoBD compliance and pricing transparency, both 0 to 1: no public information on a GoBD claim, a Verfahrensdokumentation or retention, and no public price figure; plan names appear only in a help article and buying runs through a demo. Bookkeeping core scores 3 to 4 — AI booking suggestions and automatic journals are shown, with no public information on SKR03/SKR04 or a period close — and tax and filings scores 1 to 2, ZUGFeRD e-invoicing evidenced but no public information on UStVA or ELSTER. On adviser handoff scores range 4 to 6: higher ones credit real-time adviser collaboration with 6,500 tax firms claimed, lower ones weigh the missing DATEV export. Sovereignty scores 5 to 6 on stated EU hosting, French, German and Spanish entities and named financial partners — the hosting infrastructure unnamed and the independently sourced attributes reporting jurisdiction and residency as unknown.
Speaks for it
- OCR read 2.6 million invoices in December at under 11 seconds each, with 85% of invoices at least three-quarters autofilled and identical duplicates rejected on import
- Bank connection backed by an ACPR licence as an account information service provider, with incoming payments automatically matched to open invoices and posted
- ZUGFeRD e-invoices generated automatically with format and mandatory-field checks, and created, sent, received and archived in the system
- Advisers work directly in the data in real time, with receipts sent automatically on import and 6,500 tax firms claimed as customers
- E-invoicing is included in all plans and the OCR stands free of charge for customers and tax advisory firms
Held against it
- We found no public price figure on any captured page; plan names Essential and Premium surface only in a help article on report exports, and the route offered is booking a demo
- We found no public information on GoBD conformity, a Verfahrensdokumentation, a change history or statutory retention, while mobile help pages describe deleting receipts depending on their status
- We found no public information on a DATEV export; the only documented exports are Excel and CSV files
- We found no public information on UStVA, ELSTER, EÜR, OSS or reverse charge; the e-invoicing conformity evidenced on the pages is the French system
- We found no public information on SKR03/SKR04, opening balances or a period close, and the German bookkeeping help collection holds two articles
Best for
- You want your Steuerberater working inside your software in real time — receipts flow to them automatically on import and document requests arrive with due dates
- You process high invoice volumes and want automated capture — the OCR pipeline is evidenced at 2.6 million invoices in December
- You issue ZUGFeRD e-invoices and want creation, sending, receipt and archiving in one system
- Your business is oriented to the French e-invoicing regime — e-facturation and e-reporting conformity as a Plateforme Agréée is claimed
Avoid if
- You must budget precisely before committing — no price figure is public, plan names surface only in a help article, and the only route offered is booking a demo
- You must evidence GoBD-conformant record keeping for a German tax audit — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your Kanzlei expects a DATEV handoff — the only documented exports are Excel and CSV files (plus invoice PDFs)
- You expect the tool itself to produce German filings such as UStVA via ELSTER — the conformity evidenced on the pages is the French e-invoicing regime, with no public information on German filing preparation
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Bookkeeping core | 1.5 of 5 |
| GoBD, immutability & audit | 0 of 5 |
| Tax handling & filings | 1 of 5 |
| Receipts, banking & matching | 3.5 of 5 |
| Tax adviser handoff | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0.5 of 5 |
Bookkeeping core
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Double-entry, the chart of accounts (SKR03/SKR04), postings, journals, opening balances and period closing — the ledger underneath the pretty screens.
0 — Income-and-expense lists only; no double-entry, no chart of accounts, no journal.
3 — Simplified bookkeeping suitable for EÜR with a fixed account list; no free posting, no period close.
5 — Double-entry with SKR03/SKR04, manual postings, journals, opening balances and a month-end close.
8 — Full ledger with cost centres, recurring and reversing entries, accruals, multi-year comparatives, and a documented close checklist with locking.
10 — An accountant's ledger: configurable charts including customised accounts, period locking with audit, foreign currency with documented valuation, group or multi-entity handling, and reporting that reconciles to the trial balance.
The Bookkeeper
The journals are real — the OCR pipeline generates the booking entry in the journals automatically and the AI proposes an account assignment, with categorization rules for recurring suppliers. I found no public information on SKR03/SKR04, free manual postings, opening balances, or a month-end close with locking, and the bookkeeping help collection holds just two articles. 3 4 7
The Tax Adviser
The pages show AI booking suggestions with account assignment and journal entries generated automatically from invoice data, plus help articles on capturing bank transactions and invoices — capture, not closing. I found no public information on double-entry bookkeeping, SKR03 or SKR04, manual postings, opening balances or a period close. That reads as simplified bookkeeping on a fixed account list, EÜR level. 3 4 7
The Auditor
Postings and journals exist — the AI produces booking suggestions with account assignment, and once invoice data is complete the journal entry is generated automatically — plus categorisation rules for recurring suppliers. But I found no public information on a chart of accounts, opening balances, or a period close with locking, so this sits between simplified bookkeeping and a proper double-entry ledger. 3 7 4
The Founder
The AI books incoming invoices into journals with an account suggestion, there are categorisation rules for recurring suppliers, and financial reports export to Excel — that reads as assisted, simplified bookkeeping. I found no public information on the German charts of accounts SKR03 or SKR04, free manual postings, opening balances or any period close, which is what I need underneath the pretty screens. 3 4 7
The Integrator
The German product page shows AI booking suggestions with account assignment, journals generated automatically from invoice data, categorization rules and financial report export — more than an income-and-expense list, and we found no public information on double-entry, SKR03/SKR04, opening balances or a period close. The bookkeeping help collection runs to two articles, which tells me the German ledger depth is not what is being sold. 3 4 7
The Skeptic
The captured pages show AI booking suggestions with account assignment, journal entries generated automatically from invoice data, bank transaction capture, and categorisation rules for recurring suppliers — a real ledger underneath, in the French comptabilité tradition. But we found no public information on a German chart of accounts (SKR03/SKR04), free manual postings, opening balances, cost centres, or a period close with locking, and the German bookkeeping help collection holds just two articles. 1 3 4 7
GoBD, immutability & audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record survives a tax audit: unalterable postings, complete change history, retention across the statutory period, and a Verfahrensdokumentation the vendor actually supplies.
0 — Postings can be edited or deleted without trace; no retention statement, no GoBD claim, no documentation.
3 — GoBD asserted on the marketing page with nothing behind it — no described audit trail, no documentation offered, no statement on retention.
5 — Postings become unalterable after close with corrections booked as reversals, a change log exists, and the statutory retention period is stated.
8 — Documented GoBD conformity with a supplied Verfahrensdokumentation template, complete and exportable audit trail, receipts linked to postings, and a GoBD-compliant data export (GDPdU/Z3) for the auditor.
10 — Audit-ready as a product feature: an independent GoBD certification or attestation published, Verfahrensdokumentation maintained per release, tamper-evident journals, retention executed across the full statutory period, and an export the Betriebsprüfer accepts without argument.
The Bookkeeper
I found no public information on GoBD conformity, statutory retention, a Verfahrensdokumentation, or any audit trail of changes. The only published behaviour around record changes is that expense receipts in the mobile app can be deleted or archived depending on their status; ISO 27001 and a trust center are security documentation, not record-keeping documentation. 1 8
The Tax Adviser
I found no public information on a GoBD claim, a Verfahrensdokumentation, posting immutability, a change history or the statutory retention period — nothing that would survive a Betriebsprüfung. The published compliance artefacts are ISO/IEC 27001 certification and French banking registrations, which speak to security and payment services, not tax-audit durability. The mobile help shows receipts being deleted or archived depending on status, with no word on what that means for the evidence chain. 1 2 8
The Auditor
I asked for the Verfahrensdokumentation and found no public information on GoBD conformity, a retention statement, an audit trail, or a tamper-evident export for the Betriebsprüfer. The only change-related facts I could find are that receipts in early statuses can be deleted and archived ones restored — nothing here survives a tax audit on the published evidence. 1 3 8
The Founder
Nothing in the captured pages mentions GoBD conformity, a change history, or retention of records for the statutory period. The mobile help page even describes deleting receipts outright depending on their status — that is not what survives a Betriebsprüfung. 1 4 8
The Integrator
We found no public information on GoBD conformity, a change log, retention statements or a Verfahrensdokumentation; the trust page stops at ISO 27001, which is security, not auditability. The only trace-relevant statement captured is the mobile help article describing receipt deletion depending on status, which is the opposite of tamper-evidence. 1 8
The Skeptic
This is the page after page I have learned to distrust, and here even the marketing word is absent: no GoBD claim, no Verfahrensdokumentation, no retention statement, no described audit trail anywhere in the captures — only ISO/IEC 27001, which secures data but proves nothing fiscally. The documented exports are Excel and CSV lists, not an auditor's data export, and the help pages describe deleting receipts by status. Scored at the anchor for no GoBD claim, no retention statement, no documentation. 1 8 9 10
Tax handling & filings
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
VAT logic and the filings that follow: UStVA, ELSTER submission, EÜR or Bilanz, OSS for cross-border sales, and reverse-charge handling.
0 — No VAT logic beyond a rate field; no filings, no ELSTER.
3 — VAT rates and a UStVA figure to copy out by hand; no electronic submission, no special cases.
5 — UStVA prepared and submitted electronically via ELSTER, EÜR or a simple balance sheet produced, and reverse-charge and intra-community supply handled.
8 — The above plus OSS handling for cross-border B2C, Zusammenfassende Meldung, small-business (§19) and Ist/Soll taxation, permanent extension (Dauerfristverlängerung), and E-Bilanz where relevant.
10 — The filing year is handled end to end: every routine German filing generated and submitted electronically with validation before sending, cross-border VAT determined from the transaction rather than by hand, and correction filings supported.
The Bookkeeper
VAT amounts and tax rates are recognised automatically and flow into the booking entries, and ZUGFeRD e-invoices are generated with format and mandatory-field validation — but the filing story on the captured pages is French e-invoicing and e-reporting. I found no public information on UStVA, ELSTER, EÜR, a balance sheet, or OSS. 1 3 7
The Tax Adviser
I found no public information on UStVA, ELSTER, EÜR, OSS or reverse charge; the only VAT evidence is the OCR reading amount, date, supplier and tax rate off a receipt. The French e-facturation and e-reporting conformity and the automatically generated ZUGFeRD format show e-invoice capability in the German format, but an e-invoice is not a filing. 1 3 7
The Auditor
VAT rates and amounts are recognised automatically, ZUGFeRD invoices are generated, validated, sent, received and archived, and French e-invoicing conformity as a Plateforme Agréée is claimed. But I found no public information on UStVA, ELSTER submission, EÜR or balance sheet production, reverse charge or OSS — the German filing machinery is entirely unevidenced. 3 1 7
The Founder
VAT amount and rate are recognised automatically on invoices and ZUGFeRD e-invoices are generated and validated, so the VAT data exists in the records. I found no public information on UStVA preparation, ELSTER submission, EÜR or a balance sheet, and the e-invoicing conformity claims on the captured pages concern the French system, not German filings. 1 3 7
The Integrator
What is evidenced is French e-invoicing conformity ("E-facturation et e-reporting conformes") plus automatic ZUGFeRD generation and tax-rate recognition on the German page; that is e-invoicing, not German filings. We found no public information on UStVA, ELSTER, EÜR, OSS or reverse-charge handling, so a German filing year has no evidenced support. 1 3 7
The Skeptic
What is evidenced is e-invoicing: ZUGFeRD generated automatically with format and mandatory-field checks, VAT rate recognised on receipts, and French e-invoicing and e-reporting compliance as an agréée platform. We found no public information on UStVA, ELSTER submission, EÜR or a balance sheet, OSS, or reverse charge — the captured model hands filings to the Steuerberater rather than producing them. 1 3 7
Receipts, banking & matching
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How evidence and money get into the ledger: bank feeds, receipt capture, OCR, matching rules, and whether the digital receipt is legally sufficient on its own.
0 — Manual entry only; no bank connection, no receipt storage.
3 — Bank statement import by file and receipt upload as plain attachments; matching is entirely manual.
5 — Automatic bank feeds for the major German banks, receipt upload with OCR, suggested matches, and receipts linked to their postings.
8 — PSD2 feeds across many institutions, rule-based automatic matching with learning, e-invoice handling (ZUGFeRD/XRechnung) both directions, and replacement scanning (ersetzendes Scannen) documented so paper can be destroyed.
10 — The evidence chain is closed: every posting reaches its receipt in one click, e-invoicing inbound and outbound as standard, documented compliant archiving of the digital original, and matching accurate enough that exceptions rather than transactions are the work.
The Bookkeeper
This is the strong side: 2.6 million invoices read per month at under 11 seconds each, 85% of invoices with at least three-quarters of fields autofilled, duplicate detection, algorithms that learn, incoming payments matched to open invoices automatically, and receipts attachable to bank transactions — with bank aggregation backed by an ACPR account-information licence and e-invoices created, sent, received and archived. I found no public information on ersetzendes Scannen, compliant archiving of the digital original, or named coverage of German bank feeds. 2 3 7 8
The Tax Adviser
The strongest area by far: an ACPR licence as an account information service provider stands behind the bank connection, and the OCR fills at least three quarters of the fields on 85 percent of invoices in under eleven seconds, learns over time, rejects identical duplicates and books the journal entry itself. Receipts attach to bank transactions from the mobile app, incoming payments are matched to open invoices automatically and booked, and e-invoices are created, sent, received and archived in ZUGFeRD format. I found no public information on XRechnung, replacement scanning or compliant archiving of the digital original — which is what lets the client destroy the paper — so I stop short of the top of this range. 2 3 4 7 8
The Auditor
Receipt capture is genuinely strong: OCR autofills amount, VAT, supplier and IBAN with a stated 85 percent field-recognition rate, learns over time, rejects identical duplicates, attaches receipts to bank transactions, and incoming payments are matched to open invoices automatically, with ACPR supervision as an account information service behind the bank connection. I found no public information on replacement scanning (ersetzendes Scannen), XRechnung handling, or how many institutions the feeds cover, which keeps it below the top of the range. 7 8 2 3
The Founder
This is the Sunday-saver: receipts arrive by email, Drive, Dropbox or phone camera, OCR fills amount, VAT, due date and IBAN in seconds, payments are matched to open invoices automatically, and the ACPR has licensed them as an account information service — the licence that powers bank feeds. I found no public information on bank feeds across named German institutions or on replacement scanning, so the paper may still need keeping. 2 3 4 7 8
The Integrator
The money-and-evidence chain is the strongest part: an ACPR licence as an account information service provider underpins the bank connection, incoming payments are matched to open invoices and posted, the OCR handled 2.6 million invoices in December alone with identical files rejected on import and a review hint for near-duplicates, learns over time, and ZUGFeRD e-invoices are created, sent, received and archived. We found no public information on XRechnung, on documented replacement scanning, or on which German banks are actually connected, which keeps it a notch below the top band. 2 3 7 8
The Skeptic
Capture is genuinely broad — camera with auto-crop, email forwarding, Google Drive, Dropbox, merchant connectors — with OCR filling amount, VAT and supplier in seconds, learning over time, duplicate detection, journal entries generated once data is complete, and payments automatically matched to open invoices; e-invoices are created, sent, received and archived in ZUGFeRD. But we found no public information on automatic bank feeds for German banks or on replacement scanning (ersetzendes Scannen) that would let paper be destroyed, which is what separates good capture from a closed evidence chain. 3 7 8
Tax adviser handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the books reach the Steuerberater — DATEV above all — and whether the adviser can work in the system rather than around it.
0 — No adviser access and no accounting export; the year-end is a pile of PDFs.
3 — Generic CSV or Excel export described as "suitable for your tax adviser", with no named format.
5 — A documented DATEV export (postings and, ideally, receipts) plus a read-only login for the adviser.
8 — DATEV export including receipt images with correct linking, or a maintained DATEV interface; the adviser gets their own scoped access with an audit of what they changed.
10 — The adviser is a first-class user: bidirectional DATEV exchange including corrections coming back, or a certified interface; period handover with locking, and a workflow where adviser queries are resolved inside the system.
The Bookkeeper
The adviser genuinely works inside the system — real-time access to all relevant information, 6,500 firms, document requests with due dates and notifications, commenting, and receipts sent automatically on import — which is exactly the workflow where adviser queries get resolved rather than emailed. But the export side is generic Excel and CSV for customers, products, invoices and transactions; I found no public information on a DATEV export or any named accounting-format export, and the imports/exports collection holds a single article. 3 6 9 10
The Tax Adviser
The collaboration is genuinely built in: the adviser sees everything in real time, continues working directly in the system, requests documents with due dates and automatic emails, and 6,500 Kanzleien reportedly work this way with receipts sent automatically on import. But I found no public information on a DATEV export; the documented exports are XLSX, CSV and PDF — in my book, exporting a spreadsheet for your Steuerberater means nobody asked one. There is equally no public information on period handover with locking or an audit of what the adviser changed. 3 5 6 7 9
The Auditor
The adviser works inside the system — real-time access to all relevant information, document requests with due dates and notifications, commenting on shared documents, and automatic sending of imported receipts — and 6,500 Steuerkanzleien are claimed as users. But every export described is Excel or CSV, and I found no public information on a DATEV export, so the year-end for a German adviser would still run on generic files. 5 6 9 3
The Founder
My Steuerberater could sit inside the system — receipts flow to them automatically, they request documents with due dates and notifications, and 6,500 tax firms are claimed as users. But the exports I found are Excel and CSV, and I found no public information on a DATEV export, so an adviser working in DATEV would be rebuilding my year by hand. 3 5 6 9
The Integrator
The adviser is clearly a user of the system rather than a recipient of PDFs: 6,500 tax firms are claimed as customers, receipts go to the adviser automatically on import, document requests arrive with due dates and comments, and the adviser works on everything in real time with the OCR free for firms. But the export evidence is Excel and CSV files with a re-downloadable history, and we found no public information on a DATEV export or maintained DATEV interface, nor on any audit of what the adviser changed — the collaboration model is good, the German handoff route is unevidenced. 3 6 7 9
The Skeptic
I read every captured page for the word DATEV and it never appears: the only documented exports are XLSX and CSV lists of transactions, invoices, customers and products, so a German Kanzlei on DATEV has no bridge at all. What the vendor does show is the other half of the criterion done properly — the adviser works in the data in real time, receipts are sent automatically on import, document requests arrive with due dates and automatic emails, and comments run both ways — which is worth more than a bare export but cannot replace the format every German adviser asks for. 3 6 9
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the books live and who could be compelled to produce them — plus, uniquely here, whether statutory retention survives leaving the vendor. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed — with a ten-year retention obligation attached to data held abroad.
3 — EU hosting offered while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — OCR, AI categorisation, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or German hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and a stated export that satisfies retention if the contract ends.
10 — Sovereign and durable: German or EU hosting throughout, every subprocessor European, certification published, and a documented archive export that keeps the customer compliant for the full retention period after they leave.
The Bookkeeper
The legal notice puts the contracting entity in France with a German GmbH and a Spanish entity in formation, customer data hosted in the EU, Made in France, ISO 27001 published, and three named European partners (Swan, Defacto, Adyen) for the financial offers. What keeps it short of the top: the hosting infrastructure is named no further than 'EU', the published partners cover the financial offers rather than a full list, and I found no public information on an export that satisfies statutory retention after the contract ends. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
The books sit in the European Union by contract with a French contracting entity, a German GmbH in Munich for German customers, and named European partners (Adyen, Swan, Defacto) behind the financial offers. But I found no public information on a full subprocessor list for the accounting chain — the OCR help states that external APIs process a small share of invoices, unnamed — nor on named hosting infrastructure or an export that carries the statutory retention obligation if the contract ends. 2 7 1 9
The Auditor
The books are stated to be hosted in the EU with contracting entities in France, Germany and Spain, three named European financial subprocessors, ACPR supervision and ISO 27001 published. The hosting infrastructure itself is not named, external APIs are used for a small share of invoice processing without naming them, and I found no public information on an export that satisfies statutory retention if the contract ends — so the chain is European but not fully documented. 2 1 7
The Founder
Customer data is stated as hosted in the EU, with a French parent and a German GmbH to contract with, plus ISO 27001 — good bones. The published subprocessors cover only the payment and credit offers, the captured OCR page says a small share of invoices goes to external APIs without naming them, the hosting infrastructure itself is unnamed, and I found no public information on an export that keeps me compliant for the retention period after leaving. 1 2 7
The Integrator
The vendor's own legal notice puts the SaaS and customer data in the EU, names a French SAS and a German GmbH as contracting entities, and names Adyen, Defacto and Swan for the financial offers, with ISO 27001 published — solidly mid-table. It stops short of the top band: the core infrastructure provider is unnamed, a small share of OCR runs through unnamed external APIs, we found no public information on an export that satisfies statutory retention after leaving, and the independently sourced attributes report jurisdiction and residency as unknown. 2 7
The Skeptic
Client data and the application are stated to be hosted in the EU, contracting runs through Pennylane SAS in Paris with Pennylane GmbH in Munich and a Spanish entity forming, and three financial partners (SWAN, DEFACTO, Adyen) are named — a European chain, with ISO/IEC 27001 indicated. But we found no public information on a complete subprocessor list, the captured OCR article says a small share of invoices goes through external APIs whose location is unstated, and nothing describes an export that satisfies statutory retention after leaving; the independently sourced attributes themselves came back unknown. 1 2 7
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a business can compute the real annual invoice — including the bookings, users, bank accounts and adviser access they actually need — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A headline monthly price exists, but booking or document limits, extra users or the tier where DATEV export begins are unstated.
5 — Tier prices public with billing period stated and the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (DATEV export, extra bank accounts, adviser seat) sits in an unpriced tier.
8 — Every tier and add-on priced publicly with limits, overage, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; adviser access priced or explicitly free.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given transaction volume, user count and feature set, including overage and the year-end extras.
The Bookkeeper
No public price figures exist on the captured pages — no tier prices, no limits, no billing period, no VAT treatment; the plan names Essential and Premium surface only inside a help article about report exports, and the offered path is a demo call. The only priced datapoints published are that OCR is free for customers and advisory firms and that e-invoicing is included in all plans, so a real annual invoice cannot be computed from public pages. 1 3 7 9
The Tax Adviser
I found no public information on plan prices; plan names surface only incidentally — a report export is said to require an Essential or Premium plan — and the call to action is a demo. The only price statements are that e-invoicing is included in all plans and the OCR technology stands free of charge for customers and advisory firms, which is welcome but computes nothing. 1 3 7 9
The Auditor
Plan names Essential and Premium appear in the export rules, OCR is stated as free for customers and advisory firms, and e-invoicing is included in all plans — but I found no public price figure for any tier. The only route offered on the German product page is booking a demo, so the annual invoice is not computable from public pages. 7 1 9 3
The Founder
Plan names like Essential and Premium appear in the help pages and e-invoicing is said to be included in all plans, but no price figure is published anywhere captured, and buying runs through booking a demo. I cannot compute my annual invoice from what is public — limits, users and adviser seats are equally unstated. 1 3 7 9
The Integrator
We found no public information on any price: the buying path captured is a demo call, plan names surface only inside a help article about report exports ("Essential" or "Premium"), and the only price-adjacent statements are that e-invoicing is "Incluse dans tous les plans" and that the OCR is free for customers and tax advisory firms. A business cannot begin to compute its annual invoice from what is public. 1 3 7 9
The Skeptic
The numbers I compute invoices from simply are not there: no public tier prices, no booking or document limits, no extra-user or bank-account price, no VAT treatment or minimum term — only that e-invoicing is included in all plans, the OCR is free, a reports export requires an Essential or Premium plan, and the sales route is a demo. A business cannot derive its annual invoice from these pages, and since there is no DATEV export, the question of which tier it appears in never even arises. 1 3 7 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Pennylane
Is Pennylane European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Pennylane is based.
Where does Pennylane store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 27 Oct 2026.
Does Pennylane have a free plan?
Yes. Pennylane has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 27 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Pennylane?
As of 27 Oct 2026, the panel rates Papierkram (3.5/5), sevDesk (3.5/5) and BuchhaltungsButler (3/5) highest among the other 27 Accounting products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Papierkram (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Pennylane alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 27 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 4 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (10)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Legal notice — found from the homepage www.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Bookkeeping core — found from sitemap www.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Bookkeeping core — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Tax handling & filings — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Tax handling & filings — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Tax adviser handoff — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Tax adviser handoff — found from sitemap help.pennylane.com Checked 27 Oct 2026 Details →