Project Management & Collaboration
Planisware
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Planisware SAS · www.planisware.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Planisware at a glance
- Vendor
- Planisware SAS
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Planisware 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Planisware, from Planisware SAS, is an AI-powered project portfolio management platform judged on captured public pages. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 3 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Planisware, from Planisware SAS, is an AI-powered project portfolio management platform judged on captured public pages. Its strongest scores are unambiguous: integrations sit at 9, on a native catalogue spanning Jira, bidirectional Rally sync, Microsoft Project and Primavera P6 import/export, plus ERP, HR, CRM and CTMS systems, over an OpenAPI-documented REST API; reporting sits at 8 with a built-in BI tool, earned-value reporting and BI-Box connections into Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos and Spotfire; collaboration depth clusters at 7-8 on shared portfolio roadmaps and Gantt, timeline and Kanban views across entire portfolios. The weak scores are equally stark. Sovereignty sits at 0 — we found no public information on data residency, data processing agreements or subprocessors, and the single-tenant cloud statement names no jurisdiction — and onboarding effort scores 1-2, "Request a free demo" being the only documented entry point. The widest spread, support and documentation at 4-6, reflects how judges weighed a deep Academy gated behind a Planisware portal account against absent public information on support channels; the flagged split check found nothing material.
Speaks for it
- Integrations scored 9, on a native catalogue spanning Jira, bidirectional Rally sync, Microsoft Project and Primavera P6 import/export, plus ERP, HR, CRM and CTMS systems on an OpenAPI-documented REST API.
- Reporting scored 8, with a built-in BI tool, earned-value reporting and BI-Box connections into Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos and Spotfire.
- Collaboration depth scored 7-8 on shared portfolio roadmaps and Gantt, timeline and Kanban views across entire portfolios.
- Training is documented in depth: three Academy learning plans, administrator levels from Associate to Expert, and a 30-minute multiple-choice exam with an 80% passing score.
- Analyst recognition on record as a Leader in the Forrester Wave for Strategic Portfolio Management and the Gartner Magic Quadrant for Adaptive Project Management and Reporting.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scored 0: we found no public information on data residency, data processing agreements or subprocessors, and the single-tenant cloud statement names no jurisdiction.
- Onboarding effort scored 1-2: "Request a free demo" is the only documented entry point, and we found no public information on a trial or self-serve signup.
- Support and documentation scored 4-6: Academy access requires a Planisware portal account, and we found no public information on support channels, response times or SLAs.
- We found no public information on guest or client access to projects, which judges cited in holding collaboration depth below the top band.
- Pricing transparency scored 0-1: no price, tier or billing term appears on any captured page.
Best for
- You plan across an entire portfolio and need shared roadmaps with Gantt, timeline and Kanban views plus capacity what-if scenarios.
- Your reporting leans on earned value, funding models and hand-off to Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos or Spotfire.
- Your stack already runs Jira, Rally, Microsoft Project or Primavera P6 and you need documented import/export or bidirectional sync.
- You are a PMO with budget and time for formal Academy training and administrator certification.
Avoid if
- Your procurement requires a published data residency statement or data processing agreement before a tool can be cleared.
- You want hands-on evaluation before any sales conversation; only a free demo request is documented.
- You are a small team that needs self-serve signup and a fast first week; onboarding effort scored 1-2.
- You need documented support channels, response times and SLAs before committing a large seat count.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Collaboration depth | 4 of 5 |
| Reporting | 4 of 5 |
| Integrations | 4.5 of 5 |
| Onboarding effort | 1 of 5 |
| Support & documentation | 3 of 5 |
Collaboration depth
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Data Protection Officer
Portfolio-level planning is first-class: Gantt, timeline and Kanban views extend across entire portfolios, capacity forecasts feed what-if scenarios, and document repositories carry permissions and version control, with native Slack and bidirectional Microsoft Teams work bringing discussion into the tool. External involvement is evidenced only as document signing by signees who do not use Planisware; we found no public information on guest or client access to projects. 2 4 5
The Bootstrapper
The captured pages document genuinely portfolio-scale shared work: unified roadmaps executives and teams share, Gantt, timeline and Kanban views stretched across entire portfolios, capacity forecasts feeding what-if scenarios, and permissions on centralised document repositories and role-based dashboards. We found no public information on guest or client access, which is the one piece of the top tier I could not verify. 1 2 4
The Enterprise Architect
Portfolio-grade collaboration is documented: unified portfolio roadmaps, Gantt and Kanban views extended across entire portfolios, capacity forecasts feeding what-if scenarios, and centralised document repositories with permissions, version control and audit trails. External-party access appears only as a DocuSign signature for people who are not users, so the guest and client dimension rests on thin evidence, but the shared planning, capacity and dependency surface is first-class. 2 4 5
The UX Purist
Shared portfolio roadmaps, standardised status and risk views, role-based dashboards, document repositories with permissions and version control, plus bidirectional Microsoft Teams integration and per-project Slack channels — real multi-person planning, not a shared to-do list. Capacity forecasts, resource and capacity management and Gantt/timeline/Kanban views extended across entire portfolios put team-level planning front and centre. We found no public information on guest or client access, which keeps it shy of the top band. 2 3 4 5
The Integrator
Executives and teams share unified portfolio roadmaps and one view of what is funded and sequenced, Gantt, timeline and Kanban views run across entire portfolios, and capacity forecasts with PERT and stage-gate support give real dependency and workload depth — planning here is genuinely team-level. Centralised document repositories with permissions and version control, meeting notes tied to deliverables, and native Teams and Slack surfaces round it out. We found no public information on guest or client access, which keeps this below the very top. 2 3 4
The Skeptic
Shared portfolio roadmaps, Gantt, timeline and Kanban views across whole portfolios, capacity forecasts fed by HR skills-and-availability sync, and document repositories with permissions, version control and audit trails — this is first-class team-level planning, not a personal list. We found no public information on guest or client access or on per-person assignment with comment threads, so I stop short of the top band. 1 2 4 5
Reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the tool can answer questions about the work: progress, time, budgets, utilization — and export the answer.
0 — No reporting beyond looking at the board.
3 — Fixed per-project status views only; nothing aggregates across projects and nothing exports cleanly.
5 — Useful standard reports (progress, tracked time) with basic filters and CSV export, but limited customization and no budget/utilization depth.
8 — Configurable cross-project reporting incl. time, budgets and utilization, with dashboards and reliable exports.
10 — Reporting is a product in itself: custom report builder, scheduled delivery, API access to every metric the UI shows.
The Data Protection Officer
Cross-project reporting is configurable and deep: out-of-the-box dashboards with dynamic queries, a built-in BI tool with measures, overlays and counting measures, earned value, cost tracking and capacity forecasts, plus connectors to Tableau, PowerBI and peers. Export paths exist through automated flat-file batches and CSV, and the REST API is OpenAPI-documented; we found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 4 5 7
The Bootstrapper
This is real reporting muscle: a built-in BI tool with measures, queries, dashboards and advanced overlays, out-of-the-box dashboards with dynamic queries, budget, cost and earned-value reporting, plus automated flat-file export and third-party BI connections through Tableau, PowerBI and peers. It stays below the top level because we found no public information on scheduled report delivery or API access to every metric the interface shows. 3 4 5 7
The Enterprise Architect
A built-in BI tool with measures, queries, overlays and dashboards, out-of-the-box portfolio dashboards, earned value alongside budget controls and capacity forecasts, plus BI-Box feeding Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos and Spotfire, with real-time metrics tied to underlying plans. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery or whether the REST API exposes every metric the interface shows, which keeps this short of full marks. 3 4 5 7
The UX Purist
Out-of-the-box dashboards, dynamic queries, a built-in BI tool covering measures, queries and overlays, earned value, cost tracking and capacity what-if scenarios — this answers real questions across projects. BI-Box hands Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos and Spotfire the data, batch exports run on a set cadence, the REST API is OpenAPI-documented, and AI generates reports and decks from live data in one prompt. We found no public information on scheduled delivery of reports or whether every metric shown in the interface is API-reachable, so it sits just under the top. 3 4 5 7
The Integrator
A built-in BI tool with measures, queries and dashboards, earned-value reporting, funding models, cost tracking and capacity what-if scenarios cover progress, budgets and utilization across projects, with out-of-the-box dashboards and dynamic queries on top. Exports are real: automated flat-file batches, XML and Microsoft Project schedule export, schedule exchange with Primavera P6, and BI-Box into Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos and Spotfire. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery. 3 4 5 7
The Skeptic
Earned value, funding models, cost tracking and real-time portfolio metrics are documented, with a built-in BI tool (measures, queries, dashboards up to overlays), connectors to Tableau, PowerBI, Qlik, Cognos and Spotfire, and CSV, XML, batch and REST-API export paths. That is configurable cross-project reporting with budget and capacity depth; we found no public information on scheduled delivery of reports. 3 4 5 7
Integrations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How well the tool connects to the rest of the stack: native integrations, calendar/comms hooks, API and webhooks, import/export paths.
0 — A closed box — no API, no integrations, CSV out if anything.
3 — A handful of marquee integrations, no public API or an API that covers a fraction of the product.
5 — The common set (calendar, Slack/Teams, file storage) plus a documented public API; automation platforms partially covered.
8 — Broad native catalogue, well-documented API and webhooks, first-class automation-platform support and real import paths from competitors.
10 — Ecosystem-grade: everything in 8 plus the tool is itself extensible (apps/plugins, AI/MCP surfaces) and exit via API export is complete.
The Data Protection Officer
The catalogue is broad — ERP, CRM, HR, PLM, ETL, document and scheduling systems alongside native Slack and bidirectional Teams — on an OpenAPI-documented REST API with documentation generated from each customer's own data model, Tray.io automation-platform support and real import paths from Microsoft Project, Smartsheet and Primavera. The MCP open standard and an LLM connector for the AI agent push this toward ecosystem grade; we found no public information on webhooks. 4 5
The Bootstrapper
The integrations page is the strongest material here: dozens of native connectors across Jira, Azure DevOps, Teams, Slack, HR, ERP, CRM and scheduling tools, an OpenAPI-documented REST API for all products with docs generated from your own data model, Tray.io for automation, and genuine import paths from Microsoft Project, Primavera P6, Smartsheet and Clarity. Add an LLM connector and MCP support for the AI agent and this is ecosystem-grade; I hold back one point only because we found no public information on webhooks. 5
The Enterprise Architect
The strongest surface here: an OpenAPI-documented REST API available on all products, native bidirectional Microsoft Teams, bidirectional Rally sync, Jira, Azure DevOps, ServiceNow, SAP, Workday and HR integrations, import and export paths from Microsoft Project and Primavera P6, a Tray.io iPaaS connector, an LLM connector and MCP-based agent access. We found no public information on webhooks, the only soft spot in an otherwise ecosystem-grade catalogue. 5 4
The UX Purist
A broad native catalogue — Jira, Azure DevOps, Rally with bidirectional sync, six CRM systems, SAP, ServiceNow, HR, document and ETL systems, Microsoft Project and Primavera import/export — with 80%+ of deployments running at least one integration. An OpenAPI REST API across all products, Tray.io universal connectors, and API documentation dynamically generated from the customer's own data model on Orchestra 7.0+ and Enterprise 7.1+. MCP support and an LLM connector make the product itself an extensible surface; we found no public information confirming webhooks specifically. 5
The Integrator
An OpenAPI-documented REST API across all products, API documentation dynamically generated from each customer's own data model, a Tray.io universal-connector path to any SaaS application, and real import/export with Microsoft Project, Primavera P6 and Clarity make this genuinely stack-friendly. The native catalogue is broad — Jira, Azure DevOps, Rally with bidirectional sync, Teams, Slack, SharePoint, ERP, HR, CRM, PLM, EAM and CTMS systems — and the MCP-based Oscar agent plus the bring-your-own-model LLM connector extend the platform itself. We found no public information on webhooks as a documented surface, which is the only thing between this and full marks from me. 5
The Skeptic
The catalogue is unusually broad and specific — Jira, bidirectional Rally sync, MS Project and Primavera P6 import/export, plus HR, ERP, CRM, CTMS, ETL and document systems — on an OpenAPI-documented REST API, with Tray.io iPaaS support, API documentation generated from each customer's own data model, and MCP and LLM connectors making the tool extensible. We found no public information on webhooks, which is what holds me off the top. 5
Onboarding effort
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Time and friction from signup to first real value for a small team, without paid services.
0 — No self-serve path — onboarding starts with a sales call and an implementation project.
3 — Self-serve exists but the first project requires configuration a newcomer cannot judge yet (workflows, custom fields, permissions) before anything works.
5 — A team gets a first project running within a day; trial requires payment details or key steps live behind docs.
8 — Signup to working project inside an hour: guided setup, sensible defaults, templates, trial without payment details.
10 — Minutes to value even for non-tool-people, importers pull existing work in, and the tool teaches its own advanced features as the team grows into them.
The Data Protection Officer
The entry point on the captured pages is a free demo request, with deployments described as spanning turnkey adoption to highly configurable enterprise rollouts, and the Academy training that guides first steps requires a customer portal account. We found no public information on self-serve signup or a trial, so a small team cannot judge its first-week effort from public material. 1 4 7
The Bootstrapper
The only entry point the captured pages show is "Request a free demo" — no self-serve signup, trial or free tier appears anywhere, deployments run "from turnkey adoption to highly configurable enterprise deployments", and getting started is backed by formal training programs and a certification academy. A team of three starts with a sales conversation, not a credit card. 1 4 6
The Enterprise Architect
The only public entry point on the captured pages is a request for a free demo, and we found no public information on a self-serve signup or trial, so a sales conversation precedes any product access. A Discovery learning plan and a turnkey Orchestra offering soften the implementation burden somewhat, but a small team cannot reach first value without the vendor in the room. 1 4 7
The UX Purist
The stopwatch never starts here: the only entry path the pages show is a request for a free demo, and we found no public information on a self-serve signup or trial. The learning apparatus tells the story — three learning plans, administrator levels from Associate to Expert, a 30-minute multiple-choice certification exam — and deployments run 'from turnkey to highly configurable enterprise deployments'. A fraction above zero only because a turnkey offering for PMOs exists. 1 4 7
The Integrator
The documented entry point is "Request a free demo", a sales-led conversation rather than a signup, and Academy training sits behind a customer portal account. Turnkey positioning for the Orchestra product and a Discovery learning plan covering first steps soften the picture, but we found no public information on a self-serve trial, guided setup or templates. 1 4 7
The Skeptic
The only documented way in is 'Request a free demo', deployments run from turnkey adoption to highly configurable enterprise projects, and the training academy sits behind a customer portal account. We found no public information on a trial, self-serve signup or starter templates — this is a sales-led motion. 1 4 7
European sovereignty
panel opinion
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the company and the data actually sit: legal entity, ownership control, data residency, and subprocessor exposure to non-EU jurisdictions.
0 — Non-European vendor, data on US infrastructure under US law, no DPA worth the name.
3 — DPA and GDPR language present, but hosting defaults to the US or ownership sits outside Europe — compliance paperwork over substance.
5 — EU data residency is available and contractually fixed, but the vendor or its controlling owner is non-European, or core subprocessors put data within CLOUD Act reach.
8 — European company under European control with EU-resident data and a public DPA; remaining exposure is limited to identifiable subprocessors (e.g. a US hyperscaler's EU region) and is documented.
10 — European company, European control, EU-only data residency on European infrastructure, subprocessor list free of extraterritorial reach — verifiable, not asserted.
The Data Protection Officer not rated — no public information
We found no public information on where the company or the data sit: no data residency statement, no data processing agreement, no subprocessor exposure and no deletion guarantees appear on the pages we read. The only adjacent claim — a single-tenant cloud architecture with granular data control — addresses tenant isolation, not jurisdiction, and for me a tool that cannot answer where the data lives cannot be cleared on sovereignty. 1 2
The Bootstrapper not rated — no public information
We found no public information on where the company, the data or its subprocessors sit, or on any data processing agreement; the closest fact is a single-tenant cloud architecture with granular data control, which says nothing about jurisdiction. With no sovereignty facts on record there is nothing here I can score for a European buyer. 1 2
The Enterprise Architect not rated — no public information
We found no public information on data residency, a data processing agreement, ownership control or subprocessor exposure on any captured page. A single-tenant cloud architecture with granular data control is described, but nothing states where the data or the controlling entity sits, so I cannot score this for procurement. 1 2
The UX Purist not rated — no public information
We found no public information on legal domicile, data residency, data-processing terms or subprocessors. The single-tenant cloud architecture and 'granular data control' speak to data isolation, but nothing on the captured pages places the company, the data or the subprocessors in any jurisdiction. 2
The Integrator not rated — no public information
We found no public information on the company's legal seat, ownership, data residency, a data processing agreement or subprocessors; the only hosting-related statement captured is a single-tenant cloud architecture with granular data control, and it names no jurisdiction. 2
The Skeptic not rated — no public information
We found no public information on the vendor's legal seat, data residency, a data processing agreement or any subprocessor list. The captured pages talk up 'granular data control' and a single-tenant cloud without naming a jurisdiction, so there is nothing here a buyer could verify. 1 2
Support & documentation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stuck user gets unstuck: docs quality, support channels and their availability per plan, and the health of the learning surface.
0 — No docs beyond marketing pages; support is a contact form that may answer.
3 — Docs exist but are thin or stale; support on entry plans is effectively email-only with slow turnaround.
5 — Searchable help center covering the core product; chat or email support on all plans with reasonable response times.
8 — Deep, current docs incl. onboarding guides and templates; fast chat support not gated to top tiers; visible changelog.
10 — Docs, academy, community and support so good they are a reason to buy; SLAs published, support quality independent of plan.
The Data Protection Officer
Training is a real product: the Academy offers structured learning plans from Discovery through Expert levels with certification, Engage tailors material to project managers, team members and portfolio executives, and a public Resource Center plus a bi-monthly newsletter exist. We found no public information on support channels, response times, SLAs or a changelog, and Academy access requires a Planisware portal account. 2 6 7
The Bootstrapper
There is a serious training apparatus — an Academy with three learning plans, administrator levels from Associate to Expert, 30-minute certification exams, and a dedicated course on the built-in BI tool — but it sits behind a customer portal account. Beyond a curated resource-center article library and a bi-monthly newsletter, we found no public information on support channels, response times or their availability per plan. 2 6 7
The Enterprise Architect
Training is unusually deep: an Academy with three role-based learning plans running from Discovery to a certified Administrator track with a 30-minute exam, partner training, the Engage customisable training module, and a curated Resource Center of articles and guides. We found no public information on support channels, response times or published SLAs, which is exactly what I need before committing two hundred seats. 6 7 2
The UX Purist
The Academy is a genuine learning surface — three learning plans, four administrator levels from Associate to Expert, a PEX reporting path, profile-tailored Engage training for project managers, team members and portfolio executives, and certification with a digital diploma — and the Resource Center adds a curated library of articles and guides. But Academy access requires a Planisware portal account, so the deep material sits behind the customer wall. We found no public information on support channels, response times or a changelog. 2 6 7
The Integrator
The learning surface is real: an official Academy with three structured learning plans from Discovery through PEX Expert to an Administrator track with Associate-to-Expert levels and a certification exam, role-tailored Engage training, and a curated article and guide library. We found no public information on support channels, response times or service levels by plan, or on a changelog. 2 6 7
The Skeptic
There is a real learning apparatus — an academy with four administrator levels, a reporting curriculum, 30-minute certification exams and role-tailored training — plus a curated article library and a bi-monthly newsletter. But the academy requires a portal account, and we found no public information on support channels, response times, SLAs or a changelog. 2 6 7
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Can a buyer determine the real, payable cost of the tool for their team before talking to anyone?
0 — No public pricing at all — every number sits behind "contact sales".
3 — Some tiers are public, but a deciding factor (seat minimums, mandatory add-ons, billing-period surcharge, tax treatment) only surfaces at checkout or in fine print.
5 — Self-serve tiers are publicly priced and the billing-period difference is stated, but the headline number still needs qualifying — e.g. annual-only headline, taxes excluded without saying so, or an opaque enterprise tier doing real work.
8 — Every self-serve tier is fully priced with billing periods and tax treatment plain on the page; only genuinely custom enterprise work lacks a number.
10 — Every tier including enterprise has a public price or published price formula, and the headline number is the number on the invoice.
The Data Protection Officer not rated — no public information
We found no public information on pricing: no tiers, seat prices, billing periods or tax treatment appear on any captured page, and the only entry point shown is a free demo request. A buyer cannot determine the payable cost for their team from the public material. 1 2 4
The Bootstrapper
No price, tier, seat term or billing period appears on any page captured; the only conversion path shown is "Request a free demo". I could not determine what three seats or thirty would cost before talking to the vendor, and for a buyer like me that is disqualifying. 1
The Enterprise Architect
The captured pages contain no pricing for any product line — no tiers, no seat terms, no billing figures — and the only call to action is a request for a free demo. The real, payable cost of this tool cannot be determined before talking to sales. 1
The UX Purist not rated — no public information
We found no public information on pricing: no tiers, numbers or billing terms appear on the captured pages, and the entry point offered is a request for a free demo. A buyer cannot determine a payable cost from anything captured here. 1
The Integrator
None of the captured pages shows a tier, a price or a billing term, and the only documented entry point is a free demo request. On this evidence a buyer cannot reach a payable number before talking to the vendor. 1
The Skeptic
No price, tier, seat minimum or billing-period detail appears on any captured page, and the only commercial call to action is a request for a free demo. A buyer cannot put a number on this product before talking to the vendor — that is a fully opaque pricing page. 1
Questions about Planisware
Is Planisware European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Planisware is based.
Where does Planisware store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
Does Planisware have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Planisware?
As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates awork (4/5), InLoox (4/5) and Kantree (4/5) highest among the other 64 Project Management & Collaboration products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is awork (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Planisware alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 3 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (planisware.com, planisware.com/improve-project-communication-collaboration, planisware.com/strategic-portfolio-management-dashboards, planisware.com/strategic-portfolio-management-budget-ev-metrics, planisware.com/seamless-integration-your-critical-enterprise-applications, planisware.com/training and 1 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 15 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (7)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Collaboration depth — found from sitemap planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Reporting — found from sitemap planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Reporting — found from sitemap planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Integrations — found from sitemap planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Support & documentation — found from sitemap planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Support & documentation — found from sitemap planisware.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →