CRM
GEDYS Intraware
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by GEDYS Intraware GmbH · www.gedys-intraware.de
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
GEDYS Intraware at a glance
- Vendor
- GEDYS Intraware GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates GEDYS Intraware 0.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. GEDYS Intraware GmbH sells a CRM into Germany, Austria and Switzerland, marketing it as DSGVO-konform, Made in Germany, with secure managed hosting included and complementary technologies such as AI and quality management bundled. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
GEDYS Intraware GmbH sells a CRM into Germany, Austria and Switzerland, marketing it as DSGVO-konform, Made in Germany, with secure managed hosting included and complementary technologies such as AI and quality management bundled. The bench's strongest criterion is sovereignty, and it is also where the judges genuinely split: scores run from 2 to 6, because the captured pages show a German vendor whose hosting is managed by default, while we found no public information on a published DPA, a subprocessor list, or retention and deletion controls — judges weighed that gap differently. Everything else sits at the bottom: contact management, sales pipeline, automation, integrations and data portability score between 0 and 1, and we found no public information on the data model, pipelines, workflow triggers, a documented API, or import and export tooling; the published material is a free fifteen-stage implementation e-book and support resources such as videos, a wiki and whitepapers. No prices appear on the captured pages either; the route in is a free live online presentation with sales managers assigned by postal code.
Speaks for it
- Sovereignty is the only criterion scoring above 1, with a range of 2 to 6
- Markets DSGVO-konform, Made in Germany positioning with secure managed hosting included
- A German vendor with sales coverage across Germany, Austria and Switzerland through named sales managers
- Offers a free trial and a free, no-obligation live online presentation
- Publishes a Trust Center link and support resources including videos, a wiki, blog, checklists, whitepapers and e-books
Held against it
- Contact management, sales pipeline, automation, integrations and data portability score between 0 and 1
- We found no public information on pipelines, stage enforcement, forecasting, workflow triggers or a documented API
- We found no public information on import, export or migration tooling, or contractual data-return terms
- We found no public information on a published DPA, subprocessor list, or retention and deletion controls, and the Trust Center's contents are not shown
- No prices, tiers or billing terms appear on the captured pages; buying runs through a live presentation and regional sales managers
Best for
- You are buying in Germany, Austria or Switzerland and want a German vendor with DSGVO-konform, Made in Germany positioning and managed hosting included, taking the DPA and subprocessor questions directly to the vendor
- You want a vendor-guided rollout — a free live presentation, named regional sales managers and a fifteen-stage implementation e-book drawing on 35 years of CRM practice
- European posture is your top buying criterion and you are comfortable evaluating through a sales conversation rather than public documentation
Avoid if
- You need to evaluate the data model, pipelines or automation from public documentation before talking to sales
- Your procurement requires a documented API, integration directory or data-export path in writing before signature
- You need published per-seat prices to compare vendors before booking a presentation
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Contact & data model | 0.5 of 5 |
| Pipeline & forecasting | 0.5 of 5 |
| Automation & workflows | 0.5 of 5 |
| Integrations & API | 0.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Import, export & exit | 0.5 of 5 |
Contact & data model
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.
0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.
3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.
5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.
8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.
10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.
The Solo Seller
The captured homepage sells 'CRM software' with AI and quality management 'included' and says nothing about how contacts, companies and deals relate, which fields exist, or how duplicates are handled. We found no public information on the data model, so I have no basis for believing I could set up real records in an afternoon. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The capture presents CRM software with AI and quality management included, but we found no public information on custom fields, validation, deduplication, or the relations between contacts, companies and deals. A record model a DPO must inspect for consent and retention fields is simply not on display. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
The captured page sells a general CRM story — 35 years of practice, an implementation ebook, a free trial — but we found no public information on custom fields, required fields, deduplication, or how contacts, companies and deals relate. I cannot put a 40-seat team on a data model I cannot see, so this sits at the bottom with credit only for the fact that a real product exists. 1
The RevOps Integrator
The captured page never touches the data model: I found no public information on contact and company records, deals, custom fields or deduplication, only a pitch that the software simplifies daily business and a fifteen-stage implementation e-book. Unevidenced is unscored, so this sits at the bottom of the scale. 1
The Migrator
Everything on the captured page is marketing surface — AI included, quality management included, managed hosting — with not a word about how contacts, companies, deals, custom fields or duplicate handling actually behave. I found no public information on the data model, so I can only score what is evidenced, which is nothing beyond the existence of a CRM. 1
The Skeptic
The captured page markets the CRM, the managed hosting and a free fifteen-stage implementation e-book drawn from 35 years of CRM practice, but I found no public information on contact or company records, custom fields, relationships, or deduplication tooling. A data model I cannot see is a data model I cannot score. 1
Pipeline & forecasting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.
0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.
3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.
5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.
8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.
10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.
The Solo Seller
The only thing on offer about how deals move is a free live presentation promising the software simplifies my daily business; we found no public information on pipelines, stage requirements, win/loss capture or forecasting. If I can't see the board before a sales call, I can't judge a process from it. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on pipelines, stage gates, required fields, forecasts or custom reporting; the pages speak of simplifying daily business and offer a 15-stage implementation e-book, which is guidance for adopting a CRM rather than evidence of process enforcement inside one. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
We found no public information on pipelines, stage requirements, win/loss capture, quota tracking or forecasting of any kind. The closest published material is a free ebook on 15 implementation steps, which speaks to rollout services, not enforceable process or reporting a CFO would accept. 1
The RevOps Integrator
I found no public information on pipelines, stage requirements, win/loss capture or forecasting. Nothing on the page lets me judge whether the tool enforces a process or rolls numbers up, so I can only score the floor. 1
The Migrator
I found no public information on pipelines, stage enforcement, win/loss capture, forecasting or any reporting a finance department would accept. The captured page speaks to live demos and implementation literature, not process. 1
The Skeptic
I found no public information on pipelines, stage enforcement, win/loss capture, forecasting or reporting of any kind. The only implementation substance is a free e-book about the buyer's CRM rollout project, which says nothing about whether the product enforces a process a finance department would accept. 1
Automation & workflows
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.
0 — No automation beyond email templates.
3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.
5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.
8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.
10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.
The Solo Seller
The vendor says complementary technologies like AI and quality management are included, but included doing what — we found no public information on triggers, sequences or routing. For a one-person shop, follow-ups that run while I'm on customer calls would be an act of faith, not a feature I can verify. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on workflow builders, triggers, sequences or lead routing; the only automation-adjacent mention is that complementary technologies such as AI and quality management are included, and the capture says nothing further about what they do. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
The vendor says complementary technologies like AI and quality management are included, which hints at automation ambitions, but we found no public information on triggers, multi-step workflows, branching, routing or sequence analytics. A one-line marketing mention is not something I would forecast headcount savings against. 1
The RevOps Integrator
The page advertises supplementary technologies like AI and quality management as included, but I found no public information on triggers, multi-step sequences, routing or webhooks as workflow steps. Bundled extras are marketing, not automation evidence. 1
The Migrator
The only adjacent claim is that complementary technologies like AI and quality management are included, which says nothing about triggers, multi-step sequences, branching or routing. I found no public information on workflow automation at all. 1
The Skeptic
The page's sole related claim is that complementary technologies such as AI and quality management are included — an unspecified bundle clause, not a workflow description. I found no public information on triggers, multi-step sequences, branching or lead routing. 1
Integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.
0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.
3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.
5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.
8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.
10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.
The Solo Seller
We found no public information on email or calendar sync, native integrations, or any API. My inbox is half my CRM, and nothing captured says mail and meetings would land on the records. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on an API, two-way email or calendar sync, webhooks, or a native integration directory; the support resources listed are videos, a wiki, a blog, checklists, whitepapers and e-books, with no integration content among them. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
We found no public information on email or calendar sync, native connectors, webhooks, or a documented API. The support materials listed — videos, wiki, blog, checklists, whitepapers, ebooks — describe learning content, not connections to a revenue stack. 1
The RevOps Integrator
This is the lens I weigh most and the page is silent on it: I found no public information on an API, webhooks, two-way email or calendar sync, or any native connector to the tools money already flows through. Until a documented API surface is shown, I cannot verify an ecosystem here at all. 1
The Migrator
I found no public information on an API, two-way email or calendar sync, webhooks, or a native integration directory. Nothing here tells me whether data can move in or out of this system programmatically. 1
The Skeptic
I found no public information on two-way email or calendar sync, native integrations, an API or webhooks. The only connected channels shown are the vendor's own phone, message and appointment booking for sales conversations. 1
European sovereignty
panel opinion
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.
0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.
3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.
5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.
8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.
10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.
The Solo Seller
Here the capture actually earns something: the vendor is a German company selling software it calls DSGVO-conform, 'Made in Germany', with secure managed hosting included — so the default looks like a European entity hosting in Europe. We found no public information on subprocessors or the contents of the linked Trust Center, so residual exposure can't be judged from public pages. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The vendor is German and markets "DSGVO-konform, Made in Germany" managed hosting as included, with a Trust Center link present, which is a real signal beyond a US-default posture. But we found no public information on a DPA, a subprocessor list, the concrete hosting location, consent fields, or retention and deletion that provably delete, so the conformity claim currently rests on a marketing line I cannot sign off on. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
GEDYS Intraware GmbH presents itself as DSGVO-konform, 'Made in Germany', with secure managed hosting included, which points to a German entity and German hosting by default rather than an EU region bolted on for a fee. But we found no public information on a published DPA, a subprocessor list, retention or deletion controls; a Trust Center is mentioned without its contents being shown, so I stop well short of sign-off territory. 1
The RevOps Integrator
A German vendor advertising GDPR conformity and Made in Germany with managed hosting included, and selling into Austria and Switzerland, is a genuine European starting point. But I found no public DPA, subprocessor list or hosting location — only a Trust Center whose contents are not shown — so this lands between the bottom and the level a published DPA would reach. 1
The Migrator
A German legal form, GDPR-conform positioning and a stated Made in Germany managed hosting default, selling into Germany, Austria and Switzerland, is a real start — this is structurally not a US-default operation. But I found no public information on a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, retention settings or deletion controls; a Trust Center is mentioned without any of its contents shown. 1
The Skeptic
The posture is genuinely European: a German GmbH selling only into Germany, Austria and Switzerland, advertising DSGVO compliance, Made in Germany, and secure managed hosting included by default. But a Trust Center link is not paperwork — I found no public information on a published DPA, a subprocessor list, or retention and deletion controls, so the claim rests on the vendor's own banner. 1
Import, export & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.
0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.
3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.
5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.
8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.
10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.
The Solo Seller
We found no public information on import, export or migration tooling. A free ebook on CRM implementation in fifteen stages, drawing on thirty-five years of practice, suggests getting in is a project — and nothing public describes how I'd take my notes and history back out. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on import tooling, export coverage, migration paths from other CRMs, API access, or contractual data-return terms on exit. I therefore have no basis to judge whether an operator's contact base, with history intact, can ever leave this system. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
We found no public information on import tooling, migration from other systems, or export coverage for objects, history and files. Before I bring any vendor in, I want to see how a weekend exit looks — and nothing published here evidences data return at all. 1
The RevOps Integrator
I found no public information on import, export or migration tooling. The free implementation e-book and personal coverage by named sales managers suggest a guided rollout, which is not evidence of self-serve portability in with history or out with everything. 1
The Migrator
This is the criterion I read first, and the captured page offers me nothing: I found no public information on import tooling, export of notes, activities or files, API access, or contractual data-return terms. The one onboarding artifact is a free ebook about introducing the CRM in fifteen stages, which reads as a consultant-led way in and says nothing about the way out. 1
The Skeptic
I found no public information on import tooling, export formats, migration from other systems, or contractual data-return terms. The free trial and free live presentation are about entering the funnel, and the captured page gives no evidence of a documented way out with history intact. 1
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.
5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.
8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.
10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.
The Solo Seller
We found no public information on prices — no tiers, no per-seat figures, no billing terms; the only numbers in public view are the free trial and the 'unverbindlich und kostenfrei' live presentation. Everything else routes through booking an appointment with a sales manager assigned to my postal code, which makes the real invoice a conversation rather than a page. 1
The Data Protection Officer
No tier prices, seat minimums, billing periods or VAT treatment appear on the captured pages; the published route in is a live presentation offered "unverbindlich und kostenfrei" plus a free trial, handled by sales managers assigned to regions covering Germany, Austria and Switzerland. We found no public information from which a buyer could compute the real invoice. 1
The Sales Ops Lead
No tier, per-seat price, billing period or VAT treatment appears in the capture; the buying path offered is a free, no-obligation live online presentation and a free trial. That is an unpriced funnel in its purest form — I cannot compute any invoice, at 3 seats or 30, from public pages. 1
The RevOps Integrator
We found no public prices on the captured page — only a free trial, a free live presentation, and phone, message or appointment routes to sales managers assigned by postal-code region. From public pages alone I cannot compute a single seat's cost, which is the very definition of the bottom of this scale. 1
The Migrator
We found no public information on prices, tiers, seat counts or billing terms — a free trial and a free live online presentation are offered, but everything else routes through regional sales managers assigned by postal code and booked appointments. Every tier is a sales conversation, so no invoice can be computed from what is published. 1
The Skeptic
The captured page shows no tiers, no per-seat figures, no billing period and no VAT treatment — the buying path is an "Unverbindlich und kostenfrei" live online presentation plus sales managers assigned by postal code, i.e. a pure sales conversation. When the nicest thing a vendor will ever say is a free demo, the invoice is unknowable from public pages. 1
Questions about GEDYS Intraware
Is GEDYS Intraware European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where GEDYS Intraware is based.
Where does GEDYS Intraware store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does GEDYS Intraware have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to GEDYS Intraware?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Pipedrive (3/5), Bitrix24 (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 49 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Pipedrive (EU origin, foreign-owned). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: GEDYS Intraware alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We could not confirm any pricing information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind. Know more? Tell us
- 7 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (1)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.gedys-intraware.de Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →