whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

ERP

Holded

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Holded Technologies S.L. · www.holded.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Holded: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Holded: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Holded at a glance

Vendor
Holded Technologies S.L.
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Holded 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Holded is an ERP from Holded Technologies S.L. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources

Holded alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The panel's verdict

Holded is an ERP from Holded Technologies S.L. of Barcelona, reportedly part of Norway's Visma group — a report the vendor's own pages do not confirm. The bench scores it highest on production and projects, a flat 6: three time-logging methods, four hourly-rate methods, five budget methods, and profitability built from sales, expenses and time costs. Finance and compliance sits at 4 with no spread, on per-line Spanish taxes (VAT 21%, withholding 19%, equivalence surcharge 1.4%), ledger-account segmentation and Facturae 3.2.2 XML e-invoices for public administrations — though signing requires the government's Autofirma and manual upload. Weakest is integration and portability at 0 to 2: the only documented data movement is order import/export and the e-invoice XML download, and we found no public information on an API, connectors or a full export on leaving. Sovereignty spreads from 0 to 3 — some judges left it unrated for want of hosting or subprocessor information, others credited the Barcelona entity and Spanish focus. Orders score 4 to 5 but sit behind a paid Inventory gem; rollout rests on an expert-reviewed partner programme.

Report an error

Speaks for it

  • Project billing is documented in depth — three time-logging methods, four hourly-rate methods, five budget methods, and profitability built from sales, expenses and time costs
  • Public-administration e-invoices download as a Spanish-government-recognised XML in version 3.2.2 and can be validated on the government's FACE platform
  • Per-line taxes come from a tax database — VAT 21%, withholding 19%, equivalence surcharge 1.4% — and orders assign to ledger account groups 60/65/66/67 and 70/75/76/77
  • Sales and purchase orders link onward to shipments, purchase invoices and manufacturing orders, with warehouse of origin, lot or serial numbers and product scanning
  • Implementation runs through a partner programme with expert-reviewed applications, a public directory, and partner managers acting only under client-granted roles and permissions

Report an error

Held against it

  • We found no public information on an API, webhooks or connectors to shops, marketplaces, banks or accounting tools
  • We found no public information on a documented full export of a company's data when it leaves the platform
  • We found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors or a data processing agreement
  • We found no public information on goods-receipt stock booking, reorder points, returns or picking
  • We found no public information on ledgers, payments, dunning, bank matching or an export an accountant can import

Report an error

Best for

  • You run a services firm that bills projects by time and needs profitability per project
  • You invoice Spanish public administrations and need a government-recognised Facturae 3.2.2 XML with FACE validation
  • You buy and sell in Spain and need per-line VAT, withholding and equivalence-surcharge handling with ledger-account segmentation
  • You want implementation led by vetted consultancies through the vendor's partner programme

Report an error

Avoid if

  • You need to connect a shop, marketplace, bank or accounting tool — the captured pages document only single-order import/export and the e-invoice XML download
  • You need a documented migration path and full data export before committing
  • You must see hosting location, subprocessors or a data processing agreement before signing
  • Your warehouse floor depends on goods receipt, reorder points, returns and picking

Report an error

The scores

Panel median The median of the judges’ scores per criterion. Each label opens its reasoning below.

Finance, tax & compliance

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.

0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.

3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.

5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.

8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.

10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.

Report an error

The Managing Director

Spanish-market e-invoicing is real: invoices for public administrations download as an XML in version 3.2.2 for validation on the government's FACE platform, taxes such as VAT 21%, withholding and equivalence surcharge are picked per line, and orders carry Spanish ledger account groups. The e-invoice cannot be signed on the platform itself (the government's Autofirma programme is the stated workaround), and we found no public information on ledgers, payments, dunning or an export that hands my books to my accountant. 1 2 3

Report an error

The Head of Finance

Sales invoices draw VAT, withholding and equivalence-surcharge rates per line from a tax database, tag to Spanish sales and expense account groups, and produce a Spanish-government-recognised e-invoice XML for public administrations — signed outside the platform and uploaded to the authority by hand. We found no public information on payments and open-item processing, dunning, bank matching, GoBD or an export the accountant can import. 1 2 3

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The pages show Spanish VAT and withholding rates per order line, lines assignable to ledger account groups (sales 70/75/76/77, purchases 60/65/66/67), and e-invoices for Spanish public administrations as a government-recognised Facturae 3.2.2 XML download — though signing happens outside the product with the government's Autofirma and sending is a manual upload to the administration's website. Beyond that I found no public information on payments booked in the system (the payment method field is stated to be purely informative), dunning, bank matching, GoBD compliance or any export my accountant could import. That is invoice creation with account segmentation, not a ledger that closes. 1 2 3

Report an error

The Online Retailer

Invoices are created in the system with per-line taxes (VAT 21%, withholding 19%, equivalence surcharge 1.4%) and orders assignable to Spanish ledger account groups, and public-sector e-invoices go out as government-recognized XML in version 3.2.2 with validation on the government's FACE platform — signing only via the government's Autofirma program. I found no public information on OSS VAT, GoBD, a DATEV or accountant export, dunning or bank matching, so the books my tax adviser and auditor would need are not evidenced. 1 2 3

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The pages document real Spanish tax machinery: per-line taxes from a tax database (VAT 21%, withholding 19%, equivalence surcharge 1.4%) with mandatory zero-rate classification, ledger-account assignment to groups 60/65/66/67 and 70/75/76/77, and government e-invoices in version 3.2.2 XML with FACE validation and DIR3 codes — though signing is not possible on the platform and the XML is uploaded manually to each body's website. We found no public information on ledgers, dunning, bank matching or an export the accountant can import, and the vendor itself describes the payment method field as purely informative with no effect on accounting. That sits between bare invoice creation and a full money-side suite. 1 2 3

Report an error

The Skeptic

Invoices carry per-line Spanish VAT, withholdings and equivalence surcharges and are assigned to Spanish chart-of-accounts groups, and the public-administration e-invoice is genuinely documented — Facturae 3.2.2 XML, DIR3 fields, FACE validation — though it cannot be signed in the product and reaches the authority only by manual upload. We found no public information on a general ledger, payments, dunning, or any export the accountant can import. 1 2 3

Report an error

Purchasing, inventory & order processing

Show reasoning
How this is scored

The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.

0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.

3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.

5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.

8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.

10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.

Report an error

The Managing Director

Orders and delivery notes run as one flow — sales and purchase orders generate shipments and purchase invoices, with warehouse of origin, lot or serial numbers and product scanning on the lines. For a sixty-person wholesaler the rest of the chain is the question: we found no public information on reorder points, goods receipt, returns with restocking, stock valuation or shop and carrier connections, and the inventory piece itself is a paid add-on activated in the vendor's store. 3

Report an error

The Head of Finance

Sales and purchase orders — unlocked by activating the "Inventory payment gem" in the Holded Store — carry warehouse of origin, lot or serial numbers, product scanning and follow-on documents such as shipments, purchase invoices and manufacturing orders, with a ledger account assignable per order. We found no public information on goods-receipt stock booking, reorder points or bin-level stock on the captured pages. 3

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Sales and purchase orders sit together under Inventory with a warehouse of origin on purchase orders, lot or serial numbers entered when creating an order, product scanning when adding lines, and links onward to shipments, purchase invoices and manufacturing orders; orders and delivery notes require activating the Inventory payment gem, a paid add-on in the Holded Store. I found no public information on goods receipt booking stock, storage bins, reorder points, picking, returns or stock valuation. I can raise and connect documents, but nothing captured shows the warehouse floor side — we found no public information on booking a delivery on a scanner or stock per bin. 3

Report an error

The Online Retailer

Sales and purchase orders, shipments, delivery notes and purchase invoices are documented as connected flows, with a warehouse of origin per order and lot or serial numbers selectable, and order and delivery-note functions sit behind a paid Inventory gem in the Holded Store. I found no public information on connectors to shops or marketplaces such as Amazon, eBay or Shopware, on channel stock synchronisation, reorder points, picking or returns — exactly what my one-warehouse multichannel setup runs on, and what would stop me overselling a bestseller again. 3

Report an error

The IT Integrator

Sales and purchase orders live under Inventory with a documented chain — shipments, purchase invoices and manufacturing orders can be created from an order — plus warehouse of origin, lot or serial numbers per line, product scanning, tags and sales-channel analytics. Quotes are generated from projects and budgets are tracked as documents. We found no public information on reorder points, explicit goods-receipt stock booking, mobile picking, returns or stock valuation flowing into the books. 3 4

Report an error

The Skeptic

Sales and purchase orders exist with warehouse of origin, lot and serial number capture, product scanning and delivery notes, and the whole orders function sits behind a paid inventory add-on in the vendor's store. The captured pages stop at document creation: we found no public information on goods receipt booking stock, reorder points, or multi-warehouse bin management. 3 4

Report an error

Manufacturing, services & projects

Show reasoning
How this is scored

The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.

0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.

3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.

5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.

8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.

10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.

Report an error

The Managing Director

For service firms the core is documented and genuinely configurable: time logging in three recording styles, four hourly-rate methods and five budget methods, project profit computed from sales, expenses and time costs, with quotes and invoices generated straight from the project. We found no public information on resource planning or milestone and recurring billing, and manufacturing appears only as a passing mention of manufacturing orders, with no bills of materials or production planning described. 4 3

Report an error

The Head of Finance

For service firms there is a working project core: three ways to log time, four hourly-rate billing methods, five budget methods, per-project invoicing settings and a profitability view of sales, expenses and time costs, with quotes and invoices raised directly from the project. We found no public information on resource planning, milestone or recurring billing or costs flowing to cost accounting; manufacturing appears only as an order type. 4 3

Report an error

The Operations Lead

For service firms there is a genuine working core: time logged by fractions, time ranges or a stopwatch, four hourly-rate methods, five budget methods, and project profitability built from sales, expenses and time costs, with invoices and quotes generated straight from the project. Manufacturing appears only as an order type related to a document; I found no public information on bills of materials, routings, work centres, capacity planning or MRP runs. A consultancy would be served well; planning next week's production for my assembly line has nothing to build on in these pages. 4 3

Report an error

The Online Retailer

Projects are documented in real depth: three time-logging methods, four hourly-rate methods, five budget methods, per-project invoicing and profitability built from sales, expenses and time costs; manufacturing appears only as a named order flow without bills of materials or planning. As a pure trader I would never touch this, but for a services firm it reads as a working core plus budgets. 4 3

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The service model is evidenced in depth: time logging by fractions, from-to ranges or stopwatch; four hourly-rate methods and five budget methods; invoices and quotes generated from projects; and profitability split into sales, expenses, time costs and profit with expected values. Manufacturing appears only as an order type alongside purchases and sales. We found no public information on bills of materials, routings, work centres or capacity planning. 4 3

Report an error

The Skeptic

The services model is documented with real depth: three time-logging methods, four hourly-rate and five budget methods, project-specific configuration, and a profitability view netting sales, expenses and time costs. Manufacturing surfaces only as an entry in a navigation list, and we found no public information on routings, work centres or capacity planning. 4 3

Report an error

Integration, API & data portability

n/r n/r Show reasoning
How this is scored

How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.

0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.

3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.

5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.

8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.

10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.

Report an error

The Managing Director not rated — no public information

We found no public information on a public API, webhooks, standard connectors to shops, banks or accounting tools, a migration path from a previous system, or a documented full export when leaving. The only adjacent items on the captured pages are importing or exporting a single order, and a marketplace for consultancies' services rather than software connectors — with a shop backend nobody reconciles today, this silence decides it for me. 3 5

Report an error

The Head of Finance

The only facts touching connections and data movement are importing or exporting a single order and a marketplace for partner consultancies. We found no public information on an API, webhooks, standard connectors to shops, banks or accounting tools, or a documented full export of a company's data. 3 5

Report an error

The Operations Lead

I found no public information on a documented API, webhooks, connectors to shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll or accounting tools, a migration path from a predecessor system, or a full export when a company leaves; the only portability item is an option to import or export an order. From what is captured I cannot connect a warehouse scanner, a shop or my accountant's tooling to this system on any public evidence. 3

Report an error

The Online Retailer

The only facts bearing on connections are an order import/export function and a Marketplace named in the partner program for consultancies expanding their portfolio. I found no public information on an API, webhooks, connectors to shops, marketplaces, banks or accounting tools, or a documented full export for when a company leaves. 3 5

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The only connection capability we found is import or export of individual orders and the e-invoice XML download, with sending to public administrations done by manual upload to each body's website. We found no public information on a public API, webhooks, standard connectors to shops, banks, payroll or BI, a migration path from a previous system, or a documented full data export when the company leaves — the exit I have to be able to guarantee. 3 1

Report an error

The Skeptic not rated — no public information

We found no public information on an API, webhooks, standard connectors, migration from a predecessor system, or a documented full export — I read the e-invoicing, order, project-billing and partner pages and none addresses how the data gets in or out. The only import or export the pages mention is of a single order within the product itself. 1 2 3 4 5

Report an error

Rollout, roles & operations

Show reasoning
How this is scored

What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.

0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.

3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.

5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.

8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.

10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.

Report an error

The Managing Director

There is a real implementation path: consultancies apply, are reviewed and approved by a vendor expert who guides their first steps, and then run client accounts with managers assigned under roles and permissions granted by the client — alongside a current help centre. We found no public information on typical implementation durations, support channels and hours, service levels, availability or an audit log, so I cannot yet plan a go-live date around it. 5

Report an error

The Head of Finance

Go-live runs through a partner programme in which a Holded expert reviews each applicant consultancy and guides its first steps, client accounts are opened under roles and permissions the client grants, and a current help centre documents the product. We found no public information on implementation durations, support terms, availability or an audit log on the captured pages. 5 1

Report an error

The Operations Lead

A partner programme is described in detail: consultancies manage client accounts on the platform, an expert reviews each application and guides the partner's first steps, and partner managers can act on a client account only within roles and permissions the client grants, backed by a marketplace, a public directory and a client chat; the help centre behind the captured articles is current, working documentation. I found no public information on implementation durations, support hours or service levels, availability, or a change and audit log. 5

Report an error

The Online Retailer

Implementation runs through a partner program: applications are reviewed and approved by a Holded expert who guides first steps, and partners work inside client accounts under roles and permissions the client grants, backed by a help centre of current articles. I found no public information on support terms or hours, availability, audit logging or an update policy, so I could not plan a go-live or hold anyone to a service level from these pages. 5 1

Report an error

The IT Integrator

There is a documented partner programme — expert-reviewed applications, consultancies listed in a public directory, and client-granted roles and permissions for partner managers assigned to a client account — which amounts to a real implementation path through partners, and the help centre is detailed and current. Orders also support custom fields and selectable PDF templates. We found no public information on support terms and hours, availability or service levels, or an audit log. 5 3

Report an error

The Skeptic

There is a real implementation channel: consultancies apply, are vetted by a vendor expert who follows their first steps, appear in a public directory, and work inside client accounts under client-granted roles and permissions, with a chat for client queries. We found no public information on implementation duration, support hours or service levels, availability, or any audit log. 5 2

Report an error

European sovereignty panel opinion

n/r n/r n/r Show reasoning
How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.

5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.

Report an error

The Managing Director

The contracting entity is recorded from the vendor's terms as Holded Technologies S.L. of Barcelona, Spain, with a Norwegian parent company reported only outside the vendor's own pages — and that is the whole picture. The captured pages give no information on where the ERP data would be hosted, which subprocessors sit behind the service, a data processing agreement or any certification, and for a system holding my entire commercial record that is not enough to sign. 5

Report an error

The Head of Finance

The contracting entity is named as Holded Technologies S.L. of Barcelona, and the product's help pages centre on Spanish public-administration e-invoicing; a Norwegian parent company is reported but the captured pages do not confirm it. We found no public information on where the ERP data is hosted, the subprocessors behind the service or a data processing agreement. 1 2

Report an error

The Operations Lead not rated — no public information

The provenance names Holded Technologies S.L. of Barcelona, Spain, as the vendor, but we found no public information on where the ERP data is hosted, which subprocessors sit behind the cloud, email, support or AI tooling, the ownership chain, or any certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5. The captured help pages on e-invoicing, orders, project billing and the partner programme say nothing on any of this. 1 3 5

Report an error

The Online Retailer not rated — no public information

I found no public information on where the ERP data is hosted, which subprocessors run behind the service, a data processing agreement, certifications or the ownership chain; the captured help pages cover invoicing, orders, projects and the partner program only. The vendor is identified as Holded Technologies S.L. of Barcelona per its terms, but nothing I read evidences hosting or processors. 1 2 3 4 5

Report an error

The IT Integrator not rated — no public information

We found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, a data processing agreement or the ownership chain in the captured pages, which cover invoicing, orders, projects and the partner programme. The vendor's terms name Holded Technologies S.L. of Barcelona, Spain, but no sovereignty attributes are on record, so this dimension cannot be scored from what was captured. 1 2 3 4 5

Report an error

The Skeptic

The contracting entity is named as a Barcelona company with a Spanish tax number, and press reporting places it under Norway's Visma group, which the vendor's own pages do not confirm. We found no public information on where the ERP data is hosted, which subprocessors stand behind the service, or a data processing agreement. 1 5

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

Show reasoning
How this is scored

Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.

3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.

5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Managing Director

The one pricing fact on the captured pages is that orders and delivery notes require activating a paid inventory add-on bought in the vendor's store — the exact piece a wholesaler cannot live without — and we found no figure for it. We found no public information on user or edition prices, what else costs extra, implementation fees, minimum term or what happens to my data on cancellation, so I cannot compute an annual cost before signing. 3

Report an error

The Head of Finance

The only pricing-related statement is that orders and delivery notes require activating the "Inventory payment gem" in the Holded Store. We found no public figures for users, editions or modules, implementation fees, minimum terms or cancellation and data-return terms on the captured pages. 3

Report an error

The Operations Lead

We found no public prices at all in the captured pages: no per-user or per-edition figure, no minimum term, no implementation or onboarding fees. The only pricing-related fact is that orders and delivery notes work only after activating the Inventory payment gem in the Holded Store — a paid add-on whose price is not shown — so no company can compute its annual cost from what is public here. 3

Report an error

The Online Retailer

The single pricing fact found is that using orders and delivery notes requires activating a paid Inventory gem in the Holded Store, so modules are add-ons bought separately — but I found no price figures, per-user or per-company rates, minimum terms or cancellation conditions on the captured pages, and cannot compute an annual cost from public information. For a shop whose order volume swings at Christmas, whether cost scales with every thousand orders is exactly the question left unanswered. 3

Report an error

The IT Integrator

The only pricing-related fact we found is that orders and delivery notes require activating a paid inventory add-on in the Holded Store, so the product is modular and at least one core module costs extra. No figures for users, editions, onboarding or contract terms appear in the pages we read; we found no public information on minimum terms, implementation fees or what happens to the data on cancellation. 3

Report an error

The Skeptic

The one pricing-relevant fact captured is that orders and delivery notes require activating a paid inventory add-on in the vendor's store, so the goods chain costs extra on top of an unstated base. We found no public information on per-user or module prices, minimum term, implementation fees, or what happens to the data on cancellation. 3

Report an error

Questions about Holded

Is Holded European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Holded as EU-Made.

Where does Holded store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.

Does Holded have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Holded?

As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), weclapp (3.5/5) and Haufe X360 (3.5/5) highest among the other 13 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Holded alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Sources (5)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap help.holded.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap help.holded.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap help.holded.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap help.holded.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap help.holded.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →