Design
Axure RP
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Axure Software Solutions, Inc. · www.axure.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Axure RP at a glance
- Vendor
- Axure Software Solutions, Inc.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention United States source, captured 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Axure RP 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Axure RP is downloadable prototyping software for PC and Mac, and its strength is prototyping depth: conditions and variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views for desktop, tablet and phone, and a data-driven repeater widget earned design and prototyping a uniform 6. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Axure RP is downloadable prototyping software for PC and Mac, and its strength is prototyping depth: conditions and variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views for desktop, tablet and phone, and a data-driven repeater widget earned design and prototyping a uniform 6. Collaboration and handoff scored 5-6, on automated redlines, design assets, CSS inspection and prototypes embedded in Jira and Confluence. The weakest finding is also uniform: AI and content rights scored 0, with no public information on generative features, training on customer files, or commercial rights to output. The judges split on file ownership and portability, which ranged from 2 to 4 — some credited the desktop application and documented import from Adobe XD, Figma and Sketch, while others weighed the unevidenced export path more heavily. Sovereignty scored a uniform 3: Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego as controller, uploaded files and hosted projects stored in the United States on AWS, Standard Contractual Clauses as the transfer safeguard. The pages name Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud and Enterprise, plus a free 30-day fully-functional trial, but no price figure.
Speaks for it
- Prototyping documented in real depth — conditions and variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views and a repeater widget — earning a uniform 6 on design and prototyping
- Developer handoff with automated redlines, design assets and CSS inspection, with collaboration and handoff scoring 5-6
- Prototypes embed in Jira and Confluence, with on-screen comments and Slack and Teams notifications
- Downloadable desktop software for PC and Mac, with editable import of layers and frames from Adobe XD, Figma and Sketch
- A free 30-day fully-functional trial for PC or Mac
Held against it
- AI and content rights scored a uniform 0, with no public information on generative features, training on customer files, or commercial-use rights for output
- Brand asset governance scored 0-2, with widget libraries the only shared resource and no public information on a central brand library, locked templates or rights and expiry metadata
- File ownership and portability scored 2-4, with no public information on export formats, a documented file format or an API reading full file structure
- Sovereignty scored a uniform 3 — storage of uploaded files and hosted projects in the United States on AWS, and no published subprocessor list beyond AWS
- No price figure appears for any edition, so an annual team cost cannot be computed from the captured pages
Best for
- You need conditional-logic prototypes with variables, multi-state panels and adaptive views across desktop, tablet and phone — the strongest scores on the bench sit here
- You want a concrete developer handoff — automated redlines and CSS inspection — with prototypes embedded in Jira and Confluence
- You assemble designs from other tools and value documented import from Adobe XD, Figma and Sketch into desktop software
- You want to try the full product before paying, via the free 30-day fully-functional trial for PC or Mac
Avoid if
- You need a governed brand library — locked templates, published guidelines, rights and expiry metadata — for non-designers; brand asset governance scored 0-2
- You need design files stored in the EU — the captured pages show uploaded files and hosted projects stored in the United States, with Standard Contractual Clauses as the transfer safeguard
- You depend on versioned team libraries, tokens and component variants — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Design, prototyping & design systems | 3 of 5 |
| Collaboration, review & developer handoff | 3 of 5 |
| Brand assets & governance | 1 of 5 |
| Files, formats & portability | 2 of 5 |
| AI features & rights to the work | 0 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5 of 5 |
Design, prototyping & design systems
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The making itself: vector and layout tools, interactive prototypes, and the shared components, styles and tokens that keep a company's products and materials consistent — judged on what the feature and help pages document, not on showcase images.
0 — A single-purpose editor with no reusable components, no shared styles and no prototyping.
3 — Templates and basic shapes or layouts, with styles saved per file only and prototyping limited to linking screens.
5 — Reusable components and shared styles across files, responsive or auto layout, clickable prototypes with transitions, and team libraries that update where they are used.
8 — A design system managed in the tool: variables or tokens for colour, type and spacing with modes or themes, component variants and properties, prototypes with conditional logic, and library change notes with versions.
10 — The design system is a governed product: library releases versioned and reviewable, token export in a documented format for development, usage analytics per component, and accessibility checks such as contrast built into the editor.
The Product Designer
The prototyping half is properly built: conditions and variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views for desktop, tablet and phone, and a data-driven repeater widget are all documented, which is conditional-logic prototyping far beyond linking screens. But I found no public information on tokens or variables with modes and themes, component variants and properties, or versioned library releases with change notes — widget libraries appear only as a support resource, so a design system as a governed product is not evidenced. 1
The Frontend Engineer
The prototyping engine is genuinely documented — conditional logic, variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views, and data-driven repeater widgets — which goes well past screen-linking. I found no public information on design tokens with themes or modes, component variants, or versioned library releases with change notes, so the design-system management half sits unevidenced. 1
The Brand Marketer
The product pages document genuinely powerful prototyping — unlimited event triggers with conditions and variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views for desktop, tablet and phone, and a repeater widget for data-driven grids — plus widget libraries for reusable pieces. We found no public information on shared styles or tokens, component variants, library version notes, or any governed design system, which is what would keep twelve regional offices producing consistent material. 1
The Agency Owner
The prototyping depth is real — unlimited combinations of event triggers, conditions and actions, conditional logic with variables, multi-state dynamic panels, and adaptive views for desktop, tablet and phone — which sits at the top of the scale for interactive work. But we found no public information on team libraries that update where they are used, shared styles across files, or tokens, variants and library versioning, so the design-system side falls short of the higher marks. 1
The Data Protection Officer
Conditional logic, variables, multi-state dynamic panels and adaptive views for desktop, tablet and phone put the prototyping well beyond linked screens, with shared widget libraries listed among support resources. We found no public information on design tokens with themes, component variants, or library versioning and change notes, so the design-system side falls short of a governed system. 1
The Skeptic
Prototyping is documented in real depth — conditions and variables, multi-state dynamic panels, adaptive views across devices, and a repeater widget for data-driven tables — comfortably past screens linked by clicks. But we found no public information on a token system with themes, component variants, library versioning or team libraries that update where they are used; only a generic widget-libraries support listing appears. Strong making, no evidence of a governed design system. 1
Collaboration, review & developer handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Working on the same files with colleagues, clients and developers: comments and review, permissions for internal and external people, and the handoff that gives engineering measurements, assets and code rather than screenshots.
0 — Files shared as exports or links with no comments, no permissions beyond view or edit, and no developer view.
3 — Real-time co-editing and comments, but external reviewers need a paid seat or full access, and developers get only exported images.
5 — Comments with mentions and resolution, view-only and comment-only access for guests without a paid seat, permissions per file and project, and an inspect mode with measurements, styles and asset export.
8 — Branching or review of changes before they reach the main file, version history with restore, a developer mode that links components to code, an API and plugins documented, and named integrations with issue trackers and code tools.
10 — Handoff is a contract between design and code: component properties mapped to code components, token and asset export automated through the API, an audit log of access and sharing, and external access governed by domain, expiry and admin policy.
The Product Designer
On-screen feedback with Slack and Teams notifications, publishing to Axure Cloud to share and inspect, automated redlines with design assets and CSS inspection for developers, and named Jira and Confluence embeds give a real inspect mode and real issue-tracker integrations. But I found no public information on review of changes before they reach the main file, version history with restore, a documented API and plugins, or how guests and external reviewers are seated and governed. 1
The Frontend Engineer
One-click publishing to Axure Cloud for sharing and on-screen feedback, Slack and Teams notifications, and a developer inspect with automated redlines, design assets and CSS inspection means engineering gets measurements and styles rather than screenshots. I found no public information on branching or version restore, a documented API and plugin system, or guest review without a paid seat, which is what the higher anchors turn on. 1
The Brand Marketer
On-screen feedback with Slack and Teams notifications, prototypes embedded directly in Jira and Confluence, and a developer handoff with automated redlines, design assets and CSS inspection are all documented on the product pages. We found no public information on guest or reviewer access without a paid seat, permissions per file or project, version history with restore, branching, or a documented API. 1
The Agency Owner
Publishing to Axure Cloud with on-screen comments, Slack and Teams notifications, and prototypes embedded in Jira and Confluence covers review well, and the inspect side promises automated redlines, design assets and CSS inspection — a genuine developer handoff rather than screenshots. We found no public information on branching or version history with restore, a documented API and plugins, or whether external reviewers can comment without a paid seat, which matters to how I staff client reviews. 1
The Data Protection Officer
On-screen feedback with Slack and Teams notifications, prototypes embedded in Jira and Confluence, and developer inspection with automated redlines, design assets and CSS give engineering more than screenshots. We found no public information on branching or version history with restore, guest and reviewer access terms, a documented API, or an audit log, so review governance and the handoff contract are incomplete. 1
The Skeptic
Developer handoff is documented concretely — automated redlines, design assets and CSS inspection, plus notes and specifications for stakeholders — and working prototypes embed in Jira, Confluence, Teams and Slack. We found no public information on branching or review before changes reach the main file, version history with restore, a documented API, or how view-only and comment-only guests are permitted and billed. On-screen comments are evidenced; mentions and resolution states are not. 1
Brand assets & governance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keeping a brand usable and correct across a company: a central library for logos, images and templates, brand guidelines people can find, locked templates that let non-designers produce material, and rights and expiry metadata on every licensed asset.
0 — No shared asset library; logos and images are uploaded per file by whoever needs them.
3 — A shared folder of assets and some templates, but no guidelines, no locking of brand elements and no metadata beyond file names.
5 — A central brand library with logos, colours and fonts, templates with locked elements for non-designers, brand guidelines published in the tool, and tagging and search across assets.
8 — Rights, usage and expiry metadata on assets with warnings or automatic withdrawal on expiry, approval workflows for new assets and template output, version control on assets, and access per team, market or partner.
10 — Brand governance is auditable: every asset carries its licence, owner and permitted use, usage of each asset is tracked across files and channels, distribution to external partners is logged, and the whole library with metadata is exportable in a documented format.
The Product Designer
The pages document design widgets and widget libraries, but I found no public information on a central brand library for logos, images and fonts, published brand guidelines, locked templates for non-designers, or rights and expiry metadata on licensed assets. Nothing captured here governs a brand across a company. 1
The Frontend Engineer
The only asset-library signal on the captured pages is widget libraries listed among support resources. I found no public information on a central brand library, published guidelines, locked templates for non-designers, or rights, usage and expiry metadata on licensed assets. 1
The Brand Marketer
This is the criterion closest to my job, and the captured pages say nothing about a central brand library, published brand guidelines, templates with locked elements for non-designers, or licence and expiry metadata on stock assets; the only shared library mentioned is widget libraries for interface pieces. We found no public information on rights or usage metadata, approval workflows, asset version control, or access by team or market. 1
The Agency Owner
We found no public information on a central brand library, guidelines published in the tool, locked templates for non-designers, or rights, usage and expiry metadata on licensed assets; the only adjacent item is widget libraries listed among support resources. For a product I would hand to a client's marketing team, nothing here shows a governed brand library. 1
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on a shared brand asset library, published brand guidelines, locked templates for non-designers, or rights and expiry metadata on licensed assets. Nothing in the captured pages addresses brand asset governance in any form. 1
The Skeptic
The captured pages show only widget libraries as a shared resource; we found no public information on a central brand library, templates with locked elements, published brand guidelines, or rights and expiry metadata on licensed assets. What exists reads as reusable widgets for prototyping, not anything a brand team could govern against. 1
Files, formats & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the work can leave: open or documented file formats, export that keeps layers, vectors and components, offline or self-hosted options, and what happens to files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract.
0 — Files exist only in the vendor's cloud in a proprietary format, export is a flat image, and nothing is said about files after cancellation.
3 — Export to PNG, PDF and SVG per frame, but no export of whole files with structure, and files after a downgrade or cancellation addressed only in general terms.
5 — Whole files exportable to a local or documented format, vector and layered export (SVG, PDF) with text kept as text, bulk export of a team's files, and a stated period during which files remain accessible after cancellation.
8 — An open or publicly documented file format, export and import with other tools documented, an API that reads full file structure, files of removed users transferred to the organisation by policy, and a stated deletion timeline after the contract ends.
10 — Portability is built in: an open-source or openly specified format, self-hosting or a local-first option, round-trip export without loss of components and prototypes, and the customer's ownership of all files and their export rights written into the terms.
The Product Designer
Axure RP is downloadable software for PC and Mac, so the work lives on the customer's machines rather than only in the vendor's cloud, and documented import paths from Adobe XD, Figma and Sketch are listed. But I found no public information on export formats, whole-file export that preserves components and prototypes, or what happens to files after a downgrade or a cancelled contract. 1 2
The Frontend Engineer
Axure RP is downloadable desktop software for PC and Mac, so the working file lives on the customer's own machine, and bringing layers in from Adobe XD, Sketch and Figma is documented on the product page. I found no public information on a documented or open file format, layered export with text kept as text, an API that reads full file structure, or what happens to hosted projects after cancellation. 1 2
The Brand Marketer
Axure RP is downloadable desktop software for PC and Mac with documented import bridges from Figma, Adobe XD and Sketch, so the work is not confined to the vendor's cloud. We found no public information on export formats, a documented file format, bulk export of a team's files, or what happens to files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract. 1 2
The Agency Owner
Work happens in a downloadable desktop application for PC and Mac, and editable import from Adobe XD, Figma and Sketch is documented — useful when I assemble files from other teams. But we found no public information on whole-file export formats with layers and text kept as text, bulk export of a team's files, or what happens to files after a downgrade or cancelled contract; the privacy policy's retention line covers personal data for as long as someone is a customer, not project files, and we found no quoted ownership terms from the customer agreement. 1 2 3
The Data Protection Officer
Axure RP ships as a downloadable desktop application for PC and Mac with editable import of layers and frames from Adobe XD, Figma and Sketch, so the work is not confined to the vendor's cloud. We found no public information on export of whole files with structure, a documented file format or an API reading file structure, or what happens to hosted files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
Axure RP is downloadable desktop software for PC and Mac with a fully-functional trial, and import of editable layers from Adobe XD, Figma frames and Sketch artboards is documented. We found no public information on export that keeps components and prototypes, an open or documented file format, an API that reads full file structure, or what happens to files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract. One-way import into a desktop tool counts for something; we found no public information on the exit path. 1
AI features & rights to the work
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the vendor's AI does with the customer's files and what the customer may do with the AI's output: training on customer content and the opt-out, the models and where they run, commercial use of generated images, stock licences and indemnity.
0 — Generative features with no statement on training on customer files, no named models, and no word on whether output may be used commercially.
3 — An AI page that promises responsibility but leaves open whether customer files train models, and output rights are stated only for some features or only in community terms.
5 — Training on customer content excluded or opt-out documented, AI features switchable by an admin for the organisation, model providers named, and commercial use of generated output permitted in the terms.
8 — Training excluded by default for business plans, the processing location of AI features stated, generated content labelled or carrying content credentials, stock and template licences stated per asset type, and an IP indemnity for generated output on a named plan.
10 — AI is governed in writing: a per-feature list of models, providers and locations, admin controls per team and feature, a log of AI use, training exclusion and output ownership in the contract terms, and indemnity and licence limits published in full.
The Product Designer
The captured pages are entirely silent on AI: I found no public information on generative features, named models or providers, whether customer files are used for training, admin switches for AI features, or commercial rights to generated output. For a buyer weighing AI risk, nothing here can be assessed. 1 2
The Frontend Engineer
I found no public information on AI features, training on customer files, named models or providers, or commercial rights to generated output on any of the captured pages. From a buyer's seat there is nothing here to evaluate an AI posture against. 1 2
The Brand Marketer
We found no public information on generative or AI features, on whether customer files would train any model, on named model providers or processing locations, or on commercial rights to generated output — as a buyer I cannot tell from these pages whether a generated image could legally go on a trade-fair stand. 1 2
The Agency Owner
We found no public information on AI features at all, and nothing on training on customer files, named models or providers, or commercial-use rights for generated output. As it stands, nothing in the captured terms governs AI use or output ownership. 1 2 3
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on any AI features in the product, on whether customer files train models, on named models or their processing locations, or on commercial rights to generated output. The captured product, privacy and security pages are silent on AI altogether, which leaves every question in this criterion unanswered. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
We found no public information on any generative features, named models, whether customer files train anything, or commercial-use rights for output, across the homepage and privacy pages. Nothing promised in writing means nothing a buyer could rely on, switch off, or be indemnified for. 1 2
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity is, where design files, brand assets and AI prompts are stored and processed, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where files are hosted, and subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU data residency available only on an enterprise plan or not at all, or the subprocessor list is absent, or AI features send files outside the EU without an explained safeguard.
5 — EU hosting stated for files, a DPA available, but the contracting entity or significant parts of the chain (AI, rendering, support) are non-EU without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU contracting entity, files, assets and backups stored in the EU on named infrastructure, subprocessor list published with locations and purposes, and AI processing location stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity, every hosting, AI and support subprocessor European or optional, self-hosting or a European cloud offered, and certifications published.
The Product Designer
The contracting entity and controller is Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego, and uploaded files and hosted projects are stored on AWS in the United States, replicated to Oregon, Frankfurt and Seoul — EU residency for files is not offered. Standard Contractual Clauses or the UK IDTA are named as transfer safeguards and only essential US and UK staff access data, but no subprocessor list beyond AWS is published. 2 3
The Frontend Engineer
The contracting entity and GDPR controller is Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego, with uploaded files and hosted projects stored on AWS in the United States, primary database in N. Virginia, replicated to Oregon, Frankfurt and Seoul, and data-processing staff in the US and UK. GDPR commitment plus Standard Contractual Clauses and the UK transfer agreement are published, but the captured pages show a US entity with US primary storage, and I found no public information on a subprocessor list beyond AWS as hosting provider or on any EU hosting option. 2 3
The Brand Marketer
The contracting entity is Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego; uploaded files and hosted projects are stored in the United States, with the primary database in N. Virginia replicated to Oregon, Frankfurt and Seoul on AWS, and Standard Contractual Clauses named as the transfer safeguard. We found no public information on a published subprocessor list or an EU residency option for design files and brand assets. 2 3
The Agency Owner
The contracting entity is Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego, California, with uploaded files and hosted projects stored on Amazon Web Services in the United States, primary database in N. Virginia and replicas in Oregon, Frankfurt and Seoul — we found no EU data residency option for files. Standard Contractual Clauses, the UK International Data Transfer Agreement, a GDPR commitment and staff locations in the US and UK are published, but we found no published subprocessor list beyond AWS itself. 2 3
The Data Protection Officer
The contracting entity and GDPR controller is Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego, and uploaded files and hosted projects are stated to sit on AWS in the United States, with a primary database in N. Virginia replicated to Oregon, Frankfurt and Seoul, and Standard Contractual Clauses or the UK transfer agreement named as safeguards. No EU hosting option for customer files is evidenced and no subprocessor list with locations and purposes is published, so a European buyer gets transfer clauses rather than European processing. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
The contracting entity and GDPR controller is Axure Software Solutions, Inc. of San Diego, and uploaded files and hosted projects are stored in the United States (N. Virginia and Oregon), with the database replicated to Frankfurt and Seoul — US storage with an EU replica, and we found no public information on an EU hosting option. Standard Contractual Clauses are published as the transfer safeguard and staff access is said to be US and UK only, but there is no published subprocessor list with locations and purposes beyond the AWS name. A documented chain, but a non-European one end to end. 2 3
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the annual cost for their team from public pages alone — which seat types exist and what each may do, how viewers and guests are billed, how seats are added and trued up, AI credits, and the plan where SSO, admin controls and brand features begin.
0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-seat price for an entry plan, but the seat types, the billing of guests and reviewers, and the plan needed for business features are unclear.
5 — Plans priced per seat type with their main features, but at least one commonly incurred cost (seat upgrades on request, AI credits, storage, brand or SSO add-ons) is missing or "on request".
8 — Every plan and seat type priced, free viewers and guests stated with their limits, how and when added seats are billed explained, AI credits and storage priced or included explicitly, and the plan that unlocks SSO and admin controls named.
10 — Complete cost computability: annual cost derivable for a given mix of editors, viewers and guests, true-up and auto-upgrade rules published, every add-on priced publicly, and contract term, renewal and downgrade conditions stated.
The Product Designer
The captured pages name the editions — Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud, Enterprise — and a free 30-day fully-functional trial, but no price figure appears anywhere. I found no public information on per-seat prices by seat type, how viewers and guests are billed, or the plan where SSO and admin controls begin, so an annual cost cannot be computed from what was captured. 1
The Frontend Engineer
The homepage names the product tiers — Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud and Enterprise — and a free 30-day fully functional trial for PC and Mac, but the captured pages contain no price for any plan. I found no public information on seat types and what each may do, viewer or guest billing, or the plan where SSO and admin controls begin, so an annual team cost cannot be computed from these pages. 1
The Brand Marketer
The captured pages name the editions — Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud and Enterprise — and a free 30-day trial, with a pricing link in the navigation, but we found no public information on any price figure, seat types, how viewers or guests are billed, AI credits, or which plan unlocks admin controls and brand features. 1
The Agency Owner
The captured pages name Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud and Enterprise plus a free 30-day fully-functional trial, but no prices at all. We found no public information on per-seat prices, seat types, how viewers or guests are billed, AI credits, or which plan unlocks SSO and admin controls, so a buyer cannot compute an annual team cost from these pages. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The captured pages name the editions — Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud and Enterprise — and a free 30-day fully functional trial for PC or Mac, but no price figures appear for any edition. We found no public information on seat types, how viewers or external reviewers are billed, or which plan unlocks admin controls. 1
The Skeptic
The captured pages name Axure RP, Team Edition, Axure Cloud and Enterprise, and a free 30-day fully-functional trial, but we found no public information on any price, the seat types and what each may do, how viewers or reviewers are billed, or the plan where SSO and admin controls begin. A pricing link exists in the navigation, yet no figure appears anywhere captured, so a buyer can compute nothing from these pages. 1
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Axure RP
Is Axure RP European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Axure RP is based.
Where does Axure RP store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026. The vendor’s pages mention United States as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 20 Oct 2026.
Does Axure RP have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Axure RP?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Penpot (2.5/5), Sketch (2.5/5) and Frontify (2.5/5) highest among the other 17 Design products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Penpot (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Axure RP alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (axure.com, axure.com/privacy, axure.com/gdpr). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 15 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (3)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.axure.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Privacy policy — found from the homepage www.axure.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Security / trust page — found from the homepage www.axure.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →