SEO
Botify
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Botify SAS · www.botify.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Botify at a glance
- Vendor
- Botify SAS
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Botify 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Botify (Botify SAS) earns its best scores on technical audit, reporting and API, and data portability, each 6 to 7: judges credited scheduled recurring crawls with diff filters between analyses, Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API, log analysis beside a daily full Search Console import, a documented developer portal with BQL export queries, and complete-file exports to your own AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage bucket. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Botify (Botify SAS) earns its best scores on technical audit, reporting and API, and data portability, each 6 to 7: judges credited scheduled recurring crawls with diff filters between analyses, Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API, log analysis beside a daily full Search Console import, a documented developer portal with BQL export queries, and complete-file exports to your own AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage bucket. Weakest are rank and index data at 2 to 4, keyword and content at 3 to 4, and sovereignty at 2 to 3: keyword and ranking work is grounded in the site's own Search Console data, and we found no public information on a backlink index, difficulty, intent or SERP feature data — nor on hosting location, subprocessors or data-processing terms beyond the vendor's French corporate form. The judges split on rank and index data, 2 to 4: higher scores credit the documented daily Search Console import and the vendor's candor about data lineage; lower scores weigh the absence of a documented proprietary index. No prices appear in the captured pages.
Speaks for it
- Technical audit scores cluster at 6 to 7 on scheduled recurring crawls, crawl-to-crawl comparison, log analysis and Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API.
- A documented developer portal with API tokens and BQL export queries gives teams a build path across over 1,000 report fields.
- Exports deliver the complete file rather than a sample to your own AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage bucket, on demand or scheduled.
- RealKeywords imports your complete Google Search Console data daily, feeding missed-clicks charts, keyword-loss monitoring and segmentation by page template.
- Instant 24/7 alerts cover critical site health and performance changes.
Held against it
- Rank and index data scores span 2 to 4 — the widest spread of any criterion — with the documented position data being the customer's own Search Console import rather than a proprietary index.
- Keyword discovery is confined to queries the site already earns; we found no public information on difficulty scores, intent classification or SERP feature data.
- Sovereignty scores run 2 to 3, and we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, certification or a data-processing agreement.
- Automated and full exports are documented for the upper plans only, and we found no public information on retention after cancellation.
- No prices appear in the captured pages, which give different names for the upper tiers — Pro and Professional.
Best for
- You need technical audits your developers can act on, built on recurring crawls compared crawl-to-crawl, log data and Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API.
- Your team wants SEO data landing in its own warehouse via a documented API with BQL export queries and scheduled complete-file exports.
- You want deep re-analysis of your own Google Search Console data — missed clicks, keyword losses, segmentation by page template and product type.
- You want to mirror your crawl archive continuously into cloud storage you control.
Avoid if
- You need ranking or backlink data independent of Google Search Console; the documented position data is your own Search Console import, and we found no public information on a backlink index.
- You need keyword discovery beyond the queries your site already earns, with difficulty, intent or SERP feature data.
- Your procurement requires hosting location, subprocessors or data-processing terms to be publicly documented before signature.
- You need full or automated exports on a lower-tier plan; the captured pages document them for the upper tiers only.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Crawling & technical audit | 3.5 of 5 |
| Keyword research & content guidance | 2 of 5 |
| Rank tracking & index quality | 1.5 of 5 |
| Reporting, integrations & API | 3 of 5 |
| Data portability & exit | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5 of 5 |
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.
3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.
5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.
8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
Scheduled and recurring crawls, crawl-to-crawl comparison with diff filters, per-URL trend data and a thousand-plus reportable fields produce findings specific enough for a developer ticket, and log and Search Console data sit alongside the crawl. Held below the top anchors because we found no public information on JavaScript rendering in crawls, on page-count limits per plan, or on structured-data and canonical diagnosis. 2 3 7 9
The Agency Owner
Crawls are scheduled and recurring with history, live stats and per-crawl comparison filters, Core Web Vitals field data arrives via the Chrome User Experience Report API as filters and columns, and log analysis plus a daily full Search Console import sit beside the crawler — the combination I need to argue indexation with a client's developers. We found no public information on JavaScript rendering, structured-data validation, or issue severity prioritisation, so the diagnosis stops short of a developer-ready ticket. 2 3 6 7 9
The Technical SEO
Scheduled recurring crawls with crawl history, live stats, crawl-to-crawl comparison and Diff Between Crawls filters, Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API available as filters and report columns, and log data via LogAnalyzer alongside a daily full Search Console import for crawl-versus-Google comparison. We found no public information on JavaScript rendering, a stated page cap, structured-data validation, or canonical and indexation diagnosis, so the audit stays capable rather than fully diagnostic. 2 3 6 9
The Content Strategist
Crawl comparison is genuinely diagnostic — analyses diff against previous crawls with change filters, log data sits beside crawl data, full Search Console data is imported daily, and Core Web Vitals field data comes from Google's own real-user source with impact-prioritised recommendations on top. We found no public information on JavaScript rendering, structured-data validation, or crawl budget analysis, which holds this below the top band. 2 3 7 9
The Data Analyst
Recurring scheduled crawls with comparison across analyses, Diff Between Crawls and Has Changed filters, sitemap reconciliation, LogAnalyzer, and Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API available as report filters and columns make this genuinely diagnostic rather than a list. We found no public information on JavaScript rendering, page-limit scale, or structured-data validation, which the top of the scale requires. 2 3 6 9
The Skeptic
The diagnostic loop is real and evidenced: crawls can be scheduled with history retained, LogAnalyzer reports work from log data, full Search Console data imports daily, and Diff Between Crawls filters surface regressions between analyses, with Core Web Vitals field data from the CrUX API available as filters and columns. But we found no public information on page limits, JavaScript rendering, structured-data validation, or issue severity categories, so the audit falls short of the full diagnostic tier the top anchors describe. 2 3 6 7 9
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.
3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
What is documented is deep re-analysis of my own Search Console data — daily full imports, missed-click charts, position segments, per-URL keyword recommendations and segmentation by template — tied to my own crawl metrics. For discovery beyond what the site already ranks for, we found no public information on a market keyword database, German-market volumes, difficulty, intent classification or SERP feature analysis, which caps this well below where I need it. 4 5 6
The Agency Owner
Keyword work is built on the site's own Search Console data — imported in full daily, with search volume addable to reports, segmentation by template and category, per-URL optimization suggestions and a title-tag gap filter. We found no public information on intent or difficulty signals, SERP feature detail, topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, or the depth of German-language data, so this is guidance on data the client already owns rather than discovery. 4 5 6
The Technical SEO
RealKeywords grounds keyword work in the customer's own Google Search Console data — missed-clicks charts, keyword-loss monitoring with URL lists, position-segmented Keywords Explorer reports, and per-URL keyword recommendations tied to a missing-keyword-in-title filter. We found no public information on keyword difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature analysis, or the depth of German-language data, so this reads as first-party opportunity mining rather than full research. 4 5 6
The Content Strategist
RealKeywords grounds everything in the site's own Search Console data imported daily in full, and the Missed Clicks By Average Position chart sizes opportunity in real clicks rather than volume guesses — exactly the sizing I brief against. But the research layer is thin: we found no public information on intent classification, difficulty scores, SERP feature data, competitor gap analysis, topic clustering or cannibalisation detection, and nothing on German-language depth. 4 5 6
The Data Analyst
Keyword work is grounded in the site's own Google Search Console data — daily complete import, missed-clicks and keyword-loss charts, a title-tag gap filter, and per-URL keyword optimization recommendations that reference the customer's own pages. We found no public information on difficulty scores, intent classification, SERP feature composition, or German-market data depth, so discovery stays confined to queries the site already earns. 4 5 6
The Skeptic
RealKeywords works from the site's own Search Console data with genuine analysis on top — opportunity reports, trending keywords, loss monitoring, missed-clicks charts, segmentation by product type and page template — plus basic on-page guidance like a missing-keyword-in-title filter. We found no public information on difficulty scores, intent classification, SERP feature data, or any German-language market data, and no proprietary keyword database is in evidence; the volume source is the customer's own query data. 4 5 6
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.
3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.
5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.
8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
Rankings here are the site's own Search Console data imported daily, with a bulk export option described as reducing or eliminating sampling; the daily full import is the one documented data cadence. We found no public information on proprietary rank collection, a backlink index, its size or its refresh, which leaves me no independent second opinion when numbers disagree with Search Console. 5 6 7
The Agency Owner
The cadence is documented — a daily import of the customer's complete Search Console data — with rankings cross-referenced against page depth, internal linking and device type. But the ranking data is documented as Search Console's rather than collected by the vendor, and we found no public information on country or city-level granularity, SERP feature attribution, or any backlink index and its size or freshness. 5 6 9
The Technical SEO
The keyword and position data is documented as the customer's own Search Console data imported daily in full, with device type available as a cross-referencing dimension. We found no public information on a proprietary ranking methodology or any backlink index — no size, refresh cadence or link-lost-and-found detection — so there is no documented proprietary dataset here whose accountability could be assessed. 6 7
The Content Strategist
The vendor is candid about data lineage — keyword data comes from a daily full Search Console import plus first-party crawls and logs, and they argue their bulk export beats Search Console's 1,000-row cap. We found no public information on a proprietary backlink index, country or device granularity for rankings, SERP feature attribution, or history retention, beyond the captured note that access to previous crawls is dictated by the plan. 6 7 9
The Data Analyst
The keyword data is documented as a daily, complete Google Search Console import rather than a proprietary index, with URL-level trend information and an honest explanation of the 1,000-row sampling cap in raw GSC exports. We found no public information on a backlink index, ranking granularity by country or device, or how long historical rankings are retained, so the vendor's own data footprint is thin on the captured record. 5 6 7
The Skeptic
The evidenced ranking data is the customer's own Google Search Console data imported daily, not a documented proprietary index, and we found no public information on a backlink index, a rank-update cadence, country or city granularity, or the collection methodology behind the AI visibility metrics. This is the one area a buyer cannot verify from outside, and nothing is published here to be held to. 6 7
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.
3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.
5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
A documented developer portal with token authentication and BQL-driven exports, automated exports after every crawl to AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage, custom PDF reports and instant alerts cover how my team gets data out and in front of stakeholders. We found no public information on white-label client reporting, per-endpoint API costs, or stated API rate limits. 8 9 10
The Agency Owner
There is a documented developer portal with API tokens and a query language for export, custom reports to PDF, and automated full exports to the customer's own cloud storage after every crawl on the higher-tier plans — how I would warehouse forty clients' data. We found no public information on white-label reporting, client access, multi-client management, or per-endpoint API credit costs, and export limits are referenced without figures. 8 9 10
The Technical SEO
A documented API on the Developer Portal with token authentication and BQL export queries, automated exports after every crawl, and full on-demand or scheduled exports to S3 or Google Cloud Storage for the top plans, plus custom reports drawing on over a thousand fields. We found no public information on API rate limits or credit costs per endpoint, external analytics integrations beyond Search Console, or white-label reporting with agency client access. 8 9 10 11
The Content Strategist
A documented developer portal with token access and BQL export queries, over a thousand report fields, custom reports to PDF, and automated post-crawl exports to your own AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage bucket is real data-out muscle. We found no public information on white-label reporting, API rate limits or per-endpoint costs, or data-warehouse and BigQuery export. 8 9 10
The Data Analyst
A documented developer portal with API tokens, BQL queries for exports exceeding interface limits, and automated post-crawl exports to AWS S3 or Google Cloud Storage mean the data can land in the customer's warehouse instead of a PDF, backed by over 1,000 reportable fields. We found no public information on per-endpoint credit costs, API rate limits, or white-label client reporting, which keeps it short of the top of the scale. 8 9 10 11
The Skeptic
A documented developer portal with a BQL query API, custom reports over 1,000+ fields, and automated exports after every crawl to your own S3 or Google Cloud Storage bucket on demand or scheduled make this a platform a team can build against. We found no public information on API rate limits or credit costs per endpoint, white-label reporting, or warehouse destinations, and the automated and full-export paths are gated to the upper plans. 8 9 10 11
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.
3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.
5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
Exports of the complete file rather than a sample, in several formats, on demand or scheduled after every crawl, plus an API path for data exceeding export limits, mean crawl history can be mirrored continuously — though the automated and full exports are described only for the upper plans. We found no public information on any retention or grace period after cancellation. 9 10 11
The Agency Owner
Exports are available on all plans within varying limits, full exports to the customer's own storage run on demand or on a schedule, automated post-crawl exports let me mirror the data continuously, and the API carries exports past the interface limits. We found no public information on retention after cancellation or a grace period during which the archive stays retrievable, and crawl comparison depth is dictated by the plan. 10 11
The Technical SEO
Complete-file exports to the customer's own S3 or Google Cloud Storage bucket, BQL-based bulk export through the API for data beyond interface limits, and crawl comparison with trend information at site and URL level. Crawl history access is plan-capped — comparisons only run against the crawls available in the plan — and we found no public information on a retention period after cancellation, so exit is capable but not designed-for. 9 10 11
The Content Strategist
Complete-file exports (explicitly not samples) to your own bucket, on demand or scheduled, with API export via BQL when sizes exceed export limits, approach a designed exit — but full exports are limited to Professional and Enterprise plans, while other plans get exports of varying limits and sample CSVs the vendor itself says may be insufficient for large crawls. We found no public information on any retention period after cancellation. 10 11
The Data Analyst
Exports described as the complete file rather than a sample, delivered to the customer's own S3 bucket, plus automated exports after every crawl and API export via BQL, make continuous mirroring of the data plausible — though S3 setup runs through Support by email. We found no public information on a single-pass export of the full historical archive, credit metering on exports, or any retention period after cancellation, so exit is only partially designed for. 9 10 11
The Skeptic
Bulk export including history is genuinely available: complete files rather than samples to your own S3 or Google Cloud Storage in various formats, on demand or scheduled, with API export via BQL when data exceeds interface limits, plus URL-level exports through the Explorers. We found no public information on export costs or credit metering, the size limits themselves, or any retention period after cancellation, and the automated full-export route begins at the Professional tier. 9 10 11
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
The sovereignty record for this vendor is empty: we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, or certifications, and the contracting entity's provenance is listed as unknown. The only captured page touching the question describes exports to AWS S3 — a destination option, described with a support-mediated setup, rather than a data-residency commitment. 1 11
The Agency Owner
The vendor is named as a French-form company, which is the only sovereignty signal on the captured pages; hosting infrastructure and subprocessors go unnamed. We found no public information on where account and crawl data are held, on data-processing terms, or on certifications, so I cannot hand this to a European client's legal team. 1
The Technical SEO
The only sovereignty-relevant fact on record is the contracting entity's French company form. We found no public information on hosting location, named infrastructure, a subprocessor list, certifications, or a DPA covering the crawl and Search Console data the tool ingests. 1
The Content Strategist
We found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, certification, or a data processing agreement covering the Search Console and log data the tool ingests. The only location signals in the captured pages are customer-chosen export destinations such as AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage; where the account and crawl data are stored is not documented in what we captured. 1 10
The Data Analyst
The contracting entity carries a French corporate form, but we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessor list, certification, or a DPA covering the crawl and Search Console data the tool ingests. The one visible infrastructure fact is a vendor-configured export path to AWS S3 for full file delivery. 1 11
The Skeptic
The only item on record is the vendor's French legal form; we found no public information on hosting location, named infrastructure, subprocessors, certification, or a data-processing agreement covering the crawl, log, and Search Console data the tool ingests. With no sovereignty attributes on record and the provenance of the captures listed as unknown, there is nothing here to assess beyond the entity's name. 1
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.
5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
The captured pages mention plans, giving different plan names in different articles ('Pro' and 'Professional'), but we found no public price information anywhere — no tier prices, keyword or crawl limits, seat costs, overage rates or terms. An annual invoice is not computable from these pages. 1 10
The Agency Owner
We found no public information on prices — the captured pages name Professional and Enterprise plans in the export documentation without figures, and we found no public information on keyword limits, crawl credits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum terms or VAT treatment. Every tier reads as a sales conversation, which from where I sit is a margin problem before the first invoice. 10
The Technical SEO
The captured pages name plan levels — all plans, Professional, Pro and Enterprise — gating features like automated and full exports, but we found no public information on any price, keyword limit, crawl credit, seat cost, minimum term or VAT treatment. Without even a headline figure, an annual invoice cannot be estimated from public pages. 4 10
The Content Strategist
We found no public pricing information at all — the captured pages name plans (giving different names, Pro versus Professional, alongside Enterprise) and gate exports and crawl history by plan, but no tier prices, keyword limits, crawl quotas, user costs or contract terms are stated anywhere, so an annual invoice cannot be computed from public pages. 4 10
The Data Analyst
The captured pages name plan levels (Pro, Professional, Enterprise) and state that export availability varies by plan, but we found no public information on prices, keyword limits, crawl credits, seat costs or VAT treatment. A buyer cannot derive even the headline annual cost from the captured public pages, let alone the invoice. 4 10
The Skeptic
No price appears anywhere in the captured material — not a tier figure, a crawl credit, an API unit, or the cost of an additional user — so the annual invoice cannot be computed from what is published. The pages name plans without pricing them, and the captured pages give different names for the same upper tiers (Pro versus Professional), which makes even the plan structure hard to pin down. 4 10
Questions about Botify
Is Botify European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Botify is based.
Where does Botify store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does Botify have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Botify?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates SE Ranking (3/5), Semrush (3/5) and SISTRIX (3/5) highest among the other 32 SEO products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is SISTRIX (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Botify alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 5 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (11)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap support.botify.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →