E-Signature

Autenti

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Autenti sp. z o.o. · autenti.com

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The Legal Counsel v1.0 · The HR Operations Lead v1.0 · The Revenue Operations Lead v1.0 · The Integration Engineer v1.0 · The Data Protection Officer v1.0 · The Skeptic v1.0 · rubric v2 · evaluated 3 Nov 2026

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

HTML

<a href="https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/autenti"><img src="https://whats-best.ai/badge/e-signature/autenti.svg" alt="Autenti: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai" height="66"></a>

Markdown

[![Autenti: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai](https://whats-best.ai/badge/e-signature/autenti.svg)](https://whats-best.ai/software/e-signature/autenti)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Autenti at a glance

Vendor: Autenti sp. z o.o.
Headquarters: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Data hosting: Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Free plan: Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 3 Nov 2026
Panel verdict: The AI panel rates Autenti 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Autenti is a Polish e-signature platform whose bench scores cluster at 6-7 on signature levels, identity verification, signing workflow and evidence and retention, against a 4-4 range on integration and API. how scores are made
As of: Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 3 Nov 2026. all sources

Autenti alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Legal Counsel

Weighted verdict

Decides which contracts may be signed electronically and at which level. Wants SES, AdES and QES named per plan and country, the qualified trust service provider linked to the EU Trust List, and an audit trail with timestamps that still validates when the contract is disputed in eight years.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Legal Counsel

Panel median The Legal Counsel This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.

Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion	Panel median	The Legal Counsel
eIDAS levels & trust services	3.5 of 5	3.5 of 5
Signer identification	3 of 5	3 of 5
Signing workflow & signer experience	3 of 5	3 of 5
Evidence, validation & retention	3.5 of 5	3.5 of 5
Integrations & API	2 of 5	2 of 5
European sovereignty	2.5 of 5	2 of 5

eIDAS levels & trust services

How this is scored

Which signature levels the platform offers — simple, advanced, qualified, and qualified seals — through which qualified trust service provider on the EU Trust List, for which countries and legal regimes (eIDAS, ZertES), and on which plans.

0 — Not an electronic signature service: a PDF annotation or form tool that places a drawn or typed signature image without any eIDAS signature behind it.

3 — Electronic signatures at the simple level (SES) described as compliant with eIDAS; advanced and qualified levels and the trust service provider are basic or not described.

5 — Simple and advanced or qualified signatures (SES with AdES or QES) offered and named as eIDAS levels, with the plans or add-ons that include them and which documents need which level explained for Germany or the EU.

8 — SES, AdES and QES all documented with the plans and countries they are available in, the qualified trust service provider named with its entry on the EU Trust List linked, QES under eIDAS (and ZertES where relevant) stated, qualified electronic seals for company documents, and the signature level shown in the signed document and audit trail.

10 — Levels are an explicit product decision: the provider is or contracts a named QTSP with its conformity assessment published, level selection per document type or template, remote QES without a separate account, EUDI wallet support stated with a date, and the legal effect per level documented for the main EU markets.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

All three eIDAS levels are named and distinguished — the non-qualified Autenti e-signature, the Advanced e-signature with two independent authentication factors, and qualified signatures created one-time via Cencert on mObywatel — plus qualified electronic seals and bulk caps quoted per level. The qualified trust service providers are named as Certum (Simply Sign) and InfoCert, but we found no public information linking them to the EU Trust List, mapping levels to the eSign plans, or covering ZertES and per-country availability. Until the Trust List entries and plan mapping are published, I cannot assign document classes to levels with confidence. 3 4 6 7

Report an error

Signer identification

How this is scored

How the signer is identified for each level: email and SMS codes, video ident, eID card (Online-Ausweis), bank ident or EUDI wallet — who performs it, in which countries it works, and what happens to the ID data afterwards.

0 — No signer authentication offered: by the vendor's own description anyone holding the link can sign.

3 — Signers authenticated by an email link with an access code or SMS code; identification for advanced and qualified signatures is basic or not described.

5 — Email, SMS or access-code authentication, plus identification methods for AdES or QES listed by name (for example video ident, eID card, bank ident), with the countries or ID documents they accept stated.

8 — Methods documented per level and country with the identification provider named, automated and agent-based ident distinguished, reuse of an identification for later signatures explained, retention and deletion of ID data stated, and the ident provider listed as subprocessor.

10 — Identification is transparent end to end: every method with its countries, assurance level and completion guidance, EUDI wallet and national eID supported, ID data minimisation and retention committed, and the signer-facing privacy notice published.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

Seven identification means are enumerated in the policy, and the Polish path is described end to end: mObywatel, an NFC smartphone and an e-ID card issued after March 4, 2019, with QR code and CAN code steps; OTP SMS and video ident run through BROKER.ID. We found no public information on which identification provider covers which country, on the subprocessor listing, or on retention and deletion of the identification data itself. 3 4 5 6

Report an error

Signing workflow & signer experience

How this is scored

Getting a document out and back signed: templates and form fields, signing order and roles, bulk sending, reminders and delegation, signing without an account or app, mobile signing, and accessibility for signers.

0 — Not a signing workflow: the product signs a document locally for the user and sends nothing out to other signers.

3 — Documents sent to one or more signers by email with fields placed on the PDF; templates, signing order and reminders are basic or not described.

5 — Templates with field placement, several signers with a signing order, automatic reminders, signing in the browser on mobile without an account, and a status overview for the sender.

8 — Roles and conditional fields, parallel and sequential order, bulk sending, delegation and substitute signers, team and approval workflows, a branded signer experience, signer languages listed, and signer accessibility addressed.

10 — The workflow is complete and documented: web forms and self-service signing links, mixed signature levels within one process, in-person and remote signing, a published accessibility conformance statement, and team administration with shared templates and audit of sender actions.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

Templates with drag-and-drop fields and address-book autofill, approver, reviewer and initialler roles, a configurable signing order, and bulk signing with stated caps of 100 simple and 50 qualified documents — signers need no account, certificate or installation, and the finished document is emailed to every party. We found no public information on reminders, delegation and substitute signers, team approval workflows, or signer accessibility. 4 6 7 8

Report an error

Evidence, validation & retention

How this is scored

What proves a signature years later: the audit trail and certificate of completion, qualified timestamps, long-term validation (PAdES-LTV), validation reports, and how long signed documents and evidence are kept — and whether they can leave the platform.

0 — No evidence produced: by the vendor's own description the result is a flattened PDF with a signature image and no audit trail or certificate.

3 — An audit trail or completion certificate with the signed PDF; its contents, timestamps and the retention period are basic or not described.

5 — An audit trail or certificate of completion recording signer events, time and authentication method, attached to or embedded in the signed PDF, timestamps applied, and signed documents downloadable.

8 — PAdES signatures with long-term validation, qualified timestamps from a named provider, a validation tool or report, retention period stated and configurable with automatic deletion, and bulk export of documents with their evidence.

10 — Evidence outlives the subscription: LTV and archive timestamps documented, validation verifiable with independent tools such as the EU DSS validator, export to a DMS or archive with evidence intact, and post-termination access and deletion committed in the terms.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

For an eight-year dispute this is credible but incomplete: an event register of technical activities, qualified timestamps, a qualified validator confirming validity at signing time, certificate status and any alteration, an ETSI-conformant XML validation report plus a PDF validation certificate for proceedings, and the Signatures&Seals Card; retention is at least six years with a one-month download window after the trust service ends. We found no public information on PAdES long-term validation or archive timestamps, the named timestamp provider, configurable retention with automatic deletion, or export into an archive with the evidence intact. 2 3

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Signing from inside the systems where contracts are made: a documented API with webhooks and a sandbox, embedded signing, and connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS and ERP systems.

0 — A closed web app by the vendor's own description: no API and no integrations offered.

3 — A few named integrations or a Zapier or Make connector; a documented API is basic or not described.

5 — A documented REST API with webhooks, plus named integrations with Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and at least one CRM, HR or storage system.

8 — A sandbox, embedded signing in the customer's own application, API access to every signature level, versioned API with rate limits published, SDKs, and connectors for named DMS, ERP or HR systems with their scope.

10 — Integration is a product: white-label and embedded flows documented, API parity with the web app, a status page with incident history, deprecation policy, and a marketplace of integrations with stated maintainers.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

An open API is asserted throughout — documents sent and signed from an ERP system, qualified validation fully automated via the API, and a marketplace alongside the standalone platform. We found no public information on webhooks, a sandbox, SDKs, rate limits, versioning, embedded signing, or named Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, CRM, HR or document-management connectors, so I cannot judge API access to each signature level. 1 2 5 8

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity, the trust service provider and their owners are, where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.

0 — Proven non-EU on every dimension the evidence covers: non-EU contracting entity and non-EU storage of documents and signer data, with no EU option stated.

3 — One European element proven: an EU contracting entity or EU representative, EU data storage stated, an EU qualified trust service provider, or a published DPA, with the rest of the chain unstated.

5 — EU contracting entity or EU representative and EU storage of documents stated as standard or selectable, with a DPA offered; the hosting, identification or trust service chain is unstated or partly non-EU.

8 — EU entity, documents, audit trails and ID data stored in named EU data centres, an EU qualified trust service provider, subprocessor list with locations published, and certifications (ISO 27001, ETSI conformity) published.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity and EU QTSP, every processing location and subprocessor European, customer-selectable data residency, and certifications with their scope published.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

The contracting and data controller entity is proven European — Autenti sp. z o.o. of Poznań with full Polish registry numbers — and the vendor states EU-based operation with GDPR, eIDAS, DORA and ISO compliance. We found no public information on a data-processing agreement, named EU data centres, a subprocessor list with locations, or certificates with their scope, so the rest of the sovereign chain is unproven to me. 1 3 7

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the cost of their signing volume from public pages alone — plan prices, envelope or document limits, the per-signature price of AdES and QES, identification fees, API pricing and overage.

0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.

3 — A public "from" price or one priced plan, per user or flat.

5 — Plan prices public for the main plans with the billing period stated and the envelope or document limits and main features per plan listed.

8 — Every plan and limit priced publicly, AdES and QES priced per signature, identification fees and overage stated, API pricing published, and contract term and notice period given.

10 — Complete cost computability: the cost of a given monthly volume per signature level derivable from public pages, volume tiers published, and every add-on and price-change term on a public page.

Report an error

The Legal Counsel

The only public pricing facts are a free account and free trial, pay-only-for-success on successfully issued qualified certificates, scalable signature packages, expert templates at no additional cost, and a 20% discount on the first billing period of the annual eSign PRO and PREMIUM plans. We found no public information on any plan price, per-signature rate for advanced or qualified signatures, identification fee, package price or contract term, so a buyer cannot compute a monthly cost. 4 5 6 8

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Hosting location	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Hosting options	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Open source	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error

Questions about Autenti

Is Autenti European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Autenti is based.

Where does Autenti store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

Does Autenti have a free plan?

Yes. Autenti has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 3 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Autenti?

As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates sproof sign (3.5/5), MOXIS (3.5/5) and Signicat Sign (3/5) highest among the other 22 E-Signature products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is sproof sign (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Autenti alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 3 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

11 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about Autenti? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (8)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor page autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
2 Security / trust page — found from the homepage autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
3 EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
4 EIDAS levels & trust services — found from sitemap autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
5 Signer identification — found from sitemap autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
6 Signer identification — found from sitemap autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
7 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
8 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap autenti.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →