whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Upsales

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Upsales AB · www.upsales.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Upsales: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Upsales: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Upsales at a glance

Vendor
Upsales AB
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Upsales 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Upsales is a CRM from Upsales AB, pitched as an AI-driven revenue growth platform, and its strongest scoring is on integrations, where scores cluster at 5–6 on a documented API, a directory listing 34 integrations, automatic sync of orders, products and customers with Business Central, invoice or order creation on won deals via Fortnox and Xero, and a Gmail app that creates and matches records from the inbox. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources

Upsales alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Assumes the pricing page is the nicest thing the vendor will ever say. Hunts per-seat maths that explode at renewal, "unlimited" with footnotes, AI features priced by credits, dead changelogs and acquisition rumours. Exists to keep the rest of the bench honest.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Panel median The Skeptic This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Skeptic
Contact & data model 2 of 5 1.5 of 5
Pipeline & forecasting 2.5 of 5 2 of 5
Automation & workflows 1.5 of 5 1.5 of 5
Integrations & API 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
European sovereignty 1 of 5 0.5 of 5
Import, export & exit 1 of 5 1 of 5

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Contacts and companies are the evidenced core: Gmail creates both from an email, matches a contact to its company, and stores conversations on the card, backed by a database of European company data. For the things that decide whether records survive scale — custom field types, required fields, dedupe and merge tooling, permissioned field access — we found no public information. I credit the standard objects and their relations, and stop there. 1 3

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Pipeline value, status, deal probability and risks are named, alongside intelligent sales forecasting and prebuilt plus custom dashboards for revenue analytics. For stage requirements, win/loss capture, quota and attainment tracking, or historical snapshots, I found no public information. The forecasting claims are homepage marketing rather than documented process, so I discount below the standard forecast mark. 1

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The automation I can verify is integration plumbing: Fortnox and Business Central create invoices or orders automatically on won deals, Xero invoices likewise, Zapier runs defined tasks, and upsell alerts fire notifications when a customer is ready to buy. For a native workflow builder — multi-step sequences, branching, delays, routing — I found no public information. More than email templates, but the heavy lifting is outsourced rather than built in. 1 2

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Skeptic

A documented API plus a native directory of 34 integrations, including ERP connections (Fortnox, Business Central, Xero) with automatic sync of orders, products and customers, a Gmail app that operates inside the inbox, and a Zapier connector. The captured pages give different figures for third-party app reach — the directory lists 34 while the homepage says "hundreds". On webhooks, rate limits and API parity with the interface I found no public information, so this sits at the documented-API-and-modest-directory mark. 1 2 3

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The vendor trades as Upsales AB, which reads as a Swedish entity, but beyond the name the record is empty: we found no public information on hosting regions, data processing agreements, subprocessors, retention or deletion controls. For a product that ships a database of financial and contact data on European companies, that silence is itself the finding. One point of credit for the entity name and nothing more. 1

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The one evidenced path for data to move is the API, plus integration syncs pushing orders and customers into ERP and billing systems — inbound and side-to-side, not out. We found no public information on CSV or full export, migration tooling from other CRMs, whether attachments and activity history leave with you, or contractual data-return terms. An API of unknown scope and unknown limits is not an exit plan. 1 2

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Skeptic

We found no public information on plan tiers, per-seat pricing, billing periods, VAT treatment, seat minimums or renewal rules on any captured page — and the AI Workspace launched in May 2026 is equally unpriced. A buyer cannot compute any invoice from what is public here. Every purchase starts as a sales conversation. 1 2 3

Report an error

Questions about Upsales

Is Upsales European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Upsales is based.

Where does Upsales store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

Does Upsales have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Upsales?

As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Pipedrive (3/5), Bitrix24 (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 49 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Pipedrive (EU origin, foreign-owned). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Upsales alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Upsales? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (3)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page www.upsales.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.upsales.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.upsales.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →