whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Firmao

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Firmao sp. z o.o. · firmao.net

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The RevOps Integrator

Weighted verdict

Treats the CRM as one system in a revenue stack. Optimizes for two-way email and calendar sync, a real API with webhooks, and native connections to the tools money already flows through. Rejects closed ecosystems and integrations that are one-way imports in disguise.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The RevOps Integrator

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

The confirmed facts name a CRM module and show customers, companies, orders and tasks being created through integrations, but I found no public information on custom fields, deduplication, required fields, or relationships beyond the standard objects. For a system positioned at the center of a revenue stack, that silence on the data model itself is a real gap. 1 3

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Only module names — sales management and reports and analyses — speak to this; I found no public information on stages, stage requirements, forecasting, quota tracking or win/loss capture. A finance department has nothing here to sign off on, and invoices flowing to Merit Aktiva is accounting plumbing, not pipeline enforcement. 1 3

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Record-level automation is real and evidenced: website forms create customer records and auto-assign tasks, and Zapier wiring through Hive, Landingi and PandaDoc automates cross-system steps. What I did not find is a native workflow builder with branching, delays or routing — the automation muscle looks borrowed from Zapier rather than built in. 3 4

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

The strongest area by far: two-way email sync with Outlook, event synchronization with Google and Outlook calendars, a documented API activated with a single click, an integration marketplace, and a native directory with real regional depth — Allegro, Shoper, Base.com, IdoSell, PrestaShop, WooCommerce, telephony and accounting included. It stops short of the top of the scale because I found no public information on webhooks, OAuth apps or API limits, several natives read one-way with orders synchronized into Firmao rather than with it, and deeper API detail is deferred to a contact email. 3 4

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

The vendor is a Polish company — Firmao Polska Sp. z o.o., a NIP number and a Łódź address on the page, and part of WeNet Group — but I found no public information on where data is hosted, on a DPA, or on subprocessors. An EU entity alone does not let a DPO sign anything without the paperwork. 1 4

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

Beyond an API said to integrate any external system, I found no public information on import tooling, export coverage of notes, activities or files, or data-return terms. Exit is where lock-in shows, and nothing captured here evidences a path out with history intact. 4

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The RevOps Integrator

A vendor pricing page was captured but the confirmed facts include no tier prices, per-seat figures, billing periods or VAT treatment, so a buyer cannot compute a real invoice from what is public here. I found no public information on seat minimums or renewal rules either. 2 1

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Firmao? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (4)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage firmao.net Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Vendor pricing page firmao.net Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Integrations & API — found from sitemap firmao.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Integrations & API — found from sitemap firmao.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →