HR Management
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Provenance unknown Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: not determined
by Oracle · www.oracle.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM at a glance
- Vendor
- Oracle
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- What the bench captured for Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM is a training catalogue: course pages for payroll, absence, recruiting, onboarding, segregation of duties and GDPR, a MyLearn portal description, and a not-found notice for a retired learning path. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
What the bench captured for Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM is a training catalogue: course pages for payroll, absence, recruiting, onboarding, segregation of duties and GDPR, a MyLearn portal description, and a not-found notice for a retired learning path. The judges read that catalogue as naming modules rather than showing the product. Recruiting and onboarding is the strongest area, spanning 1 to 3: the IT Integrator credited dedicated training for both halves of the join path, while the Data Protection Officer held at 1 over the absence of public information on applicant stages, retention and deletion. Payroll readiness, time and absence and employee data governance sit at 1 to 2, with no public information on export formats, working-time recording or a data-processing agreement. Weakest are core HR records, 0 for five of six judges, and sovereignty, 0 to 0, with legal-entity jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure all recorded as unknown. No price appears on any captured page. The judges did not meaningfully split; they aligned on a thin public record.
Speaks for it
- Dedicated training courses exist for both recruiting and onboarding administration, the strongest-scored area at 1 to 3
- A payroll-features course and a Global Payroll Explorer learning path put payroll on the record as a subject the vendor trains on
- A Managing Absence for Power Users course evidences an absence capability
- Training titles on segregation-of-duties audit and GDPR hint at a role-separation model
Held against it
- No public information on the personnel file, org structure, custom fields or change history, with core HR records scored 0 to 1
- Legal-entity jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure are all recorded as unknown, with sovereignty scored 0 to 0
- No public information on payroll export formats, named systems such as DATEV or Lohn und Gehalt, or mid-month joiners and leavers
- No public information on working-time recording under the German recording duty, or on entitlement and carry-over
- No public information on a signable data-processing agreement, retention periods, executable deletion or an audit log of who read what
Best for
- You want recruiting and onboarding modules from one suite and are prepared to verify stages, e-signature and the candidate-to-employee handover directly with the vendor
- You evaluate through direct vendor engagement, since answers on pricing, hosting and data processing sit with the sales team rather than public pages
- You already work in Oracle Cloud and value the vendor's own training portal covering payroll, absence, recruiting and onboarding for rollout
Avoid if
- You need documented hosting region, contracting entity or subprocessor information before shortlisting — sovereignty scored 0 to 0
- You must see payroll export formats and DATEV or Lohn und Gehalt handoff documented before a demo — payroll readiness tops out at 2
- Your works council needs public answers on logging, retention and deletion of employee and applicant data — employee data governance scored 1 to 2
- You need working-time recording that meets the German recording duty — time and absence scored 1 to 2
The scores
Too little public evidence to rate — fewer than 1 captured source or 3 proven facts — so no star rating is shown. The panel's reasoning is below.
Digital personnel file & data model
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The system of record: employee master data, the digital personnel file, org structure, custom fields, and whether history is kept rather than overwritten.
0 — A contact list with job titles; no document storage, no org structure, no history — changes overwrite what was there.
3 — Employee records with document upload, but a flat structure: no org chart, few or no custom fields, and no dated history of contract or salary changes.
5 — Digital personnel file with structured document types, an org chart, custom fields, and change history on the core employment fields.
8 — Complete record: versioned contract and compensation history with effective dates, document templates with e-signature, org structure supporting multiple entities and cost centres, and granular field-level permissions.
10 — The file is the single source of truth an auditor could work from: full effective-dated history on every field, retention rules per document type, delegated administration per entity, and export that reproduces the record intact.
The People Lead
The captured material amounts to Oracle's training-portal description plus a retired learning path; we found no public information on the personnel file, org structure, custom fields or change history. For a 400-person replacement of eleven spreadsheets, I can verify nothing about the record keeping itself. 4 7
The Payroll Officer
The only product statement captured is a description of Oracle's training portal, MyLearn; we found no public information on the personnel file, document storage, org structure, custom fields, or whether changes keep a dated history rather than overwriting. For month-end I need a record that shows what changed and when — these pages show me nothing of that. 7
The Works Council Advocate
We found no public information on the digital personnel file — nothing on document storage, org structure, custom fields, or whether change history is kept rather than overwritten. The captured material describes a training portal rather than the product's records, so there is nothing here for a works council to assess. 7
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on the digital personnel file, org structure, custom fields, or whether change history is kept: the only substantive capture describes MyLearn, "a customizable, personalized training portal" for learning Oracle Cloud. Whether contract or salary changes are versioned or overwrite what was there is a question these pages cannot answer. 7
The IT Integrator
Nothing captured describes the digital personnel file, org structure, custom fields or change history — the training pages found cover payroll, absence, recruiting and identity topics instead. We found no public information on the system-of-record core or whether history is kept rather than overwritten, so I cannot credit the file as a source of truth from these pages. 1 3 5
The Skeptic
The only pages with retrievable content describe a learning portal and a retired learning path, and we found no public information on the personnel file, document storage, org structure, or change history. A training catalogue is a syllabus, not a system of record, so the baseline for a digital personnel file is unevidenced here. 4 7
Payroll handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the month closes cleanly into payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or an external tax adviser — and how much of that is automated rather than re-typed.
0 — No payroll path stated at all; whatever leaves the system leaves as a spreadsheet somebody retypes.
3 — Generic CSV export said to be usable for payroll, with no named payroll system, no defined format and no handling of mid-month changes.
5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system (e.g. DATEV LODAS/Lohn und Gehalt), covering the recurring monthly fields.
8 — Certified or vendor-maintained integration with a named payroll provider, covering variable pay, absences and mid-month joiners and leavers, with a documented pre-payroll check.
10 — Payroll is a first-class part of the product: maintained bidirectional integrations with several named systems, an auditable approval and lock step before transmission, retro-accounting for backdated changes, and the tax adviser given their own access.
The People Lead
The only payroll material is training-course titles for payroll features and a global-payroll learning path; we found no public information on named payroll systems, export formats, or handling of mid-month joiners and leavers. For a month that closes without chasing anyone, this is very close to nothing stated. 1 2
The Payroll Officer
The captured pages are training offerings — a course titled "Oracle Cloud HCM Payroll for ERP Features" and a "Global Payroll Explorer" learning path — so payroll exists as a subject the vendor trains on, but no integration, export format or named target system is stated. We found no public information on how variable pay, absences, or mid-month joiners and leavers reach payroll, so I have nothing to judge a clean close against. 1 2
The Works Council Advocate
The payroll material consists of a training course on payroll-for-ERP features and a global payroll learning path, so some payroll capability is implied, but we found no public information on export formats, a named German system such as DATEV or Lohn und Gehalt, or how mid-month joiners and leavers reach payroll. How the month actually closes is not documented anywhere I can see. 1 2
The Data Protection Officer
The payroll material is two training-catalog entries — a payroll-features course and a global-payroll learning path — which show a payroll topic exists to be trained on and nothing more. We found no public information on export formats, on any named payroll system such as DATEV or Lohn und Gehalt, or on handling of mid-month joiners and leavers. 1 2
The IT Integrator
The only payroll evidence is a course on HCM payroll for ERP features and a global-payroll learning path — a payroll module exists, but that says nothing about the handoff. We found no public information on export formats, named payroll systems, variable pay, or mid-month joiners and leavers. 1 2
The Skeptic
Payroll course titles exist in the catalogue — Cloud HCM Payroll features and a global payroll learning path — which puts a payroll path nominally on the record, but we found no public information on any named payroll system, a defined export format, or automation of the monthly handoff. What is captured names a curriculum without showing a single integration detail. 1 2
Absence & working-time
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Vacation, sickness and working-time recording — including whether the product meets the German recording duty (BAG 2022, ArbZG) rather than merely offering a timer.
0 — No absence or time handling; both live in a spreadsheet elsewhere.
3 — Vacation requests with an approval step, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no working-time recording.
5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic working-time capture with a report per employee.
8 — Configurable per country and contract: pro-rata entitlement, public-holiday calendars per location, break and rest-period rules, overtime accounts, and an export the employer can hand to a labour inspection.
10 — Working-time recording built as a legal obligation rather than a feature: tamper-evident records, documented compliance with the ArbZG recording duty, works-council-configurable monitoring limits, and shift or on-call models handled without add-ons.
The People Lead
There is a course title for absence administration and a retired absence learning path, and that is all; we found no public information on automatic entitlement, carry-over, sickness handling or any working-time recording, let alone the German recording duty. 3 4
The Payroll Officer
A course titled "Managing Absence for Power Users" evidences an absence capability, while the linked absence learning path returned a not-found notice. We found no public information on automatic entitlement, carry-over, sickness handling or working-time recording, so nothing here speaks to the German recording duty — and that silence decides it for me. 3 4
The Works Council Advocate
An absence-management training course and a retired learning path are all that touch this area, and we found no public information on entitlement, carry-over, sickness handling, or any working-time recording at all. The German recording duty, and — decisive for co-determination — what is logged and what can be switched off, receive no public answers here. 3 4
The Data Protection Officer
One working capture exists, an absence-administration course, while the second captured learning path returned a not-found notice with its content marked retired or obsolete. We found no public information on automatic entitlement, carry-over, or working-time recording that would meet the German recording duty — the first questions a works council asks, left open by the pages. 3 4
The IT Integrator
A power-user course on managing absence exists, while the absence training path itself returned a not-found notice ("We couldn't find the resource you're looking for"). We found no public information on entitlement automation, carry-over, sickness handling, or any working-time recording, let alone the German recording duty. 3 4
The Skeptic
A course titled Managing Absence for Power Users and a retired absence learning path are the whole of the absence evidence; we found no public information on entitlement, carry-over, sickness recording, or working-time capture under the German recording duty. A power-user course is the vendor teaching its own product, not demonstrating it to a buyer. 3 4
Recruiting & onboarding
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The join path — vacancy to signed contract to a person who has an account, equipment and a plan on day one.
0 — Neither applicant tracking nor onboarding exists; hiring happens in a shared inbox.
3 — A basic applicant list with statuses, or an onboarding checklist — one of the two, without the handover between them.
5 — Applicant tracking with a careers page, structured stages and rejection handling, plus a checklist-driven onboarding that carries the hired candidate over into an employee record without re-entry.
8 — Multi-posting to named job boards, interview scheduling and scorecards, GDPR-conscious applicant retention and deletion, e-signed contracts, and onboarding that triggers tasks in IT and payroll.
10 — The whole join is one governed flow: approval-gated requisitions with budget, structured and bias-conscious evaluation, automated applicant deletion at the stated deadline, and provisioning driven from the record so day one needs no HR intervention.
The People Lead
Course titles for recruiting and onboarding administration suggest both areas exist, but we found no public information on careers pages, structured stages, the candidate-to-employee handover, e-signature or applicant deletion. Two names in a course catalogue do not make a join path. 5 6
The Payroll Officer
Training courses for "Oracle HCM Cloud Recruiting" and "Oracle HCM Cloud Onboarding Administration" show both sides of the join path exist as modules. We found no public information on careers pages, structured stages, rejection handling, or whether a hired candidate becomes an employee record without re-entry. 5 6
The Works Council Advocate
Training titles reference a recruiting module and onboarding administration, so both halves of the join path appear to exist, but we found no public information on applicant stages, structured evaluation, retention and deletion of applicant data, or the handover into an employee record. Without the applicant-data protection story I could not sign this part off. 5 6
The Data Protection Officer
Two training courses — HCM recruiting and onboarding administration — are all that was captured. We found no public information on careers pages, structured stages, rejection handling, or the handover from candidate to employee record, and no public information on applicant retention or deletion at a stated deadline. 5 6
The IT Integrator
Dedicated training for both HCM Cloud recruiting and onboarding administration establishes that both sides of the join path exist as product areas, which is where this score rests. We found no public information on applicant stages, e-signed contracts, the handover into an employee record — and my test is whether onboarding creates the account and triggers IT provisioning, on which the captured pages say nothing. 5 6
The Skeptic
Courses exist for HCM Cloud Recruiting and for onboarding administration, which is more of the join path named than any other criterion gets; we still found no public information on careers pages, stages, contracts, e-signature, or the handover from candidate to employee record. The catalogue names both halves of the join without showing either one. 5 6
Employee data protection & co-determination
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the product handles the most sensitive personal data a company holds — retention, deletion, role separation, subject rights — and whether it can pass a works council (BetrVG §87) rather than merely a procurement checklist.
0 — No stated retention or deletion handling, no role model beyond admin-or-not, and no DPA offered on the site.
3 — A DPA exists on request and roles are coarse; retention and deletion are described as something the customer arranges themselves.
5 — A signable DPA is published, roles are configurable per module, applicant and employee retention periods are stated, and deletion can be executed rather than only promised.
8 — Field-level access control with an audit log of who read what, configurable retention per data category with automatic deletion, documented subject-rights support, and monitoring or analytics features that can be switched off for co-determination.
10 — Built for the works council to say yes: published processing documentation and subprocessor list, per-entity data separation, tamper-evident audit trail, evaluation and behavioural-analysis features off by default with their scope documented, and a data-protection impact assessment the customer can build on.
The People Lead
The captured pages include GDPR and segregation-of-duties training courses, but we found no public information on a signable data-processing agreement, stated retention periods, executable deletion or configurable roles. Training material about compliance is not something I can hand a works council. 7 8
The Payroll Officer
The vendor offers training in segregation-of-duties implementation and GDPR, which hints at a role model beyond admin-or-not, but the captured pages show no published DPA, no stated retention periods and no deletion mechanism. We found no public information on an audit log of who read what, or on monitoring features a works council could ask to have switched off. 7 8
The Works Council Advocate
The captured pages include courses on segregation of duties and GDPR, which hints at a role-separation model, but we found no public information on a published data-processing agreement, stated retention periods, executed deletion, or an audit log of who read what. For co-determination, the questions of what is logged, who can read it and what can be switched off have no public answers in this material. 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
Training courses on segregation-of-duties auditing and on GDPR are the only captures here; they hint that role separation exists to be trained on, but we found no public information on a signable data-processing agreement, on retention periods with deletion that executes, or on a published subprocessor list. For the most sensitive data about people who cannot decline the processing, I treat an unpublished DPA as a finding. 7 8
The IT Integrator
Training titles on segregation-of-duties identity audit and GDPR point at role-separation tooling worth exploring, but that is all the capture shows. We found no public information on a signable data-processing agreement, retention periods, executable deletion, field-level access with read auditing, or works-council-facing documentation. 7 8
The Skeptic
Courses on segregation-of-duties implementation and on GDPR sit in the catalogue, hinting at role separation and data-protection awareness; we found no public information on a published data-processing agreement, retention periods, executable deletion, or anything addressed to a works council. GDPR training for administrators is not governance of employee data. 7 8
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether the answer is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as the buyer would weigh it.
0 — US-headquartered vendor, US contracting entity, hosting region unstated or US, subprocessors not named.
3 — EU hosting is offered as an option but the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is incomplete or absent.
5 — EU hosting stated as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, an EU contracting entity, the full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, contracting entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, certification of the data centres published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.
The People Lead
Contracting entity, ownership, hosting region and subprocessors are all recorded as unknown, and the captured pages say nothing about any of them. As a buyer I cannot verify where my people's data would live or who processes it, which is worth the bottom of the scale. 4 7
The Payroll Officer
The captured pages give no answer on contracting entity, ownership, hosting region or subprocessors — every attribute is unknown. With nothing documented anywhere in what we captured, I can verify no jurisdiction and no hosting location for the most sensitive data a company holds. 7
The Works Council Advocate
Every sovereignty attribute is unknown — contracting entity, ownership, hosting region and subprocessors — and we found no public information on any of them. The only location-related statement captured is that training works 'on any device, from any location', which says nothing about where employee data sits. 7
The Data Protection Officer
The recorded details on legal-entity jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure all came back unknown, and the compliance-themed pages that were captured state no hosting region, contracting entity, or named data-centre provider. For employee data, undocumented sovereignty is unusable whatever the underlying reality may be. 7 8
The IT Integrator
Contracting-entity jurisdiction, ownership, hosting region and the subprocessor chain are all unrecorded, and the captured training pages carry no residency or processing-location statements. A buyer weighing European placement has nothing documented to weigh. 4 8
The Skeptic
We found no public information on the contracting entity, hosting region, or subprocessors — the independently sourced attributes all came back unknown — and the captured training pages say nothing about where data lives. Nothing documented is nothing a buyer can weigh, and the computed result is the bottom of the scale. 4 7
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether an HR lead can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including the modules they actually need — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — An entry price per employee exists, but the modules most buyers need are unpriced, or a minimum headcount, setup fee or mandatory onboarding package is not stated publicly.
5 — Per-employee prices are public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed module (payroll, time, recruiting) hides in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-employee maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table that produces the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including setup, minimums and renewal terms.
The People Lead
We found no public pricing in the captured material — no per-employee price, no module price, no billing period or VAT treatment stated. I cannot compute an annual invoice for my headcount, so there is nothing here to score above zero. 4 7
The Payroll Officer
No price, tier, per-employee figure, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment appears on any captured page — an HR lead could not compute even a rough annual invoice from this. We found no public information on pricing at all; every figure is a sales conversation. 7 4
The Works Council Advocate
We found no public prices at all: no per-employee figures, tiers, billing periods, minimum terms or setup fees appear anywhere in the captured material. An HR lead could not compute even a rough annual invoice from what is published. 7
The Data Protection Officer
We found no public information on pricing of any kind — per-employee price, tiers, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment. An HR lead could not compute so much as a single month's invoice for one employee from what was captured. 7
The IT Integrator
We found no public information on pricing in any form — no per-employee rate, tier, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment appears on the captured pages, whose quoted content is a training-portal description and a not-found notice. No HR lead can compute any part of an annual invoice from this. 4 7
The Skeptic
We found no public information on prices of any kind — no per-employee figure, no tier, no billing period, no minimum term — anywhere in the captured pages. A training portal is silent on invoices, so an HR lead could not compute even the first euro of an annual bill from this evidence. 4 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Is Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM is based.
Where does Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates rexx systems (3.5/5), HRworks (3/5) and Kenjo (3/5) highest among the other 30 HR Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is rexx systems (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-cloud-hcm-payroll-for-erp-features/89350/113245, learn.oracle.com/ols/learning-path/global-payroll-explorer/44447/79874, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/managing-absence-for-power-users/44447/89832, learn.oracle.com/ols/learning-path/absence-customer-power-user-training/44447/60898, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-hcm-cloud-recruiting/46602/110513, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-hcm-cloud-onboarding-administration-for-otactee/46602/107318 and 2 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-cloud-hcm-payroll-for-erp-features/89350/113245, learn.oracle.com/ols/learning-path/global-payroll-explorer/44447/79874, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/managing-absence-for-power-users/44447/89832, learn.oracle.com/ols/learning-path/absence-customer-power-user-training/44447/60898, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-hcm-cloud-recruiting/46602/110513, learn.oracle.com/ols/course/oracle-hcm-cloud-onboarding-administration-for-otactee/46602/107318 and 2 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (8)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Absence & working-time — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Absence & working-time — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Recruiting & onboarding — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Recruiting & onboarding — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Employee data protection & co-determination — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Employee data protection & co-determination — found from sitemap learn.oracle.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →