whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Project Management & Collaboration

ClickUp

Rest of world Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 3 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by ClickUp (Mango Technologies, Inc.) · clickup.com

Compare with Scoro → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Integrator

Weighted verdict

Lives in the API docs before the product tour. Optimizes for webhooks, import/export and a tool that plays well in a stack. Rejects closed ecosystems and CSV-only exits.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Integrator

Collaboration depth

How this is scored

How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.

0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.

3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.

5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.

8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.

10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.

Report an error

The Integrator

Multi-user workspaces with owners, end users and permission inheritance are evidenced ('your team's project and task data', AI respecting user permissions, Enterprise SCIM), so a second user clearly has a defined place. But the evidence is silent on the mechanics that make planning shared — assignments, timelines, dependencies, workload, guest access — so it cannot honestly clear rubric level 3. 4 2 1

Report an error

Reporting

How this is scored

Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.

0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.

3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.

5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.

8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.

10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.

Report an error

The Integrator

Nothing here reports on the work: no dashboards, time, budget or utilization views, and no export path of any kind — not even a CSV exit. The only adjacent items are an Enterprise-only audit log and an 'Enterprise API' pricing line item, which is compliance logging plus an undocumented pipe, not reporting. 2

Report an error

Integrations

How this is scored

How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.

0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.

3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.

5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.

8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.

10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.

Report an error

The Integrator

Three marquee connections are named (Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce, 'and more') with an MCP surface claim and native automations, which nudges above the closed-box anchors. But the API exists in this evidence only as an Enterprise pricing feature, and there is no documented public API, no webhooks, no automation-platform support, no importer and no export path — a gated pipe is not an open ecosystem. 1 2

Report an error

Onboarding effort

How this is scored

Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.

0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.

3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.

5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.

8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.

10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.

Report an error

The Integrator

'Free forever. No credit card' plus native apps on every platform is a genuinely frictionless self-serve entry, and 2FA even on the free plan signals sensible defaults. Docked below 8 because nothing evidences guided setup, templates, or — the part I weigh most — an importer to pull a team's existing work in. 1 2

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.

0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.

3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.

5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.

8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.

10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.

Report an error

The Integrator

A San Diego entity governed by US/California law 'regardless of your location', under FTC oversight, with the privacy policy explicitly permitting transfer to the United States — GDPR-compliant badges and a DPA sit on top of that, which is exactly the paperwork-over-substance pattern. The Ireland AWS region is real but Enterprise-gated and sits on a US hyperscaler within CLOUD Act reach. 4 3 2

Report an error

Support & documentation

How this is scored

Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.

0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.

3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.

5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.

8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.

10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.

Report an error

The Integrator

'24/7 Support' is claimed on the homepage, pricing and privacy pages with no visible plan gating, which is better than email-only. But the registry captures no help center, guides, changelog or API documentation at all, and even ISO certificates and SOC reports are only available by emailing sales — an information culture that gates rather than publishes. 2 4 3

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?

0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".

3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.

5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.

8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.

10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.

Report an error

The Integrator

Per-user prices are public for the AI tiers ($9, $28) alongside a no-credit-card free tier, so the surface is self-serve priced. But 'save up to 20–30%' hedging, metered AI credits at $0.001 each that make the headline not the invoice, an unpriced contact-sales Enterprise tier, and silence on tax treatment keep it firmly in needs-qualifying territory. 2 1

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

3 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency EU optional ⚠ unverified 1/3 pts 3 Report an error
Subprocessors US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified 0/2 pts 3 Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about ClickUp? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (14)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage clickup.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Vendor pricing page clickup.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Security page clickup.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Privacy policy clickup.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap developer.clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Reporting — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Reporting — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Integrations — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integrations — found from sitemap developer.clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Support & documentation — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Support & documentation — found from sitemap clickup.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →