whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Information Security

Robin Data ComplianceOS (ISMS)

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Robin Data GmbH · www.robin-data.io

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The GRC Consultant

Weighted verdict

Builds and runs ISMSs for a dozen clients at once. Optimizes for reusable control catalogs, multi-framework mapping that answers a control once, and templates that make client twelve cheaper than client one. Rejects single-tenant tools and frameworks bolted on as checklists.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The GRC Consultant

Asset & risk management depth

How this is scored

The ISMS core: asset inventory, risk methodology (identification, assessment, treatment), protection-needs inheritance, incident handling with statutory clocks.

0 — No ISMS substance; "information security" is a chapter in the marketing site.

3 — A flat risk list and an asset spreadsheet import; no treatment tracking, no inheritance, incidents live in the ticket system.

5 — Asset and risk management with configurable matrices and treatment tracking; basic incident handling; inheritance and aggregation need manual work.

8 — A real risk backbone: documented methodology (ISO 27005 or equivalent), inherited protection needs across asset relations, incident workflows with statutory reporting clocks (NIS2 24h/72h), risk acceptance with ownership.

10 — Risk management a certifier works inside: complete asset-risk-treatment chain with inheritance, continuity planning, incident reporting with authority export, and risk reporting the executive level actually reads.

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

Asset classes with per-class protection-need forms, recurring assessments, a documented BSI-style risk analysis walk-through, selectable treatment strategies and immutable completed assessments feeding trend dashboards form a real BSI-flavoured backbone. We found no public information on incident handling with statutory reporting clocks, inherited protection needs across asset relations, or risk acceptance with named owners, which keeps it short of the next level. 6 7

Report an error

Controls, SoA & measures

How this is scored

Control catalogs, statement of applicability, measure tracking and internal audit — whether the control side of the ISMS is operable or a checklist.

0 — A static control checklist; applicability, implementation status and evidence are the consultant's spreadsheet.

3 — Control catalogs with status fields, but no SoA generation, no measure ownership, no link between controls and risks.

5 — Controls linked to risks and measures with owners and due dates; SoA producible with manual assembly; internal audit supported by checklists.

8 — SoA on demand from live control status, measure tracking with delegation and escalation, internal audit workflows with findings management, controls carrying their own evidence.

10 — The control fabric as a living system: catalog updates versioned, SoA always current, audit programs with recurring schedules, and every control answerable with linked evidence at any moment.

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

Controls carry applicability yes/no with justification, status, colour-coded deviation, per-control maturity ratings and evidence creatable on the fly, and TOMs from a 350-industry database link to risks — the control side is operable, not a checklist. We found no public information on SoA document generation, findings management or measure delegation with escalation, and the help pages document that imported program content cannot be linked with an organisation's own programs and controls, which breaks the answer-a-control-once story for reusable client catalogs. 8 9 12

Report an error

Framework & standard coverage

How this is scored

Which regimes the product actually operationalizes — ISO 27001, NIS2, TISAX/VDA ISA, DORA, BSI IT-Grundschutz, SOC 2 — and whether one control maps across them or each framework is a fresh island.

0 — One framework, hard-coded; anything else is "on the roadmap".

3 — Two or three frameworks as separate checklists; the same control is answered once per framework.

5 — The major regimes for its market with partial cross-mapping; newer regimes (NIS2, DORA) present as content packs of varying depth.

8 — Broad current coverage including NIS2/TISAX/DORA where relevant, one-control-many-frameworks mapping, and visible maintenance as regimes evolve.

10 — Framework coverage as a living product: dozens of regimes, genuine multi-compliance mapping on one data basis, per-industry profiles, and documented update cadence when the standard moves.

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

Importable programs cover ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 27701, ISO 55001, BSI-Grundschutz, TISAX, B3S, DIN 66398 and the GDPR plus a run of German statutes — the major regimes for its German market. We found no public information on NIS2, DORA or SOC 2 content, and no evidenced one-control-many-frameworks mapping; combined with the documented separation between own and imported content, each program risks being worked as its own island. 8 12

Report an error

Audit readiness & evidence

How this is scored

Whether the system produces defensible proof: revision-safe history, evidence collection, reports for auditors, authorities and management.

0 — Exports are screenshots; history is overwritten in place.

3 — PDF reports exist but evidence is attached ad hoc and changes leave no reliable trail.

5 — Versioned records, standard report generators, evidence attachments per control; assembling a full audit file still takes days.

8 — Revision-safe change history, audit-scoped evidence packs on demand, management reports current at a click, auditor access roles.

10 — Audit readiness as a standing state: continuous evidence status per framework and scope, exportable proof packs an external auditor accepts as-is, and a defensible answer to "show me the state on date X".

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

Completed risk, protection-need and maturity assessments lock against later change, internal and external audits run as configurable types with periods and activities created from the audit context, evidence records carry typed attachments linkable to controls, and assets and risks export to Excel. We found no public information on revision-safe per-document change history, audit-scoped evidence packs on demand, auditor access roles, or reconstructing the state on a given date — assembling a full audit file still looks like days of assembly. 6 7 12 13

Report an error

Integrations & automation

How this is scored

Whether the platform feeds from the real IT estate — directory import, CMDB, ticketing, scanners, API — and automates evidence collection instead of re-typing it.

0 — A closed island: manual entry in, PDF out, no API.

3 — CSV/Excel import and export; no live connections, no API worth the name.

5 — Directory import (AD/Entra), a documented REST API for core objects, a handful of native connectors (ticketing, CMDB or SSO); automation is reminders and recurrence.

8 — Real connector set (Jira/ServiceNow-class ticketing, CMDB, cloud and endpoint sources), webhooks, SSO/SCIM, automated evidence tests with human review.

10 — The platform behaves like infrastructure: API parity for the data model, event streams, continuous control monitoring against the live estate, and automation that measurably removes the recurring toil rather than renaming it.

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

Beyond Excel import and export for assets, risks and TOMs, the only integration evidence is one homepage sentence about connecting third-party IT services and workflows "über eine moderne Schnittstelle und Microservices". We found no public documentation of an API's objects, directory import, connectors to ticketing, CMDB or scanners, SSO, or automated evidence collection — so evidence feeding from the real IT estate stays manual. 1 6 7 9

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the security posture of the whole company actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA. The risk register is itself a target.

0 — Non-EU entity, non-EU-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list — for the system holding your risk register.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad or undocumented.

5 — EU hosting is the default, DPA and subprocessor list published; the vendor or a critical subprocessor is still within non-European jurisdictional reach.

8 — EU entity, EU hosting with named data centers, published subprocessor list free of content-touching non-EU processors, DPA and TOMs public.

10 — Jurisdictionally clean end to end: European ownership, EU-only hosting and subprocessors, on-premises or sovereign-cloud options, and the whole chain documented publicly.

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

The German GmbH with its Stendal registry entry and the vendor's own ISO 27001 certification and EFRE funding are solid European grounding. We found no public information on a DPA, a subprocessor list, ownership or the hosting location on the vendor's captured pages — the data residency line is unconfirmed, and for the system holding a client's risk register that documentation gap matters. 3 4

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per module, per entity, per year, with consulting unbundled — from public pages alone. Unpublished pricing is the B2B norm in this market, so this criterion describes rather than condemns; the benches weight it accordingly.

0 — No public prices at all; every configuration is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but module add-ons, scale steps or bundled consulting make the real total incomputable.

5 — Most editions carry real numbers with billing period stated and software separated from services; at least one commonly needed module or scale step is unpriced.

8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with entity/user boundaries and setup fees stated; only genuine corporate-group contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: modules, scale steps, service packages and renewal rules public, so the invoice for a 100-employee company and a certification project is a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The GRC Consultant

The only cost-related facts captured are free webinars and a bookable introductory meeting; we found no public information on edition, module, user or licence prices. Licensed imported programs even hide their control content until the user acquires a licence, with no price stated — the real invoice is not computable from public pages. 8 9

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Robin Data ComplianceOS (ISMS)? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (13)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Platform overview www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 About page www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Imprint www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Information security product page www.robin-data.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Asset & risk management depth — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Controls, SoA & measures — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap www.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Framework & standard coverage — found from sitemap www.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Audit readiness & evidence — found from sitemap help.robin-data.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →