Accounting
Tripletex
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Tripletex AS · www.tripletex.no
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Tripletex at a glance
- Vendor
- Tripletex AS
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Tripletex 1/5, the mean of 6 judges. Tripletex AS is a Norwegian cloud accounting vendor presenting cloud-based services since 2004, whose public pages evidence one strong capability. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Tripletex AS is a Norwegian cloud accounting vendor presenting cloud-based services since 2004, whose public pages evidence one strong capability. Documents and banking scored 4-5, the strongest cluster on the bench: the mobile app reads amount, date and currency from photographed receipts, an AI document interpreter reads amount, date, supplier and KID number from invoice images to generate posting suggestions, and an OCR-giro bank agreement matches incoming KID payments against issued invoices, updating the accounts automatically. GoBD compliance scored a flat 0 — judges found no public information on posting immutability, a change history, statutory retention or a Verfahrensdokumentation — and tax and filings scored 0-1, the only tax content a glossary entry defining VAT as the English word for merverdiavgift. Two criteria spread: bookkeeping core at 2-4, where the auditor credited the visible posting machinery while others withheld credit for the unshown ledger, and sovereignty at 0-2, where some judges counted the Norwegian contracting entity while others scored an empty record. No prices appear; the free trial requires no payment details and expires automatically.
Speaks for it
- Documents and banking scored 4-5, the strongest cluster on the bench
- The mobile app reads amount, date and currency from a photographed receipt via OCR
- A document interpreter uses AI to read amount, date, supplier and KID number from invoice images and generate posting suggestions
- An OCR-giro bank agreement matches incoming KID payments against issued invoices and updates the accounts automatically
- Support is free via chat, phone and email, with an AI assistant available around the clock
Held against it
- GoBD compliance scored a flat 0; we found no public information on posting immutability, a change history, statutory retention or a Verfahrensdokumentation
- Tax and filings scored 0-1; the only tax content found is a glossary entry defining VAT
- Bookkeeping core scored 2-4; we found no public information on double-entry mechanics, a chart of accounts, opening balances or a period close
- Adviser handoff scored a flat 2; we found no public information on an adviser export format such as DATEV or a scoped adviser login
- No sovereignty attributes are on record; judges found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, certification or an exit export
Best for
- You issue invoices with KID numbers and want incoming customer payments matched automatically against issued invoices
- You photograph receipts on the go and want amount, date and currency captured on the spot via OCR
- You receive supplier invoices as images and want posting suggestions generated without manual keying
- You are weighing doing the books yourself, in part, or outsourcing all the work to a partner while keeping access to your financial information anytime
Avoid if
- You must show a German tax auditor a GoBD-conform record; we found no public information on posting immutability, a change history or a Verfahrensdokumentation
- Your team must prepare and submit VAT returns; the only tax content found is a glossary definition of VAT
- Your adviser works in DATEV or needs a documented export format and a login inside the books
- You require an EU-based contracting entity; the vendor's contracting entity is Norwegian
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Bookkeeping core | 1 of 5 |
| GoBD, immutability & audit | 0 of 5 |
| Tax handling & filings | 0 of 5 |
| Receipts, banking & matching | 2.5 of 5 |
| Tax adviser handoff | 1 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5 of 5 |
Bookkeeping core
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Double-entry, the chart of accounts (SKR03/SKR04), postings, journals, opening balances and period closing — the ledger underneath the pretty screens.
0 — Income-and-expense lists only; no double-entry, no chart of accounts, no journal.
3 — Simplified bookkeeping suitable for EÜR with a fixed account list; no free posting, no period close.
5 — Double-entry with SKR03/SKR04, manual postings, journals, opening balances and a month-end close.
8 — Full ledger with cost centres, recurring and reversing entries, accruals, multi-year comparatives, and a documented close checklist with locking.
10 — An accountant's ledger: configurable charts including customised accounts, period locking with audit, foreign currency with documented valuation, group or multi-entity handling, and reporting that reconciles to the trial balance.
The Bookkeeper
The pages describe a cloud accounting program that handles vouchers, receipts and bank transactions automatically and generates posting suggestions from interpreted invoice data, but I found no public information on a chart of accounts, journals, opening balances or a period close that locks. What I can see is automated posting; the ledger underneath the screens stays invisible. 1 2 3 5
The Tax Adviser
The captured pages describe automated handling of vouchers, receipts and bank transactions and an ERP surface aimed at firms with 50-plus employees, but I found no public information on double-entry, a chart of accounts, journals, opening balances or any period close. I close forty years a year and none of the ledger machinery I would need to do that is shown. 1 3 5
The Auditor
These pages show a real cloud accounting product — vouchers handled automatically, posting suggestions generated from read invoices, pages addressed to the accountant's ledger — but we found no public information on double-entry mechanics, the chart of accounts, opening balances, or a period close with locking. I asked for the ledger and the capture returns category names and an ERP claim, so I credit the ledger's existence without being able to audit beneath it. 1 2 3 5
The Founder
The pages show vouchers, receipts and bank transactions handled automatically and posting suggestions generated from interpreted invoices, so postings clearly happen. But I found no public information on double-entry, a chart of accounts, opening balances or a period close, so the ledger underneath the pretty screens stays invisible to a buyer like me. 1 5
The Integrator
Postings clearly happen — vouchers, receipts and bank transactions are handled automatically and the accounts update themselves when a customer pays — but I found no public information on double-entry bookkeeping, a chart of accounts, journals, opening balances or a period close. For a product sold as accounting software, the ledger underneath the automation is entirely unevidenced, which leaves it barely above the bottom. 1 5
The Skeptic
The captured pages present a cloud accounting product where vouchers, receipts and bank transactions are handled automatically and posting suggestions are generated from read invoice data. We found no public information on double-entry mechanics, a chart of accounts, journals, opening balances or a period close, so the ledger underneath the pretty screens stays unevidenced. 1 3 5
GoBD, immutability & audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record survives a tax audit: unalterable postings, complete change history, retention across the statutory period, and a Verfahrensdokumentation the vendor actually supplies.
0 — Postings can be edited or deleted without trace; no retention statement, no GoBD claim, no documentation.
3 — GoBD asserted on the marketing page with nothing behind it — no described audit trail, no documentation offered, no statement on retention.
5 — Postings become unalterable after close with corrections booked as reversals, a change log exists, and the statutory retention period is stated.
8 — Documented GoBD conformity with a supplied Verfahrensdokumentation template, complete and exportable audit trail, receipts linked to postings, and a GoBD-compliant data export (GDPdU/Z3) for the auditor.
10 — Audit-ready as a product feature: an independent GoBD certification or attestation published, Verfahrensdokumentation maintained per release, tamper-evident journals, retention executed across the full statutory period, and an export the Betriebsprüfer accepts without argument.
The Bookkeeper
Nothing in the captured pages claims GoBD conformity, unalterable postings, a change history or a retention period, and I found no public information on an audit trail or a Verfahrensdokumentation. For a Norwegian cloud product sold into a German audit, that silence decides it. 1 2 3
The Tax Adviser
I found no public information on posting immutability, a change history, statutory retention or a Verfahrensdokumentation, and no GoBD statement anywhere on the marketing pages I reviewed. When the record survives only because the vendor says nothing about it, a Betriebsprüfung will not be kind. 1 5
The Auditor
I came asking for the data export and the Verfahrensdokumentation and leave empty-handed: the captured pages are silent on whether postings can be altered after the fact, on any change history, on retention, and on how corrections are booked, and we found no public information on any audit documentation being supplied. Under my standard that is the lowest rating, not a near miss. 1 5
The Founder
I found no public information on unalterable postings, a change history, statutory retention or a Verfahrensdokumentation anywhere in what was captured. If a Betriebsprüfer sat down next to me, nothing on these pages would let me argue the record survives an audit. 1 3
The Integrator
I found no public information on unalterable postings, a change history, retention across the statutory period, or any Verfahrensdokumentation; no GoBD statement appears on the captured pages of this Norwegian-market product. Nothing here evidences that a record would survive a German tax audit. 1 2 3
Tax handling & filings
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
VAT logic and the filings that follow: UStVA, ELSTER submission, EÜR or Bilanz, OSS for cross-border sales, and reverse-charge handling.
0 — No VAT logic beyond a rate field; no filings, no ELSTER.
3 — VAT rates and a UStVA figure to copy out by hand; no electronic submission, no special cases.
5 — UStVA prepared and submitted electronically via ELSTER, EÜR or a simple balance sheet produced, and reverse-charge and intra-community supply handled.
8 — The above plus OSS handling for cross-border B2C, Zusammenfassende Meldung, small-business (§19) and Ist/Soll taxation, permanent extension (Dauerfristverlängerung), and E-Bilanz where relevant.
10 — The filing year is handled end to end: every routine German filing generated and submitted electronically with validation before sending, cross-border VAT determined from the transaction rather than by hand, and correction filings supported.
The Bookkeeper
The only tax-related capture is a dictionary entry explaining that VAT is the English word for merverdiavgift — a definition, not VAT logic and not a filing. I found no public information on VAT return preparation, electronic submission, reverse-charge or OSS handling. 4
The Tax Adviser
The only VAT item captured is a dictionary entry explaining that VAT corresponds to Norwegian merverdiavgift; I found no public information on VAT returns, ELSTER submission, EÜR, a balance sheet, reverse charge or OSS. From these pages I could not file a single German return. 4 5
The Auditor
The whole tax record in this capture is a dictionary entry explaining that VAT corresponds to Norwegian merverdiavgift. We found no public information on VAT logic in postings, periodic returns, or electronic submission to any tax authority, so no filing capability is evidenced at all. 4
The Founder
The only tax content captured is a dictionary entry defining VAT as the English word for the Norwegian merverdiavgift — a glossary, not a feature. I found no public information on VAT returns, electronic submission, EÜR or cross-border cases, so my Sunday VAT return has no shown path to the tax office at all. 1 4
The Integrator
The only tax content captured is a glossary entry explaining that VAT is the English abbreviation for merverdiavgift. I found no public information on VAT return logic, electronic submission to ELSTER, EÜR or balance sheet output, reverse charge or any cross-border handling — a dictionary definition is not tax handling. 4
Receipts, banking & matching
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How evidence and money get into the ledger: bank feeds, receipt capture, OCR, matching rules, and whether the digital receipt is legally sufficient on its own.
0 — Manual entry only; no bank connection, no receipt storage.
3 — Bank statement import by file and receipt upload as plain attachments; matching is entirely manual.
5 — Automatic bank feeds for the major German banks, receipt upload with OCR, suggested matches, and receipts linked to their postings.
8 — PSD2 feeds across many institutions, rule-based automatic matching with learning, e-invoice handling (ZUGFeRD/XRechnung) both directions, and replacement scanning (ersetzendes Scannen) documented so paper can be destroyed.
10 — The evidence chain is closed: every posting reaches its receipt in one click, e-invoicing inbound and outbound as standard, documented compliant archiving of the digital original, and matching accurate enough that exceptions rather than transactions are the work.
The Bookkeeper
This is the strongest area: a document interpreter reads invoice and receipt images with AI, recognising amount, date, supplier and KID number, and generates posting suggestions, while OCR-giro with KID numbers matches incoming payments against issued invoices and updates the books automatically — matching that leaves exceptions rather than transactions. I found no public information on PSD2 feeds beyond a bank integration page, e-invoice standards or documented replacement scanning. 1 5 6
The Tax Adviser
The document interpreter reads amount, date, supplier and KID number from invoice and receipt images and generates posting suggestions, the mobile app captures receipts with OCR on the spot, and an OCR-giro bank agreement matches incoming payments against issued invoices automatically. That is a real evidence-and-money chain; I found no public information on German bank feeds, ZUGFeRD/XRechnung or replacement scanning, so destroying the paper originals is not defensible from what is published. 1 5
The Auditor
Here the capture is substantial: a bank agreement that automatically matches KID-numbered payments against issued invoices and updates the accounts, an AI document interpreter reading amount, date, supplier and KID from invoice and receipt images, and mobile receipt capture that reads amount, date and currency on the spot. We found no public information on rule-based matching with learning, e-invoice formats in either direction, or documented compliant archiving of scanned originals, which is what separates good from very good in my book. 1 5
The Founder
The strongest area: the mobile app reads amount, date and currency off a photographed receipt, incoming invoices are interpreted into posting suggestions, and a bank agreement with KID numbers matches incoming customer payments to issued invoices and updates the books automatically. But I found no public information on feeds for my own bank accounts, matching rules that learn, e-invoice formats or replacement scanning, so the self-matching bank feed I pay for is evidenced only on the customer-payment side. 1 5
The Integrator
This is the one well-evidenced area: the mobile app reads amount, date and currency from a photographed receipt, an AI document interpreter reads incoming invoices and proposes the postings, and an OCR-giro bank agreement matches incoming payments by KID number against issued invoices so the books update automatically. I found no public information on bank feeds beyond that payment-matching service, on rule-based matching that learns, on structured e-invoicing in either direction, or on documented compliant archiving that would let paper be destroyed. 1 5
The Skeptic
Receipt capture is well evidenced: the mobile app photographs receipts and captures amount, date and currency, a document interpreter reads amount, date, supplier and KID from invoice images to generate posting suggestions, and an OCR-giro bank agreement matches incoming KID payments against issued invoices with automatic account updates. We found no public information on PSD2 feed breadth, e-invoice formats like ZUGFeRD or XRechnung, replacement scanning, or archiving of the digital original. 1 5
Tax adviser handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the books reach the Steuerberater — DATEV above all — and whether the adviser can work in the system rather than around it.
0 — No adviser access and no accounting export; the year-end is a pile of PDFs.
3 — Generic CSV or Excel export described as "suitable for your tax adviser", with no named format.
5 — A documented DATEV export (postings and, ideally, receipts) plus a read-only login for the adviser.
8 — DATEV export including receipt images with correct linking, or a maintained DATEV interface; the adviser gets their own scoped access with an audit of what they changed.
10 — The adviser is a first-class user: bidirectional DATEV exchange including corrections coming back, or a certified interface; period handover with locking, and a workflow where adviser queries are resolved inside the system.
The Bookkeeper
The captured accountant pages show an offering aimed at accounting firms, with the option to outsource all work to a partner or do parts of the job yourself. Beyond that, I found no public information on a named export format such as DATEV, or on an adviser login that works inside the books. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
There are pages addressed to the regnskapsfører offering an outsourcing model, alongside a promise that the customer always has access to their financial information, but I found no public information on any export format — DATEV above all — on a scoped adviser login, or on period handover with locking. As it stands the year-end would be a conversation, not a handover. 2 3
The Auditor
Accountants are visibly part of this product's world — a partner programme addressed to accountants, an option to outsource all the work, always-accessible financial information — so the books reach the adviser inside the system rather than as a pile of PDFs. We found no public information on any export format for the adviser, on scoped adviser access, or on a record of what the adviser changed. 2 3
The Founder
There is a dedicated offering aimed at accountants and an option to outsource the whole job, which tells me an adviser relationship exists. But I found no public information on export formats, a named standard, an adviser login or DATEV, so I cannot see how my books would actually reach my Steuerberater. 2 3
The Integrator
Pages addressed to Norwegian regnskapsførere exist and the vendor offers to outsource all the work or let you do parts yourself, which hints at an adviser relationship, but I found no public information on any export format for the adviser, a login letting the adviser work in the system, or a documented interface such as DATEV. What is captured is a service offering, not a handoff. 2 3
The Skeptic
The accountant-facing pages offer to outsource all work to the vendor and name a partner category of invoicing, accounting and payroll, which gestures at collaboration without evidencing it. We found no public information on a named export format, DATEV, or a login through which an adviser works in the system rather than around it. 2 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the books live and who could be compelled to produce them — plus, uniquely here, whether statutory retention survives leaving the vendor. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed — with a ten-year retention obligation attached to data held abroad.
3 — EU hosting offered while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — OCR, AI categorisation, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or German hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and a stated export that satisfies retention if the contract ends.
10 — Sovereign and durable: German or EU hosting throughout, every subprocessor European, certification published, and a documented archive export that keeps the customer compliant for the full retention period after they leave.
The Bookkeeper
No sovereignty attributes are on record, and nothing in the captured pages states where the books are hosted, where the contracting entity sits or which subprocessors touch the data — with an AI assistant in the processing chain, that silence matters. I found no public information on any exit export that would preserve statutory retention after leaving. 1
The Tax Adviser
The contracting entity is Norwegian and every captured page is Norwegian-language; I found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, certifications, or an archive export that would keep a departing customer compliant through the retention period. The sovereignty record carries no attributes at all, so I cannot tell a client where their books legally sit or who could be compelled to produce them. 1 3
The Auditor
The contracting entity is Norwegian — European, but not EU — and the captured pages give no hosting location, no subprocessor list, and no statement on an export that would satisfy retention if the customer leaves; we found no public information on any of it. For books under a statutory retention duty, silence on where they live and who could be compelled to produce them sits near the bottom of my scale. 1
The Founder
The vendor presents itself as a Norwegian cloud provider since 2004, which is European but outside the EU, and I found no public information on hosting location, a subprocessor list, certification or a documented archive export if the contract ends. The ten-year retention question after leaving is simply unanswered on these pages. 1 3
The Integrator
No sovereignty attributes are on record: I found no public information on where the books are hosted beyond a cloud claim dating to 2004, on any subprocessor list, on certification, or on an export that would satisfy statutory retention if the contract ends. With a Norwegian contracting entity, hosting location unstated and subprocessors unnamed, this sits at the very bottom of the range. 1 3
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a business can compute the real annual invoice — including the bookings, users, bank accounts and adviser access they actually need — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A headline monthly price exists, but booking or document limits, extra users or the tier where DATEV export begins are unstated.
5 — Tier prices public with billing period stated and the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (DATEV export, extra bank accounts, adviser seat) sits in an unpriced tier.
8 — Every tier and add-on priced publicly with limits, overage, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; adviser access priced or explicitly free.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given transaction volume, user count and feature set, including overage and the year-end extras.
The Bookkeeper
The only pricing-adjacent facts are the free trial — no payment details, expiring automatically — and a segment mention for companies with 50+ employees. I found no public information on tier prices, booking or document limits, or where adviser features begin, so a real annual invoice cannot be computed. 1 5
The Tax Adviser
What is public is a free trial requiring no payment details and expiring automatically; I found no public information on tier prices, booking or document limits, extra users, minimum term or VAT treatment. No business can compute its real annual invoice from these pages, and neither can I. 1 5
The Auditor
The only commercial terms in the capture are a free trial with no payment details that expires automatically; we found no public information on tier prices, booking or document limits, user costs, or anything payable after the trial. No business can compute an annual invoice from these pages. 5
The Founder
The only pricing fact captured is a free trial with no payment details that expires on its own; no tier, limit, term or figure appears anywhere. I always check the real annual invoice before signing, and here I cannot even begin to compute it. 5
The Integrator
A free trial requiring no payment details and expiring automatically is the only pricing-adjacent information captured; a Pro segment for companies with 50+ employees is named without any price. I found no public information on tier prices, booking or document limits, extra users, bank connections or adviser access, so no business could compute its annual invoice from these pages. 1 5
The Skeptic
The only public pricing information we found is the free trial's terms — no payment details and automatic expiry — while the segment page names features and a 50-plus-employee target without a price. We found no public information on tier prices, booking or document limits, the cost of an extra bank account, or where an adviser export begins, so a real annual invoice cannot be computed from these pages. 1 5
Questions about Tripletex
Is Tripletex European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Tripletex is based.
Where does Tripletex store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does Tripletex have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Tripletex?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Papierkram (3.5/5), sevDesk (3/5) and BuchhaltungsButler (3/5) highest among the other 24 Accounting products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Papierkram (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Tripletex alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 16 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (6)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.tripletex.no Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Bookkeeping core — found from sitemap www.tripletex.no Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Bookkeeping core — found from sitemap www.tripletex.no Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Tax handling & filings — found from sitemap www.tripletex.no Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap www.tripletex.no Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap www.tripletex.no Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →