whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

E-Signature

MOXIS

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by XiTrust Secure Technologies GmbH · www.moxis.co

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

MOXIS: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai MOXIS: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

MOXIS at a glance

Vendor
XiTrust Secure Technologies GmbH
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates MOXIS 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. MOXIS, an e-signature platform from XiTrust Secure Technologies GmbH of Graz, Austria, is strongest on signing workflow, where scores run 7 to 8: sequential, parallel and conditional signing with approval and escalation logic, bulk sends to 10,000 contacts and 100 documents per click, and unlimited external signers without extra licences are all evidenced. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources

MOXIS alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Skeptic

Weighted verdict

Knows "legally binding" usually means a simple signature. Reads for the level the default plan actually signs at, the QTSP the provider does not operate itself, the per-QES and ident fees on top of the plan, the envelope limit, and "eIDAS-compliant" from a provider that names no trust service at all.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Skeptic

Panel median The Skeptic This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Skeptic
eIDAS levels & trust services 3.5 of 5 3 of 5
Signer identification 3 of 5 3 of 5
Signing workflow & signer experience 3.5 of 5 4 of 5
Evidence, validation & retention 2 of 5 2 of 5
Integrations & API 3 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 1.5 of 5
Pricing transparency 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5

eIDAS levels & trust services

How this is scored

Which signature levels the platform offers — simple, advanced, qualified, and qualified seals — through which qualified trust service provider on the EU Trust List, for which countries and legal regimes (eIDAS, ZertES), and on which plans.

0 — No signature level named; the platform calls its signature "legally binding" without saying which kind it is.

3 — Simple signatures by default with "advanced" or "qualified" mentioned as available, but no trust service provider named and no statement on which plan or country offers which level.

5 — SES, AdES and QES offered and labelled in the product, the qualified trust service provider named, and which documents need which level explained for at least Germany or the EU.

8 — Every level documented with the plans and countries it is available in, the QTSP's entry on the EU Trust List linked, QES under eIDAS (and ZertES where relevant) stated, qualified electronic seals for company documents, and the signature level printed in the signed document and audit trail.

10 — Levels are an explicit product decision: the provider is or contracts a named QTSP with its conformity assessment published, level selection per document type or template, remote QES without a separate account, EUDI wallet support stated with a date, and the legal effect per level documented for the main EU markets.

Report an error

The Skeptic

All three levels are labelled with their own names (EES, FES, QES), the qualified trust services come from centers the vendor does not operate itself — A-Trust, D-Trust and Swisscom — QES is stated under both eIDAS and ZertES, qualified seals exist via eStamp, and the audit trail records signature quality. What holds this back: we found no public information linking the trust centers to their EU Trust List entries, no guidance on which document type demands which level, and no country-by-level statement — the plan pages simply show QES appearing from the Business tier upward. 2 7 9 11

Report an error

Signer identification

How this is scored

How the signer is identified for each level: email and SMS codes, video ident, eID card (Online-Ausweis), bank ident or EUDI wallet — who performs it, in which countries it works, and what happens to the ID data afterwards.

0 — Email link only; no statement on how signers are authenticated.

3 — Email plus SMS or access code, with "ID verification" mentioned as an add-on but no methods, provider or countries named.

5 — Identification methods for AdES and QES listed by name (for example video ident, eID, bank ident), the identification provider named, and the countries or ID documents they accept stated.

8 — Methods documented per level and country, automated and agent-based ident distinguished, reuse of an identification for later signatures explained, retention and deletion of ID data stated, and the ident provider listed as subprocessor.

10 — Identification is transparent end to end: every method with its countries, assurance level and failure rate or completion guidance, EUDI wallet and national eID supported, ID data minimisation and retention committed, and the signer-facing privacy notice published.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Methods are named concretely — AI-based Auto-Ident with ID document scan and selfie video in under ten minutes, the German ID card via NFC, and an in-person Registration Officer — with Nect Wallet and A-Trust named in the chain, the identity valid five years for further signatures, and issuance on demand inside the signing flow. We found no public information on which countries' ID documents Auto-Ident accepts, on retention or deletion specific to identification data, or on the identification provider appearing in a subprocessor list. 3 6 7

Report an error

Signing workflow & signer experience

How this is scored

Getting a document out and back signed: templates and form fields, signing order and roles, bulk sending, reminders and delegation, signing without an account or app, mobile signing, and accessibility for signers.

0 — Single-recipient signing of an uploaded PDF; no templates, order or reminders.

3 — Multiple signers and basic templates, but no signing order, no bulk send, and signers must create an account.

5 — Templates with field placement, sequential and parallel signing order, automatic reminders and expiry, signing without an account on mobile, and a status overview for the sender.

8 — Roles and conditional fields, bulk sending, delegation and substitute signers, team and approval workflows, branded signer experience, signer languages listed, and signer accessibility addressed.

10 — The workflow is complete and documented: web forms and self-service signing links, mixed signature levels within one process, in-person and remote signing, a published accessibility conformance statement, and team administration with shared templates and audit of sender actions.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Sequential, parallel and conditional signing with approval and escalation logic, roles with tailored permissions and signatory groups, shareable templates, drag-and-drop field placement, a deputy rule for substitution, bulk sends to 10,000 contacts and 100 documents per click, QR-code on-site signing, real-time status updates and unlimited external signers without extra licences — the workflow machinery is the best-evidenced part of this product. We found no public information on signer languages or on accessibility for signers, which is what separates it from the top of the scale. 2 8 9

Report an error

Evidence, validation & retention

How this is scored

What proves a signature years later: the audit trail and certificate of completion, qualified timestamps, long-term validation (PAdES-LTV), validation reports, and how long signed documents and evidence are kept — and whether they can leave the platform.

0 — A signed PDF and nothing else; no audit trail, no statement on storage or deletion.

3 — An audit trail or completion certificate exists, but its contents, the timestamp source and the retention period are unstated.

5 — Audit trail with signer events, IP addresses and authentication method embedded in or attached to the signed PDF, timestamps applied, documents downloadable, and the retention period stated.

8 — PAdES signatures with long-term validation, qualified timestamps from a named provider, a validation tool or report, configurable retention and automatic deletion, and bulk export of documents with their evidence.

10 — Evidence outlives the subscription: LTV and archive timestamps documented, validation verifiable with independent tools such as the EU DSS validator, export to a DMS or archive with evidence intact, and post-termination access and deletion committed in the terms.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The signature protocol records signatories, timestamp, signature quality and a hash value, and the privacy policy grounds retention in Austrian statutory duties (UGB, BAO) — more than a bare completion certificate, though no concrete retention period is stated. We found no public information on long-term validation, the timestamp provider, a validation tool or report, configurable retention or automatic deletion, or export of documents together with their evidence; IP address and authentication method are not among the listed protocol contents either. 2 3

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Signing from inside the systems where contracts are made: a documented API with webhooks and a sandbox, embedded signing, and connectors for Microsoft 365, CRM, HR, DMS and ERP systems.

0 — No API and no integrations; everything happens in the vendor's web app.

3 — A few named integrations or a Zapier connector, and an API mentioned without public documentation.

5 — A documented REST API with webhooks and a sandbox, plus connectors for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace and at least one CRM or HR system named.

8 — Embedded signing in the customer's own application, API access to every signature level, versioned API with rate limits published, SDKs, and connectors for named DMS, ERP or HR systems with their scope.

10 — Integration is a product: white-label and embedded flows documented, API parity with the web app, a status page with incident history, deprecation policy, and a marketplace of integrations with stated maintainers.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Named connectors go deep into enterprise territory — Microsoft 365 and Teams, SAP, Salesforce, Doxis, OpenText, plus Adobe, Office and Explorer plug-ins and an MCP-based AI connector — and a REST API said to expose all modules independently of the user interface. But we found no public information on the API documentation itself, webhooks, a sandbox, SDKs or rate limits, so the entire API story rests on a single sentence while the connector story is well evidenced. 2 9 11

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity, the trust service provider and their owners are, where documents, audit trails and ID data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.

0 — Non-EU contracting entity, no statement on where documents and signer data are stored, and subprocessors unnamed.

3 — An EU entity contracts, but documents or signer data are processed outside the EU by default without an explained safeguard, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU contracting entity and EU data storage stated, with a DPA, but the hosting, identification or trust service chain is non-EU-controlled without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU entity, documents, audit trails and ID data stored in named EU data centres, an EU qualified trust service provider, subprocessor list with locations published, and certifications (ISO 27001, ETSI conformity) published.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, EU entity and EU QTSP, every processing location and subprocessor European, customer-selectable data residency, and certifications with their scope published.

Report an error

The Skeptic

Cloud instances sit in an EU/CH high-security datacentre with an on-premises option, the privacy policy is built on Austrian statutes, second-level support works from Graz, and the marketing says one hundred percent European — but we found no public information confirming the contracting entity's registration, on ownership, on certifications such as ISO 27001, on a data processing agreement, or on any subprocessor, and the trust-center list includes a Swiss provider. The claim of integrated data sovereignty is not matched by published ownership or processing-chain detail. 2 3 4 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the cost of their signing volume from public pages alone — plan prices, envelope or document limits, the per-signature price of AdES and QES, identification fees, API pricing and overage.

0 — No public prices at all; every plan is a sales conversation.

3 — Plan prices published, but envelope limits, QES and identification fees are unstated — the cost of a qualified signature is unknowable.

5 — Plans with envelope or document limits priced, but at least one commonly incurred cost (per-QES fee, video ident, API access, overage) is missing or "on request".

8 — Every plan and limit priced publicly, AdES and QES priced per signature, identification fees and overage stated, API pricing published, and contract term and notice period given.

10 — Complete cost computability: the cost of a given monthly volume per signature level derivable from public pages, volume tiers published, and every add-on and price-change term on a public page.

Report an error

The Skeptic

The plan page publishes tiers and what each contains — EES and FES unlimited per document on Now, QES added on Business, seals on request — but we found no public information on any price: no plan price, no per-signature QES or identification fee, no priced envelope or licence limits, no API pricing, no overage and no contract term or notice period. A buyer cannot compute a single euro of cost from public pages; every figure is a sales conversation. 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Questions about MOXIS

Is MOXIS European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies MOXIS as EU-Made.

Where does MOXIS store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

Does MOXIS have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to MOXIS?

As of 15 Oct 2026, the panel rates Penneo (2.5/5), Youtrust (Yousign) (2.5/5) and Scrive (2.5/5) highest among the other 14 E-Signature products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Penneo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: MOXIS alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about MOXIS? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (11)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Pricing page www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Legal notice www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Terms of service www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Signer identification — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Signing workflow & signer experience — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.moxis.co Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →