whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

E-Signature

MOXIS

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by XiTrust Secure Technologies GmbH · www.moxis.co

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

MOXIS: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai MOXIS: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

MOXIS at a glance

Vendor
XiTrust Secure Technologies GmbH
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates MOXIS 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. MOXIS, an e-signature platform from XiTrust Secure Technologies GmbH of Graz, Austria, is strongest on signing workflow, where scores run 7 to 8: sequential, parallel and conditional signing with approval and escalation logic, bulk sends to 10,000 contacts and 100 documents per click, and unlimited external signers without extra licences are all evidenced. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources

MOXIS alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Knows every signer who holds an ID card up to a camera hands biometric and identity data to a provider they never chose. Asks who performs the identification, where documents and ID data are stored, how long the audit trail keeps IP addresses, and who the subprocessors in the trust service chain are.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Panel median The Data Protection Officer This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Data Protection Officer
eIDAS levels & trust services 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Signer identification 3 of 5 3 of 5
Signing workflow & signer experience 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Evidence, validation & retention 2 of 5 2 of 5
Integrations & API 3 of 5 3 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 1.5 of 5
Pricing transparency 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5

eIDAS levels & trust services

How this is scored

Which signature levels the platform offers — simple, advanced, qualified, and qualified seals — through which qualified trust service provider on the EU Trust List, for which countries and legal regimes (eIDAS, ZertES), and on which plans.

0 — No signature level named; the platform calls its signature "legally binding" without saying which kind it is.

3 — Simple signatures by default with "advanced" or "qualified" mentioned as available, but no trust service provider named and no statement on which plan or country offers which level.

5 — SES, AdES and QES offered and labelled in the product, the qualified trust service provider named, and which documents need which level explained for at least Germany or the EU.

8 — Every level documented with the plans and countries it is available in, the QTSP's entry on the EU Trust List linked, QES under eIDAS (and ZertES where relevant) stated, qualified electronic seals for company documents, and the signature level printed in the signed document and audit trail.

10 — Levels are an explicit product decision: the provider is or contracts a named QTSP with its conformity assessment published, level selection per document type or template, remote QES without a separate account, EUDI wallet support stated with a date, and the legal effect per level documented for the main EU markets.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Simple, advanced and qualified signatures are labelled per plan, with A-Trust, D-Trust and Swisscom named as certified trust centers under eIDAS and ZertES, qualified seals via eStamp, and the signature protocol recording signature quality alongside timestamp and hash. We found no public information on which countries each level is available in, and the EU Trust List entries of the named trust centers are not linked, so the trust chain cannot be verified from the captured pages. 2 9 6

Report an error

Signer identification

How this is scored

How the signer is identified for each level: email and SMS codes, video ident, eID card (Online-Ausweis), bank ident or EUDI wallet — who performs it, in which countries it works, and what happens to the ID data afterwards.

0 — Email link only; no statement on how signers are authenticated.

3 — Email plus SMS or access code, with "ID verification" mentioned as an add-on but no methods, provider or countries named.

5 — Identification methods for AdES and QES listed by name (for example video ident, eID, bank ident), the identification provider named, and the countries or ID documents they accept stated.

8 — Methods documented per level and country, automated and agent-based ident distinguished, reuse of an identification for later signatures explained, retention and deletion of ID data stated, and the ident provider listed as subprocessor.

10 — Identification is transparent end to end: every method with its countries, assurance level and failure rate or completion guidance, EUDI wallet and national eID supported, ID data minimisation and retention committed, and the signer-facing privacy notice published.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Identification methods are named — AI-based Auto-Ident with ID scan and selfie video in under ten minutes, German nPA NFC authentication, and in-person registration officers — with Nect and A-Trust appearing in the chain and the five-year reusable identity explained. We found no public information on which countries' ID documents Auto-Ident accepts, on retention or deletion of the ID scans and selfie videos, or on any subprocessor list placing the identification provider in the processing chain, which is exactly what I need before sending signers to a provider they never chose. 6 7 3

Report an error

Signing workflow & signer experience

How this is scored

Getting a document out and back signed: templates and form fields, signing order and roles, bulk sending, reminders and delegation, signing without an account or app, mobile signing, and accessibility for signers.

0 — Single-recipient signing of an uploaded PDF; no templates, order or reminders.

3 — Multiple signers and basic templates, but no signing order, no bulk send, and signers must create an account.

5 — Templates with field placement, sequential and parallel signing order, automatic reminders and expiry, signing without an account on mobile, and a status overview for the sender.

8 — Roles and conditional fields, bulk sending, delegation and substitute signers, team and approval workflows, branded signer experience, signer languages listed, and signer accessibility addressed.

10 — The workflow is complete and documented: web forms and self-service signing links, mixed signature levels within one process, in-person and remote signing, a published accessibility conformance statement, and team administration with shared templates and audit of sender actions.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Team-shared templates, drag-and-drop signature fields, sequential, parallel and conditional routing with approval and escalation logic, bulk sends to 10,000 contacts, a deputy arrangement, QR on-site signing, real-time status and interface branding are all evidenced. We found no public information on signer languages or signer accessibility, which the stronger end of this criterion expects. 8 9 2

Report an error

Evidence, validation & retention

How this is scored

What proves a signature years later: the audit trail and certificate of completion, qualified timestamps, long-term validation (PAdES-LTV), validation reports, and how long signed documents and evidence are kept — and whether they can leave the platform.

0 — A signed PDF and nothing else; no audit trail, no statement on storage or deletion.

3 — An audit trail or completion certificate exists, but its contents, the timestamp source and the retention period are unstated.

5 — Audit trail with signer events, IP addresses and authentication method embedded in or attached to the signed PDF, timestamps applied, documents downloadable, and the retention period stated.

8 — PAdES signatures with long-term validation, qualified timestamps from a named provider, a validation tool or report, configurable retention and automatic deletion, and bulk export of documents with their evidence.

10 — Evidence outlives the subscription: LTV and archive timestamps documented, validation verifiable with independent tools such as the EU DSS validator, export to a DMS or archive with evidence intact, and post-termination access and deletion committed in the terms.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

A signature protocol exists listing signatories, timestamps, signature quality and hash values, and the privacy policy cites statutory retention under Austrian commercial and tax law plus ten-day server logfiles. We found no public information on qualified timestamps or long-term validation, on whether IP addresses and authentication method enter the evidence, or on a concrete retention period for signed documents and their audit trail, so what proves a signature in five years stays vague. 2 3

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Signing from inside the systems where contracts are made: a documented API with webhooks and a sandbox, embedded signing, and connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS and ERP systems.

0 — No API and no integrations; everything happens in the vendor's web app.

3 — A few named integrations or a Zapier connector, and an API mentioned without public documentation.

5 — A documented REST API with webhooks and a sandbox, plus connectors for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and at least one CRM or HR system named.

8 — Embedded signing in the customer's own application, API access to every signature level, versioned API with rate limits published, SDKs, and connectors for named DMS, ERP or HR systems with their scope.

10 — Integration is a product: white-label and embedded flows documented, API parity with the web app, a status page with incident history, deprecation policy, and a marketplace of integrations with stated maintainers.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

A REST API covering all modules independently of the user interface is stated, and the connector list is unusually concrete — Microsoft 365 and Teams, SAP, Salesforce, OpenText, Doxis, Adobe, plus an MCP-based AI connector. We found no public information on API documentation with webhooks or a sandbox, on embedded signing, SDKs, rate limits or a status page, so the API's real depth cannot be judged before purchase. 10 11 9 2

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity, the trust service provider and their owners are, where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.

0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where documents and signer data are stored, and subprocessors unnamed.

3 — An EU entity contracts, but documents or signer data are processed outside the EU by default without an explained safeguard, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU contracting entity and EU data storage stated, with a DPA, but the hosting, identification or trust service chain is non-EU-controlled without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU entity, documents, audit trails and ID data stored in named EU data centres, an EU qualified trust service provider, subprocessor list with locations published, and certifications (ISO 27001, ETSI conformity) published.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity and EU QTSP, every processing location and subprocessor European, customer-selectable data residency, and certifications with their scope published.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The captured pages assert integrated data sovereignty, EU/CH high-security data centres with an on-premises option, and a Graz-based support organisation, but the CH leaves Swiss processing open and marketing slogans are not evidence. We found no public information on the contracting entity's jurisdiction or ownership, and no subprocessor list naming who hosts, identifies or timestamps signer data — the trust chain behind the hundred percent European claim is invisible. 2 4 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the cost of their signing volume from public pages alone — plan prices, envelope or document limits, the per-signature price of AdES and QES, identification fees, API pricing and overage.

0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.

3 — Plan prices published, but envelope limits, QES and identification fees are unstated — the cost of a qualified signature is unknowable.

5 — Plans with envelope or document limits priced, but at least one commonly incurred cost (per-QES fee, video ident, API access, overage) is missing or "on request".

8 — Every plan and limit priced publicly, AdES and QES priced per signature, identification fees and overage stated, API pricing published, and contract term and notice period given.

10 — Complete cost computability: the cost of a given monthly volume per signature level derivable from public pages, volume tiers published, and every add-on and price-change term on a public page.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The pricing page distinguishes the plans by features — unlimited signature levels per document, external signers without extra licence, seals "auf Anfrage" — but we found no public information on any plan price, per-signature fee for qualified signatures, identification fee or API pricing. The cost of any signing volume is therefore a sales conversation, not a computation. 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Questions about MOXIS

Is MOXIS European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies MOXIS as EU-Made.

Where does MOXIS store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

Does MOXIS have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to MOXIS?

As of 15 Oct 2026, the panel rates Penneo (2.5/5), Youtrust (Yousign) (2.5/5) and Scrive (2.5/5) highest among the other 14 E-Signature products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Penneo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: MOXIS alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about MOXIS? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (11)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Pricing page www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Legal notice www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Terms of service www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →