Design
Linearity Curve
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Linearity GmbH · linearity.io
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Linearity Curve at a glance
- Vendor
- Linearity GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Linearity Curve 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Linearity Curve, from Linearity GmbH in Germany, pairs a vector design app with the Move animation app. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Linearity Curve, from Linearity GmbH in Germany, pairs a vector design app with the Move animation app. It scores strongest on AI and content rights at 4–5: privacy policy and AI terms state that prompts, customer content and generated outputs train vendor models only with separate explicit consent, and that the user owns input and output with no vendor copyright claim. Brand asset governance follows at 4–5 on a central searchable library of logos, imagery, templates and design systems feeding on-brand AI campaign generation. Design and prototyping spans 3–4 — pen tool, shape builder, brush tool, PDF editing and 3000+ templates, with no public information on reusable components or shared team libraries — and file ownership and portability spans 3–4 on local export plus Sketch, Illustrator and PDF import, with no documented whole-file format. Collaboration and handoff is the low point at a flat 2; pricing transparency is 1 across the range: Business and Enterprise tiers, 'Contact sales', 'Get started for free', no seat prices. Sovereignty spans 3–4: German entity, Berlin data protection officer, but no subprocessor list or file-hosting disclosure.
Speaks for it
- Prompts, customer content and generated outputs are excluded from model training unless separate explicit consent is given
- Users own AI input and output with no copyright claim from Linearity
- A central searchable library holds logos, imagery, templates and design systems and feeds them to AI campaign generation
- Curve documents pen tool, shape builder, brush tool and PDF editing plus 3000+ free templates
- Files import from Sketch, Adobe Illustrator and PDF and can be saved or exported locally
Held against it
- No public information on comments, review flows, guest access without a paid seat, or a developer mode with measurements and asset export
- No public information on reusable components, shared styles, tokens or team libraries that update across files
- Documented export settings cover resolution, frame rate and MP4, MOV or GIF, with no public information on whole-file export
- No public information on where design files and AI prompts are stored or processed, and no subprocessor list
- Business and Enterprise pages state no prices and every call to action reads 'Contact sales'
Best for
- You need written AI rights — no training on your content without separate explicit consent, and ownership of input and output
- You run brand marketing and want one searchable library of logos, imagery, templates and design systems driving on-brand AI campaign generation
- Your designers work in vector and bring in Sketch, Adobe Illustrator, PDF or Figma files, keeping work on their own devices
- You buy from an EU vendor — Linearity GmbH in Solingen with a Berlin data protection officer and GDPR transfer mechanisms
Avoid if
- You need to hand designs to engineering with measurements, styles and asset export — captured exports are MP4, MOV and GIF media files
- You maintain a design system of reusable components that update across files — the pages document a library that stores design systems, not that layer
- You must budget before a sales conversation — the business pages state no prices, only 'Contact sales'
- You need vendor indemnity for AI-generated work — the terms expressly accept no warranty or liability for output
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Design, prototyping & design systems | 2 of 5 |
| Collaboration, review & developer handoff | 1 of 5 |
| Brand assets & governance | 2 of 5 |
| Files, formats & portability | 2 of 5 |
| AI features & rights to the work | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
Design, prototyping & design systems
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The making itself: vector and layout tools, interactive prototypes, and the shared components, styles and tokens that keep a company's products and materials consistent — judged on what the feature and help pages document, not on showcase images.
0 — A single-purpose editor with no reusable components, no shared styles and no prototyping.
3 — Templates and basic shapes or layouts, with styles saved per file only and prototyping limited to linking screens.
5 — Reusable components and shared styles across files, responsive or auto layout, clickable prototypes with transitions, and team libraries that update where they are used.
8 — A design system managed in the tool: variables or tokens for colour, type and spacing with modes or themes, component variants and properties, prototypes with conditional logic, and library change notes with versions.
10 — The design system is a governed product: library releases versioned and reviewable, token export in a documented format for development, usage analytics per component, and accessibility checks such as contrast built into the editor.
The Product Designer
Curve documents a genuine vector toolset — pen tool, shape builder, brush tool, PDF editing — and Move adds real animation with a design/animate toggle and auto-animate transitions, well past screen-linking. But we found no public information on reusable components, shared styles across files, team libraries, tokens with modes or versioned library releases; the only design-system mention is that you can organize design systems inside the business asset library. Capable tools and 3000-plus templates, with the systems half of the craft unevidenced. 2 4 5 6 10
The Frontend Engineer
Curve documents real vector craft (pen tool, shape builder, brush tool, PDF editing) and Move gives scene-based animation with auto-animate transitions plus 3000+ free templates. But we found no public information on reusable components, shared styles across files, team libraries, or variables and tokens with a documented export — the layer that keeps a company consistent and feeds code. 2 4 5 6
The Brand Marketer
Curve and Move give my team genuine vector craft — pen tool, shape builder, brush tool, PDF editing, three thousand templates and a design-and-animate mode — but I found no public information on reusable components, shared styles across files, or tokens and library versioning. For twelve offices keeping one look, that shared component layer is the part these pages never document. 2 4 5 6
The Agency Owner
Curve gives my designers a real vector toolkit — pen, shape builder, brush, PDF editing — plus three thousand templates, and Move animates between scenes with Auto Animate. But we found no public information on reusable components, shared styles, or team libraries that update across files, so there is nothing shown here for building and maintaining a client's design system. 2 4 5
The Data Protection Officer
The captured pages document real vector craft — pen tool, shape builder, brush and PDF editing, three thousand plus templates, and an animation product with auto-animate transitions, presets and video — while we found no public information on reusable components, shared styles across files, or tokens, variants and versioned team libraries. 2 4 5
The Skeptic
The making tools are real — pen tool, shape builder, brush and PDF editing, plus a separate animation app with auto-animate transitions, masking and presets — and 3,000-plus free templates are on offer. We found no public information on components that update where they are used, team libraries, or colour, type and spacing tokens with themes; the closest signal is a business page describing a searchable library that can hold design systems alongside logos. 2 4 5 6
Collaboration, review & developer handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Working on the same files with colleagues, clients and developers: comments and review, permissions for internal and external people, and the handoff that gives engineering measurements, assets and code rather than screenshots.
0 — Files shared as exports or links with no comments, no permissions beyond view or edit, and no developer view.
3 — Real-time co-editing and comments, but external reviewers need a paid seat or full access, and developers get only exported images.
5 — Comments with mentions and resolution, view-only and comment-only access for guests without a paid seat, permissions per file and project, and an inspect mode with measurements, styles and asset export.
8 — Branching or review of changes before they reach the main file, version history with restore, a developer mode that links components to code, an API and plugins documented, and named integrations with issue trackers and code tools.
10 — Handoff is a contract between design and code: component properties mapped to code components, token and asset export automated through the API, an audit log of access and sharing, and external access governed by domain, expiry and admin policy.
The Product Designer
The captured pages show shared workspaces where authorized members carry identity, role and permissions, plus a Figma plugin that brings designs in — but exports are MP4, MOV and GIF, not measurements, styles or code. We found no public information on comments or review flows, an inspect or developer mode, version history with restore, or a public API and plugin ecosystem. The plugin moves work into Linearity; we found no public information on handing it off to engineering. 3 4 5
The Frontend Engineer
The privacy policy names shared workspaces with roles, permissions and activity, and the Figma plugin is a genuine import path where frames become scenes or artboards and copied elements paste as layers. We found no public information on comments, an inspect mode with measurements, a developer mode, or a documented API, and the export evidence shows MP4, MOV and GIF — media files rather than handoff. 3 4 5
The Brand Marketer
Shared workspaces with roles, permissions and activity, single sign-on, and a well-documented Figma round-trip are the extent of what I can see. I found no public information on comments or review flows, guest access without a paid seat, version history, or any developer handoff view with measurements, styles and asset export — my developers would still be working from exports. 3 4 5
The Agency Owner
The only captured evidence of working together is the privacy policy's shared workspaces with identity, roles, permissions and activity, plus a Figma plugin for bringing designs in as layers. We found no public information on comments and review, on view- or comment-only access for clients and guests, or on an inspect mode with measurements and assets for developers — my feedback rounds and handoff specs are invisible in these pages. 3 5
The Data Protection Officer
Shared workspaces with roles, permissions and activity visibility, single sign-on, and a Figma plugin that imports frames as scenes are documented; we found no public information on comments and review, guest access without a paid seat, or a developer mode with measurements, styles and asset export. 3 4 5
The Skeptic
Sharing is evidenced as shared workspaces or links where members see identity, role, permissions and activity, and the Figma plugin is a genuine two-way path for layers and frames. We found no public information on comments and mentions, external reviewers without a paid seat, version history, or any developer mode with measurements — engineering here gets a Figma round-trip and exported media, not an inspect view. 3 4 5
Brand assets & governance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keeping a brand usable and correct across a company: a central library for logos, images and templates, brand guidelines people can find, locked templates that let non-designers produce material, and rights and expiry metadata on every licensed asset.
0 — No shared asset library; logos and images are uploaded per file by whoever needs them.
3 — A shared folder of assets and some templates, but no guidelines, no locking of brand elements and no metadata beyond file names.
5 — A central brand library with logos, colours and fonts, templates with locked elements for non-designers, brand guidelines published in the tool, and tagging and search across assets.
8 — Rights, usage and expiry metadata on assets with warnings or automatic withdrawal on expiry, approval workflows for new assets and template output, version control on assets, and access per team, market or partner.
10 — Brand governance is auditable: every asset carries its licence, owner and permitted use, usage of each asset is tracked across files and channels, distribution to external partners is logged, and the whole library with metadata is exportable in a documented format.
The Product Designer
The business pages show a central searchable library for logos, imagery, templates and design systems, and an AI that takes your brand guidelines and assets as context for on-brand campaign generation — a credible play at being a source of brand truth, backed by 3000-plus templates. We found no public information on locked templates for non-designers, rights or expiry metadata on assets, approval workflows, or access scoped per team, market or partner, which is where governance starts rather than stops. 4 6 7
The Frontend Engineer
The business pages document one central searchable library of logos, imagery, templates and design systems, with brand guidelines and assets fed to the AI as context for on-brand generation. We found no public information on locked templates for non-designers, licence or expiry metadata, approval workflows, or versioning on assets. 4 6 7
The Brand Marketer
The searchable library holding logos, imagery, templates and design systems, with brand guidelines fed to the AI for on-brand campaign generation, is genuinely the shape of what I run. But I found no public information on locked elements in templates for non-designers, approval workflows, or licence and expiry metadata on assets — and the claims of "100% on-brand by default" and "source of brand truth" appear as marketing statements with no documented controls behind them. 4 6 7
The Agency Owner
The business pages document one searchable library for logos, imagery, templates and design systems, and AI campaign generation driven by uploaded brand guidelines and assets — a genuine central library with search. We found no public information on templates with locked elements for non-designers, tagging, or rights and expiry metadata on licensed assets, so governance stops at organisation plus search. 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
A central searchable library of logos, imagery, templates and design systems is published, with brand guidelines and assets feeding on-brand AI generation; we found no public information on locked templates for non-designers, brand guidelines published in the tool, or rights and expiry metadata on licensed assets. 4 6 7
The Skeptic
A central searchable library for logos, imagery, templates and design systems is documented, and the AI is positioned to generate editable campaign designs from uploaded brand guidelines and assets. The 'source of brand truth' headline is marketing weight; we found no public information on locked templates for non-designers, rights and expiry metadata, approval workflows, or per-team and per-market access controls. 6 7
Files, formats & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the work can leave: open or documented file formats, export that keeps layers, vectors and components, offline or self-hosted options, and what happens to files after a downgrade, a removed seat or a cancelled contract.
0 — Files exist only in the vendor's cloud in a proprietary format, export is a flat image, and nothing is said about files after cancellation.
3 — Export to PNG, PDF and SVG per frame, but no export of whole files with structure, and files after a downgrade or cancellation addressed only in general terms.
5 — Whole files exportable to a local or documented format, vector and layered export (SVG, PDF) with text kept as text, bulk export of a team's files, and a stated period during which files remain accessible after cancellation.
8 — An open or publicly documented file format, export and import with other tools documented, an API that reads full file structure, files of removed users transferred to the organisation by policy, and a stated deletion timeline after the contract ends.
10 — Portability is built in: an open-source or openly specified format, self-hosting or a local-first option, round-trip export without loss of components and prototypes, and the customer's ownership of all files and their export rights written into the terms.
The Product Designer
Import from Sketch, Adobe Illustrator and PDF is documented, users may save or export supported files locally, and Move exports MP4, MOV and GIF; we found no public information on exporting whole files with structure or layered vector output with text kept as text. A help-centre article on what happens to files and access on cancellation appears in the captured help centre, but no statement of its contents was captured, leaving the 30-day restoration window after account deletion as the only concrete timeline. 3 4 5 8
The Frontend Engineer
Local files are real: Curve files save to and open from device storage, import covers Sketch, Illustrator and PDF, and a support article on what happens to files and access at cancellation exists, though no figures from it appear among the captured pages. We found no public information on a publicly documented file format, layered SVG or PDF export with text kept as text, bulk export, or a stated access period after cancellation. 3 4 5 8
The Brand Marketer
Work can live on our own machines — files open from and save to device storage, and import from Sketch, Adobe Illustrator and PDF is documented, which I value. But I found no public information on bulk export of a team's files, on layered vector export keeping text as text, or on what happens to files after a downgrade or cancellation. 3 4 5
The Agency Owner
Users may save or export supported files locally and can import Sketch, Illustrator and PDF into Curve, but the export documentation captured shows video formats with resolution and frame-rate settings, and we found no public information on whole-file export with layers and components intact. The help centre includes a page titled for what happens to files and access when cancelling, though no details from it are captured; the only stated timeline is thirty days after account deletion, after which content is permanently deleted or irreversibly anonymised. 3 4 5 8
The Data Protection Officer
Local save and export, documented import from Sketch, Adobe Illustrator and PDF, and a stated thirty-day restoration window before permanent deletion of account data and customer content give the work somewhere to go; we found no public information on a documented whole-file format, layered vector export keeping text as text, or what happens to a team's files after a cancelled contract. 3 4 5
The Skeptic
Users may save or export supported files locally on their devices, and import from Sketch, Adobe Illustrator and PDF is documented — but the export settings we can see cover resolution, frame rate and MP4, MOV or GIF, with no public information on whole-file export in a documented format. The only retention statement found is a 30-day restore window after account deletion before permanent deletion or anonymisation; we found no public information on file access after a downgrade or a cancelled subscription. 3 4 5
AI features & rights to the work
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the vendor's AI does with the customer's files and what the customer may do with the AI's output: training on customer content and the opt-out, the models and where they run, commercial use of generated images, stock licences and indemnity.
0 — Generative features with no statement on training on customer files, no named models, and no word on whether output may be used commercially.
3 — An AI page that promises responsibility but leaves open whether customer files train models, and output rights are stated only for some features or only in community terms.
5 — Training on customer content excluded or opt-out documented, AI features switchable by an admin for the organisation, model providers named, and commercial use of generated output permitted in the terms.
8 — Training excluded by default for business plans, the processing location of AI features stated, generated content labelled or carrying content credentials, stock and template licences stated per asset type, and an IP indemnity for generated output on a named plan.
10 — AI is governed in writing: a per-feature list of models, providers and locations, admin controls per team and feature, a log of AI use, training exclusion and output ownership in the contract terms, and indemnity and licence limits published in full.
The Product Designer
The AI terms are unusually direct: no prompts, customer content or generated outputs train Linearity's models without separate explicit consent, and the user owns input and output with no copyright claim from the vendor — training exclusion and output ownership in writing, with publication permitted under disclosure conditions. We found no public information on which models or providers power Background Removal, Auto Trace and the rest, where AI processing runs, admin on/off controls per organisation, or content labelling; and instead of an indemnity, the terms disclaim warranty and liability on output outright. 3 10
The Frontend Engineer
The AI terms are unusually concrete: training on prompts, customer content and outputs only with separate explicit consent, and the user owns input and output with no copyright claim from Linearity. We found no public information on the model providers, where AI processing runs, admin switches per organisation, or content credentials — and the terms explicitly disclaim warranty and liability for output rather than indemnifying it. 3 4 10
The Brand Marketer
Two separate policies state our content does not train their models without separate explicit consent, and the AI terms say we own input and output with no copyright claim from Linearity — so a generated image is ours to put on a trade-fair stand. I found no public information on which model providers are used, where AI processing runs, admin switches per feature, content credentials, stock licences per asset type, or any indemnity — and the terms explicitly accept no warranty or liability for output. 3 10
The Agency Owner
The AI terms give my clients what I want in writing: no training on their content or generated output without separate explicit consent, and customer ownership of input and output with no copyright claim by the vendor. But we found no public information on the model providers behind Background Removal, Auto Trace and the rest, on admin switches per organisation, or on any indemnity — the terms explicitly accept no warranty or liability for output. 3 10
The Data Protection Officer
Training on prompts, customer content and generated outputs is excluded unless separate explicit consent is given, stated in both the privacy policy and the AI terms rather than behind a per-user toggle, and the user owns input and output with no copyright claim by the vendor. We found no public information on which model providers run the features, where AI processing happens, or organisation-wide admin switching, and the terms disclaim any warranty or liability for generated output. 3 10
The Skeptic
The two protections that matter are in writing: training on customer creations requires separate explicit consent, and the terms state the customer owns input and output with no copyright claim by the vendor, and even permit publishing AI-assisted work with disclosure. Everything operational is absent — we found no public information on model providers, processing location, admin toggles per organisation, content credentials, or indemnity, and the terms expressly disclaim warranty and liability on the output. 3 10
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity is, where design files, brand assets and AI prompts are stored and processed, and which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where files are hosted, and subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU data residency available only on an enterprise plan or not at all, or the subprocessor list is absent, or AI features send files outside the EU without an explained safeguard.
5 — EU hosting stated for files, a DPA available, but the contracting entity or significant parts of the chain (AI, rendering, support) are non-EU without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU contracting entity, files, assets and backups stored in the EU on named infrastructure, subprocessor list published with locations and purposes, and AI processing location stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity, every hosting, AI and support subprocessor European or optional, self-hosting or a European cloud offered, and certifications published.
The Product Designer
The imprint shows a German contracting entity — Linearity GmbH in Solingen, registered at Amtsgericht Düsseldorf with a German VAT number — plus a Berlin-based external data protection officer and transfers covered by adequacy decisions and standard contractual clauses. We found no public information on where design files and assets are hosted, no published subprocessor list with locations and purposes, and no statement of where AI features process content; the only hosting statement covers the website on Cloudflare in the EU. 2 3
The Frontend Engineer
The imprint nails the entity: Linearity GmbH in Solingen, registered at Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, with a German VAT number, a Berlin-based external data protection officer, and adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses for transfers. We found no public information on where design files and assets are stored, a published subprocessor list, or where AI features process; the only named hosts are Cloudflare for the website and Stripe for payments. 2 3
The Brand Marketer
The contracting entity is unmistakably European — Linearity GmbH in Solingen, registered at Amtsgericht Düsseldorf, with a Berlin-based data protection officer and GDPR transfer safeguards through adequacy decisions and standard contractual clauses. But I found no public information on where design files, brand assets and AI prompts are actually stored and processed, and no published subprocessor list — only the website host Cloudflare is named. 2 3
The Agency Owner
The imprint puts the contracting entity squarely in the EU — Linearity GmbH in Solingen, registered in Düsseldorf, with a Berlin data protection officer and GDPR-style rights and transfer mechanisms in the privacy policy. We found no public statement of where design files or AI processing are hosted, and no subprocessor list with locations and purposes; the only hosting fact is that the website runs on Cloudflare in the EU. 2 3
The Data Protection Officer
The imprint names a German contracting entity with a Düsseldorf register number, a Berlin data protection officer is named, and the website runs on Cloudflare in the EU with adequacy decisions and standard contractual clauses covering transfers. We found no public information on where design files, brand assets and AI prompts are stored and processed, and no subprocessor list with locations and purposes, which keeps a German entity at the lower end. 2 3 10
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is a German GmbH with a Düsseldorf register entry, a Berlin-based data protection officer, and transfers handled through adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses. That is where the trail ends: we found no public information on where design files and AI prompts are stored or processed, and no subprocessor list — Cloudflare for EU website hosting and Stripe for payments appear only incidentally. 2 3
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the annual cost for their team from public pages alone — which seat types exist and what each may do, how viewers and guests are billed, how seats are added and trued up, AI credits, and the plan where SSO, admin controls and brand features begin.
0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-seat price for an entry plan, but the seat types, the billing of guests and reviewers, and the plan needed for business features are unclear.
5 — Plans priced per seat type with their main features, but at least one commonly incurred cost (seat upgrades on request, AI credits, storage, brand or SSO add-ons) is missing or "on request".
8 — Every plan and seat type priced, free viewers and guests stated with their limits, how and when added seats are billed explained, AI credits and storage priced or included explicitly, and the plan that unlocks SSO and admin controls named.
10 — Complete cost computability: annual cost derivable for a given mix of editors, viewers and guests, true-up and auto-upgrade rules published, every add-on priced publicly, and contract term, renewal and downgrade conditions stated.
The Product Designer
The captured business page shows Contact sales buttons and no figures, and beyond a "Get started for free" tier and the names Business and Enterprise, we found no public information on per-seat prices, seat types, how viewers or guests are billed, or the plan where admin and brand features begin. A buyer cannot compute even a starting annual cost from the captured pages. 2 4 7
The Frontend Engineer
The business page states no prices at all — every call to action is "Contact sales" — with tiers merely named Business and Enterprise alongside a free start. No per-seat figure, no seat types, no viewer or guest billing, and no plan named for single sign-on or admin controls, so an annual cost is not computable from public pages. 2 4 7
The Brand Marketer
Beyond a free way to start, every business offer I can see ends in "Contact sales" — no seat prices, no seat types, no viewer or guest billing, no AI credits, no storage figures. Budget planning for twelve offices from these pages would be pure guesswork. 2 4 7
The Agency Owner
The captured business page states no prices and every call to action is "Contact sales", with Business and Enterprise tiers named but unpriced; beyond "Get started for free" we found no public information on seat types, how guests or reviewers are billed, or the plan where SSO and admin controls begin. I cannot compute a year's cost for fifteen seats from these pages. 2 4 7
The Data Protection Officer
The captured business and enterprise pages show only 'Contact sales', with no seat types, no viewer or guest billing, and no per-seat prices anywhere we looked; the only public price signal is a 'Get started for free' entry point. 2 4 7
The Skeptic
The business and brand pages state no prices at all, with every call to action reading 'Contact sales', and beyond a 'Get started for free' banner we found no public information on seat types, viewer or guest billing, or which plan unlocks SSO and admin controls. A buyer cannot compute an annual cost from these pages; every real figure is a sales conversation. 2 4 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Linearity Curve
Is Linearity Curve European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Linearity Curve is based.
Where does Linearity Curve store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does Linearity Curve have a free plan?
Yes. Linearity Curve has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Linearity Curve?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Penpot (2.5/5), Sketch (2.5/5) and Frontify (2.5/5) highest among the other 17 Design products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Penpot (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Linearity Curve alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 41 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (10)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Imprint — found from the homepage www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy — found from the homepage www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Collaboration, review & developer handoff — found from sitemap www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Collaboration, review & developer handoff — found from sitemap www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Brand assets & governance — found from sitemap www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Brand assets & governance — found from sitemap www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Files, formats & portability — found from sitemap support.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Files, formats & portability — found from sitemap www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 AI features & rights to the work — found from sitemap www.linearity.io Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →