Collaboration depth
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Integrator
Permissions are the strong suit — collaborator-level controls, fine-grained RBAC, IDP-synced groups, admin panels [E1/E5] — and guest access exists via paid Portals add-ons and password/domain-restricted share links [E2/E5]. But the evidence is silent on assignments, comments, dependencies, timelines and workload/capacity — none of the shared planning machinery the upper anchors require — so sharing works but multi-person planning is unevidenced. 1 2 4