Project Management & Collaboration
Kantree
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Digicoop · kantree.io
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Kantree is a project management and collaboration tool from Digicoop SARL, a French worker cooperative, hosted on OVH in France. Persona-weighted totals across the bench span 7.5 to 7.9. Onboarding effort is the strongest criterion at 8-9, built on a 15-day trial with no credit card required, thirty-plus templates and importers from Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub and spreadsheets. Reporting and collaboration depth score 7-8, covering burndown, cycle-time and velocity charts, a query language with sum() and count() aggregations, cross-project dashboards, multi-assignee cards and permissions down to field level. The real split is sovereignty, ranging 6 to 8: the higher scores credit OVH hosting in France, backups in AWS's Ireland region, a public DPA and a stated no-transfer-outside-the-EEA position, while the lowest rests on US-headquartered subprocessors in the privacy policy (AWS, Stripe, Sentry) and no published imprint or company register. Support docs sits flat at 7; pricing transparency spans 7-8, held down by the unpriced Enterprise tier.
Speaks for it
- onboarding effort is the top-scoring criterion on a 15-day trial with no credit card required and importers from Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub or spreadsheets with field mapping
- reporting covers burndown, cumulative flow, cycle time, member velocity and workload charts, KQL queries with sum() and count() aggregations, saved views, cross-project dashboards and a PowerBI live-data guide
- collaboration depth is evidenced by multi-assignee cards, mentions with reply-by-email, guests assignable to any role, observer and contractor roles, and field-level permissions
- both self-serve prices are printed — Team 8€ / user / month and Business 15€ / user / month — with VAT treatment ('Prices exclude VAT (EU only)') and annual billing terms disclosed up front
- the published posture includes OVH hosting in France, files and backups in AWS's Ireland region, a public DPA and a stated no-transfer-outside-the-EEA position
Held against it
- sovereignty scores split 6-8, the widest range on the bench, over US-headquartered subprocessors (AWS, Stripe, Sentry) and no published imprint or company register
- no public information on explicit card dependencies (blocks/blocked-by) beyond linking cards by reference number and relationship fields
- the Enterprise tier is priced only as 'Contact us' while gating directory services integration, the Teams connector and hosting options
- annual payment charges the full year immediately, cancellable only at year end, and the discount appears only as a '-20%!' flag
- support docs scores sit at 7, with phone support on Enterprise only and no public information on chat support, response times or a changelog
Best for
- You are a team from 2 to 50 people moving existing work from Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub or spreadsheets and want a self-serve start (onboarding effort 8-9; 15-day trial, no credit card required)
- You need cross-project analytics — burndown, cycle time, velocity, workload and KQL aggregation queries with a PowerBI live-data option
- You collaborate with external guests, contractors and observers and need assignable roles plus field-level permissions
- You want EU-hosted work management with OVH hosting in France, a public DPA and on-premise or SecNumCloud options on the Business plan, and can accept documented US-headquartered subprocessors
Avoid if
- You need explicit dependency management (blocks/blocked-by) — the documented mechanism is card linking by reference number, and the bench found no public information on a dependency view
- You cannot accept US-headquartered subprocessors — AWS, Stripe and Sentry are documented in the privacy policy
- You rely on the Microsoft Teams connector, directory services integration or phone support — these sit behind the Enterprise tier priced 'Contact us'
- You want annual billing without lock-in — the full year is charged immediately and cancellation is possible only at year end
The scores
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Real multi-person work is evidenced end to end: multiple assignees per card, mentions with email-replied comments, guest invitations with assignable roles and observer/contractor roles, permissions down to the field level, a per-member workload chart, and cross-project dashboards with portfolio views. We found no public information on explicit card-to-card dependencies, though relationship fields and card linking by reference number are documented. 1 5 7 8
The Bootstrapper
The multi-person machinery is real: cards take multiple assignees, comments support mentions and email replies, and external guests can be invited with any role while observers and contractors get properly scoped read paths. Workload per member, portfolio views across workspaces and cross-project dashboards put team-level planning front and center. I found no public information on dependency management beyond card-to-card reference links, so I stop just short of the full span. 5 7 8 14
The Enterprise Architect
Assignments with multiple members, guest invitations with any assignable role, read-only contractor, observer and unlicensed roles, and permissions down to field, group and view level — that survives a departmental rollout. Cross-project dashboards, a portfolio view and a per-member workload chart make team-level planning first-class; we found no public information on explicit dependency tracking beyond linking cards by reference number. 1 5 7 8
The UX Purist
Team planning is demonstrably real: multi-assignee cards, mentions with reply-by-email, guests invitable into any role, four permission levels plus custom roles, and a workload chart sitting next to cross-project dashboards and portfolio views. The one gap I can see is relations — cards link by reference number, and we found no public information on a dependency or blocker view — which keeps it just under the top of the scale. 5 7 8 14
The Integrator
Shared boards with multiple assignees, mentions, email-reply comments and roles granular down to the field level, plus guest invitations, read-only client share links, cross-project dashboards and a per-member workload chart — team-level planning is real. I found no public information on explicit card dependency tracking (blocks/blocked-by), which is what would make planning fully first-class. 1 5 7 8 14
The Skeptic
Multiple assignees per card, mentions, comments answerable by email, guest invitations assignable to any role, read-only share links and observer tiers make the second user a first-class citizen, and cross-project dashboards, portfolio views and a per-member workload chart lift planning above the single project. Dependencies surface only as 'relationship fields' inside the import documentation, Teams are gated to Business and Enterprise plans, and personal workspaces exist only on Private Cloud or Self-Hosted deployments. 5 8 9 14 2
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
Configurable cross-project reporting is well evidenced: a query language with sum and count aggregations, chart types from tables to radar, a dashboard editor combining figures and charts, time and expense logs, per-member velocity and workload views, plus a PowerBI guide for live data and a plainly stated export feature. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 2 7 8 14
The Bootstrapper
A deep built-in catalog — burndown, cumulative flow, cycle time, member velocity, workload — plus a query language doing sums and counts, charts that save as views, cross-project dashboards, time and expense tracking through card logs, and a general data export. Scheduled delivery and API access to every metric the UI shows are not evidenced, so I do not reach the top. 2 7 8 14
The Enterprise Architect
Charts go well past board status — burndown with sprint forecasting, cumulative flow, cycle time, member velocity, workload — and the query language supports aggregation calculations rendered as table, line, bar, pie or radar, saved as views, with a cross-project dashboard editor and a PowerBI guide on live data. Card logs cover time and expenses; we found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 7 8 14
The UX Purist
The analytics guide shows a genuine report builder — KQL queries with sum() and count() aggregations, five chart types, rearrangeable widgets, reports saved as views — plus burndown, cycle-time, velocity and workload charts, time and expense logs on cards, a PowerBI live-data guide, and export available at any time. Cross-project dashboards are documented; we found no public information on scheduled report delivery or API access to every metric the dashboards show. 7 8 14 2
The Integrator
Customizable reports with burndown, cumulative flow, cycle time and velocity charts, a query language with aggregations like sum() and count(), reports saved as views and combined into cross-project dashboards; card logs track time and expenses and PowerBI can build reports on live data. I found no public information on budget or utilization reporting, scheduled delivery, or report-level export beyond the general data export feature. 2 7 8 14
The Skeptic
The analytics guide shows burndown, cumulative flow, cycle time, velocity and workload charts, a query language with sum() and count() aggregations, reports savable as views, time and expenses tracked on card logs, and cross-project dashboards — with a PowerBI live-data guide and a general data export feature on top. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery or on budget reporting beyond per-card expense logs. 7 8 14 2
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
A documented public API and webhook pages, Zapier, two-way GitHub synchronization, Slack and Teams connectors, Google and Dropbox attachments, and genuine import paths from Trello, Asana, Jira and spreadsheets make for strong connectivity. We found no public information on calendar integration, and the Teams connector is reserved for Enterprise offers. 9 10 11 14
The Bootstrapper
Slack with slash commands, two-way GitHub sync, Google, Dropbox, Toggl and Zapier, with a documented API and webhooks, plus genuine import paths from Trello, Asana, Jira and spreadsheets with field mapping. I found no public information on a plugin or app ecosystem that would make it extensible as a platform, so it stays a strong connector rather than an ecosystem. 2 9 10 11
The Enterprise Architect
A documented API, per-project webhooks with JSON payloads and event headers, Zapier, GitHub two-way sync, Slack commands, Google, Dropbox, GitLab, Toggl and a Teams connector reserved for Enterprise, plus real import paths from Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub and spreadsheets with field mapping. Not ecosystem-grade: we found no public information on a plugin or app platform. 9 10 11
The UX Purist
GitHub with two-way sync, GitLab, Slack commands, Google login and Drive, Dropbox, Zapier, documented webhooks with payload and event headers, and a documented API with a full import endpoint set; the Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub and spreadsheet importers are unusually deep. But Toggl arrives through a browser extension, the Teams connector sits behind the Enterprise plan, and we found no public information on calendar feeds or automation platforms beyond Zapier — so the catalogue stops short of broad. 9 10 11 14
The Integrator
A documented API with concrete endpoints and key auth, per-project webhooks with event headers and JSON payloads (including custom payload injection), a Zapier listing, two-way GitHub sync, Slack commands and real importers from Trello, Jira, Asana, GitHub and spreadsheets with full field mapping — and an export feature for the exit. I found no public information on calendar integrations or a plugin/extension surface, which is what would push it to ecosystem grade. 9 10 11 14
The Skeptic
Webhooks are documented down to event headers and JSON payload shape, the API covers imports and project attributes with key auth, Zapier and PowerBI are covered, and importers from Trello, Asana, Jira and GitHub (with two-way sync) are real entry and exit paths. The native catalogue is a handful of names, the Teams connector is reserved for Enterprise offers, and we found no public information on calendar integration. 9 10 11
Onboarding effort
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
A 15-day trial with no credit card required, 30-plus ready-to-use templates, spreadsheet import that can create the first workspace, and a ten-minute getting-started guide put a first working project within an hour's reach. Deeper configuration such as card models and custom fields is walked through afterwards in a guide library with stated durations, so it is not needed before anything works. 1 2 6 9 11 14
The Bootstrapper
Fifteen days free with no credit card, thirty-plus ready-to-use templates, importers that pull existing work in from Trello, Asana, Jira or a spreadsheet, and a catalog of short timed guides that teach the advanced features as a team grows. That is minutes-to-value territory; I take off a sliver only because in-app guided setup itself is not shown, only guides and template imports. 1 2 6 9 11 12 14
The Enterprise Architect
Fifteen days free without a credit card, thirty-plus ready-to-use templates, and importers that pull existing Trello, Asana, Jira or spreadsheet work in with field mapping. Signup to a working project inside an hour without paid services is credible on what is published. 1 2 8 9
The UX Purist
Fifteen days free with no credit card, thirty-plus ready-to-use templates, and importers that pull Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub or a mapped spreadsheet straight in — a small team reaches a working project well inside the first hour. The guides carry honest time estimates (getting started in ten minutes, reporting in five), which is the software teaching itself; we found no public information on an in-product guided setup wizard. 1 2 6 9 14
The Integrator
A 15-day trial with no credit card required, thirty-plus ready-to-use templates and importers that pull existing Trello, Jira, Asana, GitHub or spreadsheet work in get a small team to a real project fast. The timed guides — getting started in ten minutes — teach the tool's flexibility as the team grows into it. 1 6 9 14
The Skeptic
A 15-day free trial with no credit card required, thirty-plus ready-to-use templates, and a workspace-creation flow that can import from Trello, Asana, Jira, GitHub or a spreadsheet all point to a fast first project. The default template library, however, is a manual download-and-import, admin-only to install, and version-matched to Kantree 9.X — built for admins, not the newcomer at signup. 1 2 9 12
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer
The operator is named as Digicoop SARL, a French worker cooperative, with primary hosting at OVH in France, files and backups in AWS's Ireland region, a published DPA, a no-transfer-outside-the-EEA commitment, and deletion fixed at 60 days after account termination. Subprocessor exposure is documented in the privacy policy, though several of them — AWS, Stripe, Sentry — sit under US parent companies, and we found no published company register or imprint to verify ownership beyond the vendor's own statement. On-premise and SecNumCloud hosting options on the Business plan strengthen the posture further. 1 2 3 4
The Bootstrapper
Good bones: a French workers cooperative, hosting on OVH in France, a public DPA, backups in Ireland and a stated commitment to no transfers outside the EEA. But no company register or imprint is published, ownership could not be confirmed on the captured pages, and AWS, Stripe, Sentry and Mailgun are all US-headquartered processors listed in the privacy policy — documented exposure, but exposure all the same. 1 3 4
The Enterprise Architect
A French workers' cooperative operating as Digicoop SARL, primary hosting at OVH in France, files and backups in AWS Ireland, a stated absence of transfers outside the EEA, and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to documented US-headquartered subprocessors serving EU-resident roles. We found no public imprint or company register, so verification rests on the vendor's own pages. 1 3 4
The UX Purist
A French workers' cooperative, 100% employee-owned, hosting on OVH in France, with a public DPA link and an explicit statement that no transfer takes place outside the EEA. Remaining exposure is named and documented subprocessors — AWS S3 in Ireland for files and backups, plus Sentry, Stripe and email providers — which matches the documented-subprocessor profile; the absence of a published company register or imprint costs a little verifiability. 1 3 4
The Integrator
A French worker cooperative, 100% employee-owned, hosting on OVH in France with files and backups on AWS in Ireland, a public DPA and a stated position that no transfer takes place outside the EEA. Remaining exposure is the documented US-headquartered subprocessors (AWS, Sentry, Stripe), which keeps it short of an EU-only stack. 1 3 4
The Skeptic
A French cooperative claim backed by OVH hosting in France, backups in AWS's Ireland region, a public DPA and a privacy policy stating no transfer outside the EEA puts substance above paperwork. But no imprint or company register is published — the legal form rests on 'SARL' inside the privacy policy — the 100% employee-owned line appears only as homepage marketing, and US companies Stripe and Sentry sit in the subprocessor list. 1 3 4
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
The help centre spans guides, FAQ, developers, on-premise and community sections, and the guide library covers onboarding through advanced topics with stated durations; email support exists via the contact channel while phone support sits on Enterprise and priority support on Business. We found no public information on chat support, published response times or a visible product changelog. 2 12 13 14
The Bootstrapper
The docs are genuinely deep: a help center with guides, FAQ, developer and community sections, and short timed guides from a ten-minute getting started through KQL and PowerBI, with email support available to anyone. I found no public information on chat support, response times or published SLAs, and phone support is Enterprise-only while Business buys "Priority support" — help quality is visibly tiered by plan. 2 12 13 14
The Enterprise Architect
A help center with Guides, FAQ, Developers, On-Premise and Community sections plus a deep set of timed guides — getting started in ten minutes, reporting, integrations, card customization — reads as genuine onboarding documentation. But we found no public information on chat support, response times or support channels below the Business tier, and phone support appears only on Enterprise. 2 13 14
The UX Purist
The support center spans Guides, FAQ, Developers, On-Premise and Community, with short time-estimated guides (getting started in ten minutes, KQL in ten, PowerBI in five) and genuinely deep developer documentation. But channels thin out below the top plans — phone support appears on Enterprise, priority support on Business — and we found no public information on chat availability, published response times or a visible product changelog. 13 14 2
The Integrator
A help center with Guides, FAQ, Developers, On-Premise and Community sections, plus a catalog of timed guides covering getting started, reporting, the query language and PowerBI, reads deep and current. Phone support appears only on Enterprise and priority support on Business, and I found no public information on chat availability, published response-time SLAs or a changelog. 2 3 13 14
The Skeptic
Guides carry read times (getting started 10 min, reporting 5 min, PowerBI 5 min, KQL 10 min) and the help center spans FAQ, Developers, On-Premise and Community sections with a direct support email. We found no public information on a product changelog, on chat support, or on published response times, and phone support is an Enterprise line item while Business gets 'Priority support'. 13 14 2
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer
Both self-serve tiers are priced per user per month — "8€ / user / month" and "15€ / user / month" — with tax treatment stated plainly ("Prices exclude VAT (EU only)"), the annual discount and its lock-in billing terms disclosed, and quotas such as automations and storage listed per tier. Only the Enterprise tier sits behind "Contact us", and the annual figure is presented as a "-20%!" flag alongside the monthly price rather than as its own number. 1 2
The Bootstrapper
The self-serve tiers answer fast — "Team 8€ / user / month" and "Business 15€ / user / month" with VAT treatment and annual billing terms printed right on the page, which I respect. But the annual rate appears only as a "-20%!" flag rather than a figure, paying annually means the full year is charged immediately with cancellation only at year end, and features that matter — the Teams connector, phone support, unlimited organizations — sit behind an unpriced "Contact us" Enterprise tier. 2 9
The Enterprise Architect
Team and Business tiers carry per-user monthly prices with the annual discount and its cancellation terms stated, storage and automation quotas on the page, and the tax treatment in plain sight — "Prices exclude VAT (EU only)". The Enterprise tier is "Contact us" while gating directory services, the Teams connector and hosting options that a two-hundred-seat buyer would actually need. 2
The UX Purist
Both self-serve tiers carry their numbers on the page — Team 8€ / user / month, Business 15€ / user / month — with the annual saving stated as "-20%!", VAT treatment spelled out as "Prices exclude VAT (EU only)", annual billing terms disclosed up front, and a 15-day trial with no credit card. Only Enterprise reads "Contact us", and its scope (hosting options, directory services) looks like genuinely custom work rather than a hidden line item. 2 1
The Integrator
Team at 8€ / user / month and Business at 15€ / user / month are on the page, with the annual discount ("-20%!"), VAT treatment ("Prices exclude VAT (EU only)"), automation and storage quotas all public, and only the enterprise tier behind contact-us. Even the annual billing terms — full-year charge, cancellation only at year end — are spelled out rather than buried. 1 2
The Skeptic
Team at 8€ / user / month and Business at 15€ / user / month are printed on the page with the -20% annual discount, the statement 'Prices exclude VAT (EU only)', quota lines for automations and storage, and — to their credit — the annual lock-in spelled out: charged for the full year immediately, cancellable only at the end of the year. Only the Enterprise tier hides behind 'Contact us'. 2 1
European sovereignty — proven facts
3 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in FR ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | EU only | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 3 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Ownership. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. No imprint or company register is published; the code is derived from the French legal form 'SARL' and the privacy policy's statement that data is transferred to France and processed there.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. AWS is used only for files and backups and stores them in its Ireland region, while the primary hosting subprocessor OVH is French; only the US headquarters of AWS triggers the Cloud Act exposure.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (14)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage kantree.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page kantree.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy kantree.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Security page kantree.io Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Reporting — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Integrations — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Integrations — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Support & documentation — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Support & documentation — found from sitemap kantree.io Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →