Collaboration depth
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Integrator
Task and milestone dependencies, cross-project overviews, team workloads, and custom roles & permissions are all named features, and guests are a real account class (workspace deletion explicitly removes 'members, guests') — that is first-class team-level planning per the anchor. I stop short of 10 because a marketing feature list can't evidence the full two-freelancers-to-department span, and the flat-price tier only covering 7–10 person teams hints at a team-size seam. 3 2