Project Management & Collaboration
Notion
Rest of world Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Notion Labs, Inc. · www.notion.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Notion, a project management and collaboration product from Notion Labs, Inc., San Francisco, is strongest on integrations — scores hold at 8 with no spread, on a documented public API, real-time webhooks and importers from Confluence, Asana, Trello and Evernote — and on onboarding effort at 8-9, where a Free plan at €0, starter templates and importers with limits stated up front reach value without a sales conversation. Sovereignty is the weak point at 2-3: the privacy policy says data may be transferred, processed and stored anywhere in the world including the United States, AWS and Cloudflare are named without region details, and we found no public information confirming EU data residency. Pricing transparency splits widest, 5-7: lower scores weighed Enterprise 'Custom pricing' holding the audit log and SCIM provisioning plus AI metering at $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits; higher scores read the public €0, €9.50 and €19.50 per member / month prices as clear enough. Reporting sat at 5-6, held down by dashboards gated to Business and Enterprise and analytics that count content views, not time, budgets or utilization.
Speaks for it
- Integrations scored 8 with no spread, on a documented public API, real-time webhooks and working importers from Confluence, Asana, Trello and Evernote.
- Onboarding effort scored 8-9, with self-serve signup on a Free plan at €0, starter templates personalized during onboarding and importer limits stated up front.
- Real-time collaboration is evidenced in concurrent block editing without locking, comments attached to individual blocks and mentions feeding a notification inbox.
- Support and documentation scored 7-8, backed by a help center that names import limits and webhook gaps, an academy with certifications and a published 99.9% uptime guarantee.
- Whole-workspace export to HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF is documented, giving a workable exit path.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scored 2-3, with a San Francisco legal entity, privacy-policy language allowing transfer and storage anywhere in the world including the United States, and we found no public information confirming EU data residency.
- Reporting scored 5-6, with dashboards available only on Business and Enterprise and page analytics tracking content popularity rather than time, budgets or utilization.
- Pricing transparency spanned 5-7, with Enterprise at 'Custom pricing' holding the audit log and SCIM provisioning, AI usage metered at $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits, and we found no public information on tax treatment.
- We found no public information on dependency management or workload and capacity views, which judges said keeps team-level planning short of first-class.
- Import friction is spelled out in the fine print, from one Google Doc at a time to Trello Power-Ups, automations and permissions needing a rebuild after import.
Best for
- You want a workspace your team can adopt without paid help — signup, starter templates and importers run from the Free plan at €0.
- You depend on a documented public API, real-time webhooks and connections such as Slack, GitHub and Google Drive, where integrations scored 8 with no spread.
- You are moving work from Confluence, Asana, Trello or Evernote and want a documented exit path through whole-workspace export to HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF.
- Your planning fits cross-database dashboards with timelines and assignee grouping, and you are buying Business or Enterprise.
Avoid if
- You must show where your data is processed or stored — the privacy policy says data may be transferred, processed and stored anywhere in the world including the United States, and we found no public information confirming EU data residency.
- You need time, budget or utilization reporting to manage project cost — the documented analytics count content views, and dashboards sit on Business and Enterprise only.
- You need the audit log or SCIM provisioning at a published price — both are Enterprise features, and Enterprise is 'Custom pricing'.
The scores
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Genuine multi-person work is evidenced: unlimited concurrent editing, comments attached to blocks, mentions with notifications, read/comment/edit permission levels, and external guests on every paid plan. Dashboards combine multiple databases into one team-level view with global filters, though only on Business and Enterprise, and we found no public information on dependency management or workload/capacity planning. 5 6 2 7
The Bootstrapper
Unlimited concurrent editors on the same block, comments pinned to pages, text and blocks, mentions feeding a notification inbox, and read/comment/edit permission levels with a ten-guest allowance on the free tier make this a real shared workspace from day one, priced per member so 3 seats and 30 cost the same per head. Cross-database dashboards with assignee grouping and timelines only unlock on Business and Enterprise, and I found no public information on dependency tracking or workload and capacity views, so department-level planning would need workarounds. 2 5 6 7
The Enterprise Architect
Unlimited guests on paid tiers with read, comment and edit permission levels, block-level concurrent editing, presence, mentions and lock controls give shared work real structure, and dashboards can pull timelines and assignee groupings from multiple databases. We found no public information on dependency management or workload and capacity planning, which a 200-seat deployment would need to plan around. 2 5 6 7
The UX Purist
Unlimited concurrent editing with presence avatars, comments down to individual blocks, mentions funneling into one inbox, and guest limits that lift to unlimited on paid plans — that is real shared work, not a shared folder. Cross-database dashboards with grouping by assignee give team-level planning, but we found no public information on dependency handling or workload/capacity views, which is the step from solid to first-class. 2 5 6 7
The Integrator
Concurrent block editing, block-level comments, mentions with an inbox, live presence and read/comment/edit permission levels are documented, guests run from ten on the free plan to unlimited on paid, and dashboards can combine timeline and board widgets from multiple databases. We found no public information on dependency tracking or workload/capacity views, which keeps team-level planning short of first-class. 5 6 2 7
The Skeptic
Real co-editing is genuinely evidenced — simultaneous block editing without locking, presence avatars, comments attached down to individual blocks, mentions feeding a notification inbox, and read/comment/edit permission levels with unlimited guests on paid plans. Team-level planning appears only as dashboard views combining multiple databases with timelines and grouping by assignee, gated to Business and Enterprise, and we found no public information on dependency management or workload and capacity views. 2 5 6 7
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
Page analytics with total and unique views plus who created, edited or viewed content, and a workspace-level analytics overview, are documented; dashboards support charts, filters, sorts, groups and global filters across multiple data sources. We found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting, and the documented exports are workspace content in HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF rather than reports themselves. 8 7 2
The Bootstrapper
Dashboards can stitch tables, boards, calendars, charts and timelines from multiple databases behind global filters, which is genuine cross-project reporting — but it ships only on Business and Enterprise, and page analytics counts content views rather than work done. I found no public information on time tracking, budgets or utilization, so I cannot use this to manage project cost. 2 7 8
The Enterprise Architect
Dashboards combine widgets from multiple databases with global filters, charts and timelines, page and workspace analytics track views and editors, and export runs to HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF with admin APIs for exports on Enterprise. We found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting, and dashboards are gated to Business and Enterprise. 2 7 8
The UX Purist
Dashboard views combine charts, timelines, calendars and global filters across multiple databases, and page analytics counts views and viewers — but dashboards sit on Business and Enterprise only, and we found no public information on time, budget or utilization reporting. Full-workspace export as HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF at least lets the answers leave the tool. 2 7 8
The Integrator
Dashboard views deliver configurable cross-database reporting — filters, sorts, grouping by status or assignee, charts — and page analytics track views and editors, with whole-workspace export to HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF. We found no public information on time tracking, budgets, utilization or scheduled delivery, and dashboards are Business/Enterprise-only with a twelve-widget cap. 7 8 2
The Skeptic
Dashboards can combine widgets from multiple databases with charts, timelines and global filters that cut across data sources, and page and workspace analytics track total views, unique views and who created, edited or viewed content — but dashboards sit behind Business and Enterprise, and everything evidenced measures content popularity rather than time, budgets or utilization. Whole-workspace export to HTML, Markdown, CSV and PDF is confirmed; we found no public information on scheduled delivery or a custom report builder. 2 7 8
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
A connection marketplace with native listings (Slack, GitHub, Google Drive, AI connectors for Teams, Jira, Linear, Outlook), a documented public API with real-time webhooks and a file upload API, plus real import paths from Confluence, Asana, Trello and Evernote. A beta custom-code extension surface and Enterprise admin APIs push toward ecosystem-grade; we found no public information on automation-platform coverage such as Zapier or Make. 9 10 12 2
The Bootstrapper
A connection marketplace with install counts in the hundreds of thousands for Google Drive, Slack and GitHub, a documented public API with webhooks and granular content and user permission scopes, plus importers from Confluence, Asana, Trello and Evernote, covers both the entry and the exit path. A beta custom-code surface extends it further; I found no public information on named automation-platform support such as Zapier or Make. 2 9 10 12
The Enterprise Architect
A genuine marketplace (Slack, GitHub, Google Drive, Jira and Linear connectors), a documented public API with webhooks and granular connection capabilities, Enterprise admin APIs for exports and legal holds, and importers from Confluence, Asana, Trello and Evernote make this a broad, exit-capable surface. Webhooks are documented as not covering user or workspace-settings changes, and we found no public information on automation-platform connectors. 2 9 10 12
The UX Purist
A documented public API with granular content and user capabilities, real-time webhooks (with honestly documented gaps for user and workspace-settings changes), native Slack, GitHub and Google Drive connectors, SCIM/SSO, and importers from Trello, Asana, Confluence and Evernote make both entry and exit paths real. Custom code via Notion Workers is in beta; we found no public information on automation platforms such as Zapier or Make. 2 9 10 12
The Integrator
A documented public API with granular content and user capabilities, real-time webhooks monitoring multiple workspaces, personal access tokens, a file upload API, Enterprise admin APIs for exports and legal holds, a broad catalogue and genuine import paths from Confluence, Asana, Trello and Evernote. The beta custom-code Workers push toward ecosystem-grade extensibility, but the documented webhooks give no notifications for user or workspace-settings changes, and we found no public information on automation-platform connectors such as Zapier or Make. 9 10 12 2
The Skeptic
A live marketplace with published install counts, embeds, AI connectors to Teams, Jira, Linear and calendars, a documented public API with granular content and user permission capabilities, real-time webhooks spanning multiple workspaces, and working importers from Confluence, Asana, Evernote and Trello make this the most evidenced capability on file. The webhook gaps are at least spelled out (no user or workspace-settings change notifications), and a Workers beta lets customers extend the product with custom code, though it is 'Free to try now' and 'Starts using credits on October 15'. We found no public information on automation-platform coverage, which keeps this below the top of the scale. 2 9 10 12
Onboarding effort
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
Signup lands on starter templates selected from the answers given during onboarding, thousands of marketplace templates stand behind that, and importers pull existing work in from Evernote, Trello, Confluence, Asana, CSV and ZIP archives up to 5 GB, with upload time, status and size tracked. A €0 free plan and a free trial of Notion AI mean value before any payment, and the help center teaches the advanced features as the team grows. 11 12 2
The Bootstrapper
Signup drops personalized starter templates into your sidebar based on questions you answer, thousands of marketplace templates back that up, and importers pull existing work in from Trello, Asana, Confluence and Evernote plus a long list of file formats — all reachable on a €0 plan, so no card is needed to reach first value. The limits are documented honestly, like 5 MB files on Free and one Google Doc at a time, so the first day holds few surprises. 2 11 12
The Enterprise Architect
A free tier at €0, templates personalized during signup, thousands of free and paid templates, and detailed importers for CSV, Trello, Asana, Confluence and Evernote get a team to value quickly without services. The import paths carry documented caveats — comments and permissions from Quip, suggestions from Google Docs, and Trello automations don't transfer — so the first migration needs reading, not just clicking. 2 11 12
The UX Purist
Signup lands you on starter templates personalized from what you tell them during onboarding, a marketplace of thousands more, and importers that pull in Trello boards and CSV rows with visible upload time, status and size — minutes to value on a free plan with a Notion AI trial and no payment details. Only niggles: Google Docs imports one document at a time and imports run on desktop and web only. 2 11 12
The Integrator
A free plan at €0 with a Notion AI trial, starter templates personalized during signup, thousands of marketplace templates, and importers that pull existing work from Trello, Evernote, Confluence and Asana with visible progress tracking. Import friction is real — one Google Doc at a time, Excel via CSV, five-megabyte limits on the free plan — and we found no public information on whether trials require payment details. 2 11 12
The Skeptic
Signup is self-serve on a Free plan at €0 with no payment details requested anywhere I can see, onboarding asks questions and pre-selects starter templates, and importers pull existing work in from CSV, Word, Evernote, Trello, Confluence and Asana with per-format limits stated up front. The friction hides in the importer fine print — Google Docs one document at a time, Quip one page at a time, and Trello Power-Ups, automations and permissions explicitly needing a rebuild after import. 2 11 12
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer
The controller is Notion Labs, Inc. of San Francisco, and its privacy policy states information may be transferred, processed and stored anywhere in the world, including the United States. A Data Processing Addendum and GDPR language including an EEA/UK complaint right are present, but we found no public information fixing EU data residency; AWS and Cloudflare are named as infrastructure without any region details, and the referenced subprocessor page was not available in the captured pages. The paperwork exists, yet nothing in these pages answers where the data actually lives. 4 3
The Bootstrapper
A San Francisco entity whose privacy policy states data may be transferred and stored "anywhere in the world, including but not limited to, the United States", with AWS and Cloudflare named as infrastructure and no region details given; a Master Subscription Agreement and Data Processing Addendum exist and GDPR-style complaint rights are spelled out, but this reads as compliance paperwork over substance. I found no public information confirming EU data residency on the vendor's own pages. 3 4
The Enterprise Architect
Notion Labs, Inc. is a San Francisco company whose privacy policy states information may be transferred, processed and stored anywhere in the world including the United States, with AWS and Cloudflare named as infrastructure partners and no region detail. A Data Processing Addendum and EEA/UK complaint rights exist, but we found no public information confirming EU data residency or on the contents of the subprocessor page the privacy policy points to — compliance paperwork, not substance I could defend to procurement. 3 4
The UX Purist
The privacy policy gives Notion Labs, Inc. a San Francisco address and states information may be transferred, processed and stored anywhere in the world including the United States; AWS and Cloudflare are named as infrastructure partners with no region details. A Data Processing Addendum, GDPR complaint rights and ISO/SOC attestations exist, but we found no public information establishing European ownership or EU data residency — compliance paperwork over substance. 3 4
The Integrator
A US company whose privacy policy says information may be transferred, processed and stored anywhere in the world including the United States, with AWS and Cloudflare named as infrastructure partners and no region information on the captured pages; a DPA and GDPR language exist, which reads as compliance paperwork over substance. We found no public information confirming EU data residency, and the named subprocessors sit within CLOUD Act reach. 3 4
The Skeptic
Notion Labs, Inc. is addressed in San Francisco, the privacy policy states all information 'may be transferred, processed, and stored anywhere in the world, including but not limited to, the United States', AWS and Cloudflare are named as infrastructure partners with no region details, and the referenced Subprocessor Page is not among the captured pages. A Data Processing Addendum, four ISO certifications and even a BSI C5 reference exist, which is compliance paperwork sitting on top of a US-owned, US-reachable default — we found no public information on any EU data residency option. 3 4
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
A help center, an academy with badges and certifications, chat and message support, webinars, community and a consultant directory are all evidenced. We found no public information on support response commitments per plan, a customer success manager is documented only for Enterprise, and whether chat is open on every plan is not shown. 13 6 2
The Bootstrapper
The help center is deep and concrete — exact import limits and mappings, webhook gaps named one by one, dashboard permission behavior — with chat, message support, an academy offering certifications, community webinars and a consultant directory behind it. I found no public information on a visible changelog or on response times by plan, which is what separates good here from a reason to buy on its own. 10 12 13
The Enterprise Architect
The help center is deep and current — the import guide documents limits down to file sizes and rate limits — and is surrounded by chat and message support, an academy with badges and certifications, community webinars and a consultant marketplace. We found no public information on published support SLAs or response times, the customer success manager is an Enterprise-only feature, and the 99.9% figure is an uptime guarantee rather than a support commitment. 2 6 12 13
The UX Purist
The help surface is deep and current — detailed guides for dashboards, imports and page analytics, plus an Academy with badges and certifications, community webinars, a consultant directory and a chat channel. We found no public information on support response-time SLAs or a visible changelog, and a customer success manager only appears on Enterprise; the 99.9% uptime guarantee is published but says nothing about answer speed. 2 3 13
The Integrator
Deep, current help-center articles on collaboration, dashboards, API capabilities and import limits, an academy with badges and certifications, community webinars, consultants, a chat channel and a published 99.9% uptime guarantee. We found no public information on support response times or a changelog, the customer success manager is Enterprise-only, and chat gating per plan is not documented. 13 6 2 3
The Skeptic
The help center is demonstrably deep and current — import size limits, dashboard modes and webhook exclusions are documented in specific, dated detail — and there is an academy with badges and certifications, community webinars, a consultants directory, a chat channel, a message-support link and a published 99.9% uptime guarantee. But the customer success manager is an Enterprise line item on the pricing page, and we found no public information on support response times, on which plans get chat, or on a visible changelog. 2 6 13 3
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer
Every self-serve tier carries a public price — Free at €0 per member / month, Plus at €9.50 per member / month, Business at €19.50 per member / month — with the yearly discount stated as 'Save up to 20% with yearly' and the AI add-on priced at $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits. Tax treatment is not shown on the page and Enterprise sits at 'Custom pricing', so the headline number still needs a little qualifying before it matches an invoice. 2 11
The Bootstrapper
Free at €0, Plus at "€9.50 per member / month" and Business at "€19.50 per member / month" let me price 3 seats and 30 seats the same way, we found no mention of seat minimums on the pricing page, and the plan comparison spells out history, retention and guest limits. But the yearly saving is only stated as "Save up to 20% with yearly", tax treatment goes unmentioned, Enterprise sits at "Custom pricing", and AI usage is metered as "Free to try, then $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits" — a dollar figure bolted onto euro plan prices — so the eventual invoice still needs qualifying. 2 11
The Enterprise Architect
Free, Plus and Business are publicly priced at €0, €9.50 and €19.50 per member / month with "Save up to 20% with yearly billing" stated, and AI credits are quoted at "$10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits". But the deciding factor for my seats — SSO via SAML 2.0, SCIM provisioning and the audit log — sits in the custom-priced Enterprise tier, and we found no public information on tax treatment, so the real payable cost of a compliant deployment is not determinable without a sales conversation. 2 3
The UX Purist
Free, €9.50 and €19.50 per member per month sit plainly on the page with the billing-period difference stated ('Save up to 20% with yearly') and AI usage priced at $10 per 1,000 monthly credits; Enterprise is custom, which is honest for the work it involves. We found no public information on tax treatment or what the asterisks on the plan names denote, so the headline number still needs one qualifying question before it matches an invoice. 2
The Integrator
Free, Plus and Business are priced on the page at €0, €9.50 and €19.50 per member per month with plan limits and guest counts side by side, and the yearly difference is stated as saving up to 20%. The per-month figures don't say which billing period they assume, tax treatment is absent from the captured pages, and Enterprise — the only tier with audit log, SCIM provisioning and a customer success manager — is custom-priced, so the deciding number still needs qualifying. 2
The Skeptic
Three tiers are priced in the open — Free €0, Plus €9.50 per member / month, Business €19.50 per member / month — but the billing-period difference is only the soft phrase 'Save up to 20% with yearly billing', and we found no public information on tax treatment. Enterprise is 'Custom pricing' while holding the audit log, SCIM provisioning and unlimited page history, and a metered credit economy runs on top — 'Free to try, then $10 per 1,000 monthly Notion credits' — with no published consumption rates for what actually eats those credits. 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
2 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in US ⚠ unverified | 0/3 pts | 4 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 3 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. The country is taken from the contact address in the privacy policy, not from an imprint or commercial register; no state of incorporation is named.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. AWS and Cloudflare are named as infrastructure partners without any region details, and the privacy policy refers to a separate Subprocessor Page that is not included in these excerpts.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 7 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (13)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.notion.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page www.notion.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Security page www.notion.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy www.notion.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Reporting — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Integrations — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Integrations — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Onboarding effort — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Support & documentation — found from sitemap www.notion.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →