whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

ERP

abas ERP

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by ABAS Software AG · www.abas-erp.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

abas ERP: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai abas ERP: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

abas ERP at a glance

Vendor
ABAS Software AG
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates abas ERP 3.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. abas ERP, from Forterro Deutschland Abas GmbH of Karlsruhe, targets production and manufacturing companies of 50 to 500 employees. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 3 Nov 2026. all sources

abas ERP alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Online Retailer

Weighted verdict

Sells on a Shopware shop, Amazon and eBay from one warehouse with eight staff, and oversold a bestseller twice last Christmas. Wants stock synchronised across every channel, orders, labels and returns handled in one place, OSS VAT done right, and a price that does not jump with every thousand orders.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Online Retailer

Panel median The Online Retailer This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Online Retailer
Finance, tax & compliance 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Purchasing, inventory & order processing 4 of 5 4 of 5
Manufacturing, services & projects 4.5 of 5 4.5 of 5
Integration, API & data portability 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Rollout, roles & operations 2 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5

Finance, tax & compliance

How this is scored

Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.

0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.

3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.

5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.

8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.

10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.

Report an error

The Online Retailer

The books run deep here: receivables, payables and general ledger with dunning, open items, cash management and payment settlement, VAT advance returns, e-invoicing, fixed assets under commercial law, tax law and IFRS, cost accounting and consolidation across several clients, with supplier invoices allocated to goods receipts and posted to accounts payable automatically. But I found no public information on GoBD compliance, a DATEV or accountant export, or OSS and reverse-charge handling — the exact points that decide whether my OSS returns are right. 4 5 6 7

Report an error

Purchasing, inventory & order processing

How this is scored

The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.

0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.

3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.

5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.

8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.

10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.

Report an error

The Online Retailer

The goods chain is well documented: purchase order suggestions with fully automated material requirements planning, goods receipt with quality checks, internal, consignment and external warehouses with storage locations, batch and serial numbers traceable per customer order, a browser-based scanner solution for picking, corrections and inventory, and extensive EDI with suppliers and customers. A Shopware webshop with deep ERP integration is stated, but I found no public information on Amazon or eBay connectors, parcel labels or returns handling — the pieces that would have saved me from overselling last Christmas. 1 6 7 10 11

Report an error

Manufacturing, services & projects

How this is scored

The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.

0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.

3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.

5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.

8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.

10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.

Report an error

The Online Retailer

Not my world, but the depth is real: combined bills of materials and routings, finite scheduling with simulation, machine and production data capture, CAD and contract manufacturing, plus quality management aligned to DIN EN ISO 9001:2015 on the factory side, and projects with graphical planning, budgets, critical path, resource planning and cost accounting on the service side. I found no public information on utilisation reporting, recurring billing or maintenance contracts, so it sits just short of the top of the class for the models it names. 1 8 9

Report an error

Integration, API & data portability

How this is scored

How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.

0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.

3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.

5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.

8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.

10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.

Report an error

The Online Retailer

There is a documented REST API for real-time access, a graphical low-code connector, MS SQL and DMS connectors, an import toolkit for self-service master-data migration, EDI in all common standards and an on-premise alternative to the cloud — good doors in and out. I found no public information on a versioned public API reference with webhooks, a connector marketplace, or an Amazon or eBay connection, which as a three-channel seller is the gap I care about most. 1 8 10 11

Report an error

Rollout, roles & operations

How this is scored

What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.

0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.

3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.

5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.

8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.

10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.

Report an error

The Online Retailer

The pages show a support team described as always reachable by phone, a user community with an annual user conference, demo videos, brochures and a choice between cloud and on-premise. I found no public information on the implementation path or its typical duration, user roles and permissions, a change log, service levels, availability or update policy — for eight staff like mine, that leaves too much riding on a sales conversation. 1 13

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.

5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.

Report an error

The Online Retailer

The contracting entity is a German GmbH in Karlsruhe with a commercial register entry and German VAT ID, but the parent is Forterro with a UK entity, the ultimate controller named is Jeeves Information Systems AB in Sweden, personal data is generally processed in the UK or EU/EEA, and staff in India, the USA and Morocco receive read access for support and professional services, with EU standard contractual clauses named as the safeguard. On-premise operation is offered, yet I found no public information on named hosting infrastructure, a data processing agreement or a security certification for the ERP itself. 1 2 3 13

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.

3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.

5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Online Retailer not rated — no public information

I found no public information on prices: no figure per user or module, no edition pricing, no implementation or onboarding costs, no minimum term and no data-return terms — only a target of companies with 50 to 500 employees and a long module list. For a retailer who wants to know whether the bill jumps with every thousand orders, the entire annual cost would have to come out of a quote conversation. 1 5 6 8 9

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about abas ERP

Is abas ERP European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where abas ERP is based.

Where does abas ERP store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

Does abas ERP have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to abas ERP?

As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), weclapp (3.5/5) and Haufe X360 (3.5/5) highest among the other 15 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: abas ERP alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about abas ERP? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (13)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page www.abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Imprint — found from the homepage abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Privacy policy — found from the homepage abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap abas-erp.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →