ERP
weclapp
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by weclapp GmbH · www.weclapp.com
Compare with Xentral → Compare with Odoo → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
weclapp at a glance
- Vendor
- weclapp GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Starting price
- “ERP Starter Für (noch) kleine Teams, die durchstarten wollen. € 39 pro Monat/Nutzer*” (vendor’s words) source, captured 26 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates weclapp 3.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. weclapp is a cloud ERP from weclapp GmbH of Kitzingen; sovereignty landed the top score at 8 and orders and inventory 7-8, while finance and compliance, production and projects and rollout and operations sit at 7. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
weclapp is a cloud ERP from weclapp GmbH of Kitzingen; sovereignty landed the top score at 8 and orders and inventory 7-8, while finance and compliance, production and projects and rollout and operations sit at 7. The order pages document the chain from quote through picking and shipping to returns, with serial and batch numbers, shop and marketplace connections and HGB and IFRS stock valuation; we found no public information on several warehouses with storage bins. Sovereignty rests on German-law contracts, hosting exclusively in Germany on AWS in Frankfurt, published ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification within the Exact Group, an Article 28 data processing agreement template and the weclappOn private-cloud option, tempered by US-headquartered AWS behind the Frankfurt region and ProductBoard Inc., a named subprocessor. Judges split by a point on pricing transparency, 6-7: edition prices per user are public — ERP Starter €39, ERP Dienstleistung €86, ERP Handel €163 — but onboarding packages are priced on request, so first-year cost is not computable. They split similarly on integration and portability, 6-7, citing no public information on a versioned API reference or webhooks.
Speaks for it
- End-to-end order chain documented from quote through picking and shipping to returns, with serial and batch numbers, drop shipping and HGB and IFRS stock valuation
- Named shop and marketplace connections — Shopware, WooCommerce, Shopify, Amazon, eBay, kaufland.de — with orders reconciled against warehouse stock
- Per-user prices public for all three editions, with single licences from €19 and add-ons from €55 per user and month
- Hosting exclusively in Germany on AWS in Frankfurt, published ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification, an Article 28 data processing agreement template and a weclappOn private-cloud option
- Contractual switching right with a 30-day transition, a 30-day retrieval window and administrator exports at any time
Held against it
- Onboarding and support packages priced only on request, so the first-year total is not computable from public pages
- The captured pages give different figures for implementation costs — one states implementation and maintenance costs do not exist while the onboarding page prices packages on request
- An early switch costs 30% of the remaining gross remuneration, with two months' notice and data-egress charges reimbursed by the customer
- We found no public information on a versioned public API reference or webhooks
- We found no public information on typical implementation duration, support response times or a status page with uptime history
Best for
- You run e-commerce or wholesale and want the quote-to-returns chain plus shop and marketplace connections in one system
- You hand your books to a tax advisor via DATEV and want an export with automated pre-booking and free adviser access
- You need hosting exclusively in Germany under German-law contracts, with a private-cloud option in weclappOn
- You prefer licence cost that scales with users rather than order volume
Avoid if
- You must compute the full first-year cost before signing — onboarding packages are priced on request and individual offers apply above ten licences or 40 users
- You expect to exit early — the switching right costs 30% of the remaining gross remuneration and data-egress charges are reimbursed by the customer
- You need maintenance announced in advance — the terms state regular maintenance between 1 a.m. and 5 a.m. is not announced
- You require a chain free of US-headquartered providers — the host AWS is US-headquartered despite the Frankfurt region, and ProductBoard Inc. of San Francisco is a named subprocessor
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Finance, tax & compliance | 3.5 of 5 |
| Purchasing, inventory & order processing | 4 of 5 |
| Manufacturing, services & projects | 3.5 of 5 |
| Integration, API & data portability | 3.5 of 5 |
| Rollout, roles & operations | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 4 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3.5 of 5 |
Finance, tax & compliance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.
0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.
3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.
5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.
8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.
10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.
The Managing Director
The accounting module covers postings, open items and controlling, e-invoices go out and incoming e-invoices are captured, bank transactions are retrieved with open-item reconciliation and automated dunning, and the DATEV export with automated pre-booking, booking-to-receipt linkage and free tax-advisor access gives my accountant a documented hand-over. GoBD is addressed as a supported technical basis with procedure documentation via workflows and revision-safe storage, though the vendor itself states conformity does not arise automatically; we found no public information on several companies in one tenant or OSS and reverse-charge VAT. 1 4 9 10
The Head of Finance
The dedicated GoBD page gives me what my auditors ask for: GoBD conformity support stated with a procedure documentation, immutable data with full version history, complete logging of every processing step, plus incoming and outgoing e-invoices, bank transaction retrieval with open-item offsetting, automated dunning, and a DATEV export with automated pre-booking, posting-to-receipt linkage and free tax-advisor access. We found no public information on matching incoming e-invoices to purchase orders, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, or running several companies in one tenant, which keeps it below the top band. 1 4 9 10 11
The Operations Lead
The books live in the system: an accounting module with postings, open items and controlling, bank transaction retrieval with open-item reconciliation and automated dunning, and an automated DATEV export with free tax-advisor access and correct VAT mapping. GoBD-conformant working is supported through workflows, access restrictions and revision-safe filing — the vendor itself states conformity does not arise automatically — while outgoing and incoming e-invoices are named without the format; I found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT or several companies in one tenant. 1 4 9 10
The Online Retailer
The captured pages show posting, open items and controlling in the accounting module, bank transaction retrieval with offsetting of open items and automated dunning, a DATEV-compliant export with automated pre-booking plus free adviser access, incoming e-invoices captured, and GoBD-conformant working supported by a procedure documentation with revision-safe storage and complete logging. We found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT or running several companies in one tenant, so it sits clearly above a simple invoicing tool but below full financial accounting depth. 1 4 9 10 11
The IT Integrator
The GoBD page states the technical basis for GoBD-compliant working with a procedure documentation, revision-safe filing, immutable documents and complete logging of all processing, and the DATEV pages show bank transaction retrieval with open-item clearing, automated dunning, VAT mapping, e-invoices sent and captured, and DATEV/BMD exports with free tax-advisor access. That is a genuine ledger-and-export story, but we found no public information on several companies in one tenant, OSS or reverse charge, fixed assets or intercompany postings, so I stop short of the higher anchors. 9 10 4 1 3
The Skeptic
Postings, controlling and open items plus a DATEV export with free tax-advisor access, automated pre-booking, bank-transaction retrieval, automated dunning and e-invoices in both directions are documented; the GoBD page claims a technical basis and procedure documentation via workflows and revision-safe storage while stating itself that conformity 'entsteht jedoch nicht automatisch'. We found no public information on e-invoice formats such as XRechnung or ZUGFeRD, OSS or reverse-charge VAT, or several companies in one tenant. 9 10 4 1
Purchasing, inventory & order processing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.
0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.
3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.
5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.
8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.
10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.
The Managing Director
This is the part my business lives or dies on, and it is documented end to end: inquiry, quote, order confirmation, procurement and goods receipt, picking, shipping with data transfer to the carrier, invoicing, and returns with credit note as one chain, plus serial and batch numbers, a mobile warehouse app, drop shipping via Streckengeschäfte, connections to Shopware, WooCommerce, Shopify, Amazon, eBay and kaufland.de, and stock valuation to HGB and IFRS. We found no public information on several warehouses with storage bins, which is the next thing a wholesaler running two Excel stock lists would ask. 2 3 4 11 12 15
The Head of Finance
The goods chain is documented end to end — quote through order confirmation, procurement, goods receipt, picking, shipping label, invoice and return with credit note — with serial and batch numbers including best-before management, a mobile warehouse app, carrier data transfer for parcel registration, drop shipping via Streckengeschäfte, shop and marketplace connections, and stock valuation per HGB and IFRS as balance-sheet preparation. We found no public information on several warehouses and storage bins or on demand-driven purchasing proposals. 3 4 11 12
The Operations Lead
The goods chain is documented end to end — quote, order confirmation, disposition and procurement, goods receipt with inspection, picking, shipping with data transfer to carriers, invoice and payment — plus serial and batch numbers with best-before management, a mobile warehouse app, shop and marketplace connections, returns with credit notes, drop shipping and stock valuation to HGB and IFRS. EDI alongside CSV and XML is stated; I found no public information on several warehouses with storage bins or demand-driven purchase proposals. 3 4 11 12 15
The Online Retailer
The documented chain runs from quote through order confirmation, procurement and goods receipt to picking, shipping with data handed to parcel services, invoicing, payment and returns with credit notes, with serial and batch numbers, a mobile warehouse app, Streckengeschäfte, HGB and IFRS stock valuation, and named connections to Shopware, Amazon, eBay and kaufland.de with orders reconciled against warehouse stock. We found no public information on several warehouses or storage bins or automatic restocking of returns. 2 3 4 11 12
The IT Integrator
The order pages evidence the full chain from quote through order confirmation, goods receipt, picking, shipping, returns and credit notes, with serial and batch numbers, drop shipping, a mobile warehouse app, carrier data transfer, named shop and marketplace connections, and stock valuation per HGB and IFRS feeding the balance sheet. I hold it at this level because we found no public information on multiple named warehouses with storage bins, and recall traceability per batch appears only as branch-level marketing for food and cosmetics firms rather than documented evidence. 11 12 3 4 2
The Skeptic
The documented chain runs quote, order confirmation, procurement and goods receipt, picking, delivery, invoice and payment with returns and credit notes, and the trade package adds serial and batch numbers, a mobile warehouse app, named shop and marketplace connections, Streckengeschäfte and stock valuation per HGB and IFRS. We found no public information on several warehouses, storage bins, reorder points or restocking on returns. 3 4 11 12 2
Manufacturing, services & projects
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.
0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.
3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.
5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.
8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.
10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.
The Managing Director
Both models are named and have a working core: production with bills of materials in tree structure, work plans and production orders, and services with projects, minute-level time recording, resource planning with a workload view, budget monitoring and billing from logged hours via PDF service records. We found no public information on work centres and capacity planning on the production side, or on milestone and recurring billing on the project side. 4 12 13 14
The Head of Finance
Both served models are named and documented: bills of materials with tree structure and sub-positions, work plans and production orders on the manufacturing side, and on the services side projects as orders with minute-level time recording, billing from logged hours via service records, resource planning with workload view, budget monitoring and Gantt charts, with contract management and helpdesk available as add-ons. We found no public information on work centres with capacity planning, MRP runs, or milestone and recurring billing, so the industry depth stops short of the top level. 4 12 13 14
The Operations Lead
Both served models show a working core and more: bills of materials in a tree structure with sub-positions, work plans and production orders on the manufacturing side, and projects with budgets, resource planning and utilisation view, minute-accurate time recording billed from effort records on the services side, plus helpdesk and contract-management add-ons. I found no public information on work centres, capacity planning, MRP runs or shop-floor data capture, which is what would plan next week's line instead of my whiteboard. 12 13 14
The Online Retailer
Both served models are named and described: production with bills of materials in tree structure with sub-positions, work plans and production orders, and services with project setup, resource planning, minute-level time recording billed via service records, budgets and project controlling, plus helpdesk and contract management as add-ons. We found no public information on work centres, capacity planning or milestone and recurring billing, so it reaches the working core for both models without the advanced planning depth. 4 12 13 14
The IT Integrator
The production page names bills of materials with tree structure and sub-positions, work plans and production orders, and the project module shows minute-exact time recording billed from logged hours plus budgets, resource planning and Gantt views, with the served models clearly named for services and trade. For my shop this is a working core but not the depth above it: we found no public information on work centres, capacity planning, MRP runs or shop-floor data capture. 13 14 12 4 1
The Skeptic
Both served models are documented — production with bills of materials in tree structure, work plans and production orders, and services with minute-level time recording, resource planning, budget monitoring and billing via service records, plus paid add-ons for helpdesk and contracts. We found no public information on work centres, capacity planning, milestone or recurring billing, or costs flowing into cost accounting. 13 14 12 4
Integration, API & data portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.
0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.
3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.
5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.
8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.
10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.
The Managing Director
An open REST API with read and write access, a plugin store, CSV, XML and EDI as exchange formats, bidirectional shop and marketplace connections, DATEV and BMD exports, and paid help migrating data from the old system cover the interfaces I would need on day one. The exit is unusually well documented — administrator exports at any time, a contractual switching right with a 30-day retrieval period, deletion 14 days after termination, and a private-cloud option called weclappOn — though we found no public information on webhooks or a versioned public API reference. 4 6 14 15 16
The Head of Finance
An open REST API with read and write access plus a standard API, a plugin store, bidirectional interfaces to shops, marketplaces, payment service providers and shipping services, CSV, XML and EDI exchange, DATEV and BMD exports with free tax-advisor access, help with migrating data from the previous system, and contractually documented export and switching rights paint a well-connected picture. We found no public information on a public versioned API reference, webhooks, or a migration path from named predecessor systems. 4 6 10 15 16
The Operations Lead
An open REST API with read and write access, a plugin store with partner solutions, CSV, XML and EDI exchange, connectors to shops, marketplaces, payment providers and shipping services, and DATEV and BMD exports cover the links I need between shop, warehouse and accountant. Exit is contractually documented — a switching right with two months' notice, transition support, a 30-day retrieval window and deletion on termination — but I found no public information on webhooks or a versioned public API reference. 4 6 14 15
The Online Retailer
An open REST API with read and write access, a standard API, a plugin store, CSV, XML and EDI exchange, DATEV and BMD export, help migrating from the previous system, and connectors for payment providers, marketplaces, shops and shipping are all documented. The terms also grant a switching right with two months' notice, a 30-day transition and a 30-day retrieval window, and a self-hosting option called weclappOn exists; we found no public information on a versioned public API reference or webhooks. 4 6 15 16
The IT Integrator
There is an open REST API with read and write access plus a standard API, a plugin store, CSV, XML and EDI exchange, connector categories spanning shops, marketplaces, payment and shipping, DATEV and BMD exports, and paid help with migration and shop connection, which is more than a few CSV lists. But this is what I cannot plan a factory integration on: we found no public API reference showing versioning, object coverage, webhooks or sandbox tenants, and the exit path is contractual (30-day transition, 30-day retrieval window, customer-paid egress) rather than a documented full export format. 15 14 4 6 16
The Skeptic
An 'open REST API' with read and write access, a plugin store, CSV/XML/EDI exchange and named connections to shops, marketplaces, payment providers, shipping services and DATEV are stated, but we found no public information on a public API reference with versioning or rate limits, webhooks, or a migration path from named predecessor systems. The exit is contractually documented — a switching right with a 30-day retrieval period and transition support — yet an early switch costs 30% of the remaining gross remuneration, two months' notice, and data-egress charges reimbursed by the customer. 15 14 4 6 16
Rollout, roles & operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.
0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.
3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.
5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.
8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.
10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.
The Managing Director
Implementation is offered as a seven-step path with tiered onboarding packages from Basic to Gold and named partners carrying certificate levels, and running the system is covered by a permissions concept with roles, complete processing logs, daily backups, a knowledge base with webinars, and a published availability of 99.5 percent with the transfer point named as the data-centre router output. What I cannot plan from these pages is the calendar and the bill: no typical go-live duration is stated, the onboarding packages are marked on request, and we found no public information on a status page with uptime history. 4 6 9 16 17
The Head of Finance
A go-live is plannable: onboarding packages from Bronze to Gold with defined contents, a seven-step introduction path, training by user group, a self-service portal with webinars and knowledge base, vendor professional services and a partner network with named certified partners — alongside role management with function-level access rights, complete audit logging, automatic updates, a 99.5 % availability commitment and maintenance-window terms. We found no public information on typical implementation duration, a status page with uptime history, or published release notes. 2 4 6 9 14 16 17
The Operations Lead
Onboarding is a described product: Basic, Bronze, Silver and Gold packages with kick-off, setup roadmap and basic training, training by user group, video manuals, webinars and a knowledge base, plus a partner network with named partners and certificate levels. A 99.5 percent availability commitment, complete processing logging and a permissions concept are published, but I found no public information on typical implementation duration, a status page with uptime history or response-time commitments for support. 4 6 9 16 17
The Online Retailer
Onboarding packages from Bronze to Gold with stated contents, a seven-step rollout description, training by user group, a knowledge base with video manuals and webinars, a partner network with named partners and certificate levels, role-based permissions with all processing logged, and a 99.5 percent availability commitment around the clock in the terms are all evidenced. Onboarding package prices are on request, and we found no public information on typical implementation duration or support response times. 2 4 6 9 14 16 17
The IT Integrator
The onboarding page shows a seven-step introduction, tiered onboarding packages with defined contents, a self-study library, role management with access rights, and named partners with certificate levels, and the terms publish a 99.5 percent availability commitment with support packages and daily backups, plus a cloned demo system for testing. It falls short of the top because the onboarding package prices are on request, no typical duration is stated, and we found no public information on a status page, uptime history or release notes. 16 14 9 4 17 6
The Skeptic
Onboarding packages Bronze, Silber and Gold with named contents, a seven-step introduction path, a self-service portal with webinars and knowledge base, user-group training, partners named with certificate levels, role management with complete logging, and a contractual 99.5% availability with a defined transfer point give a real operations picture. The catches are familiar: package prices are 'auf Anfrage', maintenance between 1 and 5 a.m. is not announced, the customer has no entitlement to updates, and we found no public information on typical implementation duration, support hours, a status page or release notes. 16 4 6 9 17 14
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.
The Managing Director
The contracting entity is weclapp GmbH of Kitzingen, registered at Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main and described on the certification page as part of Exact Group B.V.; data is stored exclusively in Germany in the AWS region Frankfurt across multiple data centres, a private-cloud option (weclappOn) and an Article 28 data-processing-agreement template are offered, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is published, and the privacy policy names its processors with locations. It stops short of sovereign end to end: ProductBoard Inc. of San Francisco is named for idea collection, and the US-headquartered AWS behind the Frankfurt hosting is subject to the US CLOUD Act regardless of the server region. 4 5 7 8
The Head of Finance
The chain is documented further than most: a German GmbH as contracting entity under German law, hosting exclusively in Germany on the named AWS region Frankfurt, a published ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification statement as part of the Exact Group, an Article 28 data processing agreement template, subprocessors named with their addresses, and the weclappOn private-cloud option for hosting on site. US-headquartered providers sit in the chain — AWS as the host and ProductBoard Inc. of San Francisco for idea collection — with EU standard contractual clauses stated, and we found no public information on a complete subprocessor list for the ERP service itself. 4 5 6 7 8
The Operations Lead
The chain is visible and European: a German contracting entity in Kitzingen, data hosted exclusively in Germany on AWS in Frankfurt, membership of the Exact Group per the security page, a published ISO 27001 certification, a data processing agreement template, and a private-cloud option with weclappOn. Subprocessors are listed with locations in the privacy policy, though AWS remains a US-headquartered provider subject to the US CLOUD Act regardless of the Frankfurt region, and one listed tool sits in San Francisco. 4 5 7 8 9
The Online Retailer
The contracting entity is weclapp GmbH in Kitzingen with a German commercial register entry and German-law contracts, data is hosted exclusively in Germany in the AWS region Frankfurt across several data centres, an on-premise private cloud option is stated, the privacy policy names its service providers with addresses, an Article 28 data processing agreement template is offered, and ISO 27001:2022 certification within the Exact group is published. The infrastructure provider is US-headquartered and thus subject to the US CLOUD Act despite the EU region, which keeps it short of sovereign end to end. 4 5 6 7 8
The IT Integrator
The contracting entity is a German GmbH with German law, hosting is stated as Germany-only in certified data centres with AWS Frankfurt named, the security page places the company under Exact Group B.V., subprocessors are listed with addresses under EU standard contractual clauses, an Article 28 data processing agreement template is offered, ISO 27001 is published, and weclappOn gives a private-cloud alternative. I hold it one notch below the top because the infrastructure sits with a US-headquartered provider regardless of the Frankfurt region, and the captured pages give different pictures on whether data goes to an external data centre. 5 8 9 4 7 6
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is weclapp GmbH in Kitzingen under German law, hosting is exclusively in Germany on named AWS infrastructure in Frankfurt, a private-cloud option (weclappOn) is offered, a DPA template per Art. 28 GDPR exists, subprocessors are listed with addresses, and a published ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate names the parent Exact Group B.V. in the Netherlands. The chain is not sovereign end to end: the US-headquartered infrastructure provider AWS and a US subprocessor (ProductBoard Inc.) remain in it, with the US CLOUD Act exposure that carries. 8 4 9 5 7 6
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.
5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Managing Director
Recurring costs are computable from public pages: ERP Starter at €39, ERP Dienstleistung at €86 and ERP Handel at €163 per month and user, single licences for CRM at €68, Projekt at €19 and Buchhaltung at €39, add-ons such as Helpdesk, Vertragsmanagement and weclapp POS from €55 monthly per user, a 12-month minimum term with 30-day notice, prices excluding statutory VAT, and data deleted 14 days after termination. The first-year total is what I cannot compute: above ten licences an individual offer is invited, and the captured pages give different figures for implementation — one states implementation and maintenance costs do not exist, while the onboarding page prices its packages on request and adds travel expenses for on-site days. 1 4 6 16
The Head of Finance
Edition prices per user are public with their inclusions (ERP Starter "€ 39 pro Monat/Nutzer", ERP Dienstleistung "€ 86", ERP Handel "€ 163"), single licences and add-ons "ab 55€ im Monat pro Nutzer", a 12-month minimum term with renewal and notice rules, VAT treatment stated, and deletion 14 days after termination with export rights documented. Onboarding and support packages are listed only as "auf Anfrage", and the captured pages give different figures for implementation costs — the homepage states none exist while the onboarding page sells packages on request — so the real first-year cost is not computable from public pages alone. 1 4 6 16
The Operations Lead
Per-user prices are public for all three editions — ERP Starter at 39 euros per month per user, ERP Dienstleistung at 86, ERP Handel at 163 — the add-ons contract management, helpdesk and POS cost 55 euros monthly, single licences are priced, minimum term and VAT treatment are stated, and deletion 14 days after termination is documented. Onboarding packages are only priced on request and above ten licences or 40 users it becomes an individual offer, so a go-live cost is not computable from public pages alone; one captured page states implementation and maintenance costs do not exist while another lists onboarding packages on request. 1 4 6 16
The Online Retailer
Editions are priced publicly per user and month (ERP Starter 39 €, ERP Dienstleistung 86 €, ERP Handel 163 €), single licences from 19 € and add-ons from 55 € per user and month, with the 12-month minimum term, 30-day notice and VAT treatment in the terms, and the cost scales with users rather than order volume, which is what matters to me. Onboarding packages are priced on request and individual offers apply above 10 licences or 40 users, so the annual total is not fully computable from public pages. 1 4 6 16
The IT Integrator
The pricing page publishes per-user monthly figures for three packages (Starter at €39, Dienstleistung at €86, Handel at €163), single licenses from €19 to €68, add-ons from €55, with inclusions listed per plan, implementation and maintenance costs stated as none, and the terms add a 12-month minimum term and VAT-exclusive pricing. What stops me computing a full annual cost: the vendor-recommended onboarding packages are priced only on request, and beyond ten to forty licenses the offer becomes individual. 4 16 6 1
The Skeptic
The editions, single licences and add-ons carry public per-user prices ('€ 39', '€ 86', '€ 163' pro Monat/Nutzer; add-ons 'ab 55€ im Monat pro Nutzer'), and the terms state a 12-month minimum with auto-renewal, VAT excluded, and deletion of data 14 days after termination with export beforehand. The go-live cost is not computable: one captured page states 'Implementierungs- oder Wartungskosten gibt es bei weclapp nicht' while the onboarding packages on another are quoted only 'Bitte anfragen', and the support packages name contents but no prices. 4 16 1 6 14
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 8 Report an error |
Questions about weclapp
Is weclapp European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies weclapp as EU-Made.
Where does weclapp store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
Does weclapp have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to weclapp?
As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), Haufe X360 (3.5/5) and JTL-Wawi (3.5/5) highest among the other 13 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: weclapp alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 26 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Ownership, Data residency, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. AWS processes the data only in the EU region Frankfurt, but as a US-headquartered provider it is subject to the US CLOUD Act regardless of the server region, and the pricing page even claims no data is passed to an external data centre.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 23 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (17)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (cloud ERP) www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (inventory) www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Pricing page www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Legal notice www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Terms of service www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Privacy policy www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Security / certification page www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 16 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 17 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.weclapp.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →