Information Security

Robin Data ComplianceOS (ISMS)

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The CISO v1.0 · The GRC Consultant v1.0 · The Drafted IT Officer v1.1 · The Lead Auditor v1.0 · The Evidence Integrator v1.0 · The Skeptic v1.1 · rubric v1 · evaluated 5 Oct 2026

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Evidence Integrator

Weighted verdict

Believes evidence that is typed is evidence that is stale. Optimizes for connectors to the live estate — directory, CMDB, ticketing, cloud — continuous control checks, and an API with parity to the UI. Rejects data islands with a CSV drawbridge.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Evidence Integrator

Asset & risk management depth

How this is scored

The ISMS core: asset inventory, risk methodology (identification, assessment, treatment), protection-needs inheritance, incident handling with statutory clocks.

0 — No ISMS substance; "information security" is a chapter in the marketing site.

3 — A flat risk list and an asset spreadsheet import; no treatment tracking, no inheritance, incidents live in the ticket system.

5 — Asset and risk management with configurable matrices and treatment tracking; basic incident handling; inheritance and aggregation need manual work.

8 — A real risk backbone: documented methodology (ISO 27005 or equivalent), inherited protection needs across asset relations, incident workflows with statutory reporting clocks (NIS2 24h/72h), risk acceptance with ownership.

10 — Risk management a certifier works inside: complete asset-risk-treatment chain with inheritance, continuity planning, incident reporting with authority export, and risk reporting the executive level actually reads.

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

Asset and risk management are genuine modules: per-asset-class protection-need forms, risks structured into fields and categories with configurable assessment forms, treatment strategy selection with measures derived, score trends over time, and step-by-step BSI-conformant risk-analysis guidance. We found no public information on inherited protection needs across asset relations, incident workflows with statutory reporting clocks, or risk acceptance with named owners, and linking assets to measures runs through a manual matcher. 6 7

Report an error

Controls, SoA & measures

How this is scored

Control catalogs, statement of applicability, measure tracking and internal audit — whether the control side of the ISMS is operable or a checklist.

0 — A static control checklist; applicability, implementation status and evidence are the consultant's spreadsheet.

3 — Control catalogs with status fields, but no SoA generation, no measure ownership, no link between controls and risks.

5 — Controls linked to risks and measures with owners and due dates; SoA producible with manual assembly; internal audit supported by checklists.

8 — SoA on demand from live control status, measure tracking with delegation and escalation, internal audit workflows with findings management, controls carrying their own evidence.

10 — The control fabric as a living system: catalog updates versioned, SoA always current, audit programs with recurring schedules, and every control answerable with linked evidence at any moment.

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

Controls arrive via importable programs and carry SoA-grade data — applied yes/no with documented justification, status with color coding for norm deviation, immutable maturity ratings, and evidence records linked on the fly — alongside a TOM catalog with import, industry templates and a create/check/release workflow. We found no public information on measure owners and due dates or on generated statements of applicability, and the help pages state that own and importable programs cannot be linked with each other. 8 9 12

Report an error

Framework & standard coverage

How this is scored

Which regimes the product actually operationalizes — ISO 27001, NIS2, TISAX/VDA ISA, DORA, BSI IT-Grundschutz, SOC 2 — and whether one control maps across them or each framework is a fresh island.

0 — One framework, hard-coded; anything else is "on the roadmap".

3 — Two or three frameworks as separate checklists; the same control is answered once per framework.

5 — The major regimes for its market with partial cross-mapping; newer regimes (NIS2, DORA) present as content packs of varying depth.

8 — Broad current coverage including NIS2/TISAX/DORA where relevant, one-control-many-frameworks mapping, and visible maintenance as regimes evolve.

10 — Framework coverage as a living product: dozens of regimes, genuine multi-compliance mapping on one data basis, per-industry profiles, and documented update cadence when the standard moves.

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

The importable catalog covers the major German-market regimes — ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 27701, ISO 55001, DIN 66398, BSI-Grundschutz, TISAX, B3S and nine laws including DSGVO and BDSG — plus the ability to build own programs. Cross-mapping is only partial since own and importable programs cannot be interlinked, and we found no public information on NIS2 or DORA content. 7 8 12

Report an error

Audit readiness & evidence

How this is scored

Whether the system produces defensible proof: revision-safe history, evidence collection, reports for auditors, authorities and management.

0 — Exports are screenshots; history is overwritten in place.

3 — PDF reports exist but evidence is attached ad hoc and changes leave no reliable trail.

5 — Versioned records, standard report generators, evidence attachments per control; assembling a full audit file still takes days.

8 — Revision-safe change history, audit-scoped evidence packs on demand, management reports current at a click, auditor access roles.

10 — Audit readiness as a standing state: continuous evidence status per framework and scope, exportable proof packs an external auditor accepts as-is, and a defensible answer to "show me the state on date X".

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

Audits are run in-system with configurable types, periods, activities and evidence records linked to controls, and evidence types can be imported, customized and extended with form fields; completed assessments become immutable and scores are tracked as trends over time. We found no public information on revision-safe change history across edits, auditor access roles, or audit-scoped evidence packs, and the documented exports are Excel tables of assets and risks. 6 7 12 13

Report an error

Integrations & automation

How this is scored

Whether the platform feeds from the real IT estate — directory import, CMDB, ticketing, scanners, API — and automates evidence collection instead of re-typing it.

0 — A closed island: manual entry in, PDF out, no API.

3 — CSV/Excel import and export; no live connections, no API worth the name.

5 — Directory import (AD/Entra), a documented REST API for core objects, a handful of native connectors (ticketing, CMDB or SSO); automation is reminders and recurrence.

8 — Real connector set (Jira/ServiceNow-class ticketing, CMDB, cloud and endpoint sources), webhooks, SSO/SCIM, automated evidence tests with human review.

10 — The platform behaves like infrastructure: API parity for the data model, event streams, continuous control monitoring against the live estate, and automation that measurably removes the recurring toil rather than renaming it.

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

The estate integration story is a single homepage sentence about connecting external IT services and workflows via a modern interface and microservices; we found no public information on a documented API, directory, CMDB or ticketing connectors, SSO, webhooks, or automated evidence collection against the live estate. The documented interfaces are Excel export of assets and risks and imports of the vendor's own content — an island with a spreadsheet drawbridge, with automation that amounts to recurring assessments and reminders. 1 6 7 9

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the security posture of the whole company actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA. The risk register is itself a target.

0 — Non-EU entity, non-EU-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list — for the system holding your risk register.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad or undocumented.

5 — EU hosting is the default, DPA and subprocessor list published; the vendor or a critical subprocessor is still within non-European jurisdictional reach.

8 — EU entity, EU hosting with named data centers, published subprocessor list free of content-touching non-EU processors, DPA and TOMs public.

10 — Jurisdictionally clean end to end: European ownership, EU-only hosting and subprocessors, on-premises or sovereign-cloud options, and the whole chain documented publicly.

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

The entity is a German GmbH with a German register court, address and tax number, ISO 27001 and TÜV certifications, and EFRE funding — a solid European anchor for the company. But the vendor's own captured pages do not confirm the hosting location of the platform, and we found no public information on a published DPA, a subprocessor list, or ownership, which is thin documentation for the system that holds the risk register itself. 3 4

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per module, per entity, per year, with consulting unbundled — from public pages alone. Unpublished pricing is the B2B norm in this market, so this criterion describes rather than condemns; the benches weight it accordingly.

0 — No public prices at all; every configuration is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but module add-ons, scale steps or bundled consulting make the real total incomputable.

5 — Most editions carry real numbers with billing period stated and software separated from services; at least one commonly needed module or scale step is unpriced.

8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with entity/user boundaries and setup fees stated; only genuine corporate-group contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: modules, scale steps, service packages and renewal rules public, so the invoice for a 100-employee company and a certification project is a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Evidence Integrator

We found no public price figures on the captured pages — no edition, module or per-user pricing, with a bookable introductory meeting as the documented entry point and even licensed content programs unnamed in price until a license is acquired. Every configuration is a sales conversation; the only published figure is that webinar participation is free of charge. 3 8 9

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Incorporated in DE ⚠ unverified	3/3 pts	4 Report an error
Ownership	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Data residency	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Subprocessors	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Das Land wird nicht ausdrücklich genannt, der Code wird aus dem deutschen Registergericht und der deutschen Anschrift abgeleitet.
Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

We could not confirm any pricing information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind. Know more? Tell us
27 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
9 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
7 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
4 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
3 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about Robin Data ComplianceOS (ISMS)? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (13)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor homepage www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
2 Platform overview www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
3 About page www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
4 Imprint www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
5 Information security product page www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
6 Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
7 Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
8 Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
9 Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
10 Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap www.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
11 Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap www.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
12 Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
13 Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →